Skip to main content
Normal View

Tuesday, 28 Apr 2015

Written Answers Nos. 123-140

IBRC Operations

Questions (123, 133)

Catherine Murphy

Question:

123. Deputy Catherine Murphy asked the Minister for Finance if he will provide a list of the number of large transactions undertaken by Irish Bank Resolution Corporation which his Department had concerns over, as described in documents released to this Deputy under the Freedom of Information Act, concerning the sale of a company (details supplied) by the corporation, and which he was also described as being very concerned about; if he will specifically and methodically indicate the amounts concerned in each case, that is, the impact upon the capital holdings of the corporation, the cost to the State, the total write-downs on original value and so on; and if he will make a statement on the matter. [16655/15]

View answer

Michael McGrath

Question:

133. Deputy Michael McGrath asked the Minister for Finance if he will provide details of each transaction engaged in by the Irish Bank Resolution Corporation since the nationalisation of the former Anglo Irish Bank, and prior to the appointment of a special liquidator for the corporation, that his Department officials expressed some concern about; if he will provide this information in aggregate or summary form; the action that was taken by his Department in each case; and if he will make a statement on the matter. [16751/15]

View answer

Written answers

I propose to take Questions Nos. 123 and 133 together.

In terms of transactions involving IBRC in which my Department had concerns over, I would like to draw the Deputy's attention towards the Department of Finance website where documents released under a recent FOI have been published. On page 7 of the document titled '8. Briefing ahead of 25 July meeting', there is a table containing six matters over which the Department of Finance officials raised concerns. http://www.finance.gov.ie/news-centre/press-releases/ibrc-foi-documents.

In response to publicly raised concerns, as announced last Thursday, I am directing the Special Liquidators of IBRC to review and report on all transactions, activities and management decisions which occurred between the date of nationalisation and the date that IBRC entered into liquidation that resulted in a capital loss to IBRC of at least €10 million.  I have also directed the Special Liquidators to include in their review and report any transactions which would likely give rise to public concerns in respect of the ultimate returns to the taxpayer.

The review and report will evaluate whether there is any evidence of material deficiencies in the performance of their functions by those acting on behalf of IBRC, including the board, directors, management and agents of IBRC and whether it can be concluded that any of the transactions were not commercially sound.  The special liquidators will also be obliged to ensure that any conflicts of interest which may arise are properly managed.

Directing that a review be conducted by the Special Liquidators has the advantage of enabling work on the review to commence very quickly. The review will be completed by the 31st of August and I intend to make this report available to relevant committees of the Oireachtas, as requested.

IBRC Operations

Questions (124)

Catherine Murphy

Question:

124. Deputy Catherine Murphy asked the Minister for Finance if he will elaborate specifically upon what his Department officials described as poor management which was displayed in a number of large transactions, as described in documents released to this Deputy under the Freedom of Information Act, concerning the sale of a company (details supplied) by Irish Bank Resolution Corporation; if his Department had any concerns regarding specific persons working in the corporation with regard to these poor decisions; if so, if he will state whom; and if he will make a statement on the matter. [16656/15]

View answer

Written answers

I would like to draw the Deputy's attention towards the Department of Finance website where documents released under a recent FOI have been published at http://www.finance.gov.ie/news-centre/press-releases/ibrc-foi-documents. On page 7 of the document titled '8. Briefing ahead of 25 July meeting', there is a table containing six matters of concern at that time.

As reflected in the documents released under FOI, there were concerns regarding a number of transactions and decisions at the time.  The aggregate of these concerns could fairly be described as a broader concern regarding effective corporate governance and effective communication with IBRC. It is well understood that the Department's engagement was primarily with IBRC's senior executives and Chairman.  As a result, any concerns would have been raised with those individuals.  However, it would be inappropriate to assume that concerns regarding governance and information sharing could be construed as concerns with individuals themselves.

IBRC Operations

Questions (125, 126)

Catherine Murphy

Question:

125. Deputy Catherine Murphy asked the Minister for Finance ,further to Parliamentary Question No. 220 of 16 December 2014, the reason he refused to answer the specific question, which asked if he was satisfied that the sale of a company (details supplied) by Irish Bank Resolution Corporation was done in the best possible interests of the State, instead indicating that he was informed that the board of the corporation considered it so; his views that failing to supply his position on this matter may lead to a reasonable assumption, based on the reply to the parliamentary question, that his Department had no concerns whatsoever regarding the matter; if he will concede that this is a dissimulative approach to take, considering information which later came to light proved otherwise; and if he will make a statement on the matter. [16657/15]

View answer

Catherine Murphy

Question:

126. Deputy Catherine Murphy asked the Minister for Finance if he will categorically state if the sale of a company (details supplied) by Irish Bank Resolution Corporation was in fact conducted for the maximum return for the State; the reason he has failed to state his position thus far on this matter, even though it has come to light that his Department believed that the sale decision has raised a number of areas where it believes that decisions taken by the corporation resulted in a less optimum return for the bank, as is clearly written in documents marked seen by the Minister; and if he will make a statement on the matter. [16658/15]

View answer

Written answers

I propose to take Questions Nos. 125 and 126 together.

The Chairman of IBRC provided me with strong assurances that the transaction had been thoroughly assessed by the IBRC Board and that they were satisfied that the transaction had been managed in the best manner possible to achieve the best result for the State. The IBRC Board had a fiduciary responsibility to the bank's stakeholders and in light of this legal responsibility the Chairman and the Board would have considered and provided such assurances following serious and careful consideration.  As neither I nor my officials were involved in the execution of this transaction, I must rely on the fiduciary responsibility of the IBRC Board and the explicit assurances provided to me by the Chairman of the Board that this transaction was done in the best possible interests of the State.

It is completely reasonable that I state that I was satisfied with the Board's assurances that the concerns raised had been dealt with in a manner that gave the Board no cause for concern.

IBRC Operations

Questions (127)

Catherine Murphy

Question:

127. Deputy Catherine Murphy asked the Minister for Finance if he will release the findings of the review undertaken by officials at the Central Bank of Ireland into the sale of a company (details supplied) by Irish Bank Resolution Corporation; if he will indicate the main recommendations arising from same; and if he will make a statement on the matter. [16659/15]

View answer

Written answers

Following a search of relevant files, there is no record of my Department being furnished with a copy of this report undertaken by the Central Bank into the sale of the company referred to in the question. Therefore, I am not in a position to release the report.

IBRC Liquidation

Questions (128)

Catherine Murphy

Question:

128. Deputy Catherine Murphy asked the Minister for Finance the reason he stated in Dáil Éireann on 6 February 2013 during his opening remarks on Second Stage of the Irish Bank Resolution Corporation Act 2013, that he wished to emphasise that the reason these steps were being taken was entirely distinct from the performance or direction of the board or management of the corporation, and that he wished to acknowledge, with much appreciation, the significant efforts the directors and staff of the corporation had made to the stabilisation of, and maintenance of value in, the corporation; if at that time, as has been revealed in documents dated July 2012 and released to this Deputy under the Freedom of Information Act, he was very concerned with how a large number of transactions had been handled over the previous number of months, and that this had led the Department to question the effectiveness of the chief executive officer and the current management team; and if he will make a statement on the matter. [16660/15]

View answer

Written answers

The decision to liquidate IBRC and exchange the Promissory Notes was taken with the expressed purpose of protecting the taxpayer, to end the exposure of the State and the Central Bank to IBRC, to enable the state to re-establish normalised access to the international debt markets, to resolve the debt of IBRC to the Central Bank, to restore confidence in the banking sector more generally and to provide for the orderly wind down of IBRC which was being supported, at a heavy cost to the State, by the Promissory Notes.

The relationship with the management of IBRC did not drive these strategic objectives, nor the decision making process surrounding the formulation, design and structuring of the Promissory Note transaction and liquidation of IBRC.

My statement about the Board, management and staff of IBRC reflected the position at that time.

IBRC Operations

Questions (129)

Catherine Murphy

Question:

129. Deputy Catherine Murphy asked the Minister for Finance if he took the advice of his officials who recommended that the chairman of Irish Bank Resolution Corporation be asked to commission a full independent review of a company's (details supplied) transaction, as written in documents released to this Deputy under the Freedom of Information Act; if so, the procedure that was followed; the findings of that review; the measures that were taken on foot of the review being conducted; and if he will make a statement on the matter. [16661/15]

View answer

Written answers

On 25 July 2012, I along with officials from my Department, met with IBRC's Chairman and CEO to discuss a number of concerns raised by Department of Finance officials, which included concerns regarding this transaction which were raised to me following engagement with IBRC management. 

During this meeting, I sought assurances around the concerns regarding the transaction. The Chairman provided me with strong assurances that the transaction, including those aspects of the transaction with which Department officials had concerns, had been thoroughly assessed by the IBRC Board and that the Board of IBRC were satisfied that the transaction was managed in the best manner possible to achieve the best result for the State. It should be noted that the IBRC Board had a fiduciary responsibility to the bank's stakeholders and so, in light of this legal responsibility, the Chairman and the Board would have considered and provided such assurances following serious and careful consideration. It is important to note that this transaction had completed at that stage and there was no legal possibility of reversing the transaction. In light of the level of assurances I received from the Chairman that this transaction had been properly considered by the IBRC Board, assurances which I accepted, an independent review into the transaction did not take place.

However, as announced last Thursday, due to the recent public concerns and questions raised regarding this transaction, I am directing the Special Liquidators of IBRC to review and report on all transactions, activities and management decisions which occurred between the date of nationalisation and the date that IBRC entered into liquidation that resulted in a capital loss to IBRC of at least €10 million.  I have also directed the Special Liquidators to include in their review and report any transactions which give rise or would likely give rise to public concerns in respect of the ultimate returns to the taxpayer. The Special Liquidators are also obliged to ensure that any conflicts of interest which may arise in relation to this review are properly managed.

The review and report will evaluate whether there is any evidence of material deficiencies in the performance of their functions by those acting on behalf of IBRC, including the board, directors, management and agents of IBRC and whether it can be concluded that any of the transactions were not commercially sound.

Directing that a review be conducted by the Special liquidators has the advantage of enabling work on the review to commence very quickly. The review will be completed by the 31st of August and I intend to make this report available to relevant committees of the Oireachtas as requested.

Banking Sector

Questions (130)

Thomas Pringle

Question:

130. Deputy Thomas Pringle asked the Minister for Finance the number of basic payment accounts that have been opened since the scheme was rolled out; if An Post has been included in the provision of the accounts; if an evaluation of the scheme has been carried out since its commencement; and if he will make a statement on the matter. [16689/15]

View answer

Written answers

The Strategy for Financial Inclusion called for the nationwide launch of a Standard Bank Account as a first step in promoting Financial Inclusion. A pilot project for a Basic Bank Account was run, which finished on 31 March 2013 after a 9-month pilot period. A total of 205 accounts were opened during the Pilot, which the Financial Inclusion Working Group (FIWG) felt was disappointing.

The Report of the Working Group on the Pilot project noted a number of reasons for this, including the view of stakeholders that one of the key elements required for a successful national roll-out of a Standard Bank Account is greater involvement by An Post and the credit unions. My Department is currently exploring with the relevant stakeholders how to make progress on this issue.

Bank Guarantee Scheme Data

Questions (131)

Michael McGrath

Question:

131. Deputy Michael McGrath asked the Minister for Finance if he will provide a breakdown of the €375 billion guaranteed under the Credit Institutions (Financial Support) Act 2008, by covered institution, including showing the details for covered subsidiaries separately, as set out in the Nyberg report; and if he will make a statement on the matter. [16690/15]

View answer

Written answers

The information in the table sets out the breakdown of the €375 billion guaranteed under the Credit Institutions (Financial Support) Act 2008, by covered institution. The table represents the instruments covered on the date of the introduction of the guarantee (30th Sept 2008).

-

AIB Group

Bank of Ireland

 

Anglo

 

ILP

 

EBS

 

INBS

 

POSTBANK

 

TOTAL

Net of Exclusions

 

Retail Deposits

 

56,507.0

 

53,048.0

 

18,716.0

 

7,751.0

 

5,470.0

 

4,394.0

 

214.0

 

146,100.0

Corporate Deposits

 

19,976.0

 

39,796.8

 

31,089.0

 

5,665.0

 

5,809.4

 

2,213.0

 

0.0

 

104,549.2

Total Retail + Corporate

 

76,483.0

 

92,844.8

 

49,805.0

 

13,416.0

 

11,279.4

 

6,607.0

 

214.0

 

250,649.2

Less DPS Covered

 

21,904.0

 

31,025.9

 

10,509.0

 

6,291.0

 

4,839.8

 

2,660.0

 

184.0

 

77,413.7

 

Net Retail + Corporate

54,579.0

 

61,818.9

 

39,296.0

 

7,125.0

 

6,439.6

 

3,947.0

 

30.0

 

173,235.5

Interbank Deposits

 

22,646.0

 

10,618.8

 

7,032.0

 

7,815.0

 

661.9

 

309.0

 

0.0

 

49,082.7

 

Senior Unsecured Debt

 

42,623.0

 

47,607.3

 

17,248.0

 

8,112.0

 

2,860.0

 

5,785.0

 

0.0

 

124,235.3

Financial Instruments

 

0.0

 

674.9

 

0.0

 

0.0

 

0.0

 

0.0

 

0.0

 

674.9

 

Asset Covered Securities

 

7,289.0

 

7,149.0

 

1,367.0

 

0.0

 

0.0

 

0.0

 

0.0

 

15,805.0

 

Dated Subordinated Debt

 

3,276.0

 

5,179.0

 

2,113.0

 

1,102.0

 

220.6

 

326.0

 

0.0

 

12,216.6

 

Total Guaranteed Liabilities

 

130,413.0

133,047.9

67,056.0

 

24,154.0

 

10,182.1

 

10,367.0

 

30.0

 

375,250.0

 The department does not hold information on the breakdown by covered subsidiaries at that date.

Carbon Tax Yield

Questions (132)

Sean Fleming

Question:

132. Deputy Sean Fleming asked the Minister for Finance his views on the introduction of carbon tax and whether it has reduced the sales of peat-related fuels; and if he will make a statement on the matter. [16694/15]

View answer

Written answers

The introduction of Carbon Tax was about sending a price signal that there is a cost associated with the consumption of fossil fuels to the detriment of the environment. In this regard solid fuels have the highest carbon content of all fossil fuels.

The Revenue Commissioners, who have responsibility for the collection of solid fuel carbon tax, advise me that, since its introduction on 1 May 2013, tax receipts for peat-related fuel products for the period of May to December 2013 and the period of January to December 2014, amounted to €1,479,678 and €4,291,892, respectively. Tax receipts for coal related products for 2013 and 2014 amounted to €5,625,248 and €13,186,765, respectively. The increase in tax receipts in 2014 reflects the increase in the rate of solid fuel carbon tax on 1st May 2014 from €10 per tonne of CO2 emitted to €20 per tonne of CO2 emitted.

The Commissioners advise me that they are unable to provide an assessment of the impact of the tax on sales of peat- related fuels. However, in light of the forecast by the Sustainable Energy Authority of Ireland (SEAI) in 2010, that the use of peat as an energy source would continue to decline in the period to 2020, the Commissioners expect that sales of peat-related products have reduced in the period since the tax was introduced and will continue to decline. The SEAI energy forecast report is available at the following link: http://www.seai.ie/Publications/Statistics_Publications/Energy_Forecasts_for_Ireland/Energy_Forecasts_for_Ireland_to_2020-2010_report.pdf  

Question No. 133 answered with Question No. 123.

IBRC Liquidation

Questions (134)

Michael McGrath

Question:

134. Deputy Michael McGrath asked the Minister for Finance if his decision to initiate the special liquidation of the Irish Bank Resolution Corporation in 2013 was influenced by any concerns he had regarding the operation of the corporation, including its governance, or concerns relating to any specific transactions the corporation was involved in; if he will specify any such concerns; the action he took on foot of those concerns; and if he will make a statement on the matter. [16752/15]

View answer

Written answers

The decision to liquidate IBRC and exchange the Promissory Notes was taken with the expressed purpose of protecting the taxpayer, to end the exposure of the State and the Central Bank to IBRC, to enable the state to re-establish normalised access to the international debt markets, to resolve the debt of IBRC to the Central Bank, to restore confidence in the banking sector more generally and to provide for the orderly wind down of IBRC which was being supported, at a heavy cost to the State, by the Promissory Notes.

The relationship with the management of IBRC did not drive these strategic objectives, nor the decision making process surrounding the formulation, design and structuring of the Promissory Note transaction and liquidation of IBRC.

Banking Sector

Questions (135)

Pearse Doherty

Question:

135. Deputy Pearse Doherty asked the Minister for Finance if he will stall the sale of any more loan books at Permanent TSB, until such time as legislation is enacted to regulate all mortgage book owners. [16761/15]

View answer

Written answers

I have been informed that Permanent TSB has no current plans to sell any Irish residential mortgage loan books.  I have also been informed that they have commenced a sale process for their remaining Irish Commercial Real Estate loan book and are likely to sell their UK mortgage loans in tranches in 2015 and 2016. Both the Irish Commercial Real Estate and the UK loan book sales are commitments of the Restructuring Plan approved by the European Commission, details of which were announced by Permanent TSB on 9 April 2015.

The deputy may also be aware that Permanent TSB has committed in the Restructuring Plan to reduce the value of defaulted Irish Tracker mortgages through a combination of measures, including cures and asset sales by a pre-determined date and according to a pre-determined schedule. I am advised by Permanent TSB that it is their clear preference that such a reduction would be achieved by way of completed treatments in order to cure the defaulted loans rather than other means. Such an objective provides the best outcome for affected customers. If the target cannot be met through such an approach or by other means, then Permanent TSB would be required by the Restructuring Plan to sell such loans within the pre-determined timelines.

Tax Code

Questions (136)

Willie Penrose

Question:

136. Deputy Willie Penrose asked the Minister for Finance if, in the context of correspondence with a person (details supplied) in County Westmeath, he will arrange to have the 2012 local property tax and household charge arrears deducted from this person's Department of Defence pension by way of instalments, and spread out on a monthly basis in the sum of €10, in view of the fact that this person has a significantly reduced pension and it amounts to significantly less than the supplementary welfare allowance rate, to which they would be entitled if they were not in receipt of same; and if the Minister will make a statement on the matter. [16804/15]

View answer

Written answers

I am advised by Revenue that the issue to which the Deputy is referring in his Question has already been resolved through direct discussions between the Local Property Tax (LPT) team and the person in question.

During the course of the discussions it was confirmed that the person is in fact entitled to a deferral of both his LPT and Household Charge (HHC) liabilities on foot of his income level.

The LPT agent explained to the person how deferral of LPT/HHC operates and confirmed that the outstanding tax, including interest at a rate of 4% per annum could be 'held over' at least for the duration of the current valuation period (2013 to 2016). The agent further explained that the deferred amount automatically becomes a charge on the property that must be paid before it can be sold or transferred.

On considering his options, the person decided to defer his HHC liability but to continue paying his LPT liability through deduction at source from his pension. The LPT agent assisted the person in completing the necessary mandates and I am assured that his LPT and HHC obligations are fully in order at this point.

Film Industry Tax Reliefs

Questions (137)

Seán Kyne

Question:

137. Deputy Seán Kyne asked the Minister for Finance if, following the amendments to section 481 concerning arrangements for film and television production, any examination on the impact of the changes has been carried out; if any reliefs extend to the development of film and television studios for the purposes of attracting new business into regional locations; and if he will make a statement on the matter. [16811/15]

View answer

Written answers

I am advised by the Revenue Commissioners that as the new scheme under Section 481 only came into operation on 12 January 2015 it is too early to say what impact the changes will have.  Prior to 2015 the scheme operated by giving tax relief to individuals investing in the film industry. From 2015 the scheme provides direct support to film producer companies in the form of a tax credit.

In 2014 tax relief was granted in relation to 66 projects. To date in 2015 relief has been granted under the new scheme in relation to 4 projects. The relief relates to eligible expenditure as defined within Section 481, however there is no regional element to the legislation.

Urban Renewal Schemes

Questions (138)

Seán Kyne

Question:

138. Deputy Seán Kyne asked the Minister for Finance if he will report on the current status of the living cities initiative; if approval has been received from the European Commission; and if the initiative, which has significant potential for urban areas across all cities, is being sufficiently publicised. [16814/15]

View answer

Written answers

The purpose of the Living City Initiative is to provide an urban regeneration incentive to certain areas of six cities, namely Cork, Dublin, Galway, Kilkenny, Limerick and Waterford, which are most in need of regeneration. A number of amendments were made to the Living City Initiative in Finance Act 2014 to ensure that the scheme was in accordance with EU State aid rules. These include the imposition of a cap on the level of relief for the commercial element of the scheme. This means the scheme now falls within the de minimis regulation. My officials are in discussions with the relevant local authorities and Revenue regarding operationalizing the scheme. Officials from my Department have held discussions with the relevant local authorities to identify the areas of the six cities which might fall within the scope of the scheme. The Living City Initiative will be launched shortly, and as part of that launch, details of the special regeneration areas will be made public.

It is important to note that I do not see this as a wide-spread Initiative, as it is targeted at those areas which are most in need of attention.

Tax Exemptions

Questions (139, 141)

Clare Daly

Question:

139. Deputy Clare Daly asked the Minister for Finance further to Parliamentary Question No. 306 of 21 April 2015, if he will confirm the Revenue Commissioners' definition of charitable purposes. [16816/15]

View answer

Clare Daly

Question:

141. Deputy Clare Daly asked the Minister for Finance further to Parliamentary Question No. 306 of 21 April 2015, the precise procedures involved in appealing the tax free charity status granted to any particular group. [16818/15]

View answer

Written answers

I propose to take Questions Nos. 139 and 141 together.

Charitable tax exemption is provided for by Section 207 of the Taxes Consolidation Act (TCA) 1997.

Section 3 of the Charities Act 2009, which was commenced on 16 October 2014, introduced definitions of charitable purposes into primary legislation for the first time. The Commissioners now apply these definitions when determining eligibility for charitable tax exemption. The definitions are classified under four main headings:

1. The prevention or relief of poverty or economic hardship.

2. The advancement of education.

3. The advancement of religion.

4. Any other purpose that is of benefit to the community.

Prior to the Charities Act of 2009, and because the Tax Acts do not define charity or charitable purposes, Revenue relied on the general law and judicial decisions to determine a definition. In this regard, an 1891 House of Lords judgment was the benchmark used to determine the legal meaning of charity. This ruling also classified charitable purposes under four headings, known as the 'Pemsel Categories' and these closely mirror the four categories now contained in the 2009 Act.

The Charities Act of 2009 also provides for the creation of a Charity Regulator, which was established on 16 October 2014. The role of the Regulator is to oversee compliance by Charities with their legal obligations and to ensure proper governance in respect of registration, the preparation of statements of account and the submission of annual activity reports (to the Regulator).

With regard to the second question, where a Body/Trust is aggrieved by a Revenue refusal to grant a charitable tax exemption, it is entitled to appeal that decision to the independent Appeal Commissioners. However, there is no provision in the Tax Acts for a 3rd party to appeal the granting of a charitable tax exemption to a specific Body/Trust.

Tax Exemptions

Questions (140)

Clare Daly

Question:

140. Deputy Clare Daly asked the Minister for Finance further to Parliamentary Question No. 306 of 21 April 2015, when the last review of charitable status was granted to the Iona Institute; and the outcome of that review. [16817/15]

View answer

Written answers

As previously advised to the Deputy in her question of 21 April 2015, for reasons of taxpayer confidentiality Revenue cannot comment on the tax affairs of any individual Body or Trust in receipt of a charitable tax exemption. This includes the disclosure of any information in regard to the timing or outcome of any reviews or audits completed on the Body or Trust.

However, Revenue has also again assured me that it has procedures in place to ensure that charitable tax exemption is only granted to Bodies/Trusts that meet the required criteria and that these entities are subject to periodic review to ensure that they continue to comply with the terms of the exemption.

Top
Share