I propose to take Questions Nos. 50, 51 and 52 together.
It is not the practice and it would be contrary to the public interest to disclose details of any authorisations to intercept, including their number. The Deputy will appreciate that this the long-standing practice, which has been followed by my predecessors, and it has been adopted for sound security reasons.
Furthermore, Section 12 of the Interception of Postal Packets and Telecommunications Messages (Regulation) Act 1993 places a requirement on the Minister for Justice and Equality to ensure that such arrangements are in place to limit to the minimum necessary the disclosure of the fact that an authorisation has been given, and the contents of any communication which has been intercepted pursuant to an authorisation. The Act defines "necessary" as necessary for the purpose of the prevention or detection of serious offences or in the interests of the security of the State.
As the House will be aware, I am currently working on proposals to extend the interception regime to more modern forms of communication, particularly in the light of threats posed by organised crime gangs and terrorist groups. When the House has a chance to consider any new legislative proposals, all issues which arise in this very important area can be looked at afresh.