Skip to main content
Normal View

Third Level Education

Dáil Éireann Debate, Tuesday - 27 June 2023

Tuesday, 27 June 2023

Questions (793, 794, 795, 796, 797, 798)

Jim O'Callaghan

Question:

793. Deputy Jim O'Callaghan asked the Minister for Further and Higher Education, Research, Innovation and Science if PhDs classified as non-EU will be provided with updated residency visas with a four-year duration, similar to the hosting agreement scheme used for attracting non-EU research talent; and if he will make a statement on the matter. [30646/23]

View answer

Jim O'Callaghan

Question:

794. Deputy Jim O'Callaghan asked the Minister for Further and Higher Education, Research, Innovation and Science if a recommendation will be made that PhD researchers have access to PRSI; and if he will make a statement on the matter. [30647/23]

View answer

Jim O'Callaghan

Question:

795. Deputy Jim O'Callaghan asked the Minister for Further and Higher Education, Research, Innovation and Science if a recommendation will be made on mandating that PhD researchers have access to sick leave and/or parental leave; and if he will make a statement on the matter. [30648/23]

View answer

Jim O'Callaghan

Question:

796. Deputy Jim O'Callaghan asked the Minister for Further and Higher Education, Research, Innovation and Science if a recommendation will be made for PhDs to have access to the Workplace Relations Commission in order to resolve disputes with their university; and if he will make a statement on the matter. [30649/23]

View answer

Jim O'Callaghan

Question:

797. Deputy Jim O'Callaghan asked the Minister for Further and Higher Education, Research, Innovation and Science if a recommendation will be made on establishing minimum standards for the provision of funding for PhD researchers in Ireland, including minimum standards of pay (such as the national minimum wage); and if he will make a statement on the matter. [30650/23]

View answer

Jim O'Callaghan

Question:

798. Deputy Jim O'Callaghan asked the Minister for Further and Higher Education, Research, Innovation and Science if a recommendation will be made on the matter of employee status for PhDs; and if he will make a statement on the matter. [30651/23]

View answer

Written answers

I propose to take Questions Nos. 793 to 798, inclusive, together.

In November 2022, I appointed Dr Andrea Johnson and Mr David Cagney to undertake an independent National Review of State Supports for PhD Researchers.  This reflects the objective, under the dedicated Talent Pillar of Impact 2030, Ireland’s national research and innovation strategy, for a consistent research student experience across research funders, higher education institutions and research disciplines.

The Review Terms of Reference comprise examination of:

• Current financial supports for PhD researchers,

• The adequacy, consistency and equity of current arrangements,

• The status of PhD researchers (employee/ student) including a review of international comparators,

• Impact on the funding of research programmes of any adjustments to current supports,

• Graduate outcomes, including return on investment,

• Visa requirements and duration for non-EU students.

The Co-Chairs have recently submitted their first report to me which I brought to Cabinet on Tuesday 20 June for information in advance of its publication on my Department’s web site.  

In this first report, based on extensive consultation and analysis, the Co-Chairs provide recommendations on the following:

• Financial supports for PhD researchers, with particular regard to stipend levels;

• Issues encountered by PhD researchers coming to Ireland from outside the European Union/ European Economic Area;

• Improving PhD graduate outcomes.

Within this, they recommend an increased stipend level, with an optimum target of €25,000.  They acknowledge the potential ramifications of any such change on public finances and recognise that significant additional work will be needed in order give effect to such a recommendation. 

Because of their particular complexity, the following elements of the terms of reference will require deeper analysis prior to final recommendations being made:

• Consistency and equity of approaches in how PhD researchers are supported, for  example, those coming from underrepresented groups;

• The status of a PhD researcher, i.e. classification as either a student or an employee.

The Co-Chairs will prepare a final review report to consider these outstanding issues. The status issue in particular will require significant examination – especially in terms of any consequences for the Employment Control Framework.

This first report provides a rich picture, at a point in time, of a range of important issues that now need to be considered by all stakeholders. Any budgetary implications of recommendations will be dealt with through the normal budgetary processes.

Top
Share