Skip to main content
Normal View

Thursday, 29 Jun 2017

Written Answers Nos. 214-233

Vaccination Programme

Questions (214)

John McGuinness

Question:

214. Deputy John McGuinness asked the Minister for Health further to Parliamentary Questions Nos. 831 and 832 of 2 May 2017, the basis on which he is making the claim that unfounded false claims have been made of an association between HPV vaccination and a number of conditions experienced by a group of young persons; if he will publish research, scientific or otherwise, that he has carried out which supports this statement; if no research has been undertaken by him, if he will now do so; the supports he will put in place for over 300 persons who are suffering ill heath and whose lives are devastated; if he will meet the persons concerned; and if he will make a statement on the matter. [30725/17]

View answer

Written answers

As I have stated in previous PQ responses, there is no scientific evidence that the HPV vaccine causes any long term illness. The safety of all medicines, including vaccines, is an important matter and there are robust regulatory and monitoring systems in place at both EU and national level to ensure that the medicines we use are safe and effective.

The Health Products Regulatory Authority (HPRA) is responsible for monitoring the safety and quality of all medicines that are licensed in Ireland. The HPRA and the European Medicines Agency (EMA) in Europe continually monitor adverse events to vaccination.

As part of its monitoring of the safety of medicines, the HPRA operates an adverse reaction reporting system, with healthcare professionals and patients encouraged to report adverse reactions they consider may be associated with their treatment, through the range of options in place for reporting. All reports received are evaluated and considered in the context of the safety profile of the product concerned, with reports followed up as necessary for further information, that may assist in the assessment of the case.

In addition, pharmaceutical companies are obliged, as a condition of the authorisation to market a medicine, to submit reports of adverse reactions received directly, to the HPRA. In accordance with its reporting obligations, the HPRA provides anonymised details of reports received to the EMA, the WHO and to the relevant pharmaceutical companies. The fact that a suspected adverse reaction has been reported does not necessarily mean that the medicine has caused the observed effect, which may have also been caused by the disease being treated, a new disease the patient developed, or by another medicine that the patient is taking. Further data are usually needed to complete the picture.

In the context of monitoring the safety of medicines, new information on a possible risk is called a signal. Signals may arise from various data sources, including spontaneous reports, clinical trials and epidemiological studies. Once a signal has been identified, investigations are undertaken to consider the likelihood that a medicine may have caused or contributed to the effect, try to identify risk factors and estimate the frequency of occurrence. Following the assessment, a decision on the most appropriate regulatory action is taken by the competent authorities. The regulatory action is communicated to healthcare professionals, patients and the general public through established channels, and timelines reflect the degree of urgency.

The majority of reports received by the HPRA have been consistent with the expected pattern of adverse effects for the vaccines, as described in the product information (Summary of Product Characteristics and Package Leaflet). Vaccination related events, occurring at the time of vaccine administration, such as syncope (faints) has been among the most commonly reported effects. Other commonly reported symptoms include gastrointestinal symptoms, malaise, headache, dizziness and injection site reactions.

There is no indication or signal of a causal link between the symptoms suffered by the young women and administration of the HPV vaccine. However, this does not mean that their symptoms do not have a physical basis and it is important that any conditions they may have are properly diagnosed and receive appropriate treatment. The families of any girls suffering symptoms following HPV vaccination are advised to seek medical advice from their family doctor in the normal manner and be referred to consultants familiar with these syndromes for appropriate diagnosis and management.

The EMA completed a detailed scientific review in November 2015 of the evidence surrounding reports of two conditions: complex regional pain syndrome (CRPS) and postural orthostatic tachycardia syndrome (POTS). The Agency’s Committee for Medicinal Products for Human Use concurred that the available evidence does not support that CRPS and POTS are caused by HPV vaccines. It therefore did not recommend any changes to the terms of licensing or the product information for these medicines. On 12 January 2016 the European Commission endorsed the conclusions of the European Medicines Agency, that there is no change to the way HPV vaccines are used, or to amend the current product information. This final outcome by the Commission applies in all members states.

I am aware of claims of an association between HPV vaccination and a number of conditions experienced by a group of young women. An illness that occurs around the time a vaccine is given and is already known to be common in adolescence does not imply the vaccine caused the problem. It appears that some girls first suffered symptoms around the time they received the HPV vaccine, and understandably some parents have connected the vaccine to their daughter’s condition. It is important to reassure people that anyone who is suffering ill health is eligible to seek medical attention, and to access appropriate health and social care services, irrespective of the cause of their symptoms. The individual nature of the needs of some children may require access to specialist services and the HSE are currently working to put in place a clinical care pathway appropriate to the medical needs of this group.

Hospital Waiting Lists

Questions (215)

John McGuinness

Question:

215. Deputy John McGuinness asked the Minister for Health if he will arrange an early date for a spine operation for a person (details supplied) in view of the fact that their case is urgent; and if he will expedite the matter [30726/17]

View answer

Written answers

Under the Health Act 2004, the Health Service Executive (HSE) is required to manage and deliver, or arrange to be delivered on its behalf, health and personal social services. Section 6 of the HSE Governance Act 2013 bars the Minister for Health from directing the HSE to provide a treatment or a personal service to any individual or to confer eligibility on any individual.

The scheduling of appointments for patients is a matter for the hospital to which the patient has been referred. Should a patient's general practitioner consider that the patient's condition warrants an earlier appointment, he or she should take the matter up with the consultant and the hospital involved. In relation to the specific case raised, I have asked the HSE to respond to you directly.

Infectious Disease Incidence

Questions (216, 217, 219, 220)

Charlie McConalogue

Question:

216. Deputy Charlie McConalogue asked the Minister for Health the procedures and protocols that exist to identify and isolate the source of infection of a disease (details supplied) in children under 14 years of age; and if he will make a statement on the matter. [30730/17]

View answer

Charlie McConalogue

Question:

217. Deputy Charlie McConalogue asked the Minister for Health if screening or testing of others has occurred to identify the source of an infection (details supplied); and if he will make a statement on the matter. [30731/17]

View answer

Charlie McConalogue

Question:

219. Deputy Charlie McConalogue asked the Minister for Health if standard protocols exist to deal with the discovery of an infection (details supplied); and if he will make a statement on the matter. [30733/17]

View answer

Charlie McConalogue

Question:

220. Deputy Charlie McConalogue asked the Minister for Health the procedures that exist in view of the occurrence of a notifiable disease in each of the years 2013 to 2016 in a category (details supplied); the actions that have been taken to address this; and if he will make a statement on the matter. [30734/17]

View answer

Written answers

I propose to take Questions Nos. 216, 217, 219 and 220 together.

Gonorrhoea is notifiable under the Infectious Diseases (Amendment) Regulations 2016 (S.I. No. 276 of 2016). Notifications of gonorrhoea under the regulations are compiled by the HSE - Health Protection Surveillance Centre. Procedures and protocols around screening and testing for gonorrhoea are service matters. Therefore, I have referred these questions to the Health Service Executive for a direct reply to the Deputy.

Child Protection

Questions (218)

Charlie McConalogue

Question:

218. Deputy Charlie McConalogue asked the Minister for Health the responsibilities of his Department with respect to child protection; and if he will make a statement on the matter. [30732/17]

View answer

Written answers

The Child and Family Agency (Tusla) has primary responsibility to promote the safety and well-being of children. An Garda Síochána also have statutory responsibilities for the safety and welfare of children.

Tusla operates under the remit of the Department of Children and Youth Affairs, which has established a Children First Interdepartmental Group to oversee the implementation of the requirements in the Children First Act 2015 and my Department has a representative on that Group.

My Department has also established a Children First Committee to ensure that it complies with any aspects of the legislation that are relevant to it.

Questions Nos. 219 and 220 answered with Question No. 216.

Disease Management

Questions (221)

Michael Healy-Rae

Question:

221. Deputy Michael Healy-Rae asked the Minister for Health further to Parliamentary Question No. 908 of 2 May 2017, his views on the method of diagnosis of ME; his plans to make the drug ampligen available to persons with the condition; and if he will make a statement on the matter. [30737/17]

View answer

Written answers

There is currently no specific medical diagnostic test to determine or confirm a correct diagnosis of myalgic encephalomyelitis (ME), nor is there any specific treatment which works for all sufferers. Assessment and interventions need to be tailored to the individual.

Treatment for ME is initiated based on the individuals’ symptoms. In general these treatments are delivered within the context of primary care, with referrals into secondary care for specialist interventions in the areas of Neurology, Rheumatology, Pain Specialists, Endocrinology, Immunology and Cardiology. These services are generally accessed through out-patient clinics at secondary care level by the relevant specialty.

Rintatolimod (brand name Ampligen) is an experimental medicine in development for the treatment of a variety of chronic diseases and viral disorders, including Chronic Fatigue Syndrome or ME. The medicine is not currently authorised in the European Union. Before a medicine can be placed on the Irish market the manufacturer has to seek an authorisation from the Health Products Regulatory Authority (HPRA) or in the case of certain medicinal products, the European Medicines Agency (EMA). In the case of Ampligen, because of the biotechnology nature of the active substance involved, any application for a marketing authorisation must be made to the EMA. I have no information on whether or not such an application has been received by the EMA.

Should the medicine receive marketing authorisation, it would then be open to the marketing authorisation holder to make the medicine available in Ireland and to apply to the HSE to have the product reimbursed under community drugs schemes.

Hospital Staff

Questions (222)

Louise O'Reilly

Question:

222. Deputy Louise O'Reilly asked the Minister for Health further to Parliamentary Question No. 210 of 24 May 2017, the hospitals in which the 128 doctors working as consultants but who are not on the Medical Council’s specialist register are operating; and if he will make a statement on the matter. [30741/17]

View answer

Written answers

I have asked the HSE to respond to the Deputy directly on this matter.

Bullying in the Workplace

Questions (223)

Niall Collins

Question:

223. Deputy Niall Collins asked the Minister for Health if he is satisfied that anti-bullying policies are in place in his Department and in each State body and agency under his aegis; if such polices are being implemented effectively; the amount paid in compensation for bullying claims in each of the past five years in his Department and in each State body and agency under his aegis in tabular form; the action which has been taken to ensure such cases do not arise in future; and if he will make a statement on the matter. [30753/17]

View answer

Written answers

The Department of Health, like all Government Departments, is committed to protecting dignity and respect across the organisation. In that regard, the Dignity at Work Policy has been developed in partnership between Civil Service management and staff unions through the Equality Sub Committee of General Council. It aims to promote respect, dignity, safety, and equality in the workplace. Every member of staff in my Department is aware that all forms of bullying, harassment and sexual harassment are unacceptable and every member of staff has a duty to behave in an acceptable and respectful manner. My Department has not paid any compensation for bullying claims in the past five years.

In relation to Non-Commercial State Agencies under the remit of my Department, this information is being sought and will be forwarded to the Deputy when collated.

Organic Farming Scheme Data

Questions (224)

Aindrias Moynihan

Question:

224. Deputy Aindrias Moynihan asked the Minister for Agriculture, Food and the Marine the number of persons in County Cork waiting for 2016 organic farming scheme payments; and if he will make a statement on the matter. [30539/17]

View answer

Written answers

There are a total of 194 Organic Farming Scheme participants in Co. Cork of which 23, or 12%, have not yet received a payment for 2016.

The main reason that a payment has not yet issued is due to the fact that they were selected for an on-farm inspection, the report of which has to be finalised before payment can be processed. Once this has been finalised for each participant, payment will issue thereafter.

Farm Waste Management

Questions (225)

Dara Calleary

Question:

225. Deputy Dara Calleary asked the Minister for Agriculture, Food and the Marine his views on proposals to change slurry spreading methods; if his attention has been drawn to the challenges that these changes will present for many persons, especially those on lower incomes; and if he will make a statement on the matter. [30563/17]

View answer

Written answers

I am aware of recent media coverage and at the outset, it is important to note that the lead on this issue is the Department of Communications, Climate Action and the Environment (DCCAE) as it relates to  the National Clean Air Strategy consultation which was open during March and April this year.

Within this context, the consultation document identified the main issues in relation to air quality and emission sources. It recognised that the spreading of slurry can, depending on the timing of the application and the weather conditions, result in nitrogen loss from slurry to the atmosphere through ammonia volatilisation. That Department will conduct a thorough examination of all submissions received as part of its consultation phase. No decision has been taken by this Department on a total ban. My Department continues to liaise closely with colleagues in DCCAE on this matter.

Interestingly on foot of farmer demand to improve the utilisation of slurry as a fertiliser, my Department is assisting farmers under TAMS in the purchase of Low Emission Slurry Spreading equipment where to date 539 applications have been received for trailing shoe, 394 applications for the dribble bar and 14 applications for shallow injection. Overall across all low emissions technologies over 1,058 applications have been received which is above expectations.  In addition more than 4752 farmers have applied under the GLAS scheme to apply slurry using low emission equipment.

This is being driven by farmers themselves wanting to maximise the value of the slurry on their own farms, rather than as a regulatory requirement. Recently, the Association of Farm and Forestry Contractors of Ireland also identified their support for this technology.

However, I fully understand that this technology is not suitable for all farms.

GLAS Payments

Questions (226)

Michael Healy-Rae

Question:

226. Deputy Michael Healy-Rae asked the Minister for Agriculture, Food and the Marine the status of a GLAS payment for a person (details supplied); and if he will make a statement on the matter. [30624/17]

View answer

Written answers

The person named was approved into GLAS 1 with a contract commencement date of the 1 October 2015 and has been paid the First Instalment Payment for 2015.

During the 2016 prepayment checking process an issue presented on the computerised crosscheck of Department databases with regard to the finalisation of a GLAS on-farm inspection. Department officials are actively working on the issue with a view to further processing the 2016 payment.

Agriculture Scheme Payments

Questions (227)

Robert Troy

Question:

227. Deputy Robert Troy asked the Minister for Agriculture, Food and the Marine if he will compensate farmers who have yet to revise their 2016 payment eight months late; and if he will make a statement on the matter. [30654/17]

View answer

Written answers

Under the EU Regulations governing the Green, Low-Carbon, Agri-Environment Scheme and other area-based payment schemes, a comprehensive administrative check, including cross-checks with the Land Parcel Identification System, must be completed before any payment can issue. 

All applications which pass all of the regulatory checks are processed for payment.  Over 96% of active GLAS 1 and GLAS II applicants have received their 2016 advance payment. Applications which have not been paid to date have not yet  passed all of the required checks. The Department is continuing to review outstanding applications and has contacted applicants requesting  additional information where necessary.  As applications clear the regulatory checks, payments will issue on an-going basis. 

Under the EU Regulations governing the AEOS Scheme and other area-based payment schemes, a comprehensive administrative check, including cross-checks with the Land Parcel Identification System must take place. As 2016 is the final scheme-year of payment for AEOS 2 applicants re-checks on payments made for all scheme years must be completed before final payment can be processed. Payments are issued once files have successfully passed all checks.

Agriculture Scheme Appeals

Questions (228)

Charlie McConalogue

Question:

228. Deputy Charlie McConalogue asked the Minister for Agriculture, Food and the Marine the number of cases dealt with by the agricultural appeals office in each of the years 2014 to 2016 and to date in 2017; the number of cases that have been completed; and the average length of time it takes for a case to go through the system from start to finish, in tabular form. [30708/17]

View answer

Written answers

It is not possible within the short timeframe to provide the detailed information requested by the Deputy. I will respond to the Deputy once the information has been collated.

Bullying in the Workplace

Questions (229)

Niall Collins

Question:

229. Deputy Niall Collins asked the Minister for Agriculture, Food and the Marine if he is satisfied that anti-bullying policies are in place in his Department and in each State body and agency under his aegis; if such polices are being implemented effectively; the amount paid in compensation for bullying claims in each of the past five years in his Department and in each State body and agency under his aegis in tabular form; the action which has been taken to ensure such cases do not arise in future; and if he will make a statement on the matter. [30744/17]

View answer

Written answers

With regard to an anti-bullying policy, my Department implements the Civil Service wide anti-bullying, harassment and sexual harassment policy ‘Dignity at Work’ and I am satisfied that the policy is being implemented effectively throughout my Department. All staff in my Department are reminded annually of their responsibilities under the Civil Service Code of Standards and Behaviour, which includes the duty to show due respect for their colleagues at work and to abide by the Civil Service anti-bullying policy. Furthermore, all new recruits to my Department are required to familiarise themselves with both the Civil Service Code of Standards and Behaviour and the Dignity at Work policy.

 €81,000 was paid in compensation for bullying claims in the past five years. 

I have requested the State Bodies under the aegis of  my Department to respond directly to the Deputy, on the specific information requested, as this is an operational matter for the organisations themselves.

Common Agricultural Policy Negotiations

Questions (230)

Charlie McConalogue

Question:

230. Deputy Charlie McConalogue asked the Minister for Agriculture, Food and the Marine if in future CAP reforms it will be possible to review the actions based approach in RDP schemes and to examine whole farm schemes which underperformed. [30766/17]

View answer

Written answers

Formal discussions on the future of CAP Post-2020 have not yet commenced. A Commission communication on the future shape of CAP post-2020 is expected in late 2017 and this will inform discussions on the design and content of the next RDP.

In relation to the specific point on the review of the action based approaches, Ireland's RDP 2014-2020 is subject to on-going monitoring and evaluation to assess the impact, effectiveness, efficiency and continued relevance of RDP interventions. The format of such reviews in future RDPs will only be known when the relevant RDP/CAP Regulations are finalised.

Agrifood Sector

Questions (231)

Charlie McConalogue

Question:

231. Deputy Charlie McConalogue asked the Minister for Agriculture, Food and the Marine the progress with regard to the core principles in the confidence and supply arrangement in fully implementing Food Harvest 2020 and Food Wise 2025 and in securing the future of family farms and support for the fishing industry. [30767/17]

View answer

Written answers

Food Wise 2025, the new ten year strategy for the agri-food sector published in July 2015, is the successor to the Food Harvest strategy. It identifies the opportunities and challenges facing the sector and provides an enabling strategy that will allow the sector to grow and prosper. Food Wise includes more than 400 specific recommendations, spread across the cross-cutting themes of sustainability, innovation, human capital, market development and competitiveness; as well as specific sectoral recommendations.

If these recommendations are implemented, the expert committee which drew up the Food Wise 2025 Strategy believes that the following growth projections are achievable by 2025: increasing the value of agri-food exports by 85% to €19 billion; increasing value added in the sector by 70% to in excess of €13 billion; and increasing the value of primary production by 65% to almost €10 billion. With regard to employment, Food Wise foresees the creation of 23,000 additional jobs in the agri-food sector all along the supply chain from primary production to high value added product development. Realising these growth projections will be challenging, but I am confident that they can be achieved. 

In July last year, I launched the first annual progress report of Food Wise 2025: Steps to Success 2016. Food Wise Steps to Success showed that, of the 330 detailed actions which were due to commence in 2015 or 2016, 28% have been achieved or substantial action has been undertaken; and a further 67% have commenced and are progressing well. I believe that this is a good start and I will press on to get as many actions as possible completed within the next year.

Next month, I will launch the second annual progress report of Food Wise 2025: Steps to Success 2017.

Common Agricultural Policy Subsidies

Questions (232)

Charlie McConalogue

Question:

232. Deputy Charlie McConalogue asked the Minister for Agriculture, Food and the Marine if it is possible to transfer moneys allocated under pillar 1 to pillar 2 and vice versa under EU CAP regulations. [30771/17]

View answer

Written answers

Article 14 of EU Regulation No. 1307/2013 (Direct Payments Regulation) and Article 58 of EU Regulation No. 1305/2013 (Rural Development Regulation) allow Member States to transfer up to 15% of Pillar 1 funds to Pillar 2 and vice versa on an annual basis.  Member States with direct payments per hectare less than 90% of the EU average may transfer up to 25% from Pillar 2 to Pillar 1 on an annual basis. 

Funds transferred from Pillar 1 to Pillar 2 are not required to be co-financed. Ireland has not to date availed of this provision in the Regulations.

Trade Agreements

Questions (233)

Charlie McConalogue

Question:

233. Deputy Charlie McConalogue asked the Minister for Agriculture, Food and the Marine if he will report on the Mercosur talks; the steps he is taking to protect beef farmers; his views on whether beef should not form part of a potential Mercosur deal; and if he raised the matter at the last EU agriculture ministers meeting. [30772/17]

View answer

Written answers

I and my officials have been very active in highlighting the potentially very damaging impact of a Mercosur deal on the European agriculture sector, and on the beef sector in particular.

At political level, I have raised the issue with my Member State colleagues and with Commissioners Hogan and Malmström, both within the Council of Agriculture Ministers and in written form.

These efforts have been reinforced at official level through similar contacts with Member States and the Commission, particularly through the Special Committee on Agriculture and the Trade Policy Committee.

At the recent Agri Fish Council of Ministers meeting in June, Ireland joined with a number of other member states, in requesting that negotiations should not proceed further until the Agriculture Council was given the opportunity to assess the balance between offers and commitments.

I also continue to monitor the situation closely in co-operation with my Government colleagues, particularly the Minister for Jobs, Enterprise and Innovation, and the Taoiseach.

While the Commission responded to the strong lobbying by Ireland and others by excluding a beef Tariff Rate Quota (TRQ) from the offers exchanged with Mercosur on 11 May 2016, there is a need for continued vigilance in relation to the conduct of these trade negotiations. We are also insisting that the timing and content of any beef TRQ offer is handled appropriately, and in a manner that safeguards the interests of the Irish and European beef sector in particular.

This must also take into account the findings of the Commission’s recent cumulative impact assessment, which strongly reinforce Ireland’s position in relation to beef. They are also a very effective reminder of the need for great caution in our approach to the issue of beef TRQs.

Top
Share