Skip to main content
Normal View

Tuesday, 26 Jul 2022

Written Answers Nos. 1191-1205

Social Welfare Code

Questions (1191, 1192)

Richard Boyd Barrett

Question:

1191. Deputy Richard Boyd Barrett asked the Minister for Social Protection if she intends to raise the income limit for access to the State pension non-contributory to bring into the net those on semi-State pensions who cannot access living alone allowance, fuel allowance and the household benefits package due to being marginally over the limit but yet are under the poverty line and at serious risk due to the rise in the cost of living; and if she will make a statement on the matter. [39810/22]

View answer

Richard Boyd Barrett

Question:

1192. Deputy Richard Boyd Barrett asked the Minister for Social Protection the number of persons on semi-State pensions that are unable to access the living alone allowance, the fuel allowance or the household benefits package due to being over the income limit for a State pension but below the poverty line; if she intends to extend the income limit further to bring these persons into the net given the cost-of-living crisis; and if she will make a statement on the matter. [39811/22]

View answer

Written answers

I propose to take Questions Nos. 1191 and 1192 together.

Policy issues related to civil service and public service pensions are matters for my colleague, the Minister for Public Expenditure and Reform. My Department does not hold records for Semi-State pensions.

State Pension (Non-Contributory) is a means-tested payment for people aged 66 or over who do not qualify for the State Pension (Contributory) maximum payment rate based on their social insurance record. As such, all recipients of the State Pension (Non-Contributory) are subject to a means test. The system of social assistance supports provides payments based on an income need. This ensures that each recipient has a verifiable income need and that resources are targeted to those who need them most. A maximum rate is payable where a person has no or limited means, and tapering applies to the rate payable to those with modest or more substantial means, as there is an expectation that those with resources can, at least partly, contribute towards supporting themselves.

Primary weekly social welfare payments are intended to enable recipients to meet their basic day-to-day income needs. In addition, my Department also provides a range of other secondary payments, both cash and non-cash, on a weekly, monthly, or less frequent basis. The Living Alone Allowance is one of those secondary payments. It is not a scheme or a stand-alone payment, but rather it is a weekly supplement paid to people who are in receipt of certain social welfare payments and who are living alone.

The Fuel Allowance is also a secondary-type payment and a person must be in receipt of a qualifying long-term social protection type payment to receive the allowance. The criteria for Fuel Allowance are framed to direct the limited resources available to the Department in as targeted a manner as possible, and so it is focused on recipients of long-term social protection payments where an applicant satisfies a means test. People in receipt of such long-term supports are unlikely to have additional resources of their own and are more vulnerable to poverty, including energy poverty.

The Household Benefits Package (HHB) helps with the cost of electricity or gas bill and the TV licence. Only one person in a household can receive the package. The package is available to everyone aged over 70 (no means testing applies) and, therefore, a person aged over 70 and who is not in receipt of a State Pension may still qualify for HHB. A person aged between 66 and 69 who is not receiving a qualifying payment from the Department may still apply for the HHB package subject to satisfying a means test.

The means test involves calculating their appropriate weekly means limit. This limit is based on the current maximum rate of State Pension (Contributory) including any increases for age, living alone, and adult/child dependents plus €120. The weekly income limit is then compared to their weekly means as assessed in a means test. If their weekly means are less than or equal to their income limit, then they satisfy the means test and qualify for the Household Benefits Package subject to also satisfying all other qualifying conditions. Therefore, a person in receipt of a Semi-State pension may still qualify for HHB.

While the Department's schemes are reviewed on an ongoing basis, any further expansions to the State Pension (Non-Contributory), Living Alone Allowance, Fuel Allowance and HHB schemes would have cost implications and could only be considered while taking account of the overall budgetary context and the availability of financial resources.

Finally, the Department of Social Protection provides Additional Needs Payments as part of the Supplementary Welfare Allowance scheme for people who have an urgent need, which they cannot meet from their own resources. These payments are available through our Community Welfare Officers.

I hope this clarifies the matter for the Deputy.

Question No. 1192 answered with Question No. 1191.

Pension Provisions

Questions (1193, 1210, 1211, 1229)

Niall Collins

Question:

1193. Deputy Niall Collins asked the Minister for Social Protection if she can review correspondence (details supplied); and if he will provide an update on the issues raised therein; and if she will make a statement on the matter. [39815/22]

View answer

Richard Boyd Barrett

Question:

1210. Deputy Richard Boyd Barrett asked the Minister for Social Protection if her Department has examined the way in which persons can be accommodated in the case of schemes that are not yet compliant with the Institutions for Occupational Retirement Provision II regulations and its impact on one-member pension arrangements established after 22 April 2022 , given that are no suitable PRSA arrangements in place; if she will consider extending the deadline for compliance with the Provision for these schemes for six months from 1 July to 1 January 2023, to allow for the proposed changes to be made to the PRSA system (details supplied); and if she will make a statement on the matter. [40083/22]

View answer

Gerald Nash

Question:

1211. Deputy Ged Nash asked the Minister for Social Protection her views on a policy issue raised by an organisation (details supplied) pertaining to one member pension arrangements; and if she will make a statement on the matter. [40122/22]

View answer

Matt Shanahan

Question:

1229. Deputy Matt Shanahan asked the Minister for Social Protection the steps that her Department is taking to regularising a pensions issue, one-member pensions (details supplied); and if she will make a statement on the matter. [40361/22]

View answer

Written answers

I propose to take Questions Nos. 1193, 1210, 1211 and 1229 together.

As the Deputies may be aware, the supervision of compliance with the requirements of the Pensions Act 1990 (‘1990 Act’), including new IORP II related requirements introduced into that Act, is the responsibility of the Pensions Authority, which is the regulator for pensions in Ireland. The Pensions Authority is an independent statutory body, and, consequently, the Deputies will appreciate that it would not be possible or appropriate for me, or my officials, to interfere with the Pensions Authority’s compliance supervision function or to direct the Pensions Authority to extend any compliance deadline. Furthermore, IORP II requires Member States to ensure that competent authorities, such as the Pensions Authority, conduct their tasks in a transparent, independent and accountable manner.

Directive (EU) 2016/2341 of the European Parliament and of the Council of 14 December 2016 on the activities and supervision of institutions for occupational retirement provision (IORPs) (‘IORP II’), which became effective from 13 January 2019, sets out minimum standards for the management and supervision of pension schemes, with the objective of ensuring the soundness of occupational pensions and better protections for scheme members and beneficiaries across the European Union.

IORP II requirements were transposed into Irish law by way of the European Union (Occupational Pension Schemes) Regulations 2021 (S.I. No. 128 of 2021) which came into force on 22nd April 2021. The general principle followed in respect of the transposition of IORP II, in keeping with the Government’s Roadmap for Pensions Reform, is that the requirements of IORP II apply to all schemes and trust RACs, including one-member arrangements (‘OMAs’). This is in order to ensure that all members and beneficiaries are afforded equal protection irrespective of the size of the pension arrangement. It should be noted that the decision to apply the requirements of IORP II to all schemes and trust RACs was announced by the Government in 2019 and it was expected that trustees and insurance providers would have been preparing for compliance with these requirements in advance of transposition.

The application of IORP II is prospective, not retrospective. This means that existing investments made, or borrowings entered into, by OMAs prior to S.I. No. 128 of 2021 coming into force on 22nd April 2021 can remain in place. As of that date –

- in the case of OMAs which were already established –

- IORP II investment and borrowing rules will apply only to new investments or borrowings entered into by such arrangements, and

- a five-year derogation from that date applies in respect of other new IORP II requirements,

- in the case of OMAs established on or after that date, such arrangements are required to meet all new IORP II related requirements set out under the 1990 Act, where applicable, from the date on which they were established. From a supervision perspective, the Pensions Authority has, however, outlined that it was applying a deadline of 1st July 2022 in respect of OMA’s compliance with those new requirements.

The Report of the Interdepartmental Pensions Reform and Taxation Group (IDPRTG), which was published in late 2020, set out a number of measures to help advance the goal of simplifying and harmonising the supplementary pension landscape including some recommendations in relation to PRSAs. A group comprising officials from the relevant Departments and organisations reconvened in 2021 to consider implementation of the various recommendations. To this end, a package of measures was enacted in the Finance Act 2021 which included: the removal of a prohibition of transfers from an occupational pension scheme to a Personal Retirement Savings Account for members with more than 15 years’ service; the abolition of the Approved Minimum Retirement Fund; and the extension of an Approved Retirement Fund option to death-in-service benefits.

The IDPRTG implementation group continues its work considering the various recommendations with a view to bringing further reform measures to legislative effective as soon as possible. In this regard, a number of proposals from the 2020 Report are currently being examined and worked on, some of which are technical in nature and others, which have wider policy implications, necessitating careful consideration through the normal policy channels. Of course, any measures requiring legislative change will have to complete legislative passage through the Oireachtas and there can be no guarantees until the relevant Bill is signed into law and enacted.

The Deputies can be assured that I and my officials will continue to closely monitor developments in relation to supplementary pension arrangements and will, where necessary, work towards putting in place appropriate policy responses.

I hope this clarifies the position for the Deputies.

School Meals Programme

Questions (1194, 1195, 1284, 1285)

John Lahart

Question:

1194. Deputy John Lahart asked the Minister for Social Protection the estimated total cost of the school meals programme at primary and post-primary level. [39820/22]

View answer

John Lahart

Question:

1195. Deputy John Lahart asked the Minister for Social Protection the estimated cost of providing either hot or cold meals to pupils in all schools at primary and post-primary level. [39821/22]

View answer

Richard Boyd Barrett

Question:

1284. Deputy Richard Boyd Barrett asked the Minister for Social Protection the estimated full-year cost of providing free school meals for all post-primary school pupils in public schools; and if she will make a statement on the matter. [41438/22]

View answer

Richard Boyd Barrett

Question:

1285. Deputy Richard Boyd Barrett asked the Minister for Social Protection the estimated full-year cost of providing free school meals for all primary school pupils in public schools; and if she will make a statement on the matter. [41439/22]

View answer

Written answers

I propose to take Questions Nos. 1194, 1195, 1284 and 1285 together.

The school meals programme provides funding towards the provision of food to some 1,800 schools and organisations benefitting 290,000 children. The objective of the programme is to provide regular, nutritious food to children who are unable, due to lack of good quality food, to take full advantage of the education provided to them. The programme is an important component of policies to encourage school attendance and extra educational achievement.

A budget of €68.1 million was provided for the scheme in the 2022 Revised Estimates.

Funding under the school meals (local projects) scheme can be provided for breakfast, snack, lunch, dinner, hot meals and afterschool clubs and is based on a maximum rate per child per day, depending on the type of meal being provided.

In recent years, entry to the school meals programme has been confined to DEIS schools in addition to schools identified as having levels of concentrated disadvantage that would benefit from access to the programme.

As part of Budget 2019, funding was provided for a pilot scheme from September 2019, providing hot school meals in primary schools at a cost of €1m for 2019 and €2.5m in 2020. The pilot involved 37 schools benefitting 6,744 students for the 2019/2020 academic year and was aimed primarily at schools with no onsite cooking facilities.

In Budget 2021, I announced an additional €5.5m to extend the provision of hot school meals to an additional 35,000 primary school children, currently receiving the cold lunch option. Invitations for expressions of interest were issued to 705 primary schools (612 DEIS and 93 non-DEIS) in November 2020. A total of 281 (256 DEIS and 25 non-DEIS) expressions of interest were received in respect of 52,148 children.

The 35,000 places were allocated to each local authority area based on the number of children applied for by each local authority as a percentage of the total number. A minimum of one school for each Local Authority area was selected. Thereafter, a process of random selection was used for each area.

Budget 2022 provided for hot school meals to be extended from January 2022 to the 81 DEIS schools that submitted an expression of interest but were not selected in the extension to 35,000 children as referred to earlier. This has brought the number of children currently benefitting from a hot school meal to 54,266. In March 2022, the Minister for Education announced an extension of the Delivering Equality of Opportunity in School to an additional 284 primary and 38 post-primary schools from September 2022.

I have recently announced that the provision of the hot school meal option will be extended to all new DEIS primary schools and the cold lunch option to all new DEIS secondary schools at a full year cost of €26m and benefitting some 60,000 children. However, as 31 of these schools are already in receipt of funding, the additional cost of providing these options is €23.5m in a full year.

The estimated cost of providing a cold meal and a hot school meal free of charge every school day to every primary school student and post primary student is contained in Table 1 of the attached tabular statement.

I am committed to continuing to grow the school meals programme (in particular, hot school meals for DEIS schools) and building further on the significant extension announced. In this regard, I have commissioned an evaluation of the school meals programme to be undertaken in 2022 to inform future policy decisions on the scheme.

Any extension of the school meals programme or hot school meals beyond 2022 will need to be considered as part of the budgetary process.

I trust this clarifies the matter.

Tabular Statement

Table 1 – The estimated cost of providing a cold meal and a hot school meal to primary and post-primary schools;

School Type

Pupils

Cold Lunch

Hot School Meal

Primary

546,106*

€137m

€285m

Post Primary

391,698*

€90m

€187m

Total

937,804

€227m

€472m

*Department of Education enrolment figures 30th of September 2021

Question No. 1195 answered with Question No. 1194.

Social Welfare Benefits

Questions (1196)

Seán Canney

Question:

1196. Deputy Seán Canney asked the Minister for Social Protection if she will amend the regulations governing illness benefit to ensure that workers who were out of work through no fault of their own due to Government lockdown in 2020 and who received the pandemic unemployment payment at the time are not now precluded from getting illness benefit if they are ill or injured as in the example (details supplied); and if she will make a statement on the matter. [39835/22]

View answer

Written answers

A person who was out of work during the Covid-19 pandemic and in receipt of Pandemic Unemployment Payment (PUP) or a Jobseekers payment with an underlying entitlement to PUP, has been attributed PRSI credited contributions at the appropriate class for their employment.

The person concerned was in receipt of Pandemic Unemployment Payment for 8 weeks in 2020, and has been awarded PRSI contributions at class A for this period.

My department received an application for Illness Benefit from the person concerned on the 11th May 2022. While he satisfied the PRSI contribution conditions necessary for Illness Benefit, we did not receive any medical evidence to support his claim. A letter issued to him on the 18th May 2022 requesting he send in a medical certificate. When after a period of time no medical certificate was received, his claim was withdrawn.

Upon review of his claim, we have now received a medical certificate and his claim has been awarded. The person concerned qualifies for Illness Benefit at a rate of €208.00 per week, and arrears have issued paying him in full up to the date on his medical certificate.

I trust this clarifies the position for the Deputy.

Enterprise Support Services

Questions (1197)

Charles Flanagan

Question:

1197. Deputy Charles Flanagan asked the Minister for Social Protection the supports that are available for disabled entrepreneurs to set up their own business or enterprise; the estimated cost to develop a national system for entrepreneurs to access grants and other financial supports in co-operation with Intreo, Enterprise Ireland and the Local Enterprise Offices. [39842/22]

View answer

Written answers

The Department's disability-related schemes have been structured to support recipients to pursue employment opportunities, be that self-employment or insurable employment, as follows:

The Partial Capacity Benefit scheme allows a person who is in receipt of Invalidity Pension or Illness Benefit (the latter for 26 weeks) to enter or return to employment or self-employment and continue to receive a partial or full payment. Following a medical assessment, if a person's restriction regarding their capacity for work is rated as moderate, severe or profound their payment continues at 50%, 75% or 100% of their previous payment while in employment. Partial Capacity Benefit has also been designed so that there are no restrictions or limits on earnings from employment or on the number of hours a person can work.

Both Disability Allowance and Blind Pension have been designed to support recipients to pursue employment opportunities, be that self-employment or insurable employment. When a person is in employment, an income disregard of €140 per week is applied. In addition, 50% of earnings between €140 and €375 are disregarded for the purpose of the means test.

The Back to Work Enterprise Allowance scheme has been designed to support persons, including persons with disabilities, to take up self-employment opportunities. It allows a person to retain 100% of their payment in year one and 75% in year two. This includes any increases for a qualified adult, and qualified children, in payment.

The Workplace Equipment Adaptation Grant is designed for a person with a disability who has been offered employment, is in employment or is self-employed and requires a more accessible workplace or adapted equipment to do the job. S/he or the employer may be able to get a grant towards the costs of adapting premises or equipment. A maximum grant of €6,350 is available towards the cost of adaptations to premises or equipment. Applications in excess of this sum are considered on an individual basis up to a maximum of €9,523 if specialist training for assistive technology is required.

The development of services to improve employment opportunities, including self-employment, for people with disabilities operates through a cross government approach under the Comprehensive Employment Strategy (for People with Disabilities).

The Department of Children, Equality, Disability, Integration and Youth is the lead Department with regards to the Comprehensive Employment Strategy.

Delivery under the strategy is underpinned by three year action plans, as agreed by the Comprehensive Employment Strategy Implementation Group (CES-IG). This group is independently chaired and membership is comprised of relevant departments (including the Department of Enterprise, Trade and Employment which has responsibility for Enterprise Ireland and Local Enterprise Offices), agencies and disability stakeholder representatives.

Currently, the Department of Children, Equality, Disability, Integration and Youth is working with the CES-IG to design the third action plan under the Strategy.

Budget Process

Questions (1198)

Fergus O'Dowd

Question:

1198. Deputy Fergus O'Dowd asked the Minister for Social Protection if a budget submission from an organisation (details supplied) will be examined; and if she will make a statement on the matter. [39894/22]

View answer

Written answers

As part of the annual budgetary process, my Department invites pre-Budget submissions from a range of representative bodies. I can confirm that my Department has received a submission from the Coeliac Society of Ireland, amongst many other submissions from a wide range of representative organisations.

I am very grateful for the time and effort taken by the Coeliac Society of Ireland, and all of the other organisations who submitted their views, in making pre-Budget submissions this year. I can assure the Deputy that I am aware of the issues facing families with members who have specific dietary requirements, and I will continue to keep these issues, along with proposals for changes to supports, under review. However, any additions to these supports can only be considered in an overall budgetary and policy context.

I trust this clarifies the matter for the Deputy.

Social Welfare Benefits

Questions (1199)

Martin Kenny

Question:

1199. Deputy Martin Kenny asked the Minister for Social Protection the reason that a person (details supplied) was denied a claim for hearing aids under the treatment benefit scheme on the basis of paying tax in the UK between 2015 and 2021, despite having been in full-time employment in Ireland for three decades before this and subsequently returning to employment in Ireland; and if she will make a statement on the matter. [39923/22]

View answer

Written answers

The Treatment Benefit Scheme provides dental, optical, aural and hair replacement services/products to insured workers, the self-employed and retired people who have the required number of social insurance (PRSI) contributions and their dependent spouse, partner or co-habitant.

To qualify for treatment benefit, the person concerned must satisfy the conditions of having a total of 260 paid contributions at class A/E/H/P or S since starting work and 39 contributions paid or credited in the relevant tax years on which the claim is based; 2020 being the relevant tax year in this circumstance. Although the named person meets the requirement to have 260 paid contributions, they do not have 39 contributions in the relevant tax year of 2020.

The person's social insurance record in the UK can be taken into consideration for qualification for the Treatment Benefit scheme. Details of employment in the UK have been requested from the person concerned and on receipt of the requested information their entitlement to treatment benefit will be reviewed.

I hope this clarifies the matter for the Deputy.

Social Welfare Payments

Questions (1200)

Claire Kerrane

Question:

1200. Deputy Claire Kerrane asked the Minister for Social Protection if she will provide a breakdown of the number of jobseeker’s payment claims that have been closed due to the recipients failing to satisfy compliance requirements from January 2022 to date; and if she will make a statement on the matter. [39931/22]

View answer

Written answers

While it is acknowledged that most people on social welfare are claiming the correct entitlement due to them, my Department has a duty to ensure that it pays the right person the right amount of money at the right time. Therefore, it is important that all schemes operated are subject to on-going control reviews and eligibility checks.

Control reviews can arise from targeted and random case selections, or where specific information comes to the attention of the Department. Factors such as length of time since last review, having a trade or qualification where there is a labour demand or where information is received from other agencies – such as the Revenue Commissioners - or members of the public can also trigger control reviews. In this context, it should be noted that customers are under a legal obligation to report any change in their circumstances (income or means) to the Department.

My Department is committed to ensuring that the principles of due process and natural justice are followed in all claim decisions. This applies equally to decisions at initial claim stage and when claims are subsequently reviewed.

In the period January to end-June 2022 the Department conducted 34,393 control reviews. The reviews resulted in 4,164 claim closures where eligibility was no longer satisfied and 2,786 cases where payments were reduced where the original means assessed had increased.

I hope that this clarifies the matter for the Deputy.

Social Welfare Payments

Questions (1201)

Claire Kerrane

Question:

1201. Deputy Claire Kerrane asked the Minister for Social Protection if jobseeker’s payment recipients who have been deemed as no longer satisfying compliance requirements can receive the supplementary welfare allowance or similar payment; and if she will make a statement on the matter. [39932/22]

View answer

Written answers

The supplementary welfare allowance (SWA) scheme is the safety net within the overall social welfare system in that it provides assistance to eligible people in the State whose means are insufficient to meet their needs and those of their dependents. Supports provided under the SWA scheme can consist of a basic weekly payment, a weekly or monthly supplement in respect of certain expenses, as well as single additional needs payments.

The basic supplementary welfare allowance provides immediate assistance for those in need who are awaiting the outcome of a claim or an appeal for a primary social welfare payment or do not qualify for payment under other State schemes.

Rent supplement provides short-term income support to eligible people living in private rented accommodation whose means are insufficient to meet their accommodation costs and who do not have accommodation available to them from any other source. The scheme ensures that for those who were renting, but whose circumstances have changed due to temporary loss of employment, can continue to meet their rental commitments.

Under the SWA scheme, my Department can make additional needs payments to help meet expenses that a person cannot pay from their weekly income. This is an overarching term used to refer to exceptional and urgent needs payments, and certain supplements to assist with ongoing or recurring costs that cannot be met from the client’s own resources and are deemed to be necessary.

Any person who considers they may have an entitlement to a payment under the SWA Scheme is encouraged to contact their local Intreo Centre. There is a National Community Welfare Contact Centre in place - 0818-607080 - which will direct callers to the appropriate office.

I trust this clarifies the matter for the Deputy.

Social Insurance

Questions (1202)

Catherine Murphy

Question:

1202. Deputy Catherine Murphy asked the Minister for Social Protection if her Department has received backdated PRSI contributions from RTÉ in respect of persons who were subject of the second review of working arrangements at the broadcaster for on-screen talent; the number of persons for which her Department collected backdated PRSI contributions from RTÉ as a result of that report (details supplied [39940/22]

View answer

Written answers

The Employment Status Investigation Unit is currently conducting an investigation into the employment status of RTÉ’s contractors.

The Unit is examining the status of contracted workers irrespective of their role or position within the organisation. Where it is determined that any worker has been misclassified as self-employed for some or all the engagement, PRSI arrears are assessed against RTÉ for the entire period of the misclassification.

On the completion of individual decisions to reclassify a worker, the worker's PRSI record is corrected and a compliance notice issued to RTE. On foot of these compliance notices, RTE is required to pay the full arrears of class A PRSI liability.

The scale of my Department’s investigation in RTE is significant and involves retrospective analysis of the engagement of many workers. My Department will report on the outcome of the investigation upon completion. This will ensure equality of treatment for all parties involved and enable our officers to conduct a professional investigation in the normal manner.

I trust this clarifies matters for the Deputy.

Departmental Advertising

Questions (1203)

Peadar Tóibín

Question:

1203. Deputy Peadar Tóibín asked the Minister for Social Protection the amount spent on traditional and online advertising by her Department in each of the past ten years and to date in 2022, in tabular form. [39962/22]

View answer

Written answers

For the purpose of this response, “the amount spent on traditional and online advertising” is interpreted as media buying costs incurred from public information campaigns, announcements and recruitment notices.

My Department administers over 90 separate schemes and services, which affect the lives of almost every person in the State. The Department is committed to ensuring that members of the public are fully aware of the welfare supports and services that are available, as well as ensuring key changes are communicated to them.

Public information/advertising campaigns are therefore an important part of the Department's work and span national and regional print media and radio, digital, social media and outdoor advertising.

All campaigns are developed and targeted carefully in collaboration with the agency responsible for our media planning and buying. They use the most suitable mix of media formats to ensure that the Department's messages reach members of the public effectively, while ensuring value for money.

All advertising expenditure undertaken by the Department is tendered for in accordance with Government and EU procurement guidelines, including use of framework agreements from the Office of Government Procurement.

Total advertising expenditure in each of the past 10 years, including 2022 spend incurred to date (20/07/2022) is set out in the table which follows.

The increase in advertising spend from 2017 onwards is as a result of the creation of a dedicated Communications and Customer Service Unit, with a focus on strategic external communication and the implementation of a newly developed Customer Communication Strategy.

The significant increase in advertising spend in the years 2020 and 2021 can be attributed to the ongoing requirement to ensure that the public were fully aware of the COVID-19 income supports available to them and any changes to these supports.

Year

Advertising Spend

2012

€109,920.94

2013

€54,469.17

2014

€64,095.00

2015

€209,198.58

2016

€87,642.92

2017

€839,102.66

2018

€416,585.00

2019

€845,761.29

2020

€2,538,989.37

2021

€2,289,774.30

2022

* €644,329.86

*Invoiced to 20/07/2022

Departmental Contracts

Questions (1204)

Peadar Tóibín

Question:

1204. Deputy Peadar Tóibín asked the Minister for Social Protection if her Department has spent money or sought external assistance with Departmental, Ministerial public relations; and if so, the cost; and the name of the agencies, consultants and companies involved in each of the past ten years and to date in 2022, in tabular form. [39980/22]

View answer

Written answers

My Department has sought external assistance with public relations once in the last 10 years. Details of such expenditure by my Department on public relations advice from an external agency during the past ten years follow.

Year

Agency

Amount

2017

Murray Consultants

€3,690 (inc. VAT)

My Department does not employ or engage any external consultants or firms to deal with public relations. The Department's Press Office deals with all media queries and public relations matters.

I hope this clarifies the matter for the Deputy.

Departmental Legal Cases

Questions (1205)

Peadar Tóibín

Question:

1205. Deputy Peadar Tóibín asked the Minister for Social Protection the number of legal cases brought against her Department in each of the past ten years and to date in 2022; and if she will make a statement on the matter. [39998/22]

View answer

Written answers

The number of legal cases where the Department was the respondent from 2017 to date are listed below:

Year

Number of cases

2022 (so far)

24

2021

21

2020

31

2019

15

2018

45

2017

32

Accurate figures for the years prior to 2017 are not readily available.

Top
Share