Skip to main content
Normal View

Tuesday, 10 Nov 2015

Written Answers Nos. 460 - 469

Foreign Awards to Irish Citizens

Questions (460)

Catherine Murphy

Question:

460. Deputy Catherine Murphy asked the Minister for Foreign Affairs and Trade the instances, since 9 March 2011, in which the Government considered a request by an Irish citizen to accept a title of nobility or honour, in accordance with Article 40.2.2° of Bunreacht na hÉireann, by date of consideration, by name of requestor, by title or honour concerned and by the Government's decision to approve or not approve, in tabular form; the legislative instrument that ensures the practical application of Article 40.2.2°; and if he will make a statement on the matter. [39332/15]

View answer

Written answers

The reference in Article 40.2.2o of the Constitution to "title of nobility or of honour" has been interpreted, in accordance with advice from the Attorney General, as only referring to honours conferred by or on behalf of a sovereign authority, the recipients of which become entitled, by the law or custom of the foreign state in question, to use prefixes to their names such as “Sir”, “Dame”, “Lord” or "Marquis”.

It is these types of award that are brought to the attention of Government and the table below summarises the eight such instances that have arisen in the period under review. The recipients of the awards in each instance are dual Irish-British citizens.

On the other hand, an award which provides for the use of letters or marks of distinction after one's name, medals, ribbons or academic honours, is not regarded as a title of nobility or of honour in this context.

In relation to the first six instances summarised in the table below, the prior approval of the Government was sought and secured before acceptance of the title of nobility or honour by the Irish citizen concerned.

In relation to the seventh and eighth instances summarised below, the honours in question were extended to the Irish citizens concerned last year. As no facility exists for retrospective approval, the Government has taken note of the granting of the awards and their acceptance by the Irish citizens concerned and I have asked my officials to emphasise to the authorities of the countries concerned the importance on all such occasions for the prior approval of the Government to be obtained.

It is noted that rights, privileges or dignities deriving from the award of a title of nobility or honour subsist solely within the jurisdiction conferring it and any other jurisdiction that may recognise rights, privileges or dignities as flowing from it. Under Irish law such a title has no significance in terms of conferring rights, entitlements or dignities.

Date of Consideration by the Government

Country Conferring the Award

Title of Award

Government Decision

07/05/2013

UK

Knighthood (Knight Bachelor)

Approved

30/12/2013

UK

Damehood

(Commander of the Order)

Approved

10/06/2014

UK

Knighthood (Knight Bachelor)

Approved

10/06/2014

UK

Knighthood (Knight Bachelor)

Approved

09/06/2015

UK

Knighthood (Knight Bachelor)

Approved

03/11/2015

Grenada

Knight Grand Cross of the Most Distinguished Order of the Nation

Approved

03/11/2015

Antigua and Barbuda

Knight Grand Cross of the Most Distinguished Order of the Nation

Noted

03/11/2015

Antigua and Barbuda

Knight Commander of the Most Distinguished Order of the Nation

Noted

Foreign Policy

Questions (461)

Paul Murphy

Question:

461. Deputy Paul Murphy asked the Minister for Foreign Affairs and Trade his views on the differences between China, Japan and the United States of America concerning islands in the East China Sea; and if he will make a statement on the matter. [39069/15]

View answer

Written answers

Ireland does not take a position on the respective claims and underlying sovereignty issues driving this matter. However, we are concerned at the potential for a dangerous escalation of tensions in the area in question. Our strong wish is to see these differences resolved peacefully, and in accordance with international law.

Foreign Policy

Questions (462)

Paul Murphy

Question:

462. Deputy Paul Murphy asked the Minister for Foreign Affairs and Trade his views on the recent general election in Turkey; and if he will make a statement on the matter. [39070/15]

View answer

Written answers

The Turkish elections held earlier this week followed the inconclusive result in June and took place in a particularly difficult and sensitive context.

Turkey is facing a very difficult and challenging situation, including as host to over 2 million refugees mainly from the conflict in neighbouring Syria and following the horrific bombing in Ankara on 10 October. It faces internal and external challenges.

The fact that elections were held in an open manner is, I believe, important. The joint assessment of the OSCE, ODHIR and Council of Europe found that the elections in Turkey offered voters variety of choices, but that the process was hindered by challenging security environment, incidents of violence and restrictions against media. According to their assessment, the election was generally peaceful. However, they agreed that, while there were positive elements, there were also shortcomings.

There are also serious and legitimate concerns about freedom of the media, and not only in the context of the election. Along with our European partners, we will be continuing our dialogue on these issues with Turkey, including in the context of the annual enlargement Progress Reports, which we expect to issue today.

I look forward to working with the new Government in an open and constructive manner on the many issues of mutual concern, both bilaterally and in the context of Turkey’s importance as an EU partner.

Human Rights

Questions (463)

Paul Murphy

Question:

463. Deputy Paul Murphy asked the Minister for Foreign Affairs and Trade if he or his officials have raised the case of two labour activists in Myanmar (details supplied) who are under detention with the authorities in that country following the provision of advice and support to striking garment workers; and if he will make a statement on the matter. [39071/15]

View answer

Written answers

The Irish Embassy in Hanoi, which is accredited to Myanmar, is aware of this case.

Ireland has raised this case with the EU Delegation in Yangon. The EU Delegation has been monitoring this case, and will continue to do so. Ireland has long been an advocate of human rights defenders, including throughout our current membership of the Human Rights Council. We strongly support the central role played by human rights defenders in ensuring the enjoyment of human rights by all and we condemn all acts of violence and intimidation against them. We are deeply concerned about increasing restrictions on their actions in some states.

EU Treaties

Questions (464)

Paul Murphy

Question:

464. Deputy Paul Murphy asked the Minister for Foreign Affairs and Trade further to Parliamentary Question Number 873 of 3 November 2015, his position on the free movement of persons between the European Union and Switzerland; if he will support visa-free travel and work between the European Union and Switzerland; and his position on banking secrecy agreements between the European Union and Switzerland. [39363/15]

View answer

Written answers

In a referendum held on 9 February 2014, Swiss citizens voted by a very narrow margin to accept a proposal to introduce quotas and restrictions on migrants, the vast majority of whom are EU nationals. The limits will apply to all work and residency permits issued to foreign nationals, including cross-border commuters and asylum seekers. The referendum text did not specify at what levels the quotas on migrants should be set.

The referendum outcome is a worrying development, with far-reaching implications for EU-Switzerland relations, not least because any new Swiss legislation introducing quotas on immigration by EU citizens would be incompatible with the existing EU-Switzerland Agreement on the Free Movement of Persons which has been in place since 2002. The free movement of people is a cornerstone of the construction of the European Union. It is integral to many of the 100 plus bilateral agreements between the EU and Switzerland and is a key basis on which Switzerland is able to access the EU single market.

On 11 February 2015, the Swiss Federal Council (Cabinet) published draft legislation aimed at implementing the mandate it had been given to restrict immigration, including immigration by EU nationals. Since then, there has been a General Election in Switzerland. The populist Swiss People’s Party (SVP) - which wants strict controls on immigration - won 29.4% of the vote and is now the largest party in Switzerland. The Swiss parliament will vote next month on the composition of the Federal Council. Present indications are that the SVP will take two of the seven seats, up from one at present. It remains to be seen what approach the new Swiss Government will take in response to the mandate given in the referendum. Our understanding is that the government has until 2017 implement the mandate.

The EU’s position remains that it refuses to entertain any negotiation on the principle of the Free Movement of Persons, a position Ireland fully supports.

Ireland welcomed the signature of the tax transparency agreement between Switzerland and the EU in May 2015 under which EU Member States and Switzerland agreed to exchange information on the financial accounts of each other’s residents from 2018.

Departmental Staff Allowances

Questions (465)

John Deasy

Question:

465. Deputy John Deasy asked the Minister for Foreign Affairs and Trade the monthly rent allowance paid to public servants and officials of his Department who are serving the State in the United Kingdom and in mainland Europe by location, grade and family size. [39425/15]

View answer

Written answers

Rent ceilings currently paid to officers serving the State at a number of locations in the United Kingdom and mainland Europe are set out below.

The relative size of the properties rented varies according to family size. While most officers travel accompanied by their families, in some cases officers travel unaccompanied by their spouse/partners and children, or are accompanied by some family members for periods of their posting.

Under Data Protection Regulations, our advice is that it is not permitted to release details of living arrangements such as apartment size which would allow the private family circumstances of officers and their families to be ascertained.

There are significant variations in local market circumstances from year to year, as well as a requirement to make an assessment of the individual needs of officers in relation to location, security, and suitability for representational purposes where required. In making these assessments, with a particular focus on cost control, we use data sourced from our independent consultants, Employment Conditions Abroad (ECA).

Location

Officer

Rent per month

Athens

First Secretary

€2,900

-

Third Secretary

€1,200

Berlin

First Secretary

€1,988

-

Third Secretary

€1,825

Berne

Third Secretary

€2,725

Brussels

Counsellor

€1,750

-

First Secretary

€1,800

-

Third Secretary

€1,850

-

Higher Executive Officer

€1,600

-

Executive Officer

€1,521

-

Clerical Officer

€1,400

Bucharest

First Secretary

€1,900

Budapest

Third Secretary

€1,450

Copenhagen

Third Secretary

€2,024

Edinburgh

First Secretary

€3,620

-

Third Secretary

€1,671

Geneva

First Secretary

€4,037

-

Third Secretary

€2,917

Helsinki

Third Secretary

€2,400

Lisbon

Third Secretary

€1,200

London

First Secretary

€3,016

-

Third Secretary

€3,620

Ljubljana

Third Secretary

€1,400

Madrid

First Secretary

€3,700

-

Third Secretary

€2,000

Oslo

Third Secretary

€2,023

Paris

First Secretary

€3,937

-

Third Secretary

€2,300

Prague

Third Secretary

€1,476

Rome

First Secretary

€2,300

-

Third Secretary

€3,300

Sofia

Third Secretary

€1,300

Strasbourg

First Secretary

€1,850

-

Third Secretary

€1,800

The Hague

First Secretary

€3,700

-

Third Secretary

€2,100

Vienna

First Secretary

€1,171

-

Third Secretary

€1,910

Warsaw

Third Secretary

€1,407

Departmental Expenditure

Questions (466)

Joan Collins

Question:

466. Deputy Joan Collins asked the Minister for Foreign Affairs and Trade if he is aware of remarks made (details supplied) regarding the recouping of portions of the costs associated with the recent visit of members of the British royal family; and if he will make a statement on the matter. [39466/15]

View answer

Written answers

My Department has received a request in relation to the reconciliation related costs associated with the visit earlier this year to Sligo by the Prince of Wales and Duchess of Cornwall.

However, no decision has yet been made on that request and it continues to receive attention.

EU Membership

Questions (467)

Brendan Smith

Question:

467. Deputy Brendan Smith asked the Minister for Foreign Affairs and Trade his views on the recent Economic and Social Research Institute report regarding a possible British exit from the European Union; and if he will make a statement on the matter. [39576/15]

View answer

Written answers

I welcome the publication of this valuable report by the Economic and Social Research Institute (ESRI) that was commissioned by the Department of Finance. It has already served to deepen our understanding of the various and complex issues that arise for Ireland in connection with a potential change in the nature of the UK’s relationship with the EU.

The findings of the study are clear: there are significant risks for Ireland if the UK were to leave the EU. Key areas of our economy could be adversely affected and there would also be implications for migration and in regard to the border between both parts of the island. Particular difficulties might arise as well in the energy sector.

The report reinforces our conviction that a British withdrawal from the Union would be very negative for Ireland. That is why we are already working hard, across Government, to help ensure that scenario does not come to pass. This means working with all our EU partners, and especially the UK, to find a solution that will allow for continued British membership of the Union. My Department is naturally heavily involved in that process, as is our Embassy in London and all our diplomatic missions.

The Government has also raised our concerns about any change in the nature of the EU-UK relationship with the British Government. In a number of meetings this year, I have stressed to the British Foreign Secretary, Philip Hammond, how much we value the UK’s continuing presence in the Union. I have also emphasized the important role our common membership has played in strengthening our bilateral ties and in supporting peace and political stability in Northern Ireland. The Taoiseach has made similar points in discussions with Prime Minister Cameron.

The Government will continue to make its voice heard in the debate ahead in the UK on its membership of the Union. Just yesterday in London, the Taoiseach highlighted again how important continued British membership of the EU is to Ireland in a speech at the annual conference of the Confederation of British Industry. He also reconfirmed the Government’s commitment to work with the UK on areas of common interest within the British reform agenda.

Our approach continues to be guided by the belief that the best way to mitigate the risks of a British departure from the Union is to ensure it does not happen in the first place. At the same time, we recognize that we must be prepared for any scenario.

Overseas Visits

Questions (468)

Brendan Smith

Question:

468. Deputy Brendan Smith asked the Minister for Foreign Affairs and Trade if his Department has updated its advice for Irish visitors to some regions in Egypt; and if he will make a statement on the matter. [39606/15]

View answer

Written answers

It was with great shock and sadness that I learned of the air disaster over the Sinai Peninsula on 31 October, which resulted in the tragic loss of so many lives. On behalf of the people and the Government of Ireland, I wish to express my heartfelt condolences to all Russian people during this difficult time.

Travel advice for individual countries worldwide, including the level of caution recommended, is publicly available to individuals and travel companies on my Department’s website at: www.dfa.ie/travel-advice/ and also on our official twitter account @dfatravel.

This advice is made available to assist Irish citizens in making well-informed decisions when planning their trips and when travelling. To ensure that the information provided is up-to-date and reliable, travel advice is regularly reviewed and revised as appropriate. My Department closely monitors international developments, primarily through our network of Embassies, and also through close consultation with our EU and other international partners.

The Department also operates a citizen registration facility at www.dfa.ie/citizens-registration/. This facility allows Irish citizens to register their contact details with the Department so that they are easily contactable in the event of an emergency. We strongly encourage all travelers to register, and especially so when they are travelling to remote or insecure locations.

Based on a direction issued by the Irish Aviation Authority on 4 November 2015, my Department promptly amended its travel advice for citizens intending to travel to or from Sharm el-Sheikh to the following:

“Any Irish citizen scheduled to travel to or already in Sharm El Sheikh should contact their tour operator or airline for further information. Citizens should note the direction issued by the Irish Aviation Authority on 5 November to Irish airline operators not to operate to/from Sharm el-Sheikh airport or in the Egyptian Sinai peninsula airspace until further notice. Citizens should also be mindful that UK flights are currently suspended and of the possibility of similar directions by other aviation authorities which may affect scheduled flights. Citizens in Sharm el-Sheikh should make their travel plans in coordination with their travel or tour company.”

Department officials continue to keep the travel advice for Egypt under close review.

Special Educational Needs Service Provision

Questions (469)

Catherine Murphy

Question:

469. Deputy Catherine Murphy asked the Minister for Education and Skills in the event of parents being forced to pay for the hiring of a teacher to provide extra instruction to primary school children with a diagnosis of dyslexia, whether through the Dyslexia Association or otherwise, her plans to cover the cost of hiring such teachers where there is a clear educational advantage; and if she will make a statement on the matter. [38973/15]

View answer

Written answers

I wish to advise the Deputy that all mainstream Primary schools have been allocated significant additional teaching resources under the General Allocation Model (GAM) to cater for children with high incidence special educational needs, including Specific Learning Disability (SLD), of which dyslexia is one such SLD.

All Post Primary schools have also been allocated additional teaching resources for pupils with high incidence special educational needs, including SLDs. It is a matter for individual schools to use their professional judgment to identify pupils who will receive this support and to use the resources available to the school to intervene at the appropriate level with such pupils. Schools are supported in this regard by the National Educational Psychological Services.

Schools are not required to apply directly to my Department for learning support for SLDs such as dyslexia. Schools should monitor and utilise their allocation of additional teaching support to best support the needs of identified pupils, in accordance with my Department's guidance. The teaching time afforded to each individual pupil is decided and managed by schools, taking into account each child's individual learning needs. My Departments Circulars SP ED 02/05 and 70/2014 provide guidelines for primary and post primary schools respectively in relation to the utilisation of additional teaching resources which have been allocated to them for pupils with special educational needs.

As the allocation of support for pupils with SLDs is managed locally by schools, a parent who feels that their child requires additional learning support in school should raise this matter directly with their school Principal in the first instance, or with the Board of Management of the school. My Department does not provide funding for additional teaching, or tutor support, procured by parents outside of school time, or outside of the criteria set out in my Departments Home Tuition scheme.

In addition to support in mainstream schools, my Department provides funding for a number of special schools and special classes attached to mainstream primary schools which have been sanctioned to meet the needs of children with SLDs. There are 4 Special Schools and 12 Special Classes attached to mainstream Primary schools catering for pupils with SLD.

Further supports which are provided to support pupils with Dyslexia include funding for schools for the purchase of specialised equipment; an information resource pack on Dyslexia which has been made available to all primary and post-primary schools as well as provision for continuing professional development for teachers with additional training needs in the area of Dyslexia through the Special Education Support Service (SESS).

Primary schools also have access to psychological assessments either directly through the National Educational Psychological Service (NEPS), or through the Scheme for Commissioning Psychological Assessments (SCPA).

Finally, I wish to advise the Deputy that my Department also provides funding to the Dyslexia Association of Ireland at national level which helps the organisation operate an information service for members and the public as well as assisting in meeting the costs associated with the attendance of some children from disadvantaged backgrounds at workshops and programmes organised by the association. Fees charged by the organisation to its service users are a matter between the organisation and its membership.

Top
Share