Skip to main content
Normal View

Thursday, 18 May 2023

Written Answers Nos. 222-229

Heritage Sites

Questions (224)

Aengus Ó Snodaigh

Question:

224. Deputy Aengus Ó Snodaigh asked the Minister for Public Expenditure, National Development Plan Delivery and Reform if he will list the 780 heritage sites in the care of the Office of Public Works in tabular form, with a row to indicate whether or not the site is accessible to the public; a row to indicate if the site is owned by the Office of Public Works or has a separate owner; and rows to indicate the expenditure on conservation every year on each site since 2013; and rows to indicate the expenditure on presentation of each site every year since 2013. [23839/23]

View answer

Written answers

Additional time is needed to collate the required information. The OPW will respond to the Deputy directly on the matter.

Office of Public Works

Questions (225)

Aengus Ó Snodaigh

Question:

225. Deputy Aengus Ó Snodaigh asked the Minister for Public Expenditure, National Development Plan Delivery and Reform if he will provide a breakdown of annual expenditure each year since 2000 on the Office of Public Works: OPW Heritage Services; the National Monuments Service; the Historic Properties Service; and Visitor Services, in tabular form. [23840/23]

View answer

Written answers

The responsibility for conservation, operations and maintenance of the national heritage estate reverted to the OPW in 2004. Therefore, it is only possible to provide this data for the period from 2004 to 2022.

A breakdown, is provided below in relation to the annual expenditure each year since 2004 for the OPW sections: National Historic Properties, National Monuments, and Visitor Services

Year

National Historic Property

(in 000's)

National Monuments

(in 000's)

Visitor Services

(in 000's)

2004

€21,093

€16,390

€200

2005

€16,242

€16,822

€7,742

2006

€22,669

€20,302

€9,548

2007

€18,545

€17,974

€9,427

2008

€18,616

€18,793

€9,306

2009

€16,744

€17,340

€8,189

2010

€15,901

€15,557

€7,752

2011

€14,416

€14,566

€7,599

2012

€14,222

€14,424

€7,631

2013

€14,021

€14,312

€7,552

2014

€14,241

€14,841

€7,993

2015

€14,256

€15,422

€8,120

2016

€14,649

€15,082

€9,005

2017

€15,053

€15,954

€9,588

2018

€15,451

€17,462

€10,427

2019

€15,774

€17,406

€11,041

2020

€16,131

€16,591

€9,391

2021

€16,897

€16,566

€9,110

2022

€18,469

€18,858

€11,705

Public Spending Code

Questions (226)

Aengus Ó Snodaigh

Question:

226. Deputy Aengus Ó Snodaigh asked the Minister for Public Expenditure, National Development Plan Delivery and Reform if he will outline a list of each job title in the employment complement of OPW Heritage Services; the annual salary attached to each title; the number of persons employed in each position; the number of vacancies in each position at present intended to be filled; and the total expenditure on staff each year for the past five years, in tabular form. [23849/23]

View answer

Written answers

Additional time is needed to collate the required information. The OPW will respond to the Deputy directly on the matter.

Office of Public Works

Questions (227)

Aengus Ó Snodaigh

Question:

227. Deputy Aengus Ó Snodaigh asked the Minister for Public Expenditure, National Development Plan Delivery and Reform if he will outline a list of every external organisation or company provided funding by the OPW in relation to heritage services over the past ten years to conduct work under contract on behalf of the OPW; the purpose of the work; and the amount of funding provided to each organisation or company over the past ten years, in tabular form. [23873/23]

View answer

Written answers

Public Spending Code

Questions (228)

Rose Conway-Walsh

Question:

228. Deputy Rose Conway-Walsh asked the Minister for Public Expenditure, National Development Plan Delivery and Reform if he will outline the two approval stages prior to implementation under the planned reforms to the public spending code; and if he will make a statement on the matter. [23922/23]

View answer

Written answers

In March this year, I informed Government of a package of significant actions aimed at enhancing project delivery for the NDP and announced that the Public Spending Code will be replaced by a set of Infrastructure Guidelines. This package represents a fresh approach to securing delivery as part of the Department's enhanced remit around the NDP.

The actions include significant changes to reduce the administrative burden for Departments and public bodies developing capital projects. One of these specific changes is the reduction of the number of approval stages prior to implementation from 5 to 3, reducing the administrative burden on Government departments charged with developing and delivering projects.

The three approval stages prior to implementation are:

Strategic Assessment & Preliminary Business Case - Decision Gate 1 approval by the Approving Authority is approval in principle for the proposal.

Pre-tender - Detailed Project Brief and Procurement Strategy - Decision Gate 2 approval by the Approving Authority is approval for the project to proceed to tender

Post-tender - Final Business Case - Decision Gate 3 approval by the Approving Authority is approval to award the main construction contract.

For major projects (those over €200 million), the relevant Approving Authority is required to seek Government consent at 2 stages, the Preliminary Business Case stage and the Final Business Case stage (stages 1 and 3 above). 

A fundamental tenet of the approach is the incremental approvals process. To prevent lock-in, protect scarce resources and ensure maximum value for money, proposals should only be approved to advance to the next stage in the process. Proposals must continue to reflect value for money and Sponsoring Agencies, Approving Authorities and the Government must retain the right to abandon a proposal if it ceases to reflect the best use of resources in the pursuit of a policy goal.

Public Spending Code

Questions (229)

Rose Conway-Walsh

Question:

229. Deputy Rose Conway-Walsh asked the Minister for Public Expenditure, National Development Plan Delivery and Reform if he can confirm that projects costing in the range of €100-€200 million will no longer be required to go through the external assurance process; if his Department will revert to conducting technical reviews of projects over €100 million not covered by the external assurance process; and if he will make a statement on the matter. [23923/23]

View answer

Written answers

As Minister for Public Expenditure; National Development Plan Delivery and Reform, my Department is responsible for the Public Spending Code (PSC), which sets the value for money requirements and guidance for evaluating, planning and managing Exchequer-funded capital projects. Management and delivery of investment projects and public services within allocation and the national frameworks is a key responsibility of every Department, Accounting Officer and Minister. 

In March this year, I informed Government of a package of significant actions aimed at enhancing project delivery for the National Development Plan (NDP). The actions include significant changes to reduce the administrative burden for Departments and public bodies developing capital projects. One of these specific changes was the general threshold for major projects increasing from €100m to €200m. These thresholds will be reviewed every 3 years to ensure they are still appropriate.

This will mean for projects with an estimated cost of less that €200m, departments will no longer be required to engage with the EAP or to submit these projects to my Department for technical review. As required within the Public Spending Code, the relevant Approving Authority must carry out a technical review of project proposals issued to them by their Sponsoring Agencies and it is the responsibility of the Accounting Officer to ensure these reviews ensure compliance with the requirements of the Code. 

It is the responsibility of the relevant Accounting Officer to ensure that procedures are in place to ensure full compliance with the Public Spending Code within their Department/Office and within the bodies under the aegis of the Department, including drawing up sector-specific procedures, in line with the requirements of the Public Spending Code (or the Infrastructure Guidelines when published), for management and appraisal of capital projects and programmes as appropriate. Government departments, as Approving Authorities, are to carry out assessments of proposals at each stage of the project lifecycle focussing on:

- Compliance with the Public Spending Code;

- Compliance with sector-specific appraisal guidance; and

- Appropriate policy and programme fit.

Further appraisal guidance will be published shortly, known as the Infrastructure Guidelines, as part of capital project development, which will replace the existing Public Spending Code.

Top
Share