Dáil Éireann Debate, Thursday - 14 December 2023
416. Deputy Richard O'Donoghue asked the Minister for Agriculture, Food and the Marine when farmers dealing with the ash die back will be given a resolution to the issue; and if he will make a statement on the matter. [55852/23]
View answerMy colleague, Minister of State Hackett, tasked an independent group to review existing Department supports for Ash Dieback. The group had a remit to review the existing and previous supports available to landowners with ash plantations funded under the National Forestry Programme and to engage with relevant stakeholders to seek their views on the current supports for ash forest owners.
The group presented the Minister of State with its report, which she is now considering. The report published in September contained thirteen recommendations covering a diverse range of issues. A detailed action plan is being prepared for submission to cabinet for approval in the very near future which will outline a comprehensive action plan by my Department to deal with the issue of ash dieback. Detailed deliberations are taking place to ensure an efficient, appropriate and proportionate response.
There is currently an attractive and enhanced reconstitution scheme for ash dieback open for applications under the new Forestry Programme 2023 - 2027. This scheme includes the following enhanced features:
- 100% increase in the site clearance grant rate, from €1,000 to €2,000;
- Enhanced replanting grant rates under the new Forestry Programme 2023-2027;
- Those applicants whose sites are still in premium will continue to receive the premium due for the remaining years;
- In addition, for those in receipt of farmer rate of premium, a top up premium equal to the difference between the equivalent forestry type and the existing premium will be paid. This will be calculated for the remaining years left in premium and paid in a single sum.
When the Reconstitution Ash Dieback Scheme 2023-2027 opened in July it was noted that if a forest owner made an application they would not be disadvantaged if any changes are made as a result of the independent review process.
