Skip to main content
Normal View

Thursday, 28 Jan 2016

Written Answers Nos. 322-336

School Patronage

Questions (322)

Róisín Shortall

Question:

322. Deputy Róisín Shortall asked the Minister for Education and Skills if she accepts the results of the survey she carried out with the Forum on Patronage and Pluralism in 2012 which clearly demonstrates the parental demand for a multidenominational school in Dublin 6W and further details on the engagement with existing school patrons in the area; if she is aware that schools in the area have commenced offering places for September 2016 and parents are receiving rejection letters on religious grounds; the assurances she will provide to these parents that suitable school places will be provided for their children in time for the commencement of the new school year; and if she will make a statement on the matter. [3671/16]

View answer

Written answers

The Government is committed to ensure greater diversity of choice in school provision. Since 2013, 8 new primary schools have opened under the patronage divesting process. My officials are continuing to work intensively with the main stakeholders to ensure delivery of choice in the other identified areas for 2016 and beyond. I have stated previously that this process needs to be re-examined to better accommodate parental demand for diversity. To that end, I have undertaken a round of consultations with most of the principal patron bodies over the last number of weeks with the aim of reinvigorating the process.

Regarding the Dublin 6W area, my Department officials are engaged with existing school patrons regarding the possibility of school divestment which may impact on the Dublin 6W area. My officials are working closely with the current patrons on the practicalities of the property issues involved and work is well advanced in this regard.

Separately, I announced the establishment of 4 new primary schools and 9 new post-primary schools to open in 2017 and 2018, including a new primary school which will open in September 2018 to serve the Dublin South City Centre areas of Dublin 2, 4 and 6, which is adjacent to the Dublin 6W area and which will provide additional capacity. I also indicated that my Department will keep the demographic data under ongoing review taking into account updated enrolment data and the impact of ongoing and planned expansion of capacity.

In relation to the schools in the area having commenced offering places for September 2016, the selection and enrolment of pupils in schools is the responsibility of the authorities of the individual school. My Department's main responsibility is to ensure that schools in an area can, between them, cater for all pupils seeking school places in an area. As schools may not have a place for every applicant, a selection process may be necessary. This selection process and the enrolment policy on which it is based must be non-discriminatory and must be applied fairly in respect of all applicants.

My Department has no authority to compel a school to admit a pupil, except in the case of an appeal under section 29 of the Education Act, 1998 being upheld. Section 29 of the Education Act, 1998 provides for an appeal by a parent or guardian to the Secretary General of my Department, or in the case of an Education and Training Board (ETB) school to the ETB in the first instance, where a Board of Management of a school, or a person acting on behalf of the Board, refuses to enrol a student in a school, expels a student or suspends a student for 20 or more days in any school year.

The Educational Welfare Service of the Child and Family Agency (EWS) is the statutory agency which can assist parents who are experiencing difficulty in securing a school place for their child. The EWS may be able to offer assistance and advice on securing a school placement within the pupil's area. The contact details for the EWS is Educational Welfare Service of the Child and Family Agency, Floors 2-5 Brunel Building, Heuston South Quarter, Dublin 8 phone 01 7718500.

School Accommodation

Questions (323)

Willie Penrose

Question:

323. Deputy Willie Penrose asked the Minister for Education and Skills to ensure an emergency application for toileting facilities by a school (details supplied) in County Westmeath is immediately granted given that the occupational therapist has indicated that this is a priority-one issue and needs urgent attention and is essential for the safety of the students; and if she will make a statement on the matter. [3689/16]

View answer

Written answers

The school to which the Deputy refers recently submitted additional information relating to an application for funding for works at the school. This information is currently being examined and the school will be notified of the outcome as soon as a decision has been made.

Veterinary Qualifications

Questions (324)

Bernard Durkan

Question:

324. Deputy Bernard J. Durkan asked the Minister for Education and Skills to outline the procedures to be followed to enable a person (details supplied) to practise in this jurisdiction; if further studies are required; if the person is entitled to practise on foot of a current qualification or otherwise; and if she will make a statement on the matter. [3700/16]

View answer

Written answers

The Veterinary Council is the relevant Competent Authority in Ireland for Veterinary Surgeons and will be able to advise the person in question on the recognition of their professional qualifications and their ability to practice in the State. Further details are available from the Authority's website http://www.vci.ie/.

Labour Court Recommendations

Questions (325)

Michael McGrath

Question:

325. Deputy Michael McGrath asked the Minister for Education and Skills to outline the steps she is taking to ensure that the Labour Court Recommendation LCR20577 in respect of a Labour Court hearing on 29 May 2013, relating to the pay of four workers at University College Cork Tyndall Institute, is fully implemented; if she will provide an update on the issue; and if she will make a statement on the matter. [3727/16]

View answer

Written answers

As the Deputy will be aware, in the context of measures necessary to restore order to the public finances, Government pay policy has been consistent in its approach to the processing of cost-increasing pay claims. Accordingly, non-binding Labour Court Recommendations which will result in a pay increase, such as those referred to by the Deputy, are precluded from implementation. This was provided for in the Haddington Road Agreement and continues to be provided for in the Public Service Stability Agreement (Lansdowne Road) 2013-2018. Following lengthy discussions facilitated by the Labour Relations Commission (LRC) in August 2013 and February 2014, terms of reference were agreed for an internal job evaluation exercise to establish the correct rate of pay for the employees of all grades within the Tyndall National Institute. The terms of reference covered all staff in the Institute comprehended by the unions' parity claim, including those staff who were the subject of a previous Labour Court recommendation (LCR20577). The terms of reference provided for an Oversight Committee comprised of management and union representatives to monitor progress and prevent delays. An appeals process was also agreed between the parties which could be invoked following the conclusion of the evaluation exercise.

Pricewaterhouse Coopers (PwC) were appointed to conduct the exercise following a tender process. The selection was made by a joint panel made up of representatives of the employer and both unions.

It was also agreed that, following completion of the internal job evaluation exercise, the parties would engage in discussions to seek agreement on the implementation of PwC's recommendations and the outcome of the appeals process. In the event that agreement could not be reached the matter would be referred to the Labour Court and the parties would be bound by the outcome.

The PwC job evaluation report was presented to the parties in December 2014 and as part of the appeals process, an independent appeal officer has recently heard and reported on 10 appeals by Tyndall staff. The parties have also recently met under the auspices of the Workplace Relations Commission and are due to meet again on the 8th February 2016.

School Accommodation

Questions (326)

Charlie McConalogue

Question:

326. Deputy Charlie McConalogue asked the Minister for Education and Skills to set down the number of classes that are taught in prefabricated accommodation by county and the year in which prefabricated accommodation will be phased out. [3730/16]

View answer

Written answers

My Department does not hold information on the numbers of pupils in individual schools who currently occupy prefabs as this depends on the organisation of class groups by schools within available accommodation and may vary from year to year.

As the Deputy will appreciate, the overall policy goal of my Department is to ensure the highest standard of permanent accommodation for all schools. In the context of a rapidly increasing school population, my Department's priority is to ensure that every child will have access to a physical school place and in this regard, it is sometimes necessary to make use of temporary accommodation in order to meet the accommodation needs of schools.

However, under the Department's Prefab Replacement Initiatives, in recent years approval was given to 209 primary and 8 post primary schools nationally to replace their rented prefab accommodation (614 units) with permanent accommodation. In excess of €57m has been allocated for these initiatives of which €52.2m has been paid to date.

In addition to this, as I recently announced, it is my intention to replace all purchased prefabs with permanent accommodation over the lifetime of my Departments new six-year capital programme (2016-2021).

School Management

Questions (327)

Charlie McConalogue

Question:

327. Deputy Charlie McConalogue asked the Minister for Education and Skills if she will introduce a pilot programme to devolve to the annual capital budget to schools to allow them schools to plan for capital projects; and the reasons for not progressing this proposal further, as per the programme for Government. [3731/16]

View answer

Written answers

As the Deputy will be aware in more recent years there has been a greater devolution of autonomy for smaller scale projects to individual schools. The autonomy already given to schools to manage small scale capital works should be continued. However, it does not appear feasible to extend to schools autonomy over the management of large scale capital works. Given the limited budget available, the need to prioritise spending, the complexity of major multi-million capital projects, and the limited technical expertise of school boards and the need to adhere to public procurement guidelines, it is not clear whether school boards or principals would have the capacity to engage any further with planning and managing capital projects.

The option of giving schools a capital grant as suggested by the Deputy is not feasible. It would not allow capital spending to be targeted to those schools most in need of capital investment and, in effect, the Government would end up borrowing capital sums that would be held as funds on deposit in many schools where capital expenditure is not required.

English Language Training Organisations

Questions (328, 329)

Richard Boyd Barrett

Question:

328. Deputy Richard Boyd Barrett asked the Minister for Education and Skills to specify why English language schools with no external quality assurance system were allowed to be part of the interim list of education programmes; and if she will make a statement on the matter. [3750/16]

View answer

Richard Boyd Barrett

Question:

329. Deputy Richard Boyd Barrett asked the Minister for Education and Skills how allowing English language schools to have an unspecified quality assurance system or external validation furthers the stated Government policy of Ireland becoming a quality destination of choice for international students; and if she will make a statement on the matter. [3751/16]

View answer

Written answers

I propose to take Questions Nos. 328 and 329 together.

As the Deputy may be aware, the first full iteration of the ILEP (the Interim List of Eligible Programmes - the list of education programmes considered to justify the granting of permission to students to live and work in Ireland) was published by the Department of Justice and Equality on 20th January 2016.

In order to be listed on the ILEP, all English language providers have to comply with new requirements including full disclosure of ownership, and to demonstrate that they have reached an acceptable standard.

All English language providers who submitted an application for inclusion on the ILEP were assessed against a number of criteria including attendance rates, compulsory exam registration policies, maximum class size, curriculum content and teacher qualifications. A listing on the ILEP also requires providers to have mandatory protection for enrolled learner policies in place and to operate a separate account facility to safeguard student advance payments. A number of providers were also subject to an on-site inspection by inspection teams comprised of INIS (Irish Naturalisation and Immigration Service) officials and education experts as part of the ILEP application process.

For all providers their listing on the ILEP is contingent on their ongoing compliance with immigration rules and continuing to meet the other conditions required. Providers will continue to be subject to unannounced inspections, spot checks and other monitoring of compliance. The implementation of these reforms will help to improve the overall quality of Ireland's offering to international students, promote protection for learners and enhance Ireland's reputation, strongly in line with the goals of Ireland's international education strategy.

School Funding

Questions (330)

Lucinda Creighton

Question:

330. Deputy Lucinda Creighton asked the Minister for Education and Skills to set down in tabular form by county the funding received for primary schools and post-primary schools for additional accommodation, new buildings or new schools for each year since 2011. [3756/16]

View answer

Written answers

Total capital funding expended on a county basis in the primary and post-primary sectors from 2011 to 2015 are provided in the following table.

I would further advise the Deputy that information on the Large Scale Projects Programme, the Additional Accommodation Scheme, the Prefab Replacement Initiative, the Summer Works Scheme and the Emergency Works Scheme is available on my Department's Website.

County

2011

2012

2013

2014

2015

Carlow

€7,851,722

€9,236,218

€8,556,151

€7,745,688

€8,750,519

Cavan

€9,637,296

€8,805,051

€4,598,345

€7,340,508

€8,589,538

Clare

€4,768,766

€3,476,383

€8,965,676

€4,772,962

€4,022,866

Cork

€43,180,095

€33,082,812

€46,103,814

€55,129,277

€59,955,550

Donegal

€16,492,774

€11,576,361

€7,642,181

€6,788,241

€13,249,762

Dublin

€154,662,388

€109,058,345

€141,760,911

€186,492,018

€148,655,685

Galway

€23,864,949

€14,050,542

€26,705,915

€25,292,952

€42,320,599

Kerry

€13,161,467

€11,701,174

€5,036,738

€12,692,997

€19,924,299

Kildare

€57,077,216

€24,907,784

€15,604,674

€32,010,086

€25,802,089

Kilkenny

€6,607,897

€4,410,479

€10,990,557

€7,097,002

€8,869,558

Laois

€8,700,760

€6,309,361

€12,347,910

€3,176,236

€6,682,818

Leitrim

€1,968,343

€447,646

€1,405,262

€1,339,936

€1,662,818

Limerick

€21,167,503

€16,385,730

€13,755,589

€17,729,358

€14,158,977

Longford

€2,627,937

€1,213,458

€3,330,841

€4,895,857

€6,063,232

Louth

€20,490,346

€16,003,027

€12,285,573

€15,740,325

€25,345,106

Mayo

€9,701,652

€5,801,870

€6,271,087

€9,429,339

€9,045,046

Meath

€21,993,042

€19,922,823

€41,258,814

€24,072,252

€31,951,876

Monaghan

€6,600,930

€34,310,401

€3,288,818

€5,368,025

€8,088,547

Offaly

€12,535,612

€5,658,856

€3,547,400

€11,564,167

€12,975,821

Roscommon

€3,950,776

€1,894,500

€1,450,105

€2,413,621

€2,322,732

Sligo

€9,225,691

€11,645,356

€4,803,302

€2,910,402

€4,551,215

Tipperary

€15,103,060

€18,615,492

€10,555,075

€13,113,050

€13,793,015

Waterford

€15,297,540

€4,734,452

€11,777,616

€13,771,966

€13,502,010

Westmeath

€12,742,714

€10,115,409

€5,974,303

€7,837,918

€10,155,188

Wexford

€16,304,484

€11,448,403

€8,803,577

€11,724,895

€19,298,294

Wicklow

€14,155,430

€5,415,803

€12,019,396

€14,235,093

€35,869,469

Consultancy Contracts Data

Questions (331)

Lucinda Creighton

Question:

331. Deputy Lucinda Creighton asked the Minister for Education and Skills to set down the name, costs, date of commission, date or expected date of publication and name of the external consultant of all external reports commissioned by her Department since March 2011. [3765/16]

View answer

Written answers

Details of all consultancy payments by the Department for 2011, 2012, 2013 and 2014 are available on my Department's website at http://www.education.ie/en/Publications/Corporate-Reports/Financial-Reports/Expenditure-on-Consultancy. Details for the year 2015 are currently being collated and will be published as soon as available.

Public Inquiries

Questions (332)

Lucinda Creighton

Question:

332. Deputy Lucinda Creighton asked the Minister for Education and Skills to set down in tabular form the number of tribunals of inquiry, commissions of inquiry or investigations for which she or her Department have been responsible, by name, by terms of reference, by cost, including the cost to date where an inquiry has not been concluded and by date, including the projected date of conclusion where an inquiry has not been concluded from 1991 to date; and if she will make a statement on the matter. [3780/16]

View answer

Written answers

Details of statutory inquiries for which my Department has been responsible since 1991 are included in the following table. In the time available, it was not possible to include full details to cover the Deputy's question for the time period in question. I will arrange to forward the outstanding information to the Deputy as soon as possible.

Name

Terms of Reference

Cost

Completion Date

Commission to Inquire into Child Abuse

The Terms of Reference are set out in the Commission to Inquire into Child Abuse Act, 2000, as amended by the Commission to Inquire into Child Abuse (Amendment) Act, 2005.  The main functions were to listen to those who suffered abuse as children in institutions, to inquire into abuse of children in institutions and to report and made recommendations.

€79,936,615.60 from Exchequer funds to date

The Commission is expected to conclude its work in 2016. 

Statutory Inspection of companies providing services to Waterford Institute of Technology.

The terms of reference of the statutory inquiry, pursuant to Section 20 of the Institutes of Technology Acts, 1992-2006, were:

(a) to inquire into the following matters and their possible impact on the governance, operations and financial position of Waterford Institute of Technology (WIT):

(i) the relationship, including the financial relationship, between the Institute and the range of companies providing campus services in WIT;

(ii) the financial position of these companies including the nature and extent of their assets and liabilities as they relate to operations in WIT;

(iii) utilisation of resources of the companies including the extent to which they were applied for the purposes of the Institute;

(iv) options for addressing changes that may be considered desirable in the relationship between the Institute and the companies in line with best practice;

(v) any and all other matters which the Inspector considers to be necessary or expedient to the carrying out of the terms of reference at paragraphs (i) to (iv) above.

and (b) to provide an interim report to the Minister within one month and a final report as soon as possible thereafter on his inquires and in that report to make such findings and recommendations as he considers appropriate.

€1316.46

June 2013

Statutory Inspection into certain matters relating to the operation and management of Tralee Institute of Technology

The terms of reference of the statutory inquiry, pursuant to Section 20 of the Regional Technical Colleges Act (1992) were:

(a) to inquire into the following matters, in respect of the Institute of Technology, Tralee:-

(i) the working relationship between the Governing Body and the Director;

(ii) how the respective roles of Governing Body, Chairman of the Governing Body and Director are being carried out and whether the manner in which the roles are carried out is consistent with effective management and operation of the Institute;

(iii) the implementation by the Institute and the Governing Body of directions and guidelines on the operation of the Institute, issued by me or my Department, with particular regard to directions and guidelines relating to staff appointments and courses of study;

(iv) any and all other matters which the Inspector considers to be necessary or expedient to the carrying out of the terms of reference at paragraphs (i) to (iii) and which relate to the efficiency of instruction given in the Institute or the efficient operation of the institute.

and

(b) to report to me on his inquires and in that report to make such findings and recommendations as he considers appropriate

Not Available

March 2001

Statutory Inspection – Letterkenny Regional Technical College

The terms of reference of the statutory inquiry, pursuant to Section 20 of the Regional Technical Colleges Act (1992) were:

(i) the manner in which the College and the Governing Body implement the instructions and guidelines on the operation of the College issued by me or by my Department, particularly in the areas of staff appointments and courses;

(ii) whether the respective roles of the Chairman of the Governing Body and Director are being carried out in a manner consistent with the letter and spirit of the Regional Technical Colleges Act, 1992;

(iii) the effectiveness of financial controls set by the Department and their implementation in the College;

(iv) the disbursement of monies by the College and in particular, of monies received from students as capitation sums;

(v) the current difficulties being experienced in the working relationships between the Governing Body and the Officers of the Students’ Union, I so far as these difficulties affect the operation and good management of the College;

(vi) the selection procedures for student representatives on the Governing Body;

(vii) any and all other matters which the Inspector in the course of her enquiries considers to be relevant to the satisfactory completion of her inspection and report and which relate to the efficiency of instruction given in the College or to the efficient operation of the College. 

Not available.

July 1994

Ministerial Allowances

Questions (333)

Michael McGrath

Question:

333. Deputy Michael McGrath asked the Minister for Education and Skills to set down in tabular form by calendar year the expenses claimed, including the amount of mileage and the amount claimed, by her and Ministers of State at her Department, during the current Dáil Éireann. [3808/16]

View answer

Written answers

The information requested by the Deputy is contained in the following tabular statements.

Minister's Office

2011

2012

2013

2014

2015

Total

Former Minister Ruairi Quinn

Mileage

KM’S

26850

35681

55999

32269

Amount Paid

€9,611.88

€12,125.18

€17,907.68

€11,154.12

Tolls

€910.03

€403.51

€389.75

Phone Bills

Mobile

€426.67

€604.13

€1,674.07

€1,489.28

Constituency Office

€0.00

€492.00

€455.43

Home Travel

Subsistence

203.61

Taxi

24.3

Train

68.5

Insurance

187.5

Foreign Travel

Total Subsistence Costs

€1,340.37

€617.91

1,766.29

0

Incidental/Misc Expenses including Medical, IT & Business Centre costs

€39.98

0

0

0

Overall Costs

 €    1,380.35

€617.91

€1,766.29

0

Credit Card

Minister Ruairi Quinn

319.14

1234.13

2847.1

294.99

Overall Costs

€13,131.98

€14,581.35

€25,090.65

€13,783.57

€66,587.55

-

Ministers Office

2011

2012

2013

2014

2015

Total

Minister Jan 0’Sullivan

Mileage

KM’S

18010

35966

Amount Paid

€5,125.65

€12,206.30

Tolls

€200

€360

Phone Bills

Mobile

€123.50

€529.24

Constituency Office

€722.78

€3,074.83

Home Travel

Subsistence

€409.57

Foreign Travel

Total Subsistence Costs

€554.75

€1,170.96

Incidental/Misc Expenses including Medical, IT & Business Centre costs

0

0

Overall Costs

€554.75

€1,170.96

Credit Card

Minister Jan O'Sullivan

Overall Costs

€7,836.18

€20,447.46

€28,283,64

-

Minister of State's office

2011

2012

2013

2014

2015

Former Minister of State Ciarán Cannon

Mileage

KM's

50,434

57,057

56,784

36,930

Amount Paid

16,323.87

18,208.78

18,131.09

12,480.64

Phone Bills

Mobile

375.24

902.38

692.39

194.43

Constituency Offices

*2,617.51

2,842.25

1,695.62

Foreign Travel

Total Subsistence Costs

1,075.35

1,021.12

923.92

940.71

Incidental/Misc Expenses including Medical, IT & Business Centre costs

32.45

160.00

9.84

0

Overall Costs

17,806.91

22,909.79

22,599.49

15,311.40

* 2011 and 2012 constituency office phone bills paid in 2012

-

Minister of State Damien English

2011

2012

2013

2014

2015

Mileage

KM's

25,549

55,880

Amount Paid

9,241.61

17,873.80

Phone Bills

Mobile

838.43

1,670.13

Foreign Travel

Total Subsistence Costs

73.55

Incidental/Misc Expenses including Medical, IT & Business centre costs

172.5

Overall Costs

10,326.09

19,543.93

Departmental Expenditure

Questions (334)

Michael McGrath

Question:

334. Deputy Michael McGrath asked the Minister for Education and Skills to set down the amount she spent on media clipping and media monitoring services in each calendar year from 2011 to 2015; and if she will make a statement on the matter. [3823/16]

View answer

Written answers

The information requested by the Deputy is contained in the following tabular statement. The following tabular statement outlines the expenditure of the Department of Education and Skills on media monitoring services from 2011 to 2015.

YEAR

AMOUNT

2015

€25,864.44

2014

€24,280.20

2013

€28,617.42

2012

€46,804.15

2011

€42,668.23

Student Grant Scheme Appeals

Questions (335)

Bernard Durkan

Question:

335. Deputy Bernard J. Durkan asked the Minister for Education and Skills if the case of a person (details supplied) in Dublin 6 in respect of grant repayment requirement might be reviewed given the likelihood of severe hardship. [3858/16]

View answer

Written answers

The student referred to by the Deputy was awarded the 100% adjacent rate of Maintenance Grant for the 2012/13 academic year.

Subsequent to a review, it was determined that the student was in receipt of Back to Education Allowance during the 2012/13 academic year and therefore not eligible to receive a maintenance grant. SUSI has sought to recover the amount of €1,215, this being the total amount of maintenance paid.

Any overpayment of a grant is required to be repaid by the student in accordance with the Student Support Act 2011 and the Student Grant Scheme. SUSI implements a repayment policy under which students are asked to agree a repayment plan that is appropriate to their circumstances. SUSI deals with such repayments carefully and sensitively having regard to the ability of students to make repayments.

Departmental Funding

Questions (336)

Fergus O'Dowd

Question:

336. Deputy Fergus O'Dowd asked the Minister for the Environment, Community and Local Government to set out by project and initiative, by completion date and by cost the funding he allocated and the funding spent on capital projects and other initiatives in the constituency of Louth for the past five years; and if he will make a statement on the matter. [3560/16]

View answer

Written answers

My Department has a wide and diverse business agenda, including providing necessary housing supports, fostering community and rural development in partnership with local government and other local development bodies, and protecting the environment. In order to deliver on this broad business agenda, my Department allocates significant resources to a wide range of organisations, including local authorities, dedicated agencies and non-statutory bodies, as well as to individuals. The information requested on the funding allocated and expended on capital projects and other initiatives is not readily available in my Department; such information is not routinely collated on the basis of constituency boundaries. The compilation of this information would involve a disproportionate amount of time and work. If a more specific question is tabled relating to a particular area of funding from my Department, I will endeavour to provide the information sought.

Top
Share