Skip to main content
Normal View

Thursday, 9 Jul 2015

Written Answers Nos. 162 to 171

Children and Family Services Provision

Questions (162)

Fergus O'Dowd

Question:

162. Deputy Fergus O'Dowd asked the Minister for Children and Youth Affairs if he will provide a breakdown of the waiting list for social workers for the Louth-Meath children's services by location since the end of 2014 when there were 1,451 open cases in these counties, of which 620 were waiting on the allocation of a social worker; the length of time they were waiting; the reason no social workers were available; the full complement of social workers; the number in the Louth-Meath children's services; and if he will make a statement on the matter. [28044/15]

View answer

Written answers

I have referred the Deputy's question to the Child and Family Agency for a response, and will revert when this is to hand.

One-Parent Family Payment Payments

Questions (163)

Ruth Coppinger

Question:

163. Deputy Ruth Coppinger asked the Minister for Children and Youth Affairs in view of the recent changes to the one-parent family payment, if he will report on work being done to deliver affordable childcare for all parents. [28151/15]

View answer

Written answers

Funding of more than a quarter of a billion euro is provided annually by my Department towards child care. All child care programmes supported by my Department currently provide funding directly to childcare providers, either in the form of capitation or subvention payments. This kind of funding mechanism provides the leverage to progressively build the quality of childcare provision, while at the same time making childcare more affordable.

To deliver the free pre-school year under the Early Childhood Care and Education programme, a standard capitation fee of €62.50 per week per eligible child is paid to participating services. To incentivise higher quality, a higher capitation fee of €73 per week is paid per eligible child to services with more highly qualified staff. Parents who qualify for support under this programme can have their annual childcare costs reduced by as much as €2,774 for each qualifying child.

The Community Childcare Subvention programme provides funding to community childcare services to support disadvantaged or low income families, and in the case of full day care, parents can have their weekly childcare costs reduced by up to €95 per week for each qualifying child.

Further childcare support is provided under a number of programmes which support parents returning to the workforce or availing of education or training opportunities. These include the Childcare Education and Training Supports programme for parents availing of training and education courses; Community Employment Childcare programme for parents in Community Employment schemes; and After-School Childcare programme for after-school care.

For these three programmes, the maximum contribution a parent makes to the cost of childcare is capped at €15 per week for part-time and after-school care and €25 per week in the case of full-day care.

Options for future investment in childcare are currently being considered by the Inter-Departmental Group on Future Investment in Early Years and After-School Care and Education, which I established in February this year. This Inter-Departmental Group, which is tasked with setting out a range of options for current and future investment, is considering options to enhance affordability, options to increase the accessibility of provision and options to build the quality of provision and support the sustainability of the early years sector.

The work of the Group is framed by research and evidence of best practice (both national and international) and by existing policy commitments, including those set out in Better Outcomes, Brighter Futures, the National Policy Framework for Children and Young People. The Group has solicited the views of key stakeholders, interested parties and the general public through a number of consultative processes. It will submit a series of recommendations to Government shortly.

HIQA Reports

Questions (164)

Ruth Coppinger

Question:

164. Deputy Ruth Coppinger asked the Minister for Children and Youth Affairs his views on the Health Information and Quality Authority report on services operated by Tusla, the Child and Family Agency, in Fingal County; and if he will make a statement on the matter. [28152/15]

View answer

Written answers

The Health Information and Quality Authority recently published its report on an inspection of the child welfare and protection services in the Dublin North administrative area of Tusla, the Child and Family Agency. HIQA identified two areas of significant risk in the 27 standards examined: firstly, delays in assessments by dedicated social workers, and secondly, management of assessments of adults who were alleged to pose a risk to children. These risks largely arise from staffing shortages. They were brought to the attention of the area manager during the inspection and immediate action taken. The associated action plan has been accepted by HIQA and there are clear timelines for completion before the end of the year.

I am aware that some commentators have focused on references to delays in Tusla notifications to Gardaí in relation to allegations of physical and sexual abuse, and the impact this delay was having on Garda investigations. It is right to be concerned about this. However, the inspection report indicates clearly that this issue had been resolved well before the report was published. Management level meetings had increased in frequency and had strengthened communication, leading to better management of cases. The HIQA inspection report goes on to reference positive results from a survey of Garda representatives regarding the response by Dublin North over the previous 12 months.

Tusla’s action plan indicates that it is redeploying staff to assist in handling high priority cases, and has commenced internal staff transfers to address staffing shortages. In addition, it is improving management of lower risk cases by rolling out training in Meitheal, so that families can be referred to family support services where it is appropriate to do so. Tusla is currently developing cultural competency training, with social workers on duty teams being prioritised for such training. Tusla is actively working to fill all social work vacancies, including posts with a particular focus on managing cases of retrospective child abuse.

As with previous reports, there were a number of positive findings. HIQA found that children at most serious risk of harm received a timely and effective service and there was excellent inter-agency collaboration, strong leadership and communication systems in the area. Good efforts are being made to deploy the limited resources available. Social workers advocated strongly for children in accessing specialist services and children’s rights were well respected. Other positives found within the service include strategies in place to safeguard and protect children from abuse and to promote their welfare.

Children and Family Services Provision

Questions (165, 166, 167)

Ruth Coppinger

Question:

165. Deputy Ruth Coppinger asked the Minister for Children and Youth Affairs if he will report on measures being taken to provide for an adequate number of social workers in Fingal county. [28153/15]

View answer

Ruth Coppinger

Question:

166. Deputy Ruth Coppinger asked the Minister for Children and Youth Affairs if he will report on diversity training for social workers in Fingal county. [28154/15]

View answer

Ruth Coppinger

Question:

167. Deputy Ruth Coppinger asked the Minister for Children and Youth Affairs the number of cases that are not allocated to a social worker in Fingal county. [28155/15]

View answer

Written answers

I propose to take Questions Nos. 165 to 167, inclusive, together.

I have asked my Officials to arrange for this information to be collated and provided directly to the Deputy.

Mother and Baby Homes Inquiries

Questions (168, 169, 170, 171, 172, 173, 174, 176, 177)

Mary Lou McDonald

Question:

168. Deputy Mary Lou McDonald asked the Minister for Children and Youth Affairs if all interviews with the confidential committee of the commission of investigation into mother and baby homes will be recorded, unless a witness does not consent to this. [28199/15]

View answer

Mary Lou McDonald

Question:

169. Deputy Mary Lou McDonald asked the Minister for Children and Youth Affairs if transcripts and audio copies of any recordings of witness interviews conducted by the confidential committee of the commission of investigation into mother and baby homes will be provided to witnesses. [28200/15]

View answer

Mary Lou McDonald

Question:

170. Deputy Mary Lou McDonald asked the Minister for Children and Youth Affairs the area of expertise of the experienced person taking notes when a witness is being interviewed by the confidential committee of the commission of investigation into mother and baby homes; and if a copy of any notes taken by this person will be sent to witnesses after the conclusion of the interview. [28201/15]

View answer

Mary Lou McDonald

Question:

171. Deputy Mary Lou McDonald asked the Minister for Children and Youth Affairs if witnesses to the confidential committee of the commission of investigation into mother and baby homes will have an opportunity to clarify anything they believe does not reflect their testimony. [28202/15]

View answer

Mary Lou McDonald

Question:

172. Deputy Mary Lou McDonald asked the Minister for Children and Youth Affairs if witnesses to the confidential committee of the commission of investigation into mother and baby homes will be provided a copy of the general report of the committee; and if he will make a statement on the matter. [28203/15]

View answer

Mary Lou McDonald

Question:

173. Deputy Mary Lou McDonald asked the Minister for Children and Youth Affairs if the commission of investigation is directing witnesses to the confidential committee of the commission of investigation into mother and baby homes as the first point of contact, as opposed to the investigation of the commission of investigation into mother and baby homes. [28204/15]

View answer

Mary Lou McDonald

Question:

174. Deputy Mary Lou McDonald asked the Minister for Children and Youth Affairs when a document will be made available to witnesses who wish to engage with the commission of investigation into mother and baby homes. [28205/15]

View answer

Mary Lou McDonald

Question:

176. Deputy Mary Lou McDonald asked the Minister for Children and Youth Affairs the plans of the commission of investigation into mother and baby homes for engaging with witnesses who live abroad. [28207/15]

View answer

Mary Lou McDonald

Question:

177. Deputy Mary Lou McDonald asked the Minister for Children and Youth Affairs if the confidential committee of the commission of investigation into mother and baby homes and-or the commission of investigation into mother and baby homes will be accepting evidence from persons who were in institutions, other than the 14 institutions listed in the terms of reference. [28208/15]

View answer

Written answers

I propose to take Questions Nos. 168 to 174, inclusive, 176 and 177 together.

The Commission of Investigation (Mother and Baby Homes and certain related Matters) was established by Government Order on 17 February 2015 (S.I. No 57 of 2015) pursuant to Sections 3 and 7(2)(a) of the Commissions of Investigations Act 2004. The 2004 Act gives the Commission robust powers to conduct investigations within its terms of reference in the manner it considers appropriate while also respecting fair procedures and natural justice.

The Order sets out the Terms of Reference for the Commission and provides for a comprehensive investigative framework involving interlinked and concurrent lines of inquiry. Articles 3 and 4 provide for the establishment and operation of the Confidential Committee module of the investigation. This module of the Commission's work is intended to facilitate individuals who may wish to provide accounts of their experiences of living or working in relevant homes to the Commission.

In accordance with section 9 of the Commissions of Investigation Act 2004, it is essential to recognise that the Commission is independent in the performance of its functions and in deciding how best to approach its investigations. I am therefore not in a position to advise the House on the detailed procedural arrangements and related operational matters raised by the Deputy. I have no role in decisions relating to the ongoing investigation and it would be inappropriate for me to comment on matters which are for the independent Commission to decide and progress.

The Deputy may wish to contact the Commission directly at 73 Lower Baggot Street, Dublin 2 or by email; info@mbhcoi.ie.

Top
Share