Skip to main content
Normal View

State Examinations

Dáil Éireann Debate, Tuesday - 30 June 2015

Tuesday, 30 June 2015

Questions (105)

Charlie McConalogue

Question:

105. Deputy Charlie McConalogue asked the Minister for Education and Skills if she is aware of the distress experienced by many students as a result of the difficult level of the leaving certificate mathematics ordinary level paper 1; if she has discussed the issue with the State Examinations Commission; if the commission has indicated that the marking scheme will reflect the difficulty level of the paper; and if she will make a statement on the matter. [25810/15]

View answer

Oral answers (6 contributions)

Is the Minister aware of the distress experienced by many students as a result of the difficulty level of the leaving certificate mathematics ordinary level paper 1? Has she raised this issue with the State Examinations Commission?

Has the Minister discussed with it the importance of ensuring the marking schemes adopted in correcting these papers reflect the difficulty level students experienced on the day? I am sure the Minister knows, as I do, that many students are exceptionally distressed because this could put their leaving certificate in jeopardy as passing the mathematics examination is essential to passing the leaving certificate.

I am aware of students' concerns about the content of the ordinary level leaving certificate mathematics paper 1. I have asked the State Examinations Commission to bring these concerns to the attention of the chief examiner for mathematics. Each year, commentary and correspondence on the examination from teachers, professional bodies and other interested parties are considered by the chief examiner in developing the draft marking scheme. The State Examinations Commission has assured me that, as is normal practice, prior to finalising the marking scheme, it will initially apply a draft marking scheme to a random sample of scripts so as to test the effectiveness of the examination paper and the scheme in setting and maintaining standards year on year. The outcomes of this exercise will be analysed before the marking scheme is finalised. This annual exercise ensures consistency in the marking of the examination and fairness to all candidates.

I thank the Minister for her response. I welcome the news that she has spoken to the State Examinations Commission about this matter and that it has confirmed to her that it will assess the difficulty level that students experienced in the paper, reflect that in the marking scheme, which it will adjust accordingly to ensure the bell curve, as such, is not out of sync, and that students will get a fair mark and are not unduly punished as a result of the difficulty level of the paper. I am sure, as Minister for Education and Skills, the Minister had the same experience as me, an Opposition spokesperson, on the Friday evening and night after the ordinary level mathematics paper 1 was completed. I received telephone calls until very late that night from distressed parents who had also very distressed students on their hands. The students were taken aback and shocked by the difficulty level and some of the questions on the paper. It was a good job it was a Friday and not a weekday because at least they had the weekend to compose themselves and recover. Thankfully the ordinary level mathematics paper 2 was much more doable and the feedback was quite good. Many students were reassured by that paper.

To ensure a similar experience is not repeated in future years, has the Minister asked the State Examinations Commission to examine how it came to be that such a difficult paper, as regarded by students, was set?

The reason we have chief examiners is because they are the experts. By and large, apart from that paper, there has been a reasonably positive response to the examinations. I take fully the point made by Deputy McConalogue that students were distressed on the Friday evening. It is important to ensure that we are clear in this area. The point that I just made is that the marking scheme is done after the examinations, meaning there is an opportunity to get the balance right and ensure students are not disadvantaged in any way. I acknowledge that their being upset causes a problem because they have to do all the other examinations. The State Examinations Commission endeavours to ensure there are no difficulties with papers. It works very hard to do that and it learns each year from what happens the previous year. I have been assured that it will learn from this instance.

The important message from this debate is the reassurance that students can hopefully take from the answer the Minister has given. She states that she has engaged with the State Examinations Commission and that it understands the distress the students felt and the difficulty many students experienced as a result of the questions with which they were confronted on the day. It is hoped it will be a reassurance to them that their papers will be marked accordingly. May it also allay some of their nerves. They will always naturally feel some but it is particularly the case in this instance given the difficulty of the paper concerned. That is important. We all know the leaving certificate is an exceptionally stressful examination and a difficult experience for students. It is important that the papers set do not make that any more difficult. It is important that lessons are learned from this paper. It is a daunting enough experience without students having to face into unpredictable examination papers. The reassurance that lessons will be learned from this paper for next year is very important as well.

We are all agreed that we need to learn lessons every time there are concerns about a particular paper.

My experience of the people in the State Examinations Commission is that they take their job seriously and they are rigorous in terms of how they approach the setting and marking of the examinations and the way they plan from one year to the next.

Top
Share