Skip to main content
Normal View

Wednesday, 5 Oct 2016

Written Answers Nos. 76-84

Refugee Data

Questions (76)

Pat Casey

Question:

76. Deputy Pat Casey asked the Tánaiste and Minister for Justice and Equality regarding the Government's commitment to provide asylum for 4,000 refugees in view of the crisis in Syria, in particular the appalling conditions in the refugee camp in Calais where there are 1,022 documented and unaccompanied minors and the imminent demolition of this camp due to take place on 31 October 2016, if a number of these children will be accommodated by the Irish State; and if she will make a statement on the matter. [28819/16]

View answer

Written answers

I am aware of the recent announcement that France plan to close the unofficial migrant camp at Calais by the end of this year and that this is being done to protect the security of the people of Calais, to maintain public order and to ensure dignified conditions for the migrants and refugees currently living in the Calais camp, including unaccompanied minors.

The ongoing migration crisis is a serious and extremely complex challenge facing the EU with numerous pressure points and it is important that there be a coherent and coordinated response. Persons who are currently in another EU Member State, including those in the camps in Calais, and who are in need of international protection, are entitled to make an application for asylum in that country, should they wish to do so. We also need to bear in mind that a defining characteristic of the people in Calais, including unaccompanied minors, has been their very strong desire to go to the UK as their ultimate destination and that this is unlikely to change. In that respect I do not see that a unilateral initiative from Ireland would be appropriate in this case, not least given the fact that this is a delicate situation involving the borders between two other Member States.

The Irish Refugee Protection Programme (IRPP) was established by Government Decision on 10 September 2015 as a direct response to the humanitarian crisis that developed in Southern Europe as a consequence of mass migration from areas of conflict in the Middle East and Africa. Under the programme, the Government has pledged to accept a total of 4,000 persons overall under the EU Relocation and Resettlement programmes. In announcing the IRPP, the Government recognised the importance of prioritising family groups and in addressing the position of unaccompanied children. A significant number of those who have arrived to date are children with one or two parents. With regard to unaccompanied minors Ireland has formally indicated to Greece its desire to accept unaccompanied minors under the relocation mechanism and we now have a commitment from the Greek authorities that Ireland will be receiving the first group of unaccompanied minors later this year. Tusla - the Child and Family Agency with responsibility for the care of unaccompanied minors in the State - will travel to Greece to assess the needs of those minors and plan for their care and accommodation upon arrival.

I share the Deputy's concerns in relation to unaccompanied minors as an especially vulnerable group and I expect this issue to remain high on the agenda at EU level.

Garda Communications

Questions (77)

Pearse Doherty

Question:

77. Deputy Pearse Doherty asked the Tánaiste and Minister for Justice and Equality the reason no response has issued to a letter sent to her (details supplied) concerning a criminal investigation; and if she will make a statement on the matter. [28821/16]

View answer

Written answers

As the Deputy will be aware I have acknowledged receipt of the representation from him on behalf of the person referred to in his Question. In view of the matter raised, it was necessary to seek information from the Garda Commissioner in order to be in a position to respond appropriately. I will respond to the Deputy following the receipt of the relevant information from the Commissioner.

The following deferred reply was received under Standing Order 42A

I refer to my reply to your Parliamentary Question No. 77 of 5 October 2016.

I understand that the allegations which are the subject of your representations on behalf of the person concerned have now been referred to in the course of his legal proceedings.

Accordingly, as these proceedings are ongoing, it would not be appropriate for me to comment further in the matter.

Irish Naturalisation and Immigration Service Administration

Questions (78)

Bernard Durkan

Question:

78. Deputy Bernard J. Durkan asked the Tánaiste and Minister for Justice and Equality the status of eligibility for stamp 4 in the case of a person (details supplied); and if she will make a statement on the matter. [28838/16]

View answer

Written answers

I have been informed by the Irish Naturalisation and Immigration Service (INIS) of my Department that the person concerned arrived in the State on 10 August 2000. They were in possession of a Work Permit (Stamp 1) almost continuously until 31 December 2010. The person concerned did not register again until 6 September 2015 when they were issued permission under the Reactivation of Work Permit Scheme. They were issued with a new work permit and are currently in permission, on a Stamp 1, until 29 November 2016.

If the person concerned wishes to apply for Long Term Residence, they should make an application to Unit 3 - Residence Division, INIS, Department of Justice and Equality, 13-14 Burgh Quay, Dublin 2, and their application will be considered by that section.

Queries in relation to the Status of individual immigration cases may be made directly to INIS by e-mail using the Oireachtas Mail facility which has been established for this purpose. This service enables up to date information on such cases to be obtained without the need to seek information by way of Parliamentary Question process. The Deputy may consider using the e-mail service except in cases where the response from INIS is, in the Deputy's view, inadequate or too long awaited.

Family Reunification Policy

Questions (79)

Clare Daly

Question:

79. Deputy Clare Daly asked the Tánaiste and Minister for Justice and Equality the annual refusal rates for take charge family reunification applications under the Dublin III regulation to date in 2016 and in each of the years since it was introduced; and the annual refusal rates for family reunification applications lodged by Syrians to date in 2016 and in each of the years since the regulation was introduced. [28843/16]

View answer

Written answers

The Dublin III Regulation (EU) No. 604/2013) came into effect on 1st January 2014 replacing the earlier Dublin II Regulation. While family reasons are provided for under certain articles of the Dublin Regulation, its primary purpose is not family reunification which my Department deals with under separate legislation such as the Refugee Act 1996. The Dublin Regulation determines the country responsible for examining an application for international protection. This is usually the country where the asylum application is first made. The Regulation operates on a country to country basis and an applicant for international protection may not choose a destination country in which to have his/her application processed save in accordance with the criteria in the Regulation.

Requests to join applicants together for family reasons may be made under the Dublin Regulation provided that the circumstances of the case meet the criteria laid down in the particular articles viz. Articles 8, 9, 10 and 11. In 2014 there were 11 such requests made to Ireland from other Member States in 2014, one of which related to a Syrian national. Of these, 4 were accepted including the Syrian national and 7 were rejected as they did not meet the Dublin criteria. In addition, Articles 16.1 and 17.2 may be invoked for dependency reasons, the former for care reasons while the latter is a more general discretionary provision whereby family members may be brought together on humanitarian grounds, even if a State is not responsible under the normal determining criteria of the Regulation. There were 2 such requests made to Ireland from other Member States in 2014, both of which were accepted under Article 16.1 and neither of which involved Syrian nationals.

The comparable figures for 2015 were that there were 5 requests to join applicants together for family reasons made to Ireland from other Member States in 2015 - none of which were Syrian. All 5 were accepted. In respect of Articles 16.1 and 17.2 cases there was one such request made to Ireland from another Member State in 2015 - which was rejected and was not a Syrian national.

In respect of 2016 (1st January to 30th September) there were 8 requests to join applicants together for family reasons made to Ireland from other Member States none of which involved Syrian nationals, and all of which are still under consideration pending further information. In respect of Articles 16.1 and 17.2 cases there were 4 such requests made to Ireland from other Member States in the same period, 3 of which involved Syrian nationals which were declined and 1 other case is still under consideration.

Family Reunification Data

Questions (80)

Clare Daly

Question:

80. Deputy Clare Daly asked the Tánaiste and Minister for Justice and Equality the annual refusal rates for family reunification applications under section 18 of the Refugee Act 1996 to date in 2016 and in each of the years since it was introduced; and the annual refusal rates for family reunification applications lodged by Syrians to date in 2016 and in each of the years since the Refugee Act was enacted. [28844/16]

View answer

Written answers

I am informed by the Irish Naturalisation and Immigration Service (INIS) of my Department that each application under Family Reunification under Section 18 of the Refugee Act is investigated by the Office of the Refugee Application Commissioner. In general, reasons for refusing a family reunification application include failure to establish identity, failure to establish a family link between the refugee and the person applied for, and polygamous marriage arrangements.

The information requested by the Deputy is set out in the table for the period 2012 to date. Data prior to 2012 is not readily available and would take a disproportionate amount of staff resource time to compile diverting them away from case processing.

Year

Number of applications processed

Overall number of Refusals

Refusals for Syrian applicants

2012

793

365

1

2013

574

310

15

2014

287

69

7

2015

531

186

24

2016 (to end Sept.)

332

103

16

Prison Service

Questions (81)

Catherine Murphy

Question:

81. Deputy Catherine Murphy asked the Tánaiste and Minister for Justice and Equality the prisoner population and the number of staff employed within Mountjoy prison; the number of staff on maternity leave or sick leave; the provisions in place for such leave absences of staff; and if she will make a statement on the matter. [28852/16]

View answer

Written answers

I am advised that the prisoner population, attendance and staff assigned can change on a daily basis. For the purposes of the information provided in this reply the data used is correct as of the 4 October 2016.

Number in custody in Mountjoy prison

477

Number of staff operating in Mountjoy prison

474.5

The number of staff on maternity leave

3

The number of staff rostered for duty and availing of certified sick leave

24

Prison management are responsible for the efficient and effective deployment of resources on any given day to maintain good order, safe and secure custody, whilst maintaining, as far as is reasonably practicable, access to structured activities for prisoners.

Prison Staff

Questions (82)

Catherine Murphy

Question:

82. Deputy Catherine Murphy asked the Tánaiste and Minister for Justice and Equality the optimum staff to prisoner ratio; the current ratio; and if she will make a statement on the matter. [28853/16]

View answer

Written answers

The total number of prisoners in custody in the Irish Prison Service on 30 September 2016 was 3643. The total number of prison grade staff in prisons on the same date was 2772.5 (whole time equivalents). This equated to a ratio that day between staff in prisons and prisoners of 0.76:1.

From an operational perspective, staffing is based on the security and operational needs of the individual prison. The number of staff required is influenced by the numbers in custody, category of prisoner and regimes and a range of factors, including the risks and needs associated with specific areas and particular offenders.

Legal Services Regulation

Questions (83)

Catherine Murphy

Question:

83. Deputy Catherine Murphy asked the Tánaiste and Minister for Justice and Equality in view of the fact that the Legal Services Regulation Act 2015 was signed into law in December 2015 but to date, no commencement order regarding sections 149 to 161, inclusive, dealing with the regulation of legal costs has been effected and in view of the fact that the regulation of legal costs was one of the International Monetary Fund’s main areas of concern eight years ago, the reason she has not yet implemented sections 149 to 161, inclusive; and if she will make a statement on the matter. [28854/16]

View answer

Written answers

As I have previously outlined before the House, the Legal Services Regulation Act 2015 makes extensive provision in Part 10 for a new and enhanced legal costs regime that will bring greater transparency to how legal costs are charged along with a better balance between the interests of legal practitioners and those of their clients in this area. Part 10 of the Act is divided into five Chapters of which Chapter 3, consisting of sections 149 to 153, deals with the duties of legal practitioners in relation to legal costs. The remaining Chapters of this Part, including sections 154 to 161, deal with other aspects of the new legal costs regime including the new Office of the Legal Costs Adjudicators that will take over the work currently carried out by the Office of the Taxing-Master along with the way in which the new legal costs adjudication process will operate. There is no impediment to these provisions being commenced other than that of ensuring, through detailed planning and sequencing, that the relevant legal and administrative arrangements are properly in place within the Courts system and under the new legislative measures. It should be noted that the Legal Costs Adjudicators will, like the present Taxing-Masters, be officers of the Court. The Deputy will appreciate, therefore, that a significant transformation of the existing taxation of costs system is provided for in Part 10 of the Act and that this cannot be done overnight and must be managed carefully - including in terms of having the relevant personnel and expertise in place and given the fundamental legal procedures involved.

On 19 July, under S.I. No. 383, I commenced those provisions of Part 1 and Part 2 of the Legal Services Regulation Act as necessary to get the new Authority up and running, particularly in terms of its membership and appointment. Just last week, on 29 September, I signed the Order appointing 1 October 2016 as the official “establishment day” of the new Legal Services Regulatory Authority as provided under section 7 of the Legal Services Regulation Act. Following on from the setting of establishment day, it is intended that the phased commencement of the remaining Parts of the 2015 Act will be implemented over the remainder of this year - with some carry-over anticipated into early 2017 in relation to major undertakings such as the start-up of the Authority’s critical public complaints function. The current implementation period will, therefore, include the phased commencement of Parts of the 2015 Act such as those dealing with legal costs, the new Office of the Legal Costs Adjudicator, the Roll of Practising Barristers and Pre-Action Protocols. Following this, the key provisions centred around Part 6 of the Act dealing with the new public complaints and professional conduct and disciplinary procedures, and the appointment of the new Legal Practitioners Disciplinary Tribunal, will be commenced. The various legal costs provisions and Chapters of Part 10 of the 2015 Act are very much interlinked and will, therefore, be key to the overall success of the phased commencement of the Act over the coming period.

Immigration Controls

Questions (84)

Fiona O'Loughlin

Question:

84. Deputy Fiona O'Loughlin asked the Tánaiste and Minister for Justice and Equality the reason for the delay in processing an application (details supplied) made for a visa under the de facto partnership scheme; and if she will make a statement on the matter. [28861/16]

View answer

Written answers

I am informed by the Irish Naturalisation and Immigration Service (INIS) of my Department that the person concerned made an application for De Facto Partner Permission. It was received on 04/08/2016 and was acknowledged by letter to the applicant on 09/08/2016. The Deputy may wish to note that applications of this type can take up to 6 months to be processed and that INIS is currently dealing with applications received in April, 2016.

Queries in relation to the status of individual immigration cases may be made directly to INIS by email using the Oireachtas Mail facility which has been specifically established for this purpose. This service enables up to date information on such cases to be obtained without the need to seek information by way of the Parliamentary Questions process. The Deputy may consider using the email service except in cases where the response from INIS is, in the Deputy's view, inadequate or too long awaited.

Top
Share