Skip to main content
Normal View

Corporation Tax

Dáil Éireann Debate, Thursday - 28 April 2016

Thursday, 28 April 2016

Questions (23)

Seán Fleming

Question:

23. Deputy Sean Fleming asked the Minister for Finance why there is a professional service surcharge effective rate of approximately 7% on top of the corporation tax rate of 12.5% in relation to businesses which are exporting such professional services when, at the same time, IDA Ireland is selling Ireland as an area where the maximum corporation tax rate is 12.5% given that some companies coming in under this belief are now discovering that they are caught for the additional surcharge and given that section 441 of the Taxes Consolidation Act defines what is covered by this, but some firms which are working in this area earn large amounts of their income from activities carried out in other areas by field workers on the ground who do not necessarily have professional qualifications, yet the companies' income can be surcharged additionally on this matter, and in this situation we are referring to internationally traded services companies, where they deliver their professional services abroad; and if he will make a statement on the matter. [8706/16]

View answer

Written answers

Broadly speaking, a close company is a company under the control of 5 or fewer participators (including their associates), or of participators who are directors.  The vast majority of companies registered for corporation tax in Ireland are "close companies". 

There are specific rules in Irish tax law that are applicable to close companies.  These rules are designed to ensure that persons who conduct certain activities and transactions through corporate structures do not receive an unfair tax advantage over persons who conduct similar activities and transactions without incorporating. The provisions seek to level the playing field between corporation tax, on the one hand, and personal income tax (where rates are generally higher) on the other. The close company surcharge of 20% applies in respect of investment income earned by a company, such as interest, dividend or rental income, which is not distributed to the company shareholders within 18 months of the company's year-end.  The surcharge does not apply to the retained trading income of a close company. With investment and rental income of a company subject to tax at a 25% rate, there would be a strong incentive in the absence of a surcharge for persons to accumulate and retain such income within a company and thereby avoid marginal rate income tax and USC. 

With regard to service companies (i.e. those that are engaged in professional services) that are close companies, the surcharge is extended to include a surcharge of 15% on 50% of trading profits which are not distributed within 18 months of the end of the accounting period.  The activities of service companies are those that are typically carried on by an individual or partnership. Tax legislation does not define profession so it is given its ordinary meaning, taking into account relevant case law. 

The service company surcharge was introduced in order to counteract an abuse whereby these activities were diverted to a company, being a company controlled by individuals who are actually providing the relevant services, and the income is withheld from distribution.  In the absence of the service company surcharge, the profits would be taxed at the corporation tax rate and, if not distributed, would avoid the higher personal income tax charge.  This would result in a loss of tax revenue and would give an unfair tax advantage to persons who structure their affairs through corporations.  As the surcharge only applies to 50% of undistributed trading income, provision is made for retention and re-investment of profits within professional services companies.

Non-resident companies are not within the close company provisions. 

Top
Share