Skip to main content
Normal View

Thursday, 17 Dec 2015

Written Answers Nos. 622-634

Waste Management

Questions (622)

Catherine Murphy

Question:

622. Deputy Catherine Murphy asked the Minister for the Environment, Community and Local Government which local authorities have fully undertaken the requirement to identify and categorise historic illegal dumping grounds and which have not completed that task; the measures he has taken to expedite this process; if he is aware that severe unintended consequences to home owners and businesses have already arisen from planning permissions being given to build on, or next to, such dumping grounds; and if he will make a statement on the matter. [46077/15]

View answer

Written answers

Three new regional waste management plans, which cover the entire country, were launched in May 2015 and are available to view and download on each individual Waste Management Planning Lead Authority’s website as well as on the Environmental Protection Agency’s website, www.epa.ie.

Section 13 of the Plans addresses, inter alia, historic and legacy landfills in each waste management planning region and sets out the number of sites which have been assessed as high, medium and low risk sites, as well as the number of sites which have yet to be assessed. Furthermore, Appendix F of each of the Plans sets out more detail in this regard at the individual local authority level.

The Waste Management Planning Lead Authorities (WMPLAs) are required by the end of 2015 to have ranked the high-risk sites in accordance with the risk screening process set out in the Plans, with a view to prioritising landfills for remediation over the lifetime of the plans. This process has been completed. Each region is then required to develop and agree a road-map before the end of 2016 which prioritises the investigation and remediation of the priority ranked landfills over the period 2015 to 2021. My Department will continue to work with and support the WMPLAs, through the Waste Management Planning National Co-ordination Committee, to progress the remediation of the landfills to be identified in the remediation road-map referred to above.

In addition to the above, the Programme of Measures which Ireland agreed to deliver to ensure full compliance with the judgment of the Court of Justice of the European Union (CJEU) in case C-494/01 and which is available on my Department’s website, at the following weblink: http://www.environ.ie/en/Publications/Environment/Waste/FileDownLoad,30458,en.pdf, sets out, inter alia, details of remediation projects undertaken to comply with the 2005 judgment. Recognising the dramatic improvement in waste management and enforcement practices in Ireland since that judgment was delivered, including the remediation of a number of problematic landfill sites, the European Commission were fully satisfied with our multi-stranded response and actions and closed this case in October 2015. In this regard, it is worth noting that my Department and local authorities have expended approximately €125m on landfill remediation since 2005.

My role in relation to the planning system is primarily to provide and update the legislative and policy guidance framework. The legislative framework comprises the Planning and Development Acts and the Planning and Development Regulations.

Under planning legislation, the decision as to whether to grant a planning application, with or without conditions, is a matter for the relevant planning authority in the first instance, and An Bord Pleanála in the case of appeal. In making decisions on planning applications, planning authorities and the Board must consider the proper planning and sustainable development of the area, having regard to the provisions of the local development plan, any submissions or observations received, as well as relevant Ministerial or Government policies, including any guidelines issued by my Department.

Under section 30 of the Planning and Development Act 2000, I am specifically precluded from exercising any power or control in relation to any particular case, with which a planning authority or An Bord Pleanála is or may be concerned.

Local Government Reform Expenditure

Questions (623, 625, 656)

Barry Cowen

Question:

623. Deputy Barry Cowen asked the Minister for the Environment, Community and Local Government the cost of restoring town councils; and if he will make a statement on the matter. [46091/15]

View answer

Barry Cowen

Question:

625. Deputy Barry Cowen asked the Minister for the Environment, Community and Local Government the annual savings from the abolition of town councils; and if he will make a statement on the matter. [46093/15]

View answer

Barry Cowen

Question:

656. Deputy Barry Cowen asked the Minister for the Environment, Community and Local Government to provide cost estimates for restoring all of the town and borough councils that were abolished. [46292/15]

View answer

Written answers

I propose to take Questions Nos. 623, 625 and 656 together.

The Government’s decision to replace town authorities with a new model of municipal governance was designed to strengthen local government within counties and to address widely acknowledged and long-standing weaknesses and anomalies in the previous system, including divided administration between town and county authorities, for example, in relation to matters such as planning, rating and charges.

Municipal districts now cover the entire territory of each county, removing outdated boundaries and ending the anomaly of small towns having municipal status and dual representation, while some larger centres and rural areas lacked any sub-county governance. As well as creating a more rational and comprehensive structural arrangement, the new system enables more effective and community-focused decision making. There is also a more appropriate assignment of reserved functions, full integration of local authority resources across each county and elimination of duplication both in administrative and electoral terms.

Regarding savings, it is important to recognise that 2015 is the first full year of the operation of the new structures. I initiated an operational review earlier this year in relation to the new arrangements to assess how they are impacting in relation to both non-financial and financial matters. In this regard, it is important to view the benefits not only in terms of expenditure reductions but also having regard to the broader objectives of local government reform such as strengthening the sector and seeking greater efficiency and more productive use of resources previously taken up with multiple corporate processes.

The operational review involves an Advisory Group, on which both elected members and local authority chief executives are represented, together with a Local Government Forum for engagement with the Association of Irish Local Government. To date, these groups have met on six occasions in total and the feedback thus far from these deliberations suggests that the revised structures are generally operating well but will need more time to bed down fully. Importantly, there has also been an acknowledgement that there would be no return to the structures in place prior to June 2014, a view which corresponds with my stated position that the re-introduction of the pre-reform configuration of town councils would not be the correct approach. Accordingly, costings of any restoration of such structures are not being undertaken.

Local Government Reform

Questions (624)

Barry Cowen

Question:

624. Deputy Barry Cowen asked the Minister for the Environment, Community and Local Government the cost of establishing a directly elected mayor for Dublin; and if he will make a statement on the matter. [46092/15]

View answer

Written answers

Pending the undertaking of the necessary analysis of the range of issues that would arise with such a proposal and the making of related decisions on the structures and functions of a directly elected mayor for Dublin, it is not possible to provide an estimate for the costs involved. It would, however, be prudent at this stage to assume that the costs would be significant and would not necessarily be offset by savings elsewhere in either local or central administration.

Question No. 625 answered with Question No. 623.

Irish Water Funding

Questions (626)

Barry Cowen

Question:

626. Deputy Barry Cowen asked the Minister for the Environment, Community and Local Government the cost of the abolition of Irish Water; and if he will make a statement on the matter. [46094/15]

View answer

Written answers

An Independent Assessment published in 2012 reviewed the strengths and weaknesses of the delivery of water services through 34 local authorities, and concluded that there was a fragmentation of leadership and co-ordination, difficulty in attaining economies of scale, difficulty in delivering projects of national importance and an aging and poor quality network. The report concluded that the best way of ensuring increasing efficiency and effectiveness of operations and capital investment and accessing new finances for the water sector, was to establish Irish Water as a public utility. Accordingly, no consideration is being given to the abolition of Irish Water, or the costs thereof.

Irish Water Funding

Questions (627)

Barry Cowen

Question:

627. Deputy Barry Cowen asked the Minister for the Environment, Community and Local Government the cost of the abolition of water charges; and if he will make a statement on the matter. [46095/15]

View answer

Written answers

The abolishment of water charges is not simply an issue of financing Irish Water on an annual basis. There are a number of funding, investment and legal issues which would have to be addressed.

Firstly, Article 9 of the Water Framework Directive requires member states to take account of the “polluter pays” principle. As part of the first round of River Basin Management Plans, the Government of the day indicated to the European Commission that this would be addressed through the introduction of water charges.

Secondly, the costings below, which outline the annual financial impact of abolition of water charges, do not take account of possible longer term effects outside of the period to 2016. The stream of income from domestic customers is a key tool in driving additional investment into the sector and underpins a utility model based on quality customer service and the regulated model delivering greater efficiencies. New revenue from domestic charges underpins the access to commercial borrowing for the sector.

Thirdly, charging for water based on usage leads to a reduction in overall demand for water over time with consequential impacts on required capital investment for capacity increases and operational costs.

If domestic water charges were abolished, Irish Water and the Group Water sector would require additional funding to substitute for the loss of revenue from domestic customers. The estimated additional revenue requirement in 2016 would be €210.5m, allowing for some reduced customer operation costs and working capital loans in the case of Irish Water, but not factoring in the costs, if any, of dismantling any relevant contracts.

Irish Water Expenditure

Questions (628)

Barry Cowen

Question:

628. Deputy Barry Cowen asked the Minister for the Environment, Community and Local Government the operational costs of Irish Water in 2014; the estimated final total operational cost in 2015, broken down by section, that is, wages, administration and so on; and if he will make a statement on the matter. [46096/15]

View answer

Written answers

Irish Water is a regulated utility and its operating and capital plans are reviewed by the Commission for Energy Regulation, which approves an “allowed revenue” for the regulatory period, i.e. Quarter 4 2014 to end 2016 – this represents the total costs (including depreciation and the return on capital employed) which Irish Water can recover from customer’s bills, taking account of Government subvention.

The annual average operational costs in the period 2015 and 2016 under the regulatory model are estimated at €750m. It might be noted that some costs, such as the first fix programme amounting to around €30m per annum are capitalised within the regulatory model, but are treated as operational costs under the relevant accounting rules. Details of Irish Water’s proposed costs are outlined in their revenue and water charges plan which was reviewed by the Commission for Energy Regulation (CER). Details of the review and the CER’s decision are available at www.cer.ie.

Information on Irish Water’s operational costs for 2014 are set out in its Financial Statements for 2014 which are available in the Oireachtas Library. In relation to any further breakdown of these costs, Irish Water has established a dedicated team to deal with representations and queries from public representatives. The team can be contacted via email to oireachtasmembers@water.ie or by telephone on a dedicated number, 1890 578 578.

Climate Change Policy

Questions (629, 652)

Barry Cowen

Question:

629. Deputy Barry Cowen asked the Minister for the Environment, Community and Local Government the next steps Ireland will take given the climate change agreement in Paris in France; and if he will make a statement on the matter. [46098/15]

View answer

Ruth Coppinger

Question:

652. Deputy Ruth Coppinger asked the Minister for the Environment, Community and Local Government his views on the climate change talks in Paris in France; his plans for a climate change plan in this State; and if he will make a statement on the matter. [46226/15]

View answer

Written answers

I propose to take Questions Nos. 629 and 652 together.

The overall outcome of the Paris Conference means that the long-term objective that Ireland has already established in its April 2014 National Policy Position, and that is now underpinned by the Climate Action and Low Carbon Development Act 2015, namely to pursue substantial decarbonisation of the energy, transport and built environment sectors as well as pursuing neutrality in the land sector, will now be undertaken within a broader international context.

This means that the more ambitious actions that will be required over time can be taken on the basis of shared experience and cooperation with other States and regions with the knowledge that all countries will be moving in the same direction, crucial for a small open economy like Ireland’s that competes in global markets.

The Climate Action and Low Carbon Development Act 2015 provides a statutory basis for the national objective of transition to a low-carbon, climate resilient and environmentally sustainable economy by the year 2050. In doing so, it also provides a solid statutory foundation to the institutional arrangements necessary to enable the State to pursue and achieve that national transition objective.

Among the key provisions of the Act are the preparation and adoption of:

- successive five-yearly National Mitigation Plans which will specify the policy measures to reduce greenhouse gas emissions in Ireland and meet our current and future emission reduction targets; and

- successive five-yearly National Adaptation Frameworks which will set out the national strategy for the coordinated application of adaptation measures in different sectors and by local authorities in order to adapt to the inevitable effects of climate change in Ireland.

The Act also provides for the establishment of a Climate Change Advisory Council to provide advice and recommendations to Ministers and the Government on climate matters. The Advisory Council has already been established on a non-statutory basis under the chairmanship of Professor John Fitzgerald, pending enactment of the legislation, and is already undertaking some preliminary assessments.

The preparation of the National Mitigation Plan is statutorily designed to be a whole-of-Government approach to tackling greenhouse gas emissions. In particular, each Minister with responsibility for the largest emitting sectors (namely, agriculture, transport, energy and the built environment) will be required by Government to develop sectoral mitigation measures for inclusion in the Plan.

Pursuant to the provisions of the Climate Action and Low Carbon Development Act 2015 the first National Mitigation Plan must now be produced within 18 months of the enactment date, and I expect that the first National Mitigation Plan will be produced well in advance of this deadline, for completion by the end of 2016.

Local Authority Members' Remuneration

Questions (630)

Barry Cowen

Question:

630. Deputy Barry Cowen asked the Minister for the Environment, Community and Local Government the cost of local authority members in 2015, by salaries and by expenses, in tabular form; and if he will make a statement on the matter. [46100/15]

View answer

Written answers

An estimate of the total cost to local authorities in respect of elected member representational payments and allowances for 2015 is set out in the following table. This estimate is based on the amounts for which provision is made under the Local Government (Expenses of Local Authority Members) Regulations 2014 and other associated regulations/circulars issued by my Department.

Payment Type

Estimated Cost for 2015

Representational Payment

€15.7 million

Annual Allowance

€5.9 million

Ad Hoc Payments

(Mobile phone, conference and training allowance)

€1.8 million

Chair Allowances and Members Gratuities

€4.3 million

Total

€27.7 million

Housing Adaptation Grant Funding

Questions (631, 632, 633, 634)

Barry Cowen

Question:

631. Deputy Barry Cowen asked the Minister for the Environment, Community and Local Government the cost of restoring housing adaptation grant expenditure to 2007, 2008, 2009 and 2010 levels, in tabular form; and if he will make a statement on the matter. [46101/15]

View answer

Barry Cowen

Question:

632. Deputy Barry Cowen asked the Minister for the Environment, Community and Local Government the cost of restoring housing aid expenditure to 2007, 2008, 2009 and 2010 levels, in tabular form; and if he will make a statement on the matter. [46102/15]

View answer

Barry Cowen

Question:

633. Deputy Barry Cowen asked the Minister for the Environment, Community and Local Government the cost of restoring housing adaptation grant for persons with a disability expenditure to 2007, 2008, 2009 and 2010 levels, in tabular form; and if he will make a statement on the matter. [46103/15]

View answer

Barry Cowen

Question:

634. Deputy Barry Cowen asked the Minister for the Environment, Community and Local Government the cost of restoring mobility aids grant scheme expenditure to 2007, 2008, 2009 and 2010 levels, in tabular form; and if he will make a statement on the matter. [46104/15]

View answer

Written answers

I propose to take Questions Nos. 631 to 634, inclusive, together.

My Department provides funding under the Housing Adaptation Grants for Older People and People with a Disability. There are three separate grants available and local authorities receive an overall allocation, with the responsibility for the apportionment between the three schemes being a matter for each authority.

Information on the exchequer funding provided by my Department to each local authority for these grants is available on my Department’s website at the following link: http://www.environ.ie/en/Publications/StatisticsandRegularPublications/HousingStatistics/, by selecting ‘Social and Affordable Housing’, ‘Housing Adaptation Grants by Area 2008 to date’. Information on the 2015 allocations is available on my Department’s website at the following link: http://www.environ.ie/en/GeneralNews/MainBody,41581,en.html.

The total funding allocation of €50.5m nationally for these grants that I announced in May 2015 represented an increase of some 10% over the 2014 funding. Funding provided for the grants in the years in question is set out in the table, along with the additional funding on top of the 2015 provision that would be required to restore funding to those levels.

Year

Funding Provided

Additional (to 2015 funding) to restore funding

2007 *

€ 59.44m

€ 8.94 m

2008

€ 66.85m

€ 16.35 m

2009

€ 70.61m

€ 20.11 m

2010

€ 95.46m

€ 44.96 m

The Housing Adaptation Grants for Older People and People with a Disability replaced the Disabled Persons and Essential Repairs Grants on 1 November 2007.

I am aware of the social benefit accruing from these schemes in terms of facilitating the continued independent occupancy of their own homes by older people and people with a disability and a further funding increase of 10% is proposed for the grants in 2016.

In addition, some changes were introduced to the grants in January 2014 following a review carried out in 2013. These changes are spreading the benefits of the grants more widely and improving fairness and value for money in their operation. This approach, combined with the additional funding being provided, will see over 8,500 households benefit from the grants in 2016.

Top
Share