Skip to main content
Normal View

Wednesday, 8 Jul 2015

Written Answers Nos. 132-139

Departmental Correspondence

Questions (132)

Éamon Ó Cuív

Question:

132. Deputy Éamon Ó Cuív asked the Minister for Justice and Equality if she is satisfied that no leak of information relating to correspondence regarding a person (details supplied) emanated from her Department; the steps she has taken to verify if it did or did not emanate from her Department, particularly in view of another high-profile leak from within the justice system for which she has already apologised to this Deputy on the record of the Houses of the Oireachtas; the steps she is taking to ensure a person's private business remains as such; and if she will make a statement on the matter. [27955/15]

View answer

Written answers

I have no information available to me to support any contention that there was a leak of information in respect of this correspondence from my Department. The Deputy will be aware the correspondence was signed by him and four of his colleagues. I have no information on whether it was copied to third parties.

I would point out to the Deputy that the matters which were the subject of the correspondence were reported on in the media and it is evident from that reporting that family members of the person who was the subject of the correspondence had made comments on the matter. I would point out further to the Deputy that one of the group of Deputies who were signatories to the correspondence also appeared in connection with it in media interviews.

My response to the letter in question made very clear my commitment to ensuring respect for the right to privacy. Indeed, it is against that background that I have refrained from making any detailed comment publicly about the case even where inaccurate information has been put in the public domain, including in relation to my role in the matter.

Prisoners Temporary Release

Questions (133)

Éamon Ó Cuív

Question:

133. Deputy Éamon Ó Cuív asked the Minister for Justice and Equality if there was any communication between her or her Department and the Prison Service in respect of the detention of a person (details supplied); the nature of this communication; if it resulted in a decision to recall the person to prison; and if she will make a statement on the matter. [27956/15]

View answer

Written answers

The Deputy will appreciate that it would not be appropriate for me to discuss the private medical details in the case of any prisoner. I consider that this would constitute an unacceptable intrusion on a prisoner’s right to privacy.

The person to whom the Deputy refers is serving a sentence in Portlaoise Prison for very serious offences. The question of a temporary release for him or, indeed, for any other prisoner in such circumstances would only arise if there was information available to me from the Irish Prison Service that such a release was necessary on medical grounds. It is a matter for the Irish Prison Service to make any such recommendation to me on the basis of the available medical evidence.

There is, of course, regular communication between the Irish Prison Service and my Department on a wide range of matters affecting prisoners, including the case referred to by the Deputy. However, there is no basis to suggestions that I intervened to ensure the return to prison from temporary release of the person in question. He is liable to serve his sentence in prison unless there are grounds which necessitate otherwise.

Garda Station Opening Hours

Questions (134)

Éamon Ó Cuív

Question:

134. Deputy Éamon Ó Cuív asked the Minister for Justice and Equality to set out the basis of her assertion made in a recent Parliamentary Question reply to this Deputy that all Garda Síochána stations in the Salthill and Clifden Garda Síochána divisions, other than the stations in Clifden, Salthill, Oughterard and An Cheathrú Rua, are open each weekday from Monday to Friday from 10.00 a.m. to 1 p.m., when evidence from the public clearly shows this to be incorrect; if she will re-examine the matter to ascertain, as per this Deputy's original question, the actual opening times of these stations since 1 April 2015; the steps she will take to ensure that information provided to her for replies to parliamentary questions is accurate; the steps she will take to ascertain the reason incorrect information was provided to her to provide to this Deputy in her reply; and if she will make a statement on the matter. [27957/15]

View answer

Written answers

Decisions in relation to the allocation of Garda resources, including station opening hours, are a matter for the Garda Commissioner in the context of her operational requirements and I have no direct function in the matter.

The Deputy will appreciate that the information provided in reply to Parliamentary Question 444 of 16 June 2015 relates to the designated opening hours of the named Garda stations, as advised by the Garda Commissioner.

I am advised by the Garda Commissioner, however, that due to the exigencies of the service and given the nature of rural policing it is not always possible for a member of An Garda Síochána to remain within the confines of the station. On occasion the member is required to attend to calls within his/her area of responsibility depending on the nature of the incident. Once the incident has been dealt with the member in question will be in a position to return to the Garda Station to deal with any member of the public requiring their assistance. If a person calls to any of the specified Garda Stations during the periods designated as opening hours and a Garda member is not in attendance, they may contact the District Headquarters namely Salthill (091-514720) or Clifden Garda Station (095-22500) who will ensure that appropriate arrangements are made in order that the required service is afforded to the person concerned.

I am also advised that the matter of opening hours of sub-district stations is subject to continual review and alteration by Garda management in the context of policing priorities and resources available.

Departmental Schemes

Questions (135)

Noel Harrington

Question:

135. Deputy Noel Harrington asked the Minister for Children and Youth Affairs if he will provide a list of each of the current grant schemes that are administrated by his Department and that are available to community groups or projects; the total amount paid for each of these schemes for each of the past four years; and if he will make a statement on the matter. [27777/15]

View answer

Written answers

My Department provides funding directly to a wide range of community, voluntary and other organisations that are engaged in the provision of specific services to children and young people.

My Department operates a number of grant schemes of both a capital and current nature. The most significant share of the funding is targeted at implementing three major childcare programmes, namely, the Community Childcare Subvention (CCS) programme, the Early Childhood Care and Education (ECCE) programme and the Community Education and Training (CETS) programme. My Department also operates a number of grant funding schemes for locally based youth projects and clubs. These projects are in the main operated by local youth services and volunteers.

The Capital Grant Funding Scheme for Play and Recreation was introduced in 2013 to support new and existing play and recreation facilities for children and young people. The Afterschool Childcare Programme and the Community Employment Childcare Programme were introduced in 2014. Details of the grant schemes operated by my Department to which community groups and organisations may apply for funding support and the amounts paid out under each scheme in the period 2012 to 2015 are set out in the following table.

Scheme

2012

2013

2014

2015*

Special Projects for Youth

€17.042m

€14.968m

€14.4m

€14.4m

Young People’s Facilities and Services Fund

€21.332m

€19.114m

€18.397m

€18.397m

Local Drugs Task Force youth projects

€1.34m

€1.196m

€1.151m

€1.151m

Local Youth Club Grant Scheme

€1.035m

€1.035m

€1.035m

€1.035m

Capital Scheme – Youth Programmes

€0.5m

€1.55.m

€0.5m

€0.5m

Early Childhood Care and Education Programme

€166.485m

€164.335m

€164.157m

€162.8m

Community Childcare Subvention Programme

€50.9m

€45.43m

€45.0m

€45.0m

Childcare Education and Training Programme

€17.62m

€17.0m

€17.0m

€17.0m

Afterschool Childcare Programme

_____

_____

€0.263m

€1.593m

Community Employment Childcare Programme

_____

_____

€1.973m

€6.49m

Childcare Capital Programme

€6.500m

€3.250m

€3.250m

€7.0m

Comhairle na nÓg Development Fund

€0.627m

€0.634m

€0.645m

€0.583m

National Play Day and Recreation Week

€0.063m

€0.071m

€0.061m

€0.051m

Capital Scheme – Play and Recreation

____

€0.250m

€0.250m

€0.250m

* 2015 allocation

Children in Care

Questions (136)

Róisín Shortall

Question:

136. Deputy Róisín Shortall asked the Minister for Children and Youth Affairs to set out the number of European Union and non-European Union non-Irish nationals who are currently within the care system; and the actions he has taken to ensure that Ireland is fully in compliance with its duty under the Vienna Convention and the Brussels II regulation. [27835/15]

View answer

Written answers

Obligations under the Vienna Convention (in relation to children in care) and Brussels II (bis) (for matters concerning parental responsibility including children in the care of a Member State) are discharged under the auspices of Tusla, the Child and Family Agency. A protocol regarding cases of children in care who would fall under the provisions of the Vienna Convention became operational with effect from March this year.

The Brussels II (bis) Regulation is administered by the Department of Justice and Equality as Ireland's central authority and cases falling under this framework are dealt with by Tusla as Ireland's competent authority. Work has been ongoing between both bodies, with input from the Department of Children and Youth Affairs, to further streamline the operation of the Regulation. It is hoped to have a protocol in relation to such matters agreed in the near future.

I have been informed by Tusla, the Child and Family Agency, that it does not collect data in relation to the nationality of children and young people coming into care on a national basis. Nationality of children and young people is considered on an individual basis during the admission process to ensure that children and young people are in placements that can meet their needs.

Child and Family Agency Expenditure

Questions (137)

Thomas P. Broughan

Question:

137. Deputy Thomas P. Broughan asked the Minister for Children and Youth Affairs further to reply to Parliamentary Question No. 630 of 9 June 2015 if the information from Tusla, the Child and Family Agency, is to hand; if it will be made available to this Deputy's office before the summer recess; and if he will make a statement on the matter. [27874/15]

View answer

Written answers

I refer to Parliamentary Question No. 630 of 9th June, 2015, in relation to Meade Day Care Centre. I can confirm that I responded directly to the Deputy on 29th June, 2015 in relation to this matter.

Child and Family Agency Services

Questions (138)

Bernard Durkan

Question:

138. Deputy Bernard J. Durkan asked the Minister for Children and Youth Affairs to outline the full extent of the facilities currently available to protect children at risk; the number of referrals to the appropriate bodies recorded in the past two years; the extent to which any backlogs occur; if he expects to make further provision in this regard; and if he will make a statement on the matter. [27961/15]

View answer

Written answers

Tusla, the Child and Family Agency holds the statutory responsibility for child welfare and protection, and is the appropriate body to receive reports of concerns relating to children at risk.

Each referral received by the Agency is assessed and dealt with on an individual basis by the relevant social work team. Preliminary screening is aimed at establishing the appropriateness of the referral to Tusla services and if necessary is followed by an initial assessment of the concern to determine the best course of action for the child and their family. At any stage, if a determination is made that there is abuse, whether physical, emotional, sexual or neglect, from which there is an ongoing risk of significant harm, the child protection pathway is followed. This may lead to the child being placed on the child protection notification system (CPNS). An Garda Síochána are responsible for any investigations of a criminal nature. Children First guidelines provide for the formal notification by Tusla where abuse is suspected and, where it has not been possible to establish grounds for a formal report, the guidelines indicate that an informal consultation is encouraged to protect the welfare of the child. Tulsa has a number of local offices in each of its 17 administrative areas. Information for Tusla's services, including contact numbers, is available on its website and locally.

Provisional figures for 2014 show that there were 43,179 referrals of child protection and welfare concerns received by Tusla in 2014. This is an increase on the total number of referrals received in 2013, which stands at 41,599. The majority of referrals, almost 58%, are in relation to child welfare concerns, with the remaining 42% relating to child protection. Referrals can come from a number of sources so there are some duplicates in these totals, and some will be more appropriate for more universal services, such as those provided in the education or health sectors. Also, not all referrals will result in a need for a social work service or in a child being received into care. As a result, every year, approximately 50% of referrals can be expected to proceed from preliminary enquiry to the initial assessment stage.

An open case is one which is assessed as needing a dedicated (allocated) social work service. Of the total number of open cases at the end April, 20,417 had an allocated social worker and 7,965 were waiting to be allocated a social worker. The number of cases waiting to be allocated a social worker is an issue that is being addressed by Tusla. The priority or category of high, medium or low given to the case after a preliminary enquiry, is based on information received. It is important to note that "high priority" should not simply be equated with risk. Social work duty teams keep high priority cases under review by regular checking to ascertain risk to the child, and where necessary will re-prioritise the case. At the close of April 2015, the number of children in care was reported as 6,420 children, of whom 93% were in a foster care setting. The number of children in care represents just under 23% of the total of 28,382 open cases reported by Tusla at the end of April. A national review of cases waiting allocation of a social worker is at an advanced stage. I expect that this will be submitted to me shortly and this will inform the overall approach by Tusla for the budget and deployment of social work staff.

In addition to services provided by Tusla and its own complaints mechanism in which specific issues may be raised, the child welfare and protection services are overseen by independent bodies. This includes the Ombudsman for Children, the Health Information and Quality Authority, in terms of inspections, and CORU, which regulates health and social care professionals. My Department also maintains regular contact with a range of non-governmental bodies to consult on any particular areas of interest or concern that may arise in the sector. Work is proceeding to ensure that all high priority cases receive a timely and effective service in this demand led service.

Psychological Services

Questions (139)

Bernard Durkan

Question:

139. Deputy Bernard J. Durkan asked the Minister for Children and Youth Affairs to outline the extent to which adequate child psychological services continue to be made available in line with requirements, as already indicated or notified; and if he will make a statement on the matter. [27962/15]

View answer

Written answers

Psychology services for children are currently being provided by arrangement with the HSE. Tusla and the HSE have in place both a Memorandum of Understanding and a Joint Protocol for inter-agency collaboration which underpins the provision of these services for children. The purpose of the Memorandum of Understanding is to set out the partnership agreement between the HSE and Tusla to continue pre-establishment levels of service across both organisations. The objective of the Joint Protocol is to specify a pathway and associated responsibilities for children and families whose needs cross between Health Service Divisions and Tusla.

Tusla is also proposing to put in place a Service Level Agreement with the HSE to strengthen current arrangements. The Service Level Agreement will determine the quantum of service needed to meet the Agency's requirements.

Clinical psychology services are directly provided by Tusla within multi-disciplinary teams deployed by the Assessment, Consultation and Therapy Service (ACTS). Services provided include assessment and focused interventions for children and young people with complex clinical needs and high risk behaviours. They also provide support to other professionals in order to guide interventions to children and families.

Top
Share