Skip to main content
Normal View

Wednesday, 8 Mar 2023

Written Answers Nos. 78-97

Departmental Funding

Questions (78, 79)

Ivana Bacik

Question:

78. Deputy Ivana Bacik asked the Minister for Transport if his Department maintains data as to the proportion of active travel funding spent by local authorities on new infrastructure, compared with the restoration of existing infrastructure; and, if so, for a breakdown of the proportion of active travel funding spent by each local authority in 2022 on new infrastructure, compared with existing infrastructure such as repair of footpaths (in tabular form). [11841/23]

View answer

Ivana Bacik

Question:

79. Deputy Ivana Bacik asked the Minister for Transport if his Department maintains data on the funding provided to local authorities in 2022 for footpath repair; and, if so, the amount of funding drawn down by each local authority in 2022 for repair of pavements.; and if he will make a statement on the matter. [11843/23]

View answer

Written answers

I propose to take Questions Nos. 78 and 79 together.

As Minister for Transport, I have responsibility for the policy and overall funding in relation to Active Travel. The National Transport Authority (NTA), meanwhile, has responsibility for the allocation of funding to specific projects and oversight of their development, in cooperation with the relevant local authorities.

While the majority of this funding is dedicated to the development and construction of new walking and cycling infrastructure, a proportion is earmarked for protection and renewal of existing footpaths and cycle lanes.

Noting the NTA's role in the matter, I have referred your question to the NTA for a more detailed reply. Please advise my private office if you do not receive a reply within 10 working days.

A referred reply was forwarded to the Deputy under Standing Order 51

Bus Services

Questions (80)

Marc Ó Cathasaigh

Question:

80. Deputy Marc Ó Cathasaigh asked the Minister for Transport if he will liaise with the NTA on the matter of making adequate provision for bus stops in Ballymacarbery, County Waterford to serve the new 356 service between Dungarvan and Clonmel; if funding will be made available for same; and if he will make a statement on the matter. [11850/23]

View answer

Written answers

As Minister for Transport, I have responsibility for policy and overall funding in relation to public transport. The National Transport Authority (NTA) has responsibility for the planning and development of public transport infrastructure, including the provision of bus stops and bus shelters.

Noting the NTA's responsibility in the matter, I have referred the Deputy's question to the NTA for a direct reply. Please contact my private office if you do not receive a reply within 10 days.

A referred reply was forwarded to the Deputy under Standing Order 51
Question No. 81 answered with Question No. 73.

Rail Network

Questions (82)

Willie O'Dea

Question:

82. Deputy Willie O'Dea asked the Minister for Transport who owns the large freight crane at Colbert Station, Limerick; the future plans for it; and if he will make a statement on the matter. [11985/23]

View answer

Written answers

As Minister for Transport, I have responsibility for policy and overall funding of public transport, including rail. The operation, maintenance and renewal of the rail network and stations on the network, including Colbert Station, is a matter for Iarnród Éireann in the first instance.

In view of Iarnród Éireann's responsibility in this matter, I have referred the Deputy's question to the company for direct reply. Please contact my private office if you do not receive a reply within 10 working days.

A referred reply was forwarded to the Deputy under Standing Order 51

Tax Reliefs

Questions (83, 87)

Ivana Bacik

Question:

83. Deputy Ivana Bacik asked the Minister for Finance if he will make a statement on the adequacy of the rent a room scheme in the context of supply of housing; and his views on the accessibility of the scheme for persons seeking to offer accommodation under the scheme. [11837/23]

View answer

Ivana Bacik

Question:

87. Deputy Ivana Bacik asked the Minister for Finance his views on the adequacy of the rent a room scheme. [11838/23]

View answer

Written answers

I propose to take Questions Nos. 83 and 87 together.

The rent-a-room scheme was introduced in Finance Act 2001 as an incentive to encourage individuals to let rooms in their principal private residence as residential accommodation in order to bring about an increase in the availability of rental accommodation. In accordance with section 216A of the Taxes Consolidation Act 1997, an individual who lets a room or rooms in her or his sole or main residence as residential accommodation may be exempt from income tax, PRSI and USC in respect of income from the letting where the aggregate of the gross rents and any sums for meals or other services supplied with the letting does not exceed the threshold for the year in question, which is €14,000 for 2023. Although the relief applies automatically, the amount of exempt rental income must be included in the individual’s tax return for the year in question. This relief does not apply to companies or partnerships.Initially, in 2001, the upper income threshold was set at £6,000 but this has been increased several times over the intervening period (most recently in Finance Act 2016) to €14,000.

The number of taxpayer units which availed of the Rent a Room relief scheme in respect of the 2004 year of assessment, the earliest year which data are available, was 2,300. Since then, the uptake in the numbers availing of the scheme has increased substantially.

The following table sets out data on the number of taxpayer units availing of the scheme, together with the Exchequer cost of the relief for the years 2016 - 2019 (the latest year for which data are available).

Year

Exchequer Cost €m

Number of taxpayer units

2019

22.2

9,810

2018

19.7

9,240

2017

12.0

8,160

20

16

9.3

7,3

As the Deputy will appreciate, decisions regarding tax incentives and reliefs are normally made in the context of the annual Budget and Finance Bill process. Such decisions must have regard to the sound management of the public finances and my Department's Tax Expenditure Guidelines. The guidelines make clear that any policy proposal which involves tax expenditures should only occur in limited circumstances where there are demonstrable market failures, where a tax-based incentive is more efficient than a direct expenditure intervention.

My Department is not aware of evidence which suggests that the current scheme is difficult for tax payers to access.

Business Supports

Questions (84)

Jackie Cahill

Question:

84. Deputy Jackie Cahill asked the Minister for Finance if the temporary business energy support scheme will now allow businesses who heat and fuel their premises through oil, such as dry cleaners, to access the badly needed supports in this scheme; if not, the reason this decision was made, given that it is the only alternative for many; and if he will make a statement on the matter. [11664/23]

View answer

Written answers

The Temporary Business Energy Support Scheme (TBESS) was introduced to support qualifying businesses with increases in their electricity or natural gas costs over the winter months.

Details of the scheme are set out in Finance Act 2022. The scheme provides support to qualifying businesses in respect of energy costs relating to the period from 1 September 2022 to 30 April 2023. However, subject to State aid approval, this period is to be extended to cover energy costs up to 31 May 2023. It is available to tax compliant businesses carrying on a trade or profession the profits of which are chargeable to tax under Case I or Case II of Schedule D where they meet the eligibility criteria.

The TBESS operates by reference to bills for the metered supply of natural gas and electricity. It is available to eligible businesses whose average unit price of electricity or gas for the relevant billing period has increased by a certain percentage as compared with the average unit gas or electricity price in the corresponding reference period in the previous year. Currently the relevant percentage is 50% however, as recently announced, and subject to State aid approval, this percentage is to be reduced to 30% on a retrospective basis, which will allow more businesses to qualify. Amounts payable under the TBESS are calculated based on a percentage of the increase in an electricity or natural gas bill as compared to a bill amount in a corresponding reference period in the previous year. Currently, the payment is based on 40% of the increase however, subject to State aid approval, this is to be increased to 50% for claim periods from 1 March 2023.

TBESS only applies to the metered supply of natural gas and electricity. The scheme is designed around determining increases in unit prices and actual consumption for each month falling within the period of the scheme as compared to the same month in the previous year based on information made available through electricity and gas meters. Based on the feedback from Revenue it is not possible to calculate oil and LPG usage in the same manner as for electricity and metered mains gas. As a consequence, the Government announced recently that a separate scheme will be developed for businesses that use oil and LPG and the Minister for Enterprise Trade and Employment has committed to exploring options for such a scheme and to revert to Government on this matter in due course.

Tax Reliefs

Questions (85)

Cathal Crowe

Question:

85. Deputy Cathal Crowe asked the Minister for Finance if he can devise a mechanism to prevent developers from not accepting the help-to-buy scheme as a deposit for a new house purchase; and if he will make a statement on the matter. [11688/23]

View answer

Written answers

Help to Buy (HTB) is a scheme available to first-time purchasers who are buying or building a new house or apartment. It offers a refund on Income Tax and Deposit Interest Retention Tax (DIRT) paid in the State over the previous four years, subject to limits outlined in section 477C of the Taxes Consolidation Act 1997.

Section 477C Taxes Consolidation Act 1997 outlines the definitions and conditions that apply to the HTB scheme. One such condition, where a property is being purchased rather than self-built, is that a purchase contract is entered into with a “Qualifying Contractor” (QC).

In order to become a registered QC, a contractor/developer must first apply to Revenue and meet certain requirements as outlined by section 477C(2). In summary, the contractor must be tax compliant and be either a zero rated, or 20% rated, contractor for the purposes of Relevant Contracts Tax.

QC’s have an important role in the HTB process, including verifying information provided by the HTB applicant. Where the conditions of the HTB scheme are satisfied and a HTB refund is available, the HTB refund is paid to the QC to be offset against the purchase price of the property.

Participation in the Help to Buy Scheme is voluntary. A list of QCs registered under the scheme is published on the Revenue website.

Section 477C does not specify at what stage the HTB refund should be accounted for by the contractor in terms of payments on account for the property. As such, while the HTB scheme aims to assist first-time purchasers with funding the required deposit, the amount of the deposit and timing of the payment of the deposit is a matter for negotiation between the purchaser and the contractor.

As the Deputy will appreciate, any further specification within section 477C as to the timing of the payment is a matter which would fall to be considered in the context of the annual Budget and Finance Bill process.

Insurance Industry

Questions (86)

Anne Rabbitte

Question:

86. Deputy Anne Rabbitte asked the Minister for Finance the latest update regarding the insurance Action Plan Implementation Report; the timeline for the amendment of legislation with regard to duty of care under the insurance Action Plan Implementation Report; if there is an insurance facility for organisations such as bouncy castle operators and landowners who allow hill walkers on to their lands; how can a group or organisation make a case to be recognised under such; and if he will make a statement on the matter. [11750/23]

View answer

Written answers

The Cabinet Committee Sub-Group on Insurance Reform oversees implementation of the Action Plan for Insurance Reform. This Plan sets out the Whole- of-Government approach, with 66 actions to improve the insurance environment for consumers, businesses and community groups. The most recent Implementation Report, published in November, shows that 90 per cent of the initiatives under the Action Plan are considered complete. Achievements to date include:

- implementation of the Personal Injuries Guidelines to replace the Book of Quantum;

- the commencement, by the Central Bank, of new Regulations to ban price walking following its Review of Differential Pricing in the Private Car and Home Insurance Markets;

- establishment of the Office to Promote Competition in the Insurance Market within the Department of Finance;

- enactment of the Personal Injuries Resolution Board Act 2022 , which will enhance the role of the Personal Injuries Assessment Board (PIAB) to facilitate an increase in the number of personal injury claims that may be resolved through the Board’s process and without recourse to litigation;

- enactment of the Competition (Amendment) Bill 2022 , which will enhance the enforcement powers of the Competition and Consumer Protection Commission (CCPC) – the Act provides for a new civil enforcement regime for the CCPC and ComReg with the power to levy significant administrative sanctions as well as other measures;

- launch of a databank for new entrants by the Central Bank of Ireland;

- establishment of an Insurance Fraud Coordination Office within the Garda National Economic Crime Bureau;

- publication, by the Central Bank, of the third National Claims Information Database (NCID) report on private motor insurance, and the two NCID reports on Employers’ Liability, Public Liability and Commercial Property Insurance;

- enactment of the Criminal Justice (Perjury and Related Offences) Act 2021 ;

- introduction of new regulations on solicitors’ advertising; and

- enactment of the majority of provisions under the Consumer Insurance Contracts Act 2019 .

Work is continuing across Government to complete outstanding reforms, include a rebalancing the “common duty of care”, via amendments to the Occupiers’ Liability Act 1995, in line with the Government policy objective of restricting the liability of occupiers. The legislation to amend the 1995 Act – the Courts and Civil Law (Miscellaneous Provisions) Bill 2022 – is the responsibility of the Minister for Justice and continues to progress through the Oireachtas. The Bill completed all stages in Dáil Éireann on 1 March and will now progress to Seanad Éireann for its consideration. This reform has been “an ask” by insurance reform campaigners and industry for some time, and it should help to reduce frivolous claims proceeding to litigation. In time, cost savings from reduced claims should also help to lower premiums for businesses and community, voluntary and sporting groups.

In relation to insurance for bouncy castle operators, the Irish Inflatable Hirers Federation, the group which represents bouncy castle operators across the country, has collaborated with a major domestic broker to form a group insurance scheme. This resolves an insurance market pinch-point that had recently been experiencing coverage issues. Sectors, including activities such as hill walkers walking on lands with landowners permission, which are facing insurance capacity problems could consider forming a group scheme. Group schemes can provide centralised risk identification and management, along with offering a competitive business proposition with which to attract underwriters. In addition, the collective bargaining power of an affinity group offers distinct advantages for individual businesses.

Finally, it is my expectation that reforms to the common duty of care should improve the insurance environment in these areas more generally.

Question No. 87 answered with Question No. 83.

Consumer Rights

Questions (88)

Martin Browne

Question:

88. Deputy Martin Browne asked the Minister for Finance if he intends to introduce legislation to protect access to cash as recommended by the Retail Banking Review; and if this legislation will include a protection on cash sales as part of the access to cash. [11848/23]

View answer

Written answers

The Retail Banking Review, published in November 2022,recommended that the Department of Finance should develop Access to Cash legislation and prepare heads of a bill in 2023.

The Review also called on Department officials to prepare heads of a bill in 2023 to require ATM operators to be authorised and supervised by the Central Bank and to provide the Central Bank with responsibility and powers to protect the resilience of the cash system including the authorisation and supervision of cash-in-transit firms in respect of their cash handling activities and related financial services.

It is my intention to fully honour this commitment and this work is now underway by officials in my Department. It is intended that one piece of legislation will be drafted for all three recommendations on access to cash.

Following consultation with the Central Bank and other stakeholders, the Department will establish what the appropriate levels of access to cash are to ensure that any further evolution of the cash infrastructure will be managed in a fair, orderly, transparent and equitable manner for all stakeholders.

The Retail Banking Review also recommended that the Department should lead on the preparation of a new National Payments Strategy (NPS) to be ready in 2024. Preparatory work to implement this is now underway. The NPS will set out a roadmap for the future evolution of the entire payments system, taking account of developments in digital payments, cash usage and how future changes should be made to the legislative criteria relating to Access to Cash.

It will also consider if legislation should be introduced to require certain firms or sectors to accept, or facilitate the acceptance of, cash; and if it should be policy to require the public service to accept, or facilitate the acceptance of, cash.

Revenue Commissioners

Questions (89)

Rose Conway-Walsh

Question:

89. Deputy Rose Conway-Walsh asked the Minister for Finance the number of final demands issued by revenue and the number of sheriff referrals below the value of €1,000, €5,000 and €10,000 respectively, for each year since 2016, in tabular form; and if he will make a statement on the matter. [11849/23]

View answer

Written answers

I am advised that Revenue only refers outstanding tax liabilities to its enforcement agents, including Sheriffs, as a last resort. Before any such action is taken, Revenue makes every effort to engage with the taxpayer to resolve the situation. The important message for taxpayers who receive final demands is to engage with Revenue at the earliest opportunity so that a mutually acceptable solution can be found.

The table below outlines the number of final demands issued each year from 2016 to 31 January 2023 and the total number of warrants issued to the Sheriffs in the same period, with a breakdown given in the value ranges requested by the Deputy.

Year

Final Demands Issued

Total No. of Sheriff Referrals

No. of Sheriff Referrals below the value of €1,000

No. of Sheriff Referrals between the value of €1,000 and €5,000

No. of Sheriff Referrals between the value of €5,000 and €10,000

2016

191,648

36,632

3,701

19,595

6,640

2017

224,082

40,038

3,930

21,477

7,425

2018

202,658

34,373

2,684

17,881

7,067

2019

355,240

72,697

14,592

37,492

11,407

2020

122,516

20,162

5,500

10,041

2,627

2021

5,707

707

14

83

169

2022

197,446

30,419

1,863

12,020

7,200

2023 (up to 31 January)

21,789

2,501

210

945

511

Vehicle Registration Tax

Questions (90, 91, 92)

Marian Harkin

Question:

90. Deputy Marian Harkin asked the Minister for Finance if he will provide statistics relating to the Revenue Commissioners seize and release VRT enforcement procedure, in tabular form (details supplied); and if he will make a statement on the matter. [11980/23]

View answer

Marian Harkin

Question:

91. Deputy Marian Harkin asked the Minister for Finance if he will provide statistics relating to appeals and petitions relating to the Revenue Commissioners seize and release VRT enforcement procedure, in tabular form (details supplied); and if he will make a statement on the matter. [11981/23]

View answer

Marian Harkin

Question:

92. Deputy Marian Harkin asked the Minister for Finance if he will provide statistics relating to appeals and petitions relating to the Revenue Commissioners seize and release VRT enforcement procedure in tabular form; and if he will make a statement on the matter. [11982/23]

View answer

Written answers

I propose to take Questions Nos. 90, 91 and 92 together.

I am advised by Revenue that its approach to enforcement of the law relating to Vehicle Registration Tax (VRT) is that in each instance where a failure to comply with the relevant legal requirements is detected, the matter is dealt with in a manner that is fair and proportionate in the circumstances of the particular case. Section 5.4.2 of the VRT Enforcement Manual gives examples of the forms of action appropriate in the various situations that a Revenue Officer may encounter.

In certain instances, a warning will be given or a VRT Demand Notice issued in accordance with Section 5.5 of VRT Enforcement Manual.

A vehicle may be detained under section 140(3) of the Finance Act 2001 where an Officer has reasonable suspicion that the vehicle has not been registered in the State, has been converted and a declaration of conversion has not been made, or VRT has not been paid. It may be detained for such period as is required by the Officer to carry out enquiries to determine whether such vehicle has been registered, such declaration has been made or such VRT has been paid. The period of detention is the earlier of the period of time taken to make such enquiries or on the expiration of a period of one month.

Where an Officer forms the view that a person is a resident of the State and in possession of an unregistered vehicle contrary to section 139 of the Finance Act 1992, and that the person has had the vehicle in the State for in excess of a 30-day period, the vehicle may be lawfully seized in accordance with Section 141 of the Finance Act 2001.

Depending on the circumstances of the particular case, Officers may offer local release of the seized vehicle at the roadside pursuant to the provisions of s.144(2) of the Finance Act 2001 on payment of a compromised sum. Paragraph 5.8 of Section 5 Enforcement of the Vehicle Registration Tax Manual sets out the procedure for local release of seized vehicles.

Paragraph 5.8.1 provides that an officer may offer the local release of a seized vehicle in cases involving a first offence, including a seizure that resulted from a VRT Demand Notice (Form VRT31) being ignored. In all other instances the case is reported to Revenue’s National Prosecutions and Seizures Office (NPSO) for a decision on what action(s) should be taken. It is also provided in that paragraph that in instances where a seized vehicle is released locally, this should be approved and closed by management at Higher Executive Officer level or higher, with all documentation maintained locally. Paragraph 5.8.4 sets out the scale of compromise amounts to be applied in local release situations.

Any petition made by a person subsequent to the release of the vehicle is dealt with by a manager at local level. If the person is not satisfied with the outcome of this local review, he/she is informed that the petition can be reviewed by NPSO. In such cases, NPSO will request a complete file on the seizure and release terms from the seizing station. Additional information may be requested from the officers concerned and/or the person whose vehicle was seized. A review is conducted and the petitioner is written to informing them of the outcome of their petition and the seizing station is informed likewise. This review is entirely independent of the seizing station.

The number of warnings issued, detentions, vehicles seized for VRT related offences and the number of cases where a compromise sum was paid for the period November 2022 to end January 2023, is set out below. I am informed that these monthly numbers may fluctuate as Revenue’s systems are updated in respect of each case. This data is based on information as of 6 March 2023:

Warnings

Detentions (s.141 FA 2001)

Seizures (s.141 FA 2001)

Compromise Penalties (s.144(2) FA 2001)

Total Value of Compromise Penalties

November 2022

18

6

64

62

€55,160

December 2022

6

2

22

20

€10,702

January 2023

20

4

93

89

€50,945

The table below outlines the number of VRT petitions and appeals heard and granted relating to Revenue’s ‘Seize and Release’ VRT Enforcement Procedure in the period 2016 – 2022. I am advised by Revenue that data prior to 2016 is not available.

Petitions (heard)

Petitions (granted)

Appeals s.145/146 FA 2001 (heard)

Appeals s.145/146 FA 2001 (granted)

2016

0

0

0

0

2017

1

0

0

0

2018

2

1

0

0

2019

4

1

0

0

2020

12

0

0

0

2021

0

0

0

0

2022

8

1

0

0

Primary Medical Certificates

Questions (93)

Éamon Ó Cuív

Question:

93. Deputy Éamon Ó Cuív asked the Minister for Finance when a new Medical Appeal Board will be appointed to assess appeals in relation to primary medical certificates for purchasers of cars; and if he will make a statement on the matter. [11986/23]

View answer

Written answers

The Disabled Drivers & Disabled Passengers Scheme provides relief from VRT and VAT on an adapted car, as well as an exemption from motor tax and an annual fuel grant.

The Scheme is open to severely and permanently disabled persons who also meet the below medical criteria, as a driver or as a passenger and also to certain organisations. In order to qualify for relief, the applicant must hold a Primary Medical Certificate issued by the relevant Senior Area Medical Officer (SAMO) or a Board Medical Certificate issued by the Disabled Driver Medical Board of Appeal. Certain other qualifying criteria apply in relation to the vehicle, in particular that it must be specially constructed or adapted for use by the applicant.

To qualify for a Primary Medical Certificate an applicant must be permanently and severely disabled, and satisfy at least one of the following medical criteria, in order to obtain a Primary Medical Certificate:

- be wholly or almost wholly without the use of both legs;

- be wholly without the use of one leg and almost wholly without the use of the other leg such that the applicant is severely restricted as to movement of the lower limbs;

- be without both hands or without both arms;

- be without one or both legs;

- be wholly or almost wholly without the use of both hands or arms and wholly or almost wholly without the use of one leg;

- have the medical condition of dwarfism and have serious difficulties of movement of the lower limbs.

In the event that a PMC is not granted by the relevant Principal Medical Officer an appeal may be made to the independent Disabled Drivers Medical Board of Appeal (DDMBA).

The Minister has no role in relation to the granting or refusal of PMCs and the HSE and the Medical Board of Appeal must be independent in their clinical determinations.

As the Deputy is aware the previous members of the DDMBA resigned effective from 30th November 2021. Since then two Expression of Interest campaigns have been held, seeking suitable candidates for the Board. The Department of Health has led on all actions and tasks with respect to the Expression of Interest Campaigns. Department of Finance officials have provided support to the Department of Health in this matter.

The first campaign closed on 29th April. As there were insufficient suitable candidates arising from the first campaign, a second round was issued with a closing date of 5th July 2022. Five members are legislatively required for a functional Board with a quorum of three needed for any appeal hearing. Two other candidates were recently nominated by the Minister for Health. All five candidates have now successfully completed Garda Vetting.

I had hoped that I could finalise these appointments and recommence the work of DDMBA in the next few weeks. However, the National Rehabilitation Hospital (NRH) has recently indicated that it wishes to cease its involvement with the scheme, and as its facilities and secretarial service, which are funded by my Department, are integral to the operation of the DDMBA, it may take time to put in place feasible and appropriate alternative arrangements to enable the appeals process to re-commence. You should note that both I and my officials are actively looking into this matter.

You should be aware that assessments for the primary medical certificate, by the HSE, are continuing to take place. In this regard, an important point to make is that even though there has been no appeal mechanism since the previous Board resigned, applicants who have been deemed not to have met one of the six eligibility criteria required for a PMC are entitled to request another PMC assessment six months after an unsuccessful PMC assessment.

Brexit Supports

Questions (94)

Peadar Tóibín

Question:

94. Deputy Peadar Tóibín asked the Minister for Public Expenditure, National Development Plan Delivery and Reform the amount that was allocated by the European Union to the State under the Brexit adjustment fund; the amount that has been spent; and what his Department intends to do with the remaining funds. [11642/23]

View answer

Written answers

The European Union’s Brexit Adjustment Reserve (BAR), provides support to counter the adverse economic, social, territorial and, environmental consequences of the withdrawal of the UK from the European Union. €5.47 billion euro was allocated to the fund and Ireland’s allocation is €1.165 billion. The application for BAR funding must set out the negative impacts of the withdrawal of the UK from the European Union and how the measures carried out under the Fund alleviate the adverse consequences.

The BAR eligibility period for expenditure runs from the 1st of January 2020 to the 31st of December 2023.

The Government has made significant allocations across a range of sectors, both before and during the 4-year BAR period. The purpose of these allocations is to mitigate against the negative consequences of Brexit and to adapt to regulatory changes. Following the BAR Regulation coming into force in October 2021, specific funding was provided in Budgets 2022 and 2023, as set out in the Table below, and further funding can be considered for allocation over the remainder of 2023. This would also include consideration of funding in relation to permanent infrastructure at Rosslare port required for customs and SPS checks.

My Department has been engaging with Departments in respect of spending allocated to mitigate Brexit in advance of Budget 2022. A figure of €0.6 billion has been identified in this regard. Work is ongoing to verify for eligibility this significant funding allocated across 2020 and 2021 for inclusion in Ireland’s final BAR claim in September 2024.

Over the course of Budgets 2022 and 2023, some €389 million was allocated, as follows.

Department

€m

Agriculture

271

Enterprise

15

Further and Higher Education, Research, Innovation and Science

37.3

Public Expenditure, NDP Delivery and Reform

4.4

Foreign Affairs

2.2

Tourism Culture Arts Gaeltacht Sports and Media

7.75

Environment Climate and Communications

24

Health

5.5

Justice

21.5

Transport

0.1

Total

389

The Deputy will also be aware that since the Russian invasion of Ukraine in 2022, the EU has moved quickly to phase out EU dependence on Russian gas, oil and coal imports and accelerate the green transition. EU Member States are adding specific chapters to their national recovery and resilience plans (NRRPs) to finance key investments and reforms that will help achieve the REPowerEU objectives. These objectives include energy savings, the diversification of energy supplies and the accelerated roll-out of renewables. The EU has provided that member states may transfer a portion of their BAR funding to support these priorities. Given that the timeline under REPowerEU extends to 2026, Ireland has in recent days sent a request to the EU Commission setting out a transfer of €150 million of the BAR funding to support priorities under REPowerEU and is continuing to engage in this regard.

National Development Plan

Questions (95)

Michael Creed

Question:

95. Deputy Michael Creed asked the Minister for Public Expenditure, National Development Plan Delivery and Reform his views on the use of bundled construction projects for delivery of the National Development Plan; if he accepts that in the event of such a strategy being deployed that all component parts of the bundle should be at the same stage of readiness to proceed to construction; if he is satisfied that this is the case; if, in circumstances where it is apparent that there is a significant gap in the readiness of projects that are bundled, he will indicate the steps, if any, his Department has taken to disentangle the bundle and proceed with the ready component parts of the bundle; the contractual consequences, if any, of this; and if he will make a statement on the matter. [11654/23]

View answer

Written answers

As Minister for Public Expenditure, NDP Delivery, and Reform I am responsible for setting the overall capital allocations across Departments. Management and delivery of individual investment projects within the allocations agreed under the NDP is a key responsibility of every Department and Minister. My department is also responsible for maintaining the national frameworks within which Departments operate to ensure optimal value for money for public expenditure.

In terms of developing projects, it is up to each Department, with their agencies, to decide which approach suits best depending on the project type. The relevant Department is then responsible for ensuring that a Business Case is developed to meet the requirements of the Public Spending Code, which should also set out the preferred planning and procurement strategy for delivering the project.

Bundling has been deployed to deliver projects across a number of capital programmes including the education, housing, health, transport and justice sectors. Typically, bundling has been most readily applied in the delivery of Public Private Partnership (PPP) contracts in these sectors but it has also been applied in a number of public works contracts. Scheme designs for these larger scale projects are typically prepared by a single design team and brought through the statutory planning processes at the same time and subsequently procured together for delivery within the chosen contract types, be they PPP or public works.

The individual Departments are responsible for ensuring that the decision making and policy matters pertaining to each project is managed so that no one project impacts negatively on the overall delivery timelines. For example, if a single project were to be delayed in the planning process, then during pre-procurement, it might be possible to decouple the project from the bundle and procure it as a single project contract or include it in a subsequent bundle, depending on the constraints being managed by the particular Department. If the tender process for a bundle has already commenced, then decoupling a project from that bundle may impact on the procurement process and associated timelines. It must be said that where a contract for a bundle has been awarded, then contractually the options to decouple a project from that bundle are more limited.

Public Sector Pensions

Questions (96)

James Lawless

Question:

96. Deputy James Lawless asked the Minister for Public Expenditure, National Development Plan Delivery and Reform the status of a pension increase (details supplied); and if he will make a statement on the matter. [11748/23]

View answer

Written answers

It was agreed in 2009 that increases in Vhi pensions and preserved pensions would be based on the level of increases in the consumer price index (“CPI”), up to a maximum of 2%. These increases may be granted at the discretion of the company, and are subject to the approval of the Minister for Health with the concurrence of the Minister for Public Expenditure, NDP Delivery and Reform.

The Code of Practice for the Governance of State Bodies and DPER Circular 16/2021 requires that any request for a Vhi pension increase must first be submitted to the Department of Health for Ministerial approval. When the Minister for Health has given his approval, the Department of Health would then seek my concurrence with an accompanying business case and a report prepared by NewERA on the matter.

I acknowledge that cost-of-living increases are creating challenges for pensioners and my Department is currently engaging with the Department of Health in relation to pension increases to Vhi pensions.

The request for an increase will be given full consideration by my Department when a completed business case and proposal has been received from the Department of Health, with reference to advice provided by NewERA.

Coastal Protection

Questions (97)

Cathal Crowe

Question:

97. Deputy Cathal Crowe asked the Minister for Public Expenditure, National Development Plan Delivery and Reform with responsibility for Office of Public Works if he will ensure that coastal defence works are carried out at a property (details supplied) to ensure that erosion does not continue to impact on the owners. [11767/23]

View answer

Written answers

Coastal protection and localised flooding issues are matters, in the first instance, for each local authority to investigate and address. To assist Local Authorities in managing the coastline for coastal erosion, the Office of Public Works has undertaken a national assessment of coastal erosion (including erosion rates) under the Irish Coastal Protection Strategy Study (ICPSS) and the results of this study have been published on the Office of Public Works website www.floodinfo.ie. This data enables Local Authorities to develop appropriate plans and strategies for the sustainable management of the coastline in their counties.

The Local Authorities may carry out coastal protection works using their own resources. If necessary, they may also put forward proposals to the relevant Government Departments for funding of appropriate measures. Intervention or hard defences has the potential to cause problems further along the coast. Therefore, any proposed intervention measures are best developed in conjunction with a formal coastal risk management study that has carefully investigated the problem and explored the full range of management options.

The Office of Public Works operates the Minor Flood Mitigation Works and Coastal Protection Scheme since 2009, under which applications for funding from local authorities for small localised works are considered for measures costing up to €750,000 in each instance. Funding for coastal risk management studies may also be applied for under this scheme. It is a matter for each local authority to ensure that all the necessary environmental, statutory and regulatory approvals are in place prior to any works being undertaken.

I have been advised that Clare County Council are currently considering this matter.

Top
Share