Skip to main content
Normal View

Thursday, 21 Jun 2018

Written Answers Nos. 52-71

Military Aircraft Landings

Questions (52)

Clare Daly

Question:

52. Deputy Clare Daly asked the Taoiseach and Minister for Defence further to Parliamentary Question Nos. 53 and 200 of 14 June 2018, if the Defence Forces were engaged of the monitoring of the foreign military aircraft while they were in Irish airspace in view of the fact that the plane involved in the emergency landing at Shannon Airport on 3 June 2018 was involved in refuelling US fighter aircraft either during or immediately prior to the emergency occurring (details supplied). [27158/18]

View answer

Written answers

The Air Corps is not tasked or equipped to monitor aircraft overflying the entirety of Irish airspace.  However, the Deputy will be aware that all foreign military aircraft require the permission of the Minister for Foreign Affairs and Trade to overfly Irish airspace. In line with existing protocols, the Department of Foreign Affairs and Trade notified my Department of the request for a US military aircraft to make an emergency landing at Shannon Airport on 3 June.

State Bodies Data

Questions (53)

Michael McGrath

Question:

53. Deputy Michael McGrath asked the Taoiseach and Minister for Defence the number of positions on the board in respect of the board of agencies and commercial State companies under his Department’s aegis in tabular form; the quorum required for a board meeting; the number of ministerial appointee vacancies on the board to date; the length of time the ministerial appointee vacancy has been present for each vacancy; and if he will make a statement on the matter. [27217/18]

View answer

Written answers

The only State body under the aegis of the Department of Defence is the Army Pensions Board.  The Army Pensions Board is an independent statutory body established under the Army Pensions Act 1927.  The Act specifies that the Board shall consist of a chairman and two ordinary members.  The two ordinary members must be qualified medical practitioners of whom one must be an officer of the Army Medical Corps.  The chairman and the non-military ordinary member are appointed by the Minister for Defence with the concurrence of the Minister for Public Expenditure and Reform.  The Army Medical Corps ordinary member is appointed by the Minister for Defence on the recommendation of the Chief of Staff of the Defence Forces. The Army Pensions Board only meets when all three members are available to attend.

There has been 1 appointment to the Army Pensions Board in the period since 6 May 2016,  on the recommendation of the Chief of Staff, Commandant Zdenek Osecky was appointed as an ordinary member of the Board on the 21 June 2016. There are currently no vacancies on the Army Pensions Board.

Defence Forces Operations

Questions (54)

Clare Daly

Question:

54. Deputy Clare Daly asked the Taoiseach and Minister for Defence if Irish troops participated in Exercise Siil 2018; if so, the role they played in the exercise; and if he will make a statement on the matter. [27288/18]

View answer

Written answers

Exercise Siil, also known as exercise Hedgehog, is an annual exercise held by Estonia.  The exercise is to evaluate the combat readiness of the Estonian Defence Forces and to create a training venue to exercise cooperation with other international forces.

Ireland received an invitation from Estonia to participate in Exercise Siil 2018.  Following consideration of this request, Ireland decided not to participate in this exercise.

Military Aircraft Landings

Questions (55)

Clare Daly

Question:

55. Deputy Clare Daly asked the Tánaiste and Minister for Foreign Affairs and Trade further to Parliamentary Questions Nos. 53, 165 and 200 of 14 June 2018, if an aeroplane was in fact involved in military operations (details supplied) immediately prior to the emergency that required the emergency landing at Shannon Airport on 3 June 2018 contrary to the response given. [27155/18]

View answer

Written answers

An extremely urgent request for landing facilities was granted on 3 June 2018 for a US military aircraft, a McDonnell Douglas KC-10A Extender, on the basis that this was purely an emergency situation. The aircraft concerned was not in Irish sovereign airspace when the emergency was declared nor was it scheduled to enter Irish sovereign airspace under its original flight plan. The US Embassy subsequently confirmed to my Department in writing that the aircraft in question was unarmed, did not carry any arms, ammunition or explosives, was not engaged in intelligence gathering and that the requested flight did not form part of any military operations or exercises.

Military Aircraft Landings

Questions (56)

Clare Daly

Question:

56. Deputy Clare Daly asked the Tánaiste and Minister for Foreign Affairs and Trade further to Parliamentary Question Nos. 53 and 200 of 14 June 2018, if full details of the prior notification received will be provided. [27156/18]

View answer

Written answers

Notification of the request and the reason for an emergency landing on 3 June 2018 by a US military aircraft, a McDonnell Douglas KC-10A Extender, was conveyed to my Department, via the Department’s Duty Officer, following the declaration of an emergency by the aircrew and prior to the landing in Shannon taking place. The Duty Officer in turn was in immediate contact with An Garda Síochána and Shannon Airport. The US Embassy subsequently confirmed to my Department in writing that the aircraft in question was unarmed, did not carry any arms, ammunition or explosives, was not engaged in intelligence gathering and that the requested flight did not form part of any military operations or exercises.

Military Aircraft Landings

Questions (57)

Clare Daly

Question:

57. Deputy Clare Daly asked the Tánaiste and Minister for Foreign Affairs and Trade further to Parliamentary Question Nos. 53 and 200 of 14 June 2018, if fighter aircraft entered Irish airspace in view of the fact that the plane involved in the emergency landing at Shannon Airport on 3 June 2018 was involved in refuelling US fighter aircraft either during or immediately prior to the emergency occurring (details supplied). [27157/18]

View answer

Written answers

The answer to the Deputy’s question is no.

State Bodies Data

Questions (58)

Michael McGrath

Question:

58. Deputy Michael McGrath asked the Tánaiste and Minister for Foreign Affairs and Trade the number of positions on the board in respect of the board of agencies and commercial State companies under his Department’s aegis in tabular form; the quorum required for a board meeting; the number of ministerial appointee vacancies on the board to date; the length of time the ministerial appointee vacancy has been present for each vacancy; and if he will make a statement on the matter. [27221/18]

View answer

Written answers

There are no State agencies nor commercial State companies under the aegis of my Department.

EU Treaties

Questions (59)

Clare Daly

Question:

59. Deputy Clare Daly asked the Tánaiste and Minister for Foreign Affairs and Trade the status of a protocol (details supplied) in regard to common defence and the Treaty of Lisbon; if a copy of the text of the protocol will be provided; if it has been adopted; if not, the reason therefor; and if he will make a statement on the matter. [27286/18]

View answer

Written answers

Paragraph 5(iv) of the European Council Conclusions of 18/19 June 2009 provided that at the time of the conclusion of the next accession Treaty, the provisions of the Decision in Annex I would be set out in a Protocol to be attached, in accordance with Member States’ respective constitutional requirements, to the Treaty on European Union (TEU) and the Treaty on the Functioning of the European Union (TFEU). Pending completion of these Treaty procedures, the Heads of State and Government declared that the Decision would be legally binding and take effect from the date of entry into force of the Treaty of Lisbon which occurred on 1 December 2009. The Decision is published on the Irish Treaty Series as No. 20 of 2010.Ireland duly instigated the Treaty amendment process by submitting a proposal in accordance with Article 48 TEU, which governs the “ordinary revision procedure” for amending the Treaties. After positive consideration by the European Parliament in April 2012 and the Commission in May 2012, by a Decision of 11 May 2012 the European Council decided that a conference of the representatives of the governments of the Member States should examine the amendments proposed by Ireland in the form of a Protocol on the Concerns of the Irish People on the Treaty of Lisbon, to be annexed to the TEU and TFEU. The European Council further decided that in view of the extent of the proposed amendments, a Convention under Article 48(3) TEU need not be convened. The Protocol on the Concerns of the Irish People on the Treaty of Lisbon was submitted to a written procedure which closed on 16 May 2012 and was subsequently opened for signature.

Following its ratification by all EU Member States, the Protocol entered into force on 1 December 2014. The Protocol was published in the Irish Treaty Series as No. 25 of 2014 and laid before the Dáil on 17 December 2014. In the most recent consolidated version of the EU Treaties, the Protocol is included as Protocol No. 38. In accordance with Article 51 TEU, the Protocols form an integral part of the Treaties.

Section 1, paragraph (iv) of the European Communities (Amendment) Act 2012 amended section 1(1) of the European Communities Act 1972 so as to include a reference to the Protocol within the definition of the “treaties governing the European Union”, which are to be binding on the State and part of the domestic law thereof. The section was commenced on 1 December 2014 by Statutory Instrument No. 577 of 2014 so as to coincide with the entry into force of the Protocol.

The Protocol stipulates, inter alia, that the Treaty of Lisbon does not affect or prejudice Ireland’s traditional policy of military neutrality, that any decision to move to a common defence will require a unanimous decision of the European Council and that it would then be a matter for Member States, including Ireland, to decide, in accordance with their respective constitutional requirements, whether or not to adopt a common defence. In Ireland’s case, participation in a common defence is precluded by Article 29.4.9 of Bunreacht na hÉireann.

Election Monitoring Missions

Questions (60)

Seán Sherlock

Question:

60. Deputy Sean Sherlock asked the Tánaiste and Minister for Foreign Affairs and Trade when a new call for election monitors will be issued. [27316/18]

View answer

Written answers

International election monitoring missions play an important role in the promotion of democracy and human rights. The Department of Foreign Affairs and Trade maintains a roster of election observers for such missions. We aim to ensure, when requested, an appropriate level of Irish participation in international observation missions for elections and constitutional referendums. Irish observers participate primarily in missions organised by the European Union or those organized by the Organisation for Security and Cooperation in Europe (OSCE). Plans to establish a new roster are well advanced and the public call for applications will issue on 2 July 2018. A notice to this effect was published on the Election Observation webpage of the Department on 15 June 2018.

The call for applications will be published on the Department of Foreign Affairs and Trade website, as well as on the Irish Aid website.

A candidate information booklet setting out eligibility requirements and detailing the process leading to the establishment of the roster will be published for the information of applicants.

Military Aircraft Landings

Questions (61)

Clare Daly

Question:

61. Deputy Clare Daly asked the Tánaiste and Minister for Foreign Affairs and Trade further to Parliamentary Questions Nos. 53 and 200 of 14 June 2018, if the plane in question was located in Irish controlled airspace when the emergency was discovered; if so, if this is normal practice; and his views on whether this practice is acceptable. [27364/18]

View answer

Written answers

As I have indicated to the Deputy in related Parliamentary Question answers, an extremely urgent request for landing facilities was granted on 3 June 2018 for a US military aircraft to land at Shannon Airport on the basis that this was purely an emergency situation. The aircraft concerned was not in Irish sovereign airspace when the emergency was declared nor was it scheduled to enter Irish sovereign airspace under its original flight plan. The Air Navigation (Foreign Military Aircraft) Order gives the Minister for Foreign Affairs and Trade primary responsibility for the regulation of activity, both landing in the State and overflying Irish sovereign airspace, by foreign military aircraft. Management of Irish controlled airspace is a matter for the Irish Aviation Authority, a statutory state body operating under the aegis of the Minster for Transport, Tourism and Sport.

Human Rights Cases

Questions (62)

Ruth Coppinger

Question:

62. Deputy Ruth Coppinger asked the Tánaiste and Minister for Foreign Affairs and Trade if the case of a person (details supplied) who is presently detained by the Israeli authorities was raised by him; and if he will make a statement on the matter. [27367/18]

View answer

Written answers

I am aware of the case of the person concerned, whose administrative detention order has just been renewed for a further period reported to be four months. She has been in administrative detention without trial for a year, having already been detained, under administrative detention and a conviction whose basis was very unclear, for much of the period since April 2015. I understand that she is a member of the Popular Front for the Liberation of Palestine, which is an outlawed group in Israel and considered a terrorist group by the EU. However, no real and credible imputation of personal involvement in violent activities has been made against her.

My view on this case, and on the practice of administrative detention generally, is very clear. While no-one can doubt the particular threats and security concerns which Israel faces, administrative detention should only be used, if at all, in the most serious of cases and in the face of serious and immediate threat. In all other cases, persons should be charged and tried in the courts, able to hear and challenge the evidence against them. No evidence of such a serious and immediate threat has been presented, in a way which would allow the person in question to address it, in this case.

In general, there is serious concern that administrative detention is being applied on an increasingly routine basis against people who are politically active and critical of the occupation of the Palestinian territory, without any evidence being made available to indicate that these individuals constitute a security threat. Such periods of detention are often rolled over and extended indefinitely.

All of these criticisms have been conveyed to the Israeli authorities, most recently in the context of the Universal Periodic Review of Israel at the Human Rights Council in January of this year, when Ireland reiterated that detainees must have the right to be informed of the charges underlying any detention, have access to legal assistance, and receive a fair trial. Ireland has also been instrumental in having them included in EU Council Conclusions on the situation in Israel and Palestine.

It is incumbent on Israel to charge this person with credible and evidence-based offences, or to release her. I note that a leading article in one of the main Israeli newspapers this week made the same call.

Pensions Reform

Questions (63)

Noel Grealish

Question:

63. Deputy Noel Grealish asked the Minister for Finance if the promised review of the Interdepartmental Pensions Reform and Taxation Group on the cost of funded supplementary pensions will include public sector pension schemes, benefits and contributions; if the promised review is solely for the private sector; the timeline for completion and publication of the review; and if he will make a statement on the matter. [27147/18]

View answer

Written answers

Under the Government’s Roadmap for Pensions Reform 2018-2023, a number of specific actions have been allocated to the Interdepartmental Pensions Reform and Taxation Group (IDPRTG). The IDPRTG is chaired by the Department of Finance and includes representatives from the Department as well as from the Department of Public Expenditure & Reform, the Department of Employment Affairs & Social Protection, Revenue and the Pensions Authority.

Action 3.13 of the Roadmap provides for a review of the cost of funded supplementary pensions to the Exchequer in the context of the development of a new auto-enrolment scheme.

The State encourages individuals to save for retirement by offering tax incentives when saving for a pension, and marginal tax relief is considered to be a material incentive to encourage such savings. The income draw-down phase is taxed and, to a degree, tax relief on pensions represents a deferral of taxation. Though public sector schemes generally operate on a pay-as-you-go basis, contributions made by public sector employees and pension benefits received by public sector employees are subject to applicable tax laws. 

The IDPRTG is currently considering a number of action points that were identified in the Government's Roadmap.  As part of its consideration, it will be important to canvass the views of interested parties and with this in mind my Department is planning to shortly launch a public consultation process.  Taking account of the need to give time to elicit the various external views and to then consider the submissions made, my Department is currently planning to report on these matters by the end of the year.”

Tax Reliefs Application

Questions (64, 65)

Timmy Dooley

Question:

64. Deputy Timmy Dooley asked the Minister for Finance the date on which the anticipated cost of the VRT rebate on the purchase of electric vehicles is factored into calculations of the fiscal space. [27193/18]

View answer

Timmy Dooley

Question:

65. Deputy Timmy Dooley asked the Minister for Finance the date on which the anticipated cost of the VRT rebate on the purchase of hybrid vehicles is factored into calculations of the fiscal space. [27194/18]

View answer

Written answers

I propose to take Questions Nos. 64 and 65 together.

The relief from Vehicle Registration Tax (VRT) applying to electric vehicles has been included in fiscal space calculations which are currently set out to 2021. The relief is due to expire at end 2021.

The VRT reliefs applying to both conventional hybrid vehicles and plugin hybrid vehicles are due to expire at the end of 2018 and have been factored into fiscal space calculations for the lifetime of their validity.

It is the long standing practice of the Minister for Finance not to comment on measures which may or may not be included in the upcoming Budget.

Fiscal Policy

Questions (66)

Timmy Dooley

Question:

66. Deputy Timmy Dooley asked the Minister for Finance the date on which the anticipated cost of the 0% benefit in kind rate has been factored into calculations of the fiscal space. [27195/18]

View answer

Written answers

The introduction of the 0% rate of benefit-in-kind on electric vehicles is a measure designed to incentivise the uptake of an emerging technology. This measure is estimated to cost €500,000 in terms of tax foregone in 2018 and has been included in the calculations of fiscal space for 2018.

I have previously announced my intention to extend this relief in the upcoming Budget and this will be factored into the fiscal space.

Ministerial Staff Data

Questions (67)

Eoin Ó Broin

Question:

67. Deputy Eoin Ó Broin asked the Minister for Finance the name, responsibilities and salaries of all advisers appointed by him since July 2017, in tabular form. [27197/18]

View answer

Written answers

I wish to inform the Deputy that there are currently four Special Advisers employed in the Department of Finance/Department of Public Expenditure & Reform. Two of these advisers are on the Department of Finance payroll. Three Special Advisers report to me and one Special Adviser reports to Minister of State Michael D'Arcy.

The names and salaries of all advisors appointed by me since July, 2017 are shown in tabular form.

Minister Donohoe

 Name

 Salary

 Ms Deborah Sweeney

 4th point Principal Officer (Standard) PPC scale

 Mr Ed Brophy

 5th point Principal Officer (Standard) PPC scale

 Ms Niamh Callaghan

 1st point Principal Officer (Standard) PPC scale

 Mr Stephen Lynam *

 3rd point Principal Officer (Standard) PPC scale

*Mr Stephen Lynam resigned in March 2018.

Minister of State D'Arcy

 Name

 Salary

 Mr Barry Harrington

 5th point Assistant Principal (Higher) PPC scale

 All appointments were made in line with “Instructions to Personnel Officers - Ministerial Appointments for the 32nd Dáil” which include “Guidelines on staffing of Ministerial offices” issued by the Department of Public Expenditure and Reform.

Special Advisers are appointed under Section 11 of the Public Service Regulations Act 1997 (2) A Special Adviser to a Minister or to a Minister of State, as in the case may be, shall

(a)   assist the Minister or Minister of State, as the case may be, by –

(i)    providing advice,

(ii)   Monitoring, facilitating and securing the achievement of the Government objectives that relate to the Department, as requested by the Minister or the Minister of State, as the case may be, and

(iii)  Performing such other functions as may be directed by the Minister or the Minister of State, as the case may be that are not otherwise provided for in this Act and do not involve the exercise of any specific powers conferred on the Minister or the Minister of State as the case may be or any other office holder by or under any other Act.

The appointments of Advisers are kept under review given the breath of my responsibilities across two Departments.

Tax Data

Questions (68)

Michael McGrath

Question:

68. Deputy Michael McGrath asked the Minister for Finance the estimated amount of corporation tax receipts that will be collected by the Revenue Commissioners in each year into the future; and if he will make a statement on the matter. [27199/18]

View answer

Written answers

The most recent update of my Department's estimate for corporation tax receipts, over the coming years, is provided in the Stability Programme Update 2018.

My Department has provided an estimate for corporation tax receipts until 2021, which are as follows.

 Year

2018 (€m)

2019 (€m)

2020 (€m)

2021 (€m)

Corporation Tax

8,505

8,985

9,445

9,890

The Stability Programme Update 2018 can be accessed at: https://www.finance.gov.ie/wp-content/uploads/2018/04/spu-final-final.pdf

Insurance Costs

Questions (69, 70)

Michael McGrath

Question:

69. Deputy Michael McGrath asked the Minister for Finance if he will request the CSO to report on the cost of public and employer liability insurance; and if he will make a statement on the matter. [27201/18]

View answer

Michael McGrath

Question:

70. Deputy Michael McGrath asked the Minister for Finance if his Department has data on insurance premiums in the area of public and employer liability; and if he will make a statement on the matter. [27202/18]

View answer

Written answers

I propose to take Questions Nos. 69 and 70 together.

At the outset the Deputy should note that my Department does not collect or hold data on insurance premiums. However, increasing the availability of data in relation to Employer and Public Liability Insurance is a matter which was discussed by the Cost of Insurance Working Group and its Report on the Cost of Employer and Public Liability Insurance (2018) recommends a number of actions to improve transparency in this area.

Among these, Recommendation 1 requires the Central Statistics Office to consider the feasibility of collecting price information on the cost of insurance to businesses with this exercise to commence by the end of Q2 2018. My officials have been informed by the CSO that this review commenced in May. They have been advised that this work will involve the following steps:

- Researching the methodological approach including contacting other countries that already compile such an index;

- Meeting with each of the relevant insurance companies to explain the data requirements for the creation of such an index;

- Requesting sample data (retrospective) from the companies;

- Compiling the index based on the sample data and testing the index for plausibility, accuracy and quality; and

- Writing up the conclusions of the research into the feasibility report

In addition, the CSO has stated that there will be significant methodological and practical challenges that will need to be overcome in order to produce a price index for business insurance. From a practical point of view, the new survey if deemed feasible, will have to be completed on a voluntary basis as there are no legal instruments in place to compel insurance companies to respond to data requests. It should also be noted that from a methodological point of view, the market for business insurance is far more heterogeneous compared to the relatively homogeneous market for motor insurance. This creates difficulties when trying to decide on the product or service which must be tracked consistently over time. You should also be aware that it would not be usual to publish a price index with just a couple of data points so a number of months of data would need to be compiled before publication of any price data for such premiums.

The complexity of this project was factored into the timeline of the action plan and consequently the CSO is scheduled to deliver its feasibility report by Q4 2018. If it concludes that such an index is possible to produce, then the implementation process will begin in such a way that allows the collection of the necessary data to be done in a credible and effective way.

In parallel with the CSO’s feasibility study, Recommendation 4 of the Report provides that the Department of Finance should publish a key information report on Employer and Public Liability insurance claims by the end of this year. In this regard, my Department has written to Insurance Ireland requesting that the necessary data is supplied to the Department in good time so that the Department can produce the planned report within the agreed timeline.

Insurance Industry Regulation

Questions (71)

Michael McGrath

Question:

71. Deputy Michael McGrath asked the Minister for Finance the number of insurance firms selling business in the market here that are prudentially regulated in the UK and that rely on the freedom of movement of services across the EU to sell here; if there are risks for consumers here in the event of a hard Brexit in this context; and if he will make a statement on the matter. [27203/18]

View answer

Written answers

I understand from the Central Bank of Ireland that in 2016, premium volumes written by life and non-life firms between Ireland and the UK were €9.7 billion (87 Irish authorised firms) and €2.5 billion (161 UK and Gibraltar authorised firms), respectively.

As the Deputy will understand, any negative impacts on the macro-economy of either or both the UK and Ireland is likely to impact the Irish insurance market.  From the date of the UK exit (or, if agreed, the end of a transition period) UK insurers which rely on a “passport” to provide services into the Irish market and vice-versa will lose the right to provide such services.  As a result impacted firms in both the UK and Ireland are extensively engaged in contingency planning which may result in the relocation of business from the UK to the EU (including Ireland) and vice-versa. 

The key risk to consumers in the context of a hard Brexit is in the event that such insurers do not take mitigating actions against the possibility of that scenario, such as the establishment of a third-party branch and/or portfolio transfer to a EU27 undertaking, and that as a result of that, the ability of those insurers to continue to service cross border insurance contracts written prior to 29 March 2019 may become an issue. However, I think it is important to note that extensive work is underway to try and mitigate these risks as much as possible. 

In the context of contingency planning, the Central Bank of Ireland and the Prudential Regulatory Authority (PRA) in the UK are engaged in dialogue with firms including insurers who will be impacted by Brexit.  In this context, it is important to note that not all firms will be effected in the same way.  The Central Bank is also monitoring the implementation of plans by UK insurers, which includes several UK firms applying to set up subsidiaries or third-country branches in Ireland, as well as other applying in other EU27 countries.  It should be noted that Irish authorised firms selling into the UK are also implementing Brexit mitigation plans using similar approaches. 

In addition, the European regulatory system is formulating the supervisory guidance on the many issues raised by Brexit and the Central Bank of Ireland from an insurance perspective is involved in this process through our participation in EIOPA.  In particular, I understand that the Central Bank is a member of the EIOPA Brexit Platform, which provides a forum for regulators to exchange information about firms’ plans.

While many firms are moving forward with Brexit preparation plans, the final impact of Brexit on insurers will depend on the outcome of the EU27-UK negotiations, with the nature and duration of transition arrangements an important factor in determining the speed of adjustment.

My Department’s preparation and contingency work is ongoing and continues to examine all possible scenarios and challenges, and is a key input into the whole of Government approach. As part of its contingency planning, the Department is engaged on an ongoing basis in examining the potential impacts of Brexit on the financial services sector including insurance and potential mitigants.  As part of this work the Department liaises with other Government Departments and Agencies who have responsibilities in this area, including Enterprise Ireland and the IDA. The Department also engages closely with the Central Bank of Ireland which has the statutory responsibility for financial stability.  Engagement with the Central Bank also takes place via the Financial Stability Group where Brexit is a standing item on the Group’s agenda.

Top
Share