Skip to main content
Normal View

National Treatment Purchase Fund

Dáil Éireann Debate, Wednesday - 4 October 2023

Wednesday, 4 October 2023

Questions (193)

Bríd Smith

Question:

193. Deputy Bríd Smith asked the Minister for Health if he will allocate funding in budget 2024 to extend the national treatment purchase fund to include timely assessment for both child and adult psychological services, as committed to in the programme for Government, and extend it to include occupational therapy, speech and language therapy and physiotherapy until backlogs are cleared; if he will fully fund the carer’s guarantee; and if he will make a statement on the matter. [42872/23]

View answer

Written answers

I understand that issues in relation to the carers allowance were addressed by my colleague the Minister for Social Protection.

The NTPF was established under the Health (Corporate Bodies) Act 1961, with the function of providing hospital treatment for citizens and the collection and validation of information in relation to waiting lists. Its role was extended in 2009 (via the Nursing Home Support Scheme Act, 2009) to provide for negotiations with private nursing homes in the context of fees payable for Fair Deal clients.

Notwithstanding the fact that Primary Legislation would be required to expand the NTPF’s role there are other core factors that may militate against a role for the NTPF in the areas identified by the Deputy in the short to medium term.

Firstly, there is the nature of private capacity in the context of hospitals versus community services. Currently, NTPF treatments are purchased from hospitals (institutions) through panel agreements with the relevant providers; community services are predominately provided via individual practitioners.

People using HSE primary care therapies are likely to have more complex needs and, therefore, require several services at the same time, provided through a multidisciplinary team. In essence, they have a longer-term relationship with health services rather than an episodic relationship such as that provided in a hospital, and as such it would be necessary to cost and profile ‘bundles’ of work that would be required to address service user needs and pathway requirements, as distinct from the once-off episodic treatment arrangements with hospitals.

In addition, careful consideration would need to be given to the impact of the purchasing of private capacity on long-term expansion of public capacity within primary care, and ensuring appropriate skill mix to meet the needs of people including children with more complex needs.

Any changes would need to be widely consulted upon, analysed, and planned prior to enactment. The NTPF could potentially play a role in the future. However, there are foundational issues as outlined above that need systematic reform and development to enable an NTPF style approach.

Top
Share