Skip to main content
Normal View

Thursday, 24 Jun 2021

Written Answers Nos. 280-294

Human Rights

Questions (281)

Bernard Durkan

Question:

281. Deputy Bernard J. Durkan asked the Minister for Foreign Affairs the ten locations globally now deemed to be the most serious in the context of conflict, starvation, genocide, ethnic cleansing, human rights violations and any other issues threatening the lives and well-being of civilian populations with a view to enhancing the extent to which the UN can respond and protect communities in such circumstances; if the international community is sufficiently alert to such abuses and is willing to put in place measures to address these issues; and if he will make a statement on the matter. [34211/21]

View answer

Written answers

Conflict regrettably continues to be prevalent throughout the world, despite the call by the UN Secretary-General to all warring parties to pull back from hostilities during the current pandemic. Worldwide, conflict remains the primary driver of hunger and humanitarian crises.

The number and complexity of these crises globally has increased in recent years but each conflict is unique in its character, scale and complexity, and as such cannot be ranked by any single set of criteria of severity.

Ireland is a strong contributor to global efforts to prevent and resolve conflict, and to address hunger and violations of human rights. Central to this is our strong and enduring commitment to effective multilateralism, particularly through our Membership of the European Union and the United Nations. 

At the UN Security Council, Ireland is actively promoting accountability and compliance with international law in our work on the Council and its subsidiary bodies, including through the Informal Expert Group on Women, Peace and Security, which Ireland is co-chairing, and the Working Group on Children and Armed Conflict. 

Accountability, including for crimes against humanity, is important not only as a means of pursuing justice for victims, but also as a crucial component to create stability and peace in post-conflict situations. A strong international criminal justice system is central to fighting impunity and in deterring future violations.

While states bear the primary responsibility to investigate the most serious international crimes, Ireland regards the International Criminal Court as the cornerstone of such a system. Ireland, together with its EU partners is a consistent and strong supporter of the Court. We will continue to support and defend the Court throughout our term on the United Nations Security Council.

Ireland also has a long and proud tradition of contributing to UN and EU peace-support missions, including in some of the world’s most complex and intractable conflicts. The Government remains committed to participation in peacekeeping operations as a tangible contribution to the protection of global peace and security including the protection of human rights. 

Irish Aid

Questions (282)

Bernard Durkan

Question:

282. Deputy Bernard J. Durkan asked the Minister for Foreign Affairs the extent to which Ireland’s bilateral and multilateral aid programme continues to address hunger and starvation at various locations across the globe; and if he will make a statement on the matter. [34212/21]

View answer

Written answers

Ireland has been a long-standing champion of global efforts to reduce hunger and starvation. The roots of hunger lie in poverty, deprivation and exclusion, exacerbated by conflict, climate change - and now COVID-19. The eradication of hunger and a particular focus on tackling undernutrition has been a cornerstone of Ireland’s development programme since its inception.

‘A Better World’, Ireland’s policy for international development, makes a clear commitment to reaching the furthest behind first, including through an emphasis on food systems. For example, we allocated €25 million this year to the World Food Programme, €8 million of which was targeted to the response in Syria.

Successive OECD Development Assistance Committee (DAC) peer reviews have commended Ireland’s development cooperation for its poverty focus and commitment to Least Developed Countries. The OECD DAC’s most recent review, published in May 2020, notes that Ireland 'walks the talk' in allocating ODA to least developed countries and fragile states, priority partners and sectors.  The ODI, a leading development think-tank, has also ranked Ireland as the most effective international donor in directing resources to those in extreme poverty. 

Ireland works with a variety of partners in order to reach those in greatest need around the world. Our work through the EU and United Nations give Ireland a significant global presence and footprint, including in fragile states and conflict-affected contexts. Our partnerships with Irish and other NGOs enable us to emphasize food and malnutrition in our programmes, and target assistance to those most at risk of hunger.

Irish Aid

Questions (283)

Bernard Durkan

Question:

283. Deputy Bernard J. Durkan asked the Minister for Foreign Affairs the extent to which the Irish Aid programme continues to meet its targets globally; and if he will make a statement on the matter. [34213/21]

View answer

Written answers

Irish Aid's objectives are outlined in A Better World, Ireland's international development policy. These reflect Ireland's strong commitment to the sustainable development goals (SDGs) and its targets, which remain at the heart of our approach to international development.  The Government's annual report on official development assistance is a useful resource which details the impact of Irish Aid's investments in the prior year.  The most recent annual report is available on my Department's website at: https://www.irishaid.ie/media/irishaid/publications/Annual-Report-2019.pdf

Together with our partners, Ireland supports progress toward these goals and targets, and we are a well-respected donor. In 2020, Ireland's development programme was reviewed by its peers through the OECD Development Assistance Committee Peer Review mechanism. It found that Ireland is a strong development partner that 'walks the talk' on its poverty focus and on its commitment to least developed countries. 

That said, the pandemic has dramatically set back development gains across the world and many SDG targets are in jeopardy. In 2020, over 100 million people became "extremely poor". The pandemic also generated a global education crisis, especially for girls, and reversed hard-won gains in gender equality.  This will inform future programming choices. 

Globally, reversing these setbacks will take considerable investment and effort from all stakeholders. Recovering the gains that have been lost due to COVID-19 is an important focus of our bilateral, multilateral and Team Europe global response.

Irish Aid

Questions (284)

Bernard Durkan

Question:

284. Deputy Bernard J. Durkan asked the Minister for Foreign Affairs the extent to which the Irish Aid programme, multilateral and bilateral, continues to target those for whom the aid was intended; and if he will make a statement on the matter. [34214/21]

View answer

Written answers

Ireland's Official Development Assistance (ODA), directed through multilateral and bilateral channels, is directed to countries and people who are in greatest need.

A Better World, Ireland's international development policy, re-emphasizes this approach throughout with an overarching principle to reach those that are furthest behind first, as well as achieving the core objective of reducing humanitarian need. 

Our ability to follow-through on these commitments in practice is evident in, for example, the high proportion of Irish Aid funding which targets least developed and low income countries. Where the average DAC member's bilateral allocation to these countries is just under one quarter, half of Irish ODA is bilateral aid to low income and least developed countries. 

Our commitment to, and ability to deliver on, a needs-based allocation of development assistance is also internationally recognised. In 2020, the OECD Development Assistance Committee (DAC) highlighted Ireland as "an excellent humanitarian partner", with its funding models a "useful inspiration for other DAC donors".

Also last year, the respected international think-tank ODI assessed the characteristics of ODA expenditure in leading donors and found Ireland to be the most principled donor, noting specifically Ireland's needs-based approach. 

Irish Aid

Questions (285)

Bernard Durkan

Question:

285. Deputy Bernard J. Durkan asked the Minister for Foreign Affairs the number of bilateral aid programmes currently being progressed by Irish Aid; the extent to which they continue to make a difference; and if he will make a statement on the matter. [34215/21]

View answer

Written answers

Irish Aid currently has 11 bilateral programmes. There are nine in sub-Saharan African countries: Ethiopia, Liberia, Malawi, Mozambique, Uganda, Sierra Leone, South Africa, Tanzania, and Zambia; with two further bilateral programmes in Vietnam and the Occupied Palestinian Territories (OPT).

A number of the Embassies in these countries support development work in countries of secondary accreditation as well, for example, from South Africa we support development work in Zimbabwe.

These programmes continue to make a difference in partner countries. Results and key lessons from our bilateral programmes are included in the Irish Aid annual report. Importantly, these programmes also make a valuable contribution to our multilateral development work, as they provide us with on-the-ground information about the challenges developing countries are facing and knowledge about possible solutions that can be supported at scale by the likes of the UN and the World Bank. 

Irish Aid

Questions (286)

Bernard Durkan

Question:

286. Deputy Bernard J. Durkan asked the Minister for Foreign Affairs the degree to which Irish Aid continues to engage in projects providing drinking water to communities suffering from a lack of clean water; and if he will make a statement on the matter. [34216/21]

View answer

Written answers

Safe drinking water is essential in the fight against poverty, hunger, child deaths and gender inequality, and has a renewed importance in preventing the spread of COVID-19. Despite this, 844 million people worldwide lack access to safe drinking water.

Ireland recognises that ensuring affordable and sustainable access to clean water is a key public health and development issue. The 2030 Agenda for Sustainable Development commits countries to combat water-borne diseases, and to significantly reduce the number of deaths and illness from water pollution and contamination.

Ireland’s efforts to ensure greater clean water access are delivered through different development partners. These include local and national Government agencies; Irish, international and local NGOs; and multilateral organisations.  Ireland will continue to emphasise the importance of clean water at key multilateral events, such as the upcoming Food Systems Summit. 

For example, Ireland supports community water and sanitation projects in Mozambique and Vietnam, is investing in solar panels for a sewage treatment plant in Gaza, and upgrading of sanitation in schools in Sierra Leone.  Ireland also supports the UN’s Global Environment Monitoring System, helping developing countries to accurately monitor water quality, working with University College Cork.

Irish Aid

Questions (287)

Bernard Durkan

Question:

287. Deputy Bernard J. Durkan asked the Minister for Foreign Affairs the degree to which Irish Aid continues to engage with communities across the globe that are deeply affected by a lack of basic health and hygiene requirements; and if he will make a statement on the matter. [34217/21]

View answer

Written answers

Ireland recognises that access to health systems and basic sanitation remain out of reach for many of the world’s poorest communities, despite the progress that has been made in reducing child mortality, improving maternal health and fighting diseases including HIV and AIDS.

In Ireland’s international development policy, A Better World, we have committed to continue to support global ambitions towards ending the epidemics of AIDS, TB and malaria. Improving the quality and availability of health services with a strong focus on maternal and child health has been a long-standing emphasis of Ireland’s development cooperation.

Through the Health Service Executive Global Programme, Irish NGOs and projects funded by Irish Missions abroad, Ireland is working to address the barriers to access and quality of health services. People-centered, gender responsive and community-based responses  are prioritised. Ireland is also supporting a range of projects to build basic water and sanitation facilities at community level, through our bilateral programmes. 

In 2021, Ireland has allocated at least €100 million to global public health, which includes the COVID-19 response. Also included in this €100 million is funding of €15 million to the Global Fund to fight AIDS, TB and Malaria, and €3 million to Gavi, the global vaccine alliance. This strong health response is especially important as health systems globally are under strain due to the COVID-19 pandemic.

Question No. 288 answered with Question No. 269.

Foreign Conflicts

Questions (289)

Bernard Durkan

Question:

289. Deputy Bernard J. Durkan asked the Minister for Foreign Affairs the extent to which the Boko Haram and Al Shabaab are being deterred through the activities of the international community or otherwise; and if he will make a statement on the matter. [34219/21]

View answer

Written answers

Ireland strongly condemns the continued violence perpetrated by Boko Haram and Al Shabaab. Ireland supports the EU, UN and other international efforts to reduce the influence of Boko Haram and Al Shabaab and to prevent their attacks, especially against civilians and humanitarian workers and facilities. Ireland continues to monitor the activities of these groups and to assist populations affected by their actions.

Through Irish Aid, the Government's official aid programme, Ireland is tackling poverty, hunger and exclusion which can be a driver of support for groups such as Boko Haram and Al Shabaab, as well as responding to humanitarian need in regions affected by conflict. This includes €27 million in humanitarian funding to the Lake Chad region since 2015, and also funding for those displaced by conflict in North-East Nigeria, where the numbers of people in need of humanitarian assistance and protection are at the highest levels recorded. Since 2012, Ireland has provided over €56.4 million in humanitarian assistance to Somalia, including to communities displaced by conflict in Al Shabaab-held areas.  With humanitarian needs in these regions likely to remain acute, Irish funding will continue to target those most in need.

The UN is active in the Lake Chad Basin areas affected by Boko Haram, through its Office for West Africa and the Sahel (UNOWAS) and the UN Peacebuilding Commission. Ireland is penholder together with Niger on the UNOWAS file at the UN Security Council, working to ensure that UNOWAS has a clear strategic direction in its work on conflict prevention and peacebuilding in West Africa. In its Presidential Statement on peace consolidation in West Africa of 3 February, the Security Council condemned attacks against civilians in Borno State on 28 November 2020, and the abduction of schoolchildren in Katsina state, claimed by Boko Haram.

The UN-mandated African Union-led peacekeeping mission in Somalia (AMISOM) supports the Federal Government of Somalia in its efforts to combat Al Shabaab.  Ireland is Chair of the Somalia Sanctions Committee at the UN Security Council.  That Committee oversees an arms embargo and other tools to encourage a more peaceful and secure Somalia, including engagement with Al Shabaab.  This complements Ireland’s role as an EU Member State supporting Somalia, including the strengthening of its government institutions.  The EU provides significant development funding to Somalia, and to countries affected by Boko Haram. Ireland is a member of the International Support Group of the Regional Stabilisation Strategy for the Lake Chad Basin (ISG), and has observer status at the Sahel Alliance:  both are forums which enable donors to coordinate support in addressing the challenges in Boko Haram-affected areas of the Lake Chad Basin.  

The EU has three Common Security and Defence Policy (CSDP) Missions in the Horn of Africa. A number of Irish nationals are deployed to EUCAP Somalia, including the current Head of Mission. In the Sahel, Ireland currently has 20 Defence Forces personnel participating in EUTM Mali. Ireland also deploys one expert to the EUCAP Sahel Niger. 14 Defence Forces personnel are deployed in the United Nations Multidimensional Integrated Stabilisation Mission in Mali (MINUSMA). Ireland’s participation in these missions allows us to contribute to peace and security across the Sahel and the Horn of Africa, help protect human rights, and put in place conditions for its sustainable development.

Human Rights

Questions (290)

Bernard Durkan

Question:

290. Deputy Bernard J. Durkan asked the Minister for Foreign Affairs the extent to which the international community continues to assist in the fight against political and human rights abuses in Belarus; and if he will make a statement on the matter. [34220/21]

View answer

Written answers

Ireland stands in solidarity with the Belarusian people in their dignified and staunch defence of their democratic and human rights. The international community have repeatedly expressed their strong concerns regarding the ongoing repression of the Belarusian people by the Lukashenko regime across a range of international fora. Along with our EU and like-minded international partners, we will continue to ensure that international attention remains focused on the appalling human rights situation in Belarus.

Despite repeated calls from the international community, the Belarusian authorities have shown no willingness to investigate violations of human rights in their own country and have permitted the security forces to act with impunity. Ireland and the EU have been clear that impunity breeds violence and we have taken a number of concrete steps to bring international accountability. 

Ireland has made our deep concern at the situation in Belarus clear in UN Security Council discussions on the matter. Ireland worked constructively to ensure the successful adoption of an EU-led resolution at the Human Rights Council that expanded the mandate of the Office of the UN High Commissioner for Human Rights to investigate the over two thousand reported cases of human rights violations in Belarus. The High Commissioner’s team have begun their work, which will be complemented by the NGO-led International Accountability Platform for Belarus and investigations in EU Member States under the concept of Universal Jurisdiction. 

We regret that the Belarusian authorities continue to deny the UN Special Rapporteur on the situation of human rights in Belarus access to the country in her official capacity. Until she is given the opportunity to complete her important work, we will continue to support the renewal of her mandate, including during the ongoing forty-seventh session of the Human Rights Council. We will also continue to call on the regime to implement the recommendations of OSCE expert investigator, Professor Wolfgang Benedek, which are outlined in his November 2020 Moscow Mechanism Report. 

Sanctions also play a role in bringing international accountability and as a signal of solidarity with the Belarusian people. I and my fellow EU foreign ministers agreed a fourth package of targeted sanctions during the 21 June Foreign Affairs Council, bringing the total number of those sanctioned to one hundred and sixty-six individuals, including Lukashenko himself, and fifteen economic entities. Those targeted include those responsible for the ongoing repression, the coercive forced landing of the Ryanair aircraft on 23 May, the falsification of the August 2020 Presidential election result in Belarus, and those supporting or profiting from the Lukashenko regime. 

The EU is working on operationalising carefully calibrated economic sanctions that target the wallets of the regime. This is one of the concrete measures agreed by EU leaders at the European Council on 24 May, in response to the flagrant disregard for international law and human rights shown by the Belarusian authorities. Ireland is playing a constructive role and we remain open to considering further measures at a later stage.

Ireland and our EU partners continue to support the Belarusian people as best we can by redirecting EU funding away from the regime and towards civil society. Member States have also coordinated on efforts taken at national level to provide support. For our part, Ireland contributed national funds to two projects through the European Endowment for Democracy that seek to protect the human rights and media freedoms of the Belarusian people. In a further signal of support, on 28 May the EU Commission announced a €3 billion economic support package for a future democratic Belarus.

Our focus remains on pressing the Lukashenko regime to respect the human rights and fundamental freedoms of the Belarusian people, to adhere to their international commitments, and to engage in a meaningful national dialogue that leads to fresh elections that are free and fair. That is what we will continue to do. 

Question No. 291 answered with Question No. 275.

Military Honours

Questions (292)

John McGuinness

Question:

292. Deputy John McGuinness asked the Minister for Defence the status of the report being undertaken by an independent review group into the question of the recommendation of gallantry medals for the Irish soldiers involved in the siege of Jadotville; the timeframe for the completion of the report and a final decision; if the report will be published; and if he will make a statement on the matter. [34043/21]

View answer

Written answers

The issue of awarding of Military Medals for Gallantry (MMG) and Distinguished Service Medals (DSMs) to personnel who served in Jadotville in September 1961 has been considered on a number of occasions over the years and a number of actions have taken place to give due recognition to the courage and bravery of all the members of “A” Company, 35th Infantry Battalion who were stationed in Jadotville in 1961.

Notwithstanding the actions that have been undertaken to date, I have asked the Chief of Staff to consider whether it is possible, as an exceptional measure, to have a retrospective examination of the events at Jadotville in September 1961 in the context of the award of medals and the possible implications for the integrity of the award of medals system.  In response the Chief of Staff proposed the establishment of an independent group of external experts to consider the entire case and evidence, including new evidence, if any, available.

The Independent Review Group was established by the Chief of Staff in December 2020 and consists of the following members:

Brigadier-General Paul Pakenham (Retired) (Group Chairperson).

Dr Michael Kennedy, Royal Irish Academy.

Commandant Billy Campbell (Retired).

RSM Michael Dillon (Retired).

Ms Linda Hickey, Military Archives.

Their Terms of Reference are as follows.  The Review Group will

(a)  consider ONUC’s operational environment in Katanga, and in particular in Elizabethville and Jadotville

(b)  consider the historical evidence and processes in relation to all recommendations for military medals received with respect to the events at Jadotville or encompassing Jadotville.

(c)  engage with national and international stakeholders (including Jadotville veterans) as appropriate, with a view to uncovering any additional or new evidence in this case.

(d) may consider the actions of individuals not already the subject of a recommendation for a medal in respect of Jadotville

(e)  report its findings to the Chief of Staff. The Review Group may make recommendations in relation to possible awards in respect of Jadotville.

In line with the Terms of Reference, the Independent Review Group will examine, report and make recommendations in relation to the ‘Battle of Jadotville’ from 13 to 17 September 1961 and will report its findings to the Chief of Staff.

The Independent Review Group have been actively engaged in the consultation and research process and was originally due to conclude by 31st March 2021.  However, given the sheer volume of meetings and the comprehensive nature of the research process, an interim report was submitted and an extension to the timeframe for reporting to the Chief of Staff was requested.   

Taking into account the volume of research material and engagement being undertaken by the Independent Review Group in the course of its work on this very important matter, this request for extension was acceded to.  It is expected that the Independent Review Group will submit it's final report to the Convening Authority shortly.

Once the work of the Indpendent Review Group has been  completed, the Chief of Staff will make recommendations, as appropriate, to my Office.

At this juncture, it would be premature to state if the interim  report or the final report, once submitted, will be published or released.  I will await the outcome of the work of the Independent Review Group and the recommendations of the Chief of Staff in due course.  When the final report has been received and any findings have been given due consideration, a decision on the release of the interim report and final report will then be made, taking into account any legal or other considerations arising.

Scoileanna Lán-Ghaeilge

Questions (293)

Catherine Murphy

Question:

293. D'fhiafraigh Deputy Catherine Murphy den Aire Oideachais cad iad na pleananna atá aici chun bunscoil lán-Ghaeilge a bhunú i gCilldroichid, Contae Chill Dara; an dtabharfaidh sí achoimre ar aon idirghníomhaíocht atá ar siúl aici nó ag a Roinn le scoileanna sa cheantar chun oideachas trí Ghaeilge a chur ar fáil sna scoileanna sinata aici bunscoil Ghaelach i Celbridge, Contae Chill Dara a bhunú; achoimre a thabhairt maidir le aon idirgníomhaíocht atá ar siúl aici nó ag a Roinn le scoileanna sa cheantar chun oideachas a chur ar fáil trí Ghaeilge sna scoileanna sin; agus an ndéanfaidh sí ráiteas ina thaobh. [33993/21]

View answer

Written answers

Chun pleanáil a dhéanamh le haghaidh sholáthar scoile agus anailís a dhéanamh ar na sonraí déimeagrafacha ábhartha, déanann an Roinn seo an tír a roinnt ina 314 limistéar pleanála scoile agus baineann sí úsáid as Córas Faisnéise Geografaí, ag úsáid sonraí ó raon foinsí, lena n-áirítear sonraí maidir le Sochar Leanaí agus rollú scoile, chun a fháil amach cá háit a mbeidh an brú ar áiteanna scoile ar fud na tíre agus nuair a bheidh cóiríocht bhreise scoile de dhíth ag leibhéal bunscoile agus iar-bhunscoile.

Nuair a thugtar le fios sna sonraí go bhfuil gá le soláthar breise ar leibhéal bunscoile nó iar-bhunscoile, bíonn seachadadh na forála breise sin ag brath ar chúinsí áirithe gach cáis agus is féidir í a sholáthar trí cheann amháin, nó trí mheascán díobh seo a leanas:

- An acmhainn neamhúsáidte atá ann cheana a úsáid laistigh de scoil nó scoileanna,

- Acmhainn scoile nó scoileanna a leathnú,

- Scoil nó scoileanna nua a sholáthar.

Bunaítear scoileanna nua mar fhreagairt ar éileamh déimeagrafach mar a shainaithnítear iad trí anailís den sórt sin. Léirítear sna réamh-mheastacháin is déanaí ón Roinn seo an t-éileamh laghdaithe ar áiteanna bunscoile i limistéar pleanála scoile Chill Droichid, ach leanfar ag athbhreithniú na riachtanas.

Mar is eol don Teachta, ó Aibreán 2018, d’fhógair mo Roinn pleananna chun 47 scoil nua a bhunú lena n-áirítear bunscoileanna i Léim an Bhradáin, Maigh Nuad, agus sa Nás. Tá na scoileanna i Léim an Bhradáin, agus i Maigh Nuad curtha ar bun cheana féin agus is Gaelscoil í an scoil i Maigh Nuad faoi phátrúnacht An Foras Pátrúnachta. Cinnfear pátrúnacht agus teanga an teagaisc don scoil nua sa Nás trí phróiseas pátrúnachta as seo amach.

Rinneadh an próiseas um Athchóiriú Scoileanna don Éagsúlacht a fhorbairt d’fhonn dlús a chur le seachadadh scoileanna ilchreidmheacha ar fud na tíre. Is éard atá i gceist leis an bpróiseas Athchóirithe seo aistriú scoileanna atá ann cheana féin seachas samhail chónasctha agus / nó dúnta an phróisis maidir le dífheistiú pátrúnachta. Soláthraíonn an próiseas deiseanna do scoileanna ilchreidmheacha breise i nGaeilge nó i mBéarla. D’fhéadfadh roinnt scoileanna Béarla iarracht a dhéanamh aistriú go Gaelscoil sa chomhthéacs sin.

Special Educational Needs

Questions (294)

Aodhán Ó Ríordáin

Question:

294. Deputy Aodhán Ó Ríordáin asked the Minister for Education if she will provide statistical information regarding special schools and their students (details supplied). [34004/21]

View answer

Written answers

I wish to advise the Deputy that my Department continues to prioritise investment in special education, with over €2 Billion due to be spent on special education this year.

For the coming school year there will be over 13,600 Special Education Teachers allocated to mainstream schools, who will support class teachers to address the special educational needs and learning needs of pupils who attend mainstream schools.

This year we are also providing for two new special schools and 269 new special classes.

For the 2021/22 school year, we will have a total of 2118 special classes, which is the largest number of special classes that we have ever had, and compares to 548 classes available in 2011.

18,000 Special Needs Assistants will also be available to support the care needs of pupils with special educational needs in our schools.

For the 2019/20 school year, 10,328 pupils attended special classes, which represents just over 1% of the total pupil population.

There are also 124 special schools which provide specialist educational services for pupils who have the most severe or complex levels of disabilities, or special educational needs.  

For the 2019/20 school year, 8,224 pupils attended special schools, representing less than 1% of the total pupil population.

The remainder of pupils who have some form of additional learning needs or special educational needs attend mainstream schools. 

In relation to the use of reduced time tables, it is the policy of my Department that all children, including children with special educational needs should attend school for the full school day.

Only in very limited circumstances, for example, where children are recovering from illness, and are required to be reintegrated into school, should reduced timetables be considered. In such circumstances, this should be part of a transition or reintegration intervention, based on the needs of individual students.

Where a reduced timetable is used, it should be applied proportionately, should have signed parental/guardian consent and should last only as long as is necessary to facilitate a return to school on a full-time basis. 

The Department has consulted with education stakeholders to consider the timing of the introduction of guidelines on reduced timetables in the context of Covid 19 and the current operating environment for schools. There were concerns about issuing guidelines in the current Covid context where the safe and sustainable reopening of schools remains the overriding priority for all stakeholders.

It is my Department’s intention to issue Guidelines to schools on the use of reduced timetables for the next school year.

It is intended that the guidelines will include measures by which schools will be required to report on the use of reduced timetables.

Until such time as this reporting mechanism is in place, data is not available as to the number of pupils who are currently on reduced timetables.

In relation to the number of appeals taken under Section 29 of the Education Act against suspension or refusal to enrol pupils with special educational needs, Section 7 of the Education (Admissions to Schools) Act 2018 came into operation on the 12 November 2020 and provided for the replacement of the existing Section 29 of the Education Act 1998 with a series of new sections numbered 29 to 29F.

These new appeal provisions in sections 29 to 29F are designed to work alongside the wider admissions framework in the 2018 Act. In accordance with section 29B of the Education Act, 1998, the Minister also developed procedures for appeals which apply to all appeals submitted from 12 November 2020 onwards.

Since the commencement of the new arrangements for appeals on the 12 November 2020 to date, a total of 95 appeals have been taken under section 29 of the Education Act 2018 where the applicant has indicated that the child has special educational needs. This represents 29% of all appeals in the same period.

Prior to 12 November only data in relation to total numbers of appeals per appeal type was recorded and therefore the Department cannot provide data in relation to the numbers of appeals which related to children with special educational needs for previous years. 

Section 29 of the Education Act 2018 allows for appeals against the decision of a Board of Management of a school to suspend or permanently exclude a student. The decision of the independent appeals committee in such appeals may only be challenged by way of a Judicial Review. It is open to either party to an appeal to seek a Judicial Review.

My Department has recorded the following number of Judicial Reviews of section 29 appeal decisions in suspension and expulsion cases involving children with special educational needs in the last 3 years and to date in 2021:

2021 - 1 expulsion case

2020 – 2 expulsion cases

2019 - 3 expulsion cases and 1 suspension case

2018 – 0 cases

In relation to the number of pupils with special educational needs who may be currently on suspension, expulsion, or out of school, and for whom Section 29 cases may not have been brought forward, I wish to advise the Deputy that in accordance with the Education (Welfare) Act, 2000 schools are obliged to report on school attendance, and data on non-attendance in primary and post-primary schools at the aggregated level are collected by Tusla through the Annual Attendance Report (AAR) and, also at the student level through the Student Attendance Report (SAR).

This latest report published presents data for the academic year 2017/18 and is available on Tusla’s website at

https://www.tusla.ie/uploads/content/Analysis_of_School_Attendance_Data_in_Primary_and_Post-Primary_Schools_2017-2018.pdf

As the information requested is collected and recorded by Tusla, I have referred this part of the question to that agency, for their attention and direct reply to the Deputy. 

Finally, in respect of children with special educational needs who may not be suspended or expelled, but who may be without a school placement, I can advise that ensuring that every child has a suitable school placement is a key objective of my Department.  Significant resources are allocated each year to ensure that appropriate supports are available for children with special educational needs.

It is the policy of my Department that all children with Special Educational Needs can have access to an education appropriate to their needs, preferably in school settings through the primary and post primary school network.

Such placements facilitate access to individualised education programmes which may draw from a range of appropriate educational interventions, delivered by fully qualified professional teachers, with the support of Special Needs Assistants and the appropriate school curriculum.

My Department’s policy focuses on ensuring that all students with special educational needs can have access to an education appropriate to meeting their needs and abilities.

The National Council for Special Education (NCSE) is responsible, through its network of Special Needs Organisers (SENOs), for the development and delivery and co-ordination of education services to children with Special Educational Needs, including the establishment of special class and special school placements. 

In circumstances, where the NCSE confirms that no placement is available for a child with special educational needs, my Department can provide Home Tuition grant funding towards the provision of 20 hours home tuition per week as an interim measure until the NCSE confirms that a placement is available.

It is important to note that Home tuition funding is not an alternative to a school placement, by its nature it is intended to be a short term intervention.

For this reason home tuition will not be available where a school placement has been identified by the NCSE.  

Similarly, failure to enrol a child in school will not give rise to eligibility under this scheme.

I have no plans to change this approach.   

Where the NCSE have identified an available school placement for a child, the local SENO will continue to be available to engage with the family and the school concerned to ensure that the child's needs are addressed.

The total number of children with special educational needs who are being supported by the Home Tuition scheme on the grounds that they do not currently have a school placement, or an early intervention class placement, is 732.

 -

Sanctioned

 

 

SEN school aged no placement

88

3+   (Early Intervention support)

522

6 During year

37

6+

85

Total

732

Top
Share