I propose to take Questions Nos. 480 to 483, inclusive, together.
I was delighted to see the huge level of interest in the Results-Based Agri Environment Pilot (REAP), demonstrated by over 10,800 applications being received by the Department.
Initially, as REAP is a pilot initiative, we were limited to 2,000 spaces. However, the participation numbers in the project have been increased following consultation I had with the EU Commission. Approvals have now issued to 4,926 farmers for support to undertake environmental commitments to increase the environmental value of their farm features. This figure is more than double the original participation figure envisioned and there are no plans to increase the figure further.
As REAP was oversubscribed, a ranking and selection process was used to assess applications. This process considered the presence of priority water areas (as defined by the EPA) and the proportion of Natura and ANC land on the holding. The details of the selection process is outlined in section 10 of the REAP terms and conditions.
Applicants have a right to request a review of the decision to be declined entry to REAP, similar to other Department decisions, if they feel that decision was incorrect. Such review requests must set out the reason why the decision is considered to be incorrect. Full details of this option and contact details are included in correspondence that has issued directly to the farmers concerned.