Skip to main content
Normal View

Zero-hour Contracts

Dáil Éireann Debate, Wednesday - 27 January 2016

Wednesday, 27 January 2016

Questions (68)

Éamon Ó Cuív

Question:

68. Deputy Éamon Ó Cuív asked the Minister for Jobs, Enterprise and Innovation the status of zero-hour workers, including if workers can be held in this status for ten years; if State agencies employ such workers; if these workers should get permanent part-time status after ten years with pay scales, guaranteed hours, sick pay schemes, and so on; if they should have received cuts as part of public service cuts and how this would be justified with such workers’ current status; and if he will make a statement on the matter. [3390/16]

View answer

Written answers

The Statement of Government Priorities, July 2014 committed to conduct a study on the prevalence of zero hour contracts among Irish employers and their impact on employees and make policy recommendations to Government on foot of this. The University of Limerick was appointed in February 2015, following a competitive tendering process, to carry out a study into the prevalence of zero hour contracts and low hour contracts in the Irish economy and their impact on employees.

The study had a broad scope, covering both the public and private sectors, with a particular focus on the retail, hospitality, education and health sectors. The study, published in November, 2015, found that zero hour contracts as defined within current Irish employment rights legislation are not extensively used in Ireland. It found low working hours can arise in different forms in employment contracts, such as regular part-time contracts with fixed hours or a contract with “If and when” hours only or a hybrid of the two. If and when contracts are contracts where workers are not contractually required to make themselves available for work.

The UL report made a range of recommendations relating to contracts, hours of work and notice, minimum hours, how contracted hours should be determined, collective agreements, data gathering and wider contextual issues.

It is important to point out that the UL study was an independent study and the conclusions drawn and the recommendations made in it are those of UL. Therefore, it was essential that the various stakeholders who contributed to the study and indeed other interested parties who may not have had an opportunity to engage with UL, were given an opportunity to consider and respond to the report.

To this end, my Department sought submissions from interested parties by way of a Public Consultation. A large number of submissions were received by 4 January 2016, the closing date for receipt of such submissions. The responses contain a variety of views both for and against the findings and recommendations as made by UL, which will require careful consideration by my Department over the coming period. This will inform the policy response to be considered by Government arising from the study.

Finally, I am informed by my colleague, the Minister for Public Expenditure and Reform, that reductions in the remuneration payable to public servants, including those employed in State agencies, were effected under the terms of the Financial Emergency Measures in the Public Interest Acts.

Top
Share