Skip to main content
Normal View

Thursday, 1 Dec 2016

Written Answers Nos. 65-77

Public Private Partnerships Data

Questions (66)

Louise O'Reilly

Question:

66. Deputy Louise O'Reilly asked the Minister for Health the level of private finance initiative, PFI, or public private partnership, PPP, that currently exists in the health system; the details of any hospitals, primary care centres or other infrastructure and capital that is currently financed under PFI or PPP; the details of all such contracts; the annual PFI and PPP charges on each of these and in total, including the unitary charges, the availability fees and the service charges; and if he will make a statement on the matter. [37853/16]

View answer

Written answers

Currently, the first Health public private partnership (PPP) project is underway. Primary care centres will be delivered at the following 14 locations - Summerhill, north inner city Dublin; Coolock/Darndale, north city Dublin; Kilcock; Wexford town; Waterford city; Dungarvan; Carrick-on-Suir; Limerick city; Tuam; Ballinrobe; Claremorris; Westport; Boyle and Ballymote. Assuming progress is maintained, primary care centres at six locations are projected to open Q3/Q4 2017. These are Limerick city; Tuam; Ballinrobe; Claremorris; Boyle and Ballymote.

This project is being delivered using the Design, Build, Finance, and Maintain (DBFM) model. The contract period is 25 years. The PPP company will deliver the 14 primary care centres and will be responsible for providing facilities management services only. The HSE will pay the PPP company a total annual unitary charge payment of circa €17m, in monthly instalments. All costs, including the design, build, finance and maintenance (DBFM) costs as required in the contract, are included in this annual unitary charge. At the end of the 25 year contract, the centres will be handed over to the HSE who will become responsible for the facility management services provided by the PPP company.

A next phase of the State's PPP programme, which includes a Health PPP, was announced in 2015. Recently, the HSE submitted its initial report on project suitability which is being considered by the Department.

Hospital Waiting Lists

Questions (67)

Eugene Murphy

Question:

67. Deputy Eugene Murphy asked the Minister for Health the reason for the 350% increase in inpatient and day case waiting lists in Roscommon hospital since April 2014, which significantly ahead of the national average increase of 57%. [38025/16]

View answer

Written answers

This Government is committed to improving waiting times for patients. While recognising that demand for hospital inpatient and day case activity nationally has increased by 4% year on year to end October, the important issue for patients is how long they wait.

Under the HSE Service Plan 2016 targets, 95% of people should be waiting less than 15 months for their inpatient or day case appointment. The latest NTPF inpatient-day case waiting list figures indicate that the total number of people on that list for Roscommon Hospital is 1,939 and that the hospital is meeting the 15 month target in respect of 98% of people. Based on the HSE Performance Reports, inpatient discharges have increased by 5% since the end of 2013 at the hospital.

In August, I asked the HSE to develop a Waiting List Action Plan for 2016 to reduce by year end the number of patients waiting over 18 months on the inpatient-day case waiting list. Since then, approximately 6,500 patients have been removed from the waiting list. Additional funding of €11.25m has been allocated under the Winter Initiative in order to support patient treatment under this Action Plan.

Budget 2017 provides for the treatment of our longest-waiting patients. €20m is being allocated to the NTPF in 2017, rising to €55m in 2018. Planning of these initiatives is currently being finalised. I will shortly be asking the HSE to develop a Waiting List Action Plan for 2017 working collaboratively with the NTPF to address inpatient, day case and outpatient waiting times.

Primary Care Services Provision

Questions (68)

James Browne

Question:

68. Deputy James Browne asked the Minister for Health the way it is proposed to address the growing demand for counselling in primary care services; and if he will make a statement on the matter. [38016/16]

View answer

Written answers

As this is a service issue, this question has been referred to the HSE for direct reply.

Special Educational Needs Service Provision

Questions (69)

Gino Kenny

Question:

69. Deputy Gino Kenny asked the Minister for Health if he will expedite special education assessments, in the view of the National Disability Authority and the Disability Act 2005, due to the failure to commence sections of the Education for Persons with Special Educational Needs Act 2004; the action he is taking in his dealings with the Department of Education and Skills and others to address this; and if he will make a statement on the matter. [37967/16]

View answer

Written answers

Policy responsibility for special education and for the EPSEN Act resides with my colleague the Minister for Education and Skills. My Department works closely with that Department and the Department of Children and Youth Affairs on a range of issues relating to children with a disability via a Cross-Sectoral team, which meets regularly.

I am informed by the Minister for Education that a number of sections of the Education for Persons with Special Educational Needs (EPSEN) Act 2004 have been commenced, including those establishing the National Council for Special Education (NCSE) and those promoting an inclusive approach to the education of children. The remaining sections of the Act have yet to be commenced. Legal advice provided to the Department of Education and Skills indicates that the EPSEN Act, as it is currently constituted, may not be implemented on a phased, or age cohort, basis.

While awaiting the full implementation of the EPSEN Act, the NCSE has published a number of policy advice papers which make recommendations aimed at developing a better or more effective alternative to the current resource allocation model, and which aims to move the system towards ultimate implementation of the EPSEN Act.

The NCSE identified that the current model for allocating resource teachers to schools is potentially inequitable, because access to the range of professional assessments required for the diagnosis of low incident disabilities is not always readily available to those who cannot afford to access them privately. The NCSE has also advised that the current model can lead to unnecessary labelling of children from a young age.

The NCSE has proposed a new resource teaching allocation model which will, when introduced, remove the formal requirement for diagnostic assessment to access additional support and which will provide resources to schools based on school profiles.

In addition the Department of Education and Skills National Educational Psychological Service (NEPS) provides educational psychology service to all primary and post primary schools through an assigned NEPS psychologist and in some cases through the Scheme for Commissioning Psychological Assessments (SCPA), full details of which are on the Department's website. Under this scheme schools can have an assessment carried out by a member of the panel of private psychologists approved by NEPS, and NEPS will pay the psychologist the fees for this assessment directly.

Question No. 70 answered with Question No. 49
Question No. 71 answered with Question No. 25.

Hospital Appointments Delays

Questions (72)

Éamon Ó Cuív

Question:

72. Deputy Éamon Ó Cuív asked the Minister for Health the action that will be taken to address the fact that 2,155 persons have been waiting more than18 months for an outpatient appointment at University Hospital Galway; and if he will make a statement on the matter. [38055/16]

View answer

Written answers

This Government is committed to improving waiting times for patients. While recognising that demand for acute hospital services has increased, the important issue for patients is how long they wait.

Under the HSE Service Plan 2016 targets, 85% of people should be waiting less than 52 weeks for their first outpatient appointment. The latest NTPF Outpatient Waiting List figures indicate that 82% of people in Galway University Hospital are waiting less than 52 weeks for their first outpatient appointment and 94% of people are waiting less than 18 months. There are a number of ongoing and planned construction projects at Galway University Hospital that will increase capacity in the future.

In August, I asked the HSE to develop a Waiting List Action Plan for 2016 to reduce, by year end, the number of patients waiting over 18 months for an inpatient or day case procedure. Since then, approximately 6,500 patients have been removed from the waiting list nationally.

Regarding outpatient waiting lists in particular, the HSE recently launched the Strategy for the design of Integrated Outpatient Services 2016-2020. It seeks to improve waiting times for outpatient services by enhancing patient referral pathways and utilising technology to enable better planning.

Budget 2017 provides for the treatment of our longest-waiting patients. €20m is being allocated to the NTPF in 2017, rising to €55m in 2018. Planning of these initiatives is currently being finalised. I will shortly be asking the HSE to develop a Waiting List Action Plan for 2017, working collaboratively with the NTPF, to address inpatient, day case and also outpatient waiting times.

Mental Health Services Staff

Questions (73)

John McGuinness

Question:

73. Deputy John McGuinness asked the Minister for Health the targets that will be in the 2017 HSE service plan for child and adolescent mental health service teams staff levels in CHO 5 next year to bring them closer to the target set in A Vision for Change; and if he will make a statement on the matter. [38062/16]

View answer

Written answers

As this is a service issue, this question has been referred to the HSE for direct reply.

Medicinal Products Prices

Questions (74)

Gerry Adams

Question:

74. Deputy Gerry Adams asked the Minister for Health the status of the HSE negotiations with the pharmaceutical company responsible for the production of the cystic fibrosis drug, Orkambi, in respect of the effort to secure significant price reductions for the drug; when the process is due to conclude; if the pilot will continue; and if he will make a statement on the matter. [37867/16]

View answer

Written answers

The HSE has statutory responsibility for decisions on pricing and reimbursement of medicines under the community drugs schemes, in accordance with the Health (Pricing and Supply of Medical Goods) Act 2013.

I am informed that, following a request from the HSE, the NCPE carried out an assessment of the manufacturer's economic dossier submitted in March 2016 on the cost effectiveness of Orkambi. This dossier included details on all relevant costs and relevant cost offsets including those associated with hospitalisation, disease management costs, intravenous antibiotics, adverse events and any additional costs arising in patients not taking Orkambi.

The NCPE has completed its Health Technology Assessment and this is available on its website. It was submitted to the HSE in June 2016. The NCPE determined, following an evaluation of the economic dossier, that the manufacturer failed to demonstrate cost-effectiveness or value for money from using the drug. The NCPE have confirmed that all relevant costs were included in the analysis.

The HSE has recently completed its most recent round of negotiations with the manufacturer. On foot of this, the HSE’s Drugs Committee, having considered the NCPE recommendation and other expert advice, is in the process of sending its latest recommendation on the cost-effectiveness of Orkambi to the HSE Directorate. The HSE Directorate will then make a decision taking into consideration the manufacturers' latest price offer. This decision will be made on objective, scientific and economic grounds in line with the 2013 Act.

I share the HSE's disappointment that the manufacturer in this case has maintained a very high price in the course of negotiations in relation to the potential reimbursement of Orkambi for Irish patients.

I appreciate that this is a very stressful time for Cystic Fibrosis patients and their families. However, I want to assure them that I do not consider this to be the end of the process. I would strongly urge Vertex, as the manufacturer in this case, to fundamentally reconsider its position and to table a pricing proposal which can facilitate the provision of Orkambi at a price that will represent value for money for the Irish health service, patients and the taxpayer.

I understand that Vertex have confirmed that patients currently receiving Orkambi under the Managed Access Scheme will continue to do so until reimbursement is finalised in Ireland.

Mental Health Services Staff

Questions (75)

Jack Chambers

Question:

75. Deputy Jack Chambers asked the Minister for Health the number of paediatric psychiatrists employed in each public and voluntary hospital, in tabular form; and if he will make a statement on the matter. [38019/16]

View answer

Written answers

As this is a service issue, this question has been referred to the HSE for direct reply.

Medicinal Products Expenditure

Questions (76)

Bríd Smith

Question:

76. Deputy Bríd Smith asked the Minister for Health the reason spending on prescribed drugs according to a recent survey here remains extremely high, second only to Germany in the EU, while lifesaving drugs, such as Orkambi for cystic fibrosis, are refused funding due to price gouging by pharmaceutical companies; and if he will make a statement on the matter. [37960/16]

View answer

Written answers

OECD statistics are useful for comparing expenditure on medicines and other areas. However, per capita figures are only one of a number of measures that can give a view of drugs spending in Ireland.

The OECD report cited by the Deputy uses data from 2014, the last year for which full figures are available. In 2014, expenditure on prescription and over the counter medicines accounted for just over 14 percent of overall health expenditure in Ireland. Although this was higher than several other EU countries, including Denmark, Finland, and Belgium, it was lower than Germany, France, Italy, and Spain, and significantly lower than Greece or Hungary.

OECD data on pharmaceutical expenditure includes expenditure on both prescription and over the counter medicines but excludes expenditure on pharmaceuticals consumed in hospitals and other health care settings as part of an inpatient or day case treatment. As acknowledged by the OECD "comparability issues exist with regards to the administration and dispensing of pharmaceuticals for outpatients in hospitals."

Looking at expenditure in Ireland alone, the report noted the significant reversal in the growth of pharmaceutical spending in Ireland between 2009 and 2014. There has also been a number of significant developments since 2014 that will further reduce the cost of medicines in Ireland. The Framework Agreement on the Pricing and Supply of Medicines will reduce the price of medicines to the average of 14 other countries and provides for an annual downward only price realignment. This will ensure that Irish medicine prices continue to reduce in line with price reductions across reference countries. This Agreement is expected to deliver savings of up to €750 million over the next four years.

Other initiatives will continue to be pursued, to ensure that we achieve affordable prices for medicines for both patients and the State including the HSE's Medicines Management Programme, which has a particular focus on cost-effective prescribing, and the continued implementation of generic substitution and reference pricing.

In relation to Orkambi, the HSE has statutory responsibility for decisions on pricing and reimbursement of medicines under the community drugs schemes, in accordance with the Health (Pricing and Supply of Medical Goods) Act 2013.

I am informed that, following a request from the HSE, the NCPE carried out an assessment of the manufacturer's economic dossier submitted in March 2016 on the cost effectiveness of Orkambi. This dossier included details on all relevant costs and relevant cost offsets including those associated with hospitalisation, disease management costs, intravenous antibiotics, adverse events and any additional costs arising in patients not taking Orkambi.

The NCPE has completed its Health Technology Assessment and this is available on its website. It was submitted to the HSE in June 2016. The NCPE determined, following an evaluation of the economic dossier, that the manufacturer failed to demonstrate cost-effectiveness or value for money from using the drug. The NCPE have confirmed that all relevant costs were included in the analysis.

The HSE has recently completed its most recent round of negotiations with the manufacturer. On foot of this, the HSE’s Drugs Committee, having considered the NCPE recommendation and other expert advice, is in the process of sending its latest recommendation on the cost-effectiveness of Orkambi to the HSE Directorate. The HSE Directorate will then make a decision taking into consideration the manufacturers' latest price offer. This decision will be made on objective, scientific and economic grounds in line with the 2013 Act.

I share the HSE's disappointment that the manufacturer in this case has maintained a very high price in the course of negotiations in relation to the potential reimbursement of Orkambi for Irish patients.

I appreciate that this is a very stressful time for Cystic Fibrosis patients and their families. However, I want to assure them that I do not consider this to be the end of the process. I would strongly urge Vertex, as the manufacturer in this case, to fundamentally reconsider its position and to table a pricing proposal which can facilitate the provision of Orkambi at a price that will represent value for money for the Irish health service, patients and the taxpayer.

HSE Reports

Questions (77)

Robert Troy

Question:

77. Deputy Robert Troy asked the Minister for Health when the report on services for St. Christopher’s, Longford, completed in 2015, will be published; and if he will make a statement on the matter. [38061/16]

View answer

Written answers

As the Deputy's question relates to service matters, I have arranged for the question to be referred to the Health Service Executive (HSE) for direct reply to you.

Top
Share