Skip to main content
Normal View

Employment Support Services

Dáil Éireann Debate, Tuesday - 11 May 2021

Tuesday, 11 May 2021

Questions (548, 549)

Catherine Murphy

Question:

548. Deputy Catherine Murphy asked the Minister for Social Protection the number of persons that have had a sanction imposed on their payment for failing to engage with the JobPath services in 2019, 2020 and to date in 2021, by county in tabular form. [24472/21]

View answer

Catherine Murphy

Question:

549. Deputy Catherine Murphy asked the Minister for Social Protection the number of persons that have been referred to the JobPath service in 2019, 2020 and to date in 2021, by county in tabular form. [24473/21]

View answer

Written answers

I propose to take Questions Nos. 548 and 549 together.

My Department provides a range of employment supports for long-term unemployed jobseekers and those most distant from the labour market to secure and sustain full-time paid employment. These supports include the JobPath service.

The range of factors to be considered when applying a reduced rate of payment preclude me from making a definitive statement that the sole context involved in the application of a reduced rate would have been non engagement with the JobPath service. In addition the Deputy should note that that reduced rates of payment have been suspended since March 2020 as part of the Department's response to the pandemic.

The process for sanctioning clients who do not engage with the JobPath service is exactly the same as the process for clients who fail to engage with the Department’s employment service Intreo or by other contracted providers, the Local Employment Services and Job Clubs.

In the normal course of business, the JobPath service providers would submit non-engagement notifications to the Department. This is an administrative function which is not necessarily indicative of any particular outcome. In the majority of cases the client will be contacted, and their appointment will be rescheduled. Some clients may have multiple non-engagements recorded without any sanction.

Contracted providers do not apply or recommend the application of a reduced rate of payment. They simply inform the Department if a jobseeker is failing to attend the service without good cause. The application of reduced rates of payment is entirely a matter for my Department and officials involved will take all relevant factors into account.

In the interests of natural justice, a jobseeker who fails to engage with an employment service, whether that is provided directly by my Department’s Intreo Service or via a contracted service provider, is given both written and verbal warnings and an opportunity to comply before a reduced rate of payment is applied. Furthermore, Jobseekers can, through co-operation with my Department's employment services, benefit from early re-instatement of the full rate of Jobseeker’s payment.

Of those clients who were referred to and engaged with JobPath in 2019 , 2020 and thus far in 2021 some 2,235 unique clients had a reduced rate of payment applied at some stage during their engagement with JobPath. These are presented on a per county basis in table (i).

The JobPath service seeks to support the long-term unemployed to obtain and sustain paid employment. Covid restrictions have had a significant impact on the 2020 provision of services compared to previous years. Referrals stopped 3 times in 2020 (March, October and December).

Referrals recommenced in March 2021 and are continuing. The two JobPath providers, Seetec and Turas Nua have continued to work with those already referred and have moved to a remote model of service delivery engaging with customers remotely. The number of jobseekers who engaged with the JobPath service in 2019 , 2020 & to date in 2021 are set out on a per county basis in Table (ii).

Table (i) Clients referred to and engaged with JobPath in 2019, 2020 & 2021 (end March) who have had reduced rates of payment applied during their JobPath engagement period, listed by county.

County

Number of clients

Carlow

<10

Cavan

60

Clare

30

Cork

50

Donegal

20

Dublin

970

Galway

130

Kerry

30

Kildare

90

Kilkenny

<10

Laois

50

Leitrim

30

Limerick

70

Longford

40

Louth

50

Mayo

<10

Meath

190

Monaghan

20

Offaly

50

Roscommon

<10

Sligo

20

Tipperary

100

Waterford

80

Westmeath

80

Wexford

80

Wicklow

20

Please note: the figures in the above table have been rounded to the nearest 10, counties where there is a total of 10 clients or less have been marked as <10.

Table (ii) Clients referred to and engaged with JobPath in 2019, 2020 & 2021 (end March) listed by referral year & county

County

2019

2020

2021 YTD

Total

Carlow

797

740

109

1,646

Cavan

1,359

705

111

2,175

Clare

1,018

1,014

150

2,182

Cork

3,375

2,544

398

6,317

Donegal

3,478

1,732

181

5,391

Dublin

12,909

6,935

1,146

20,990

Galway

3,069

1,381

220

4,670

Kerry

1,248

1,307

131

2,686

Kildare

1,377

1,215

186

2,778

Kilkenny

798

665

84

1,547

Laois

999

843

165

2,007

Leitrim

726

439

73

1,238

Limerick

1,634

1,295

185

3,114

Longford

949

509

72

1,530

Louth

2,246

1,309

235

3,790

Mayo

2,105

746

177

3,028

Meath

1,561

848

137

2,546

Monaghan

611

322

42

975

Offaly

1,234

840

91

2,165

Roscommon

619

272

29

920

Sligo

1,038

619

61

1,718

Tipperary

1,526

1,209

173

2,908

Waterford

1,232

1,236

144

2,612

Westmeath

1,774

990

147

2,911

Wexford

1,655

1,995

221

3,871

Wicklow

1,064

1,028

142

2,234

Grand Total

50,401

32,738

4,810

87,949

Question No. 549 answered with Question No. 548.
Top
Share