Skip to main content
Normal View

COMMITTEE OF PUBLIC ACCOUNTS debate -
Thursday, 6 Jul 2023

Financial Statements 2021: Inland Fisheries Ireland

Mr. Francis O'Donnell (Chief Executive Officer, Inland Fisheries Ireland) called and examined.

I apologise to the witnesses, who we had to hold up for a few moments. As we normally do not like to keep people waiting, I thank them for their patience. Apologies have been received from Deputy Munster. The witnesses are all welcome and I remind all those who are in attendance to ensure their mobile phones are switched off or on silent mode.

Before we start, I wish to explain some limitations to parliamentary privilege and the practice of the Houses as regards references witnesses may make to other persons in their evidence. The evidence of witnesses physically present or who give evidence from within the parliamentary precincts is protected, pursuant to both the Constitution and statute, by absolute privilege. As they are within the precincts of Leinster House, they are protected by absolute privilege with respect to the presentations they make to the committee. This means the witnesses have an absolute defence against any defamation action for anything they say at the meeting. However, witnesses are expected not to abuse this privilege and it is my duty as Cathaoirleach to ensure it is not abused. Therefore, if the witnesses' statements are potentially defamatory in relation to an identifiable person or entity, they will be directed to discontinue their remarks. It is imperative that they comply.

Members are reminded of the provisions within Standing Order 218 that the committee shall refrain from inquiring into the merits of a policy or policies of the Government, or a Minister of the Government, or the merits of the objectives of such policies. Members are also reminded of the long-standing parliamentary practice that they should not comment on, criticise or make charges against a person outside the Houses or an official either by name or in such a way as to make him or her identifiable. Furthermore, it is not the role of the committee to make findings or fact about a person who is not a Member of the Oireachtas that could impinge on their good name or reputation. I ask members to be mindful of this in examination of the issues in question.

Today, we are joined by the Comptroller and Auditor General, Mr. Seamus McCarthy, who is a permanent witness to the committee. He is accompanied this morning by Ms Mary Henry, deputy director of audit at the Office of the Comptroller and Auditor General.

This morning we will engage with Inland Fisheries Ireland, IFI, to examine its financial statements for 2021. We will be speaking with the following representatives of Inland Fisheries Ireland: Mr. Francis O'Donnell, chief executive officer, Ms Suzanne Campion, head of finance and corporate services, Mr. Barry Fox, head of operations, Dr. Cathal Gallagher, head of research and development, and Ms Róisín Bradley, head of human resources. We are also joined by the following official from the Department of the Environment, Climate and Communications, Mr. Denis Maher, principal officer. To begin with, I call on the Comptroller and Auditor General, Mr. Seamus McCarthy, for his opening statement.

Mr. Seamus McCarthy

Inland Fisheries Ireland was established in 2010 amalgamating the previous regional fisheries boards with the Central Fisheries Board. Its remit is to protect, manage and conserve Ireland’s inland fisheries and sea-angling resources. IFI's income in 2021 amounted to €31.7 million. This was down from €36.9 million in 2020. Approximately three quarters of the income comes from Exchequer grant funding and the grant income was down in 2021 mainly to reduce IFI’s high cash balance at the end of 2020.

IFI’s expenditure in 2021 amounted to €36.8 million and this was up from €33.9 million in 2020. More than 70% of expenditure, or €26.6 million, was in respect of remuneration and other pay costs. Some €8.6 million was spent on operations with €1.6 million spent on administration.

I certified the 2021 financial statements on 29 March 2023 and issued a clear audit opinion. However, I drew attention to a number of items in my audit report. First, I drew attention to certain governance concerns. The chairperson of the IFI board resigned in April 2022. A new chairperson was appointed in May 2022 and resigned in January 2023. There were a further four resignations from the board during 2022 and in January 2023. As a result, the board became unable to reach the required quorum to meet and to make decisions, including approval of the annual financial statements. In February 2023, the remaining board members were removed by the Minister for the Environment, Climate and Communications on a no-fault basis. Two persons were appointed for a period of up to six months to perform the functions of IFI pending the reconstitution of the board.

A number of disclosures were made in 2022 to the Department of the Environment, Climate and Communications and to IFI. These disclosures resulted in the commissioning of a succession of reviews and reports. The statement on internal control outlines the status of these reviews at the date of signing of the financial statements. Following one internal review, the chief executive reported a potential fraud to An Garda Síochána in 2022. Due to an administration error, 16 vehicles leased by IFI in 2021 were uninsured for a period. The matter only came to light when one of the vehicles was involved in a road traffic accident. IFI anticipates that legal action may be taken against it over the incident. The financial liability accruing from the accident was uncertain at the time the audit was being signed off.

Finally, I drew attention to a change in the chief executive’s normal place of work from IFI’s headquarters in Donegal to the regional office in Ballyshannon in November 2021. This has implications for the claiming of expenses by the chief executive. We found no contemporaneous written record of the proposal for the work location change, or of its financial implications or of a decision in that regard by the board, which is responsible for setting the terms and conditions of the chief executive.

The number and complexity of the issues that have arisen in IFI contributed to a delay in the completion of the audit of the 2021 annual financial statements. The audit of the 2022 annual financial statements is currently in progress and I expect earlier completion of that work. Separately, my office is further examining a number of control and value-for-money issues in IFI and I may present a report on any significant findings from that work, if that is warranted.

I thank Mr. McCarthy. Mr. O'Donnell has five minutes for his opening statement.

Mr. Francis O'Donnell

Gabhaim buíochas as ucht an deis a bheith i láthair anseo inniu chun aon cheisteanna cuí a bhfuil baint acu le hIascach Intíre Éireann agus an ráiteas airgeadais don bhliain 2021 a fhreagairt. I dtús báire, cuirfidh mé in iúl don choiste go bhfuil sé ar intinn ag Iascach Intíre Éireann a bheith oscailte agus go dtí an pointe inniu. Muna bhfuil muid ábalta ceisteanna a fhreagairt, tabharfaidh muid freagraí i bhfoirm scríofa chomh luath agus is féidir. I thank the committee for the opportunity to appear before it today and discuss our annual report for 2021 and financial statements.

I am joined by supporting witnesses: Mr. Barry Fox, head of operations; Ms Suzanne Campion, head of finance and corporate services; Dr. Cathal Gallagher, head of research and development; and Ms Róisín Bradley, head of human resources. I will keep my remarks to some overarching topics and relevant issues regarding the financial statements and accounts for 2021.

We are a team of just over 300 full-time staff comprising fisheries protection staff, development staff, environmental officers, research staff and, very importantly, an excellent administrative back-up team. I am very grateful to our passionate and accomplished employees, who see their roles as a vocation. Many have given decades of dedicated public service to Inland Fisheries Ireland, and are national and international specialists in their respective fields.

In 2021, our protection and environmental teams were extremely active in addressing illegal fishing, pollution incidents, fish kills and habitat destruction in and around freshwater systems across Ireland. IFI delivered over 167,000 hours of anti-poaching patrolling activities. We concluded 82 cases for fisheries offences and commenced a further 103 cases in 2021. We also concluded 23 cases for environmental offences and commenced a further 13 cases in the same period. Most of the latter were associated with fish kills and serious water pollution incidents.

In 2021, IFI carried out river habitat restoration on 21 km of river channel, treated 11 ha of lake infested with lagarosiphon, an alien invasive aquatic plant species that has serious ecological impacts and may spread to other water bodies, and carried out maintenance on 34 km of river channel habitat. In the same year IFI staff audited 2,800 angler access structures and carried out maintenance on 510 structures to ensure the public were safe. This is just a snapshot of what we did in 2021.

IFI, like all public service organisations, must adhere to the highest standards in governance. IFI has made governance mistakes which have overshadowed the excellent public service we provide. The shortcomings in terms of good governance, for which we apologise today, were not deliberate and not deceitful in any way. Today we welcome this opportunity to explain the causes of these issues, and provide the requisite background and context to the committee. It is important for the public to know this.

Following extensive internal reviews of processes and procedures, and associated remedial action, IFI is operating within a very strong corporate governance environment. The external governance review of IFI will commence shortly and our section 18 board appointees are overseeing this process. This will strengthen IFI governance processes to a very high standard.

Separately, but in addition to these significant operational risks, we discovered alleged fraud within IFI in 2022 which is now subject to a criminal investigation by An Garda Síochána. I believe this occurred over a significant amount of time in Inland Fisheries Ireland but does not pertain to any serving staff member of IFI. The investigation also relates to the harassment and intimidation of the executive over a 17-month period. This has taken its toll on colleagues across IFI. I will endeavour to brief the committee to the best of my ability on this issue. As this is the subject of a live Garda investigation, I will remain cautious on this matter.

Inland Fisheries Ireland is overstretched and has been for a long time. Since 2009 our staffing complement has been reduced by 30%. We have statutory responsibility for Ireland’s 74,000 km of rivers and streams, together with 128,000 ha of lake systems. We patrol a coastline of 9,700 km and patrol the marine environment out to 12 nautical miles from the base lines. Our area of operation is extensive. We face significant operational challenges, especially the lack of staffing in specialist areas, which impedes our ability to respond more effectively and efficiently to the pressing needs of an environmental agency in an ever-changing ecological world.

These challenges are not an excuse for mistakes that have been made. The challenges are however a reality. The Minister, Deputy Eamon Ryan, has stated that IFI needs to be “adequately resourced” to “build and sustain capacity for both existing functions and an enhanced role.” The year 2021 was very challenging for IFI due to Covid-19 restrictions, and the last 18 months have been equally difficult for the organisation. Climate change, the pollution of our water bodies, the destruction of freshwater and terrestrial habitats, the proliferation of non-native invasive species and the impacts of aquaculture on migrating salmonids is making our role extremely challenging as an environmental organisation.

I was born in 1971. Wild salmon numbers returning to Ireland in that year were 1.2 million. In 2022 that number was reduced to 171,000, which represents a reduction of 86%. Arctic charr, a species that was encountered by the first inhabitants of this island, is now extinct from Lough Conn, County Mayo and faces a similar fate in other lake systems. The freshwater eels that were once prolific in the streams we played in as children are now facing extinction. Wild brown trout lakes across Ireland are disappearing due to the introduction of non-native species and the pollution associated with excessive farming practices.

IFI must be expanded and strengthened so we can deliver on all that is required of us by extant national legislation and the ever-increasing burdens of EU directives and regulations. Those regulations serve to protect nature. Nature has no voice other than the human one.

I am very proud of the progressive and innovative work we do, and the value it gives to the State, to our citizens and to the resource we protect. IFI could not do this without our committed staff, stakeholder support and the excellent support we receive daily from our parent Department, the Department of the Environment, Climate and Communications.

I and my team will address the committee members' oral questions and will share with them any written information they request in this session at the first available opportunity. I thank members for their attention this morning.

I thank the witnesses for appearing today and I thank Mr. O'Donnell for the opening statement. It is unfortunate that no board members are here today, but that is where we find ourselves. This organisation is receiving €27 million in Exchequer funding but does not have a functioning board in place. The witnesses have come to the Committee of Public Accounts today to ask for an expansion in its services, or at least that is part of the narrative.

When preparing for today's meeting, I asked somebody where the IFI is headquartered - I did not know the building. The reply I got was that it was halfway between Ballymagash and Killinaskully. That is not a good look for an organisation that is making a case here for increased staffing and funding. Many of the issues we will address here would sit very comfortably in the world of the D'Unbelievables or Hall's Pictorial Weekly. Even the corporate slogan invites an element of satire, "It's about the fish".

The protective crews are not getting out when they should. We do not have the trained RIB drivers to get out in the nighttime. Invasive species are allowed to get out of hand before being brought back under control. Lapsed insurance policies are not noticed until there is a crash. There are property leasing arrangements to employees which could be described as loose at best. Whatever about the fish, there is definitely something fishy happening here. As usual in such situations, at the end of the day the taxpayer will be left on the hook here.

IFI has a corporate governance structure that is in freefall, with mass resignations from the board leaving a board that is non-quorate and non-functioning so that the Minister needs to step in and take the nuclear option, essentially. There have been a series of internal reports, protected disclosures and a Garda investigation relating to serious allegations of fraud. There are questions about dormant accounts funding. We have sense that taxpayers' money is being thrown around like snuff at a wake.

In the wider context of the request for increased staffing, there is no doubt that the role and remit of IFI are changing radically as we respond to the urgency of the climate and biodiversity crisis. As Mr. O'Donnell outlined in his opening statement, there are increased pressures on our waterways. Our fish populations are also in freefall. I know that the Minister, Deputy Eamon Ryan, has called on IFI to be more ambitious and there is a need for more ambition. Its business case to Mazars referred to a 61% increase in staffing to go from approximately 320 to closer to 520. I absolutely understand the need for that level of ambition. I would love to be going to the Minister, Deputy Donohoe, ahead of the budget to say that I support IFI's request for this extra funding, but it is difficult.

It is difficult as a Member of the Oireachtas and as a member of the Committee of Public Accounts, which has oversight of the spending of public money, to have confidence in an organisation and to make a case for increased funding. There is a whole range of issues here and I am aware that time is limited.

I will begin with Mr. O'Donnell and the issue of his work base and where he was working from. I think there are questions for Ms Bradley as well and for Ms Campion. The Comptroller and Auditor General takes issue with how adequately this is reflected in the statement of internal control. The decision to move to Ballyshannon was based on the fact that it is closer to Galway. I am very fond of Donegal but that is the first time I have ever seen anybody make a case for moving to Donegal because it is closer to anything. It might be closer to Galway, but Inland Fisheries Ireland also operates in my catchment area of Waterford. That is not close to Donegal. I believe it was agreed by the head of HR. Ms Bradley signed off on this. Could I ask for the rationale first?

Mr. Francis O'Donnell

The rationale for it is that it was 2021 and we were in the middle of a pandemic. As the chief of the organisation, I was asking my staff to stay at home, to work from home and to work from regional bases if possible. We have staff normally based in Dublin, for example, in the research department. They could be from Cork or Waterford. We have seven regional offices. It made absolutely no sense to ask them to come in to headquarters, which was only open once a week at that point. I was living in Donegal. I would only have access to secure IT systems one day a week. At that point in time, I was also paying invoices on behalf of the taxpayer that ranged from €30,000 to €900,000. I did not have a secure system at home to do that.

Could Mr. O'Donnell not have set up a secure system in Dublin? As a case in point, my staff did not travel to Dublin during the pandemic but I did.

Mr. Francis O'Donnell

I would like to explain. The office was only open one day a week, so I would have to travel to Dublin once a week to undertake all of that work, whereas in most cases I would need two to three days working in a secure environment because I was handling various different sensitive issues within IFI.

I will just point out that the statement of internal control does not detail any of this.

Mr. Francis O'Donnell

It may not have detailed that.

And there are no contemporaneous written accounts.

Mr. Francis O'Donnell

It was agreed at that time by the chairperson and the head of HR. The Comptroller and Auditor General pointed out clearly that it should have gone to a full board decision. It was done with the best of intent. There was no malice intended, and it was done for the right reasons. As soon as it was pointed out by the Comptroller and Auditor General I took corrective action on that. I accept that.

The decision to revert back to the Dublin headquarters only happened when the Minister made the section 18 appointees.

Mr. Francis O'Donnell

That is correct. The position of the section 18 appointees was that once my base changed to Ballyshannon, my expenses were being signed off by the then chair, and a second chair thereafter. The section 18 appointees were concerned with the period from when they started.

Could I ask Ms Campion about the financial implications of the move? How much did it cost the taxpayer?

Ms Suzanne Campion

Just over €5,000 in terms of the amount spent during the period of the base being in Donegal. Since the section 18s were appointed, more than €1,000 has been repaid.

The figure I have in front of me is up to €5,400. Is that accurate? A total of €1,000 of it has been repaid.

Ms Suzanne Campion

It was €1,000 of the amount that was claimed since the section 18s were appointed. That is the full amount that was due.

Okay. I want to move on to the issue of protection teams in general but the protection team in Ballyshannon, County Donegal in particular. A difficulty was identified with the activity of that protection team. It might be a question for Mr. O'Donnell, but Mr. Fox might wish to respond also.

Mr. Francis O'Donnell

Could I defer to Ms Bradley on this one?

Ms Róisín Bradley

Our teams are fairly small and I do not think it is appropriate to call out one particular team because the staff would be easily identifiable. What I would say is that-----

Was there an investigation into one particular team?

Ms Róisín Bradley

No.

Was there not an internal process whereby this was checked?

Ms Róisín Bradley

No. There was no performance investigation with regard to the Ballyshannon team.

Have I made an error there? Was there a performance investigation into a team in a different area?

Ms Róisín Bradley

No, what I would say to the Deputy is that there were some discussions about a number of areas around the country where they needed additional resources. For example, we will choose the north because the Deputy has spoken about it. Our corporate plan has placed a focus on development, in particular around the assessment of barriers to fish migration, and other development duties. Because our resources are so stretched, it is difficult to stretch them across protection and development. There were some protection issues that we were concerned about, so we refocused the team. We put in a pilot scheme called a mobile support unit, which put out a call of interest to staff, if they wanted to participate. The idea was that it would be a central mobile support unit that could go to any area in the country that needed additional resources. To be clear; there was no performance investigation into anyone in Ballyshannon.

Okay. I want to turn to fleet management in particular. I think it is the second biggest expenditure outside of salaries. I understand the need for maintenance of the fleet. The valuation for plant and equipment comes to €21.4 million, which is substantial. To a certain extent I can understand it. I just want to get the right page in front of me here. There is a question around how many vehicles there are. How many people does IFI have in the field? I know there are 320 employees. How many of those employees are in the field?

Ms Róisín Bradley

Slightly over 200.

Are there slightly over 200 vehicles?

Ms Róisín Bradley

I should say that there are also another 30 to 40 people in research and they also have vehicles because they do fieldwork for six months of the year.

We are pretty close to a one-on-one ratio in terms of vehicles to staff.

Ms Róisín Bradley

What I would say to the Deputy is that we have done some research with other agencies that are quite like us in terms of the use of vehicles, for example, the Garda. This was at the time when we decided we wanted to bring in a telemetric system so that we could monitor each of the vehicles. We asked how the Garda manage vehicle utilisation. They said that the vehicle is a tool and they do not monitor the tool, they monitor the individual performance of the officer.

We do have 205 vehicles, but 31% of our fleet comprises 4X4 crew cabs. These vehicles are utilised for specific heavy-tow operations and off-road protection and development activities. Some 22% are sport utility vehicles, SUVs, for higher ground clearance and all-wheel drives and another 22% are cars and vans, and then we have a number of special types such as tractors, dumper trucks and stuff like that. It is not the case that every employee has a vehicle.

I accept that. Given the type of work IFI does, I accept the fact that there is a need for specialist vehicles but it just seems a very high ratio. It also seems that there is a very high figure included for general car hire; €350,000.

Ms Róisín Bradley

Again, we have spent a lot of time looking at what is the best way to meet the needs of the operations, in line with what type of vehicles are needed. Because we have what we consider a high season between March and September-October, which is when we bring in our seasonal staff, we have a lot more staff in the operations section of the organisation. Researchers are now out doing fieldwork and then other staff, such as people in my team, might need to travel around the country. We use pool cars. If somebody needed a vehicle to perform a duty, if they are in an operational team there would be a number of vehicles managed by the inspector locally. If they are in research, there are usually older vehicles that they use or we would lease vehicles. A lot of times they are externally funded through the research funds that they would be carrying out work for.

In broad strokes, there is the guts of €500,000 being spent on fuel and €350,000 spent on car hire. The size of the fleet means that depreciation is a very serious cost.

I understand there is a need for that but I find it astonishing, considering the size of the fleet, a fleet manager was only put in place after somebody had a crash in an uninsured vehicle.

Ms Róisín Bradley

I would not go so far as to say that.

Is the timeline wrong?

Ms Róisín Bradley

No. We had what we called a logistics manager, who was responsible for the fleet, which is cars, boats and trailers, and for health and safety, procurement, facilities and warehouses. We have so few-----

It is evident in the fact there were 16 uninsured vehicles driving around the place that there was a need for a fleet manager.

Ms Róisín Bradley

I agree.

I have a follow-on question on the climate commitments IFI set out. I think it is high level objective 4 and it refers to the type of reductions needed in carbon emissions across the organisation. The guts of €500,000 is being spent on fuel to get that expensive fleet around the place and that is not counting fuel for the RIBs, which is a separate cost. A significant amount of money is being spent on car hire and the maintenance and upgrade of the fleet. What steps is IFI taking towards electrification of the fleet? Have we a significant component of electric vehicles, EVs?

Ms Róisín Bradley

We do. Some 22.5% of our fleet is electric, which is 46 vehicles. I will go back to say one thing. In 2021, we were still at the height of the pandemic and, with regard to vehicle occupancy, rules kept changing. Our staff were deemed essential workers so we were doing everything we could to make sure they were out on the ground carrying out their job and doing it safely. At certain points in the pandemic, we could only have one staff member in a car where normally we would have four or even sometimes five. At other times, we had screens allowing two people in the car, one in front of the screen and one in the back. In 2021 we had, I think, 102 lease cars. The following year we had 38. It was an unusual year.

Getting back to the Deputy's question on EVs, 46 cars in our fleet, or 22.5%, are EVs. They have travelled more than 665,000 km in the course of duty since 2019. We recognise that 70% of our emissions are attributed to our fleet but we are proud to say we have made a 44.5% improvement in energy efficiency compared to our baselines, which is an SEAI performance energy indicator. We are a leader in energy performance and proud of that fact.

I thank the witnesses for their presentation. Following up on uninsured vehicles, there were 16 of those. Surely vehicles have an indication they are insured on the windscreen. The other issue was about tax. How could there be so many? I could understand, though it should not happen, one or two, but this was 16, a substantial number. Surely there are checks and balances to make sure all vehicles are insured at all times.

Ms Róisín Bradley

There are now. Every year when we get our insurance policy we shop around to get the best value for the public purse. In that year we went with a company called LeasePlan. A requirement was to contact them when any car went onto fleet. Our permanent cars are on at the beginning of the year and do not change unless we buy new vehicles. In 2021 we had 103 lease cars. They are not all brought on and taken off at the same time. It is two cars for two weeks, five cars for-----

Is that not a complicated way of dealing with it. If a member of the IFI's staff needs a car at 6 p.m., how does it cover insurance?

Ms Róisín Bradley

Sorry, give me that question again.

Say somebody suddenly requires a vehicle at 6 p.m., their existing vehicle is not functioning and they need to follow up something urgently. Is Ms Bradley saying they are not covered by insurance because IFI will not be able to get on to the insurance company there and then?

Ms Róisín Bradley

No. We have a 24-hour requirement to get a vehicle so if you knew you needed a vehicle for tomorrow, you would contact our field services team and they would organise a vehicle, the first being to try to see if there is a vehicle----

If an emergency arose-----

Ms Róisín Bradley

Yes, if an emergency arose. In the short term-----

Surely the policy needs to be looked at from the point of view of cover being there without having to necessarily identify the vehicle.

Ms Róisín Bradley

That is in place now.

And that was not the case before.

Ms Róisín Bradley

That was not the case at the time.

Money was spent trying to make the insurance retrospective. My understanding is IFI engaged a firm of solicitors to deal with that and a cost was incurred. You cannot make insurance retrospective.

Ms Róisín Bradley

I do not believe that was the case.

IFI engaged a firm of solicitors.

Ms Róisín Bradley

We obviously did not know the vehicles were uninsured. How we became aware of it when the accident happened------

If an accident did not happen, those 16 vehicles could still be going around without insurance.

Ms Róisín Bradley

For the period of time they were on a short-term lease, the Deputy is absolutely right. We would not have known.

Ms Bradley is satisfied there are enough checks and balances there now.

Ms Róisín Bradley

Absolutely. The arrangement we have with Axa is that the notification period is not immediate. All our cars are registered on the national vehicle database so this situation cannot happen. With the LeasePlan insurance policy, we needed to tell the insurer before the car was driven that it was on the policy. The current policy does not require that notification.

On insurance for premises, boats, etc., is IFI satisfied it has adequate procedures in place to make sure a slip-up like this does not arise again?

Ms Róisín Bradley

Absolutely. There are two things. One, we have put in a fleet manager who is solely responsible for boats, cars and trailers and the insurance. He also has two staff working with him.

Is IFI satisfied it has adequate insurance for buildings it owns as regards public liability?

Ms Róisín Bradley

Yes.

Remember insurance is any one event, so if ten people are injured in one accident, the limit is for the ten people rather than ten individual claims.

Ms Róisín Bradley

Yes. As I said, we apologise for what happened-----

I am asking about insurance for limited liability. Is IFI satisfied it has adequate cover in relation to limited liability?

Ms Róisín Bradley

Yes.

I move on to a different issue, namely, legal costs incurred. In prosecutions, one has to engage with people. Is IFI satisfied it has adequate procedures for getting value for money in relation to legal costs?

Ms Suzanne Campion

Yes. We do a legal tender through e-tenders. We have appointed 15 different solicitors as our solicitors in the 2021 accounts. They give us the best rates available and are based throughout the country to deal with prosecution matters that come up in the different regions. We also have some Dublin-based solicitors that deal with more corporate-----

IFI has taken a judicial review case.

Ms Suzanne Campion

That is correct.

Was that a board decision to take that judicial review? What stage is the review at and what is its likely cost to the fisheries board?

Mr. Francis O'Donnell

I will answer the second question afterwards. The case has been heard and is being written up by the judge at the moment. We had full support of the board to undertake that process.

The start of it was a board decision.

Mr. Francis O'Donnell

It was a board decision.

I ask the question because I have seen a scenario where the fisheries board objected to planning permission for a school and took it all the way to An Bord Pleanála even though the school gave a commitment to the fisheries board. I reckon that delay has cost €2 million to the project. Is there a policy for engaging on environmental issues with schools and local authorities where the fisheries board has a concern?

Mr. Francis O'Donnell

We would always to try to find a solution-----

In this case, there was not one. The issue basically was that the fishery board felt the sewage treatment facility in a small local community was not adequate for the school. The old school was already connected to the system. The school gave an undertaking that it would not increase the number of pupils but the fisheries board took it all the way to An Bord Pleanála and delayed the project for more than 18 months. Is there a policy in the fisheries board for dealing with issues such as this?

Mr. Francis O'Donnell

Our policy is to be pragmatic at all times and to try to find a solution. I am not familiar with the particular case that Deputy Burke is speaking about. I have not seen the file on it so it is difficult for me to speak on it. I do not know whether there is anybody-----

I am asking whether there is a policy. In this case, it went all the way to An Bord Pleanála at a cost to the Department of Education and to the local community.

Mr. Francis O'Donnell

On these particular issues, there would not be written policy whereas-----

Is it not about time that there was a written policy because this is-----

Mr. Francis O'Donnell

We have a policy-----

I fully understand the fisheries board wanting to protect the environment. What I am saying is that in this case, there was no engagement. Even where the school authorities tried to have engagement it was a closed door.

Mr. Francis O'Donnell

We have a stakeholders policy. I believe, as a senior person in the executive and as my colleagues do, that we would always engage. Like any public service organisation, we may have a policy on an issue and we may have a statutory remit but often there are discussions with other agencies to try to find solutions. Nobody wants to see one public service organisation not working in close co-operation with another. I am more than prepared to look at this and speak to Deputy Burke about it afterwards. I am not familiar with it.

I want to ask about co-ordination between local authorities and the fisheries board. Is the fisheries board satisfied there are enough processes in place so that there is a maximum benefit from its point of view and the delivery of the service that it is trying to provide? It is satisfied there are adequate processes in place for this engagement to be ongoing?

Mr. Francis O'Donnell

We engage at the highest level with county councils and city councils on a range of issues. The local authorities water programme, LAWPRO, is part of the county council system. We engage with it on a regular basis on water quality issues, catchment issues and habitat restoration. The answer is "Yes".

Mr. O'Donnell is speaking about the staff and I fully understand they have a lot of territory to cover. With regard to environmental issues, does Mr. O'Donnell feel that at this stage it would be helpful if IFI had additional staff to help out in this area? The fisheries board watches developments all of the time. Mr. O'Donnell has already explained how fish stocks have decreased substantially. Therefore, IFI is watching future developments. Is he satisfied that IFI has sufficient staff to deal with the issue so there can be co-ordination between it, local authorities and developing projects?

Mr. Francis O'Donnell

We are understaffed in this area. I identified that when I came back to IFI a number of years ago. What we find is that our environmental officers in particular are, for want of a better phrase, becoming locked into the office reviewing planning applications and environmental assessments all of the time. In the past, they spent more time in the field and detected more issues. They took remedial action on more issues and they took more prosecutions if it was necessary to do so. As I said in my opening statement, the ecological world we are in is changing all of the time. It is getting very complex. We now find that our specialists are reviewing applications from other agencies and private companies and it is bogging us down. This is why Ms Bradley, my colleagues and I in the senior management team worked on a business case. We have identified it as weakness in the organisation.

I thank Mr O'Donnell and his colleagues for their opening statement. Like my colleague Deputy Ó Cathasaigh, I would prefer to have spoken about fish today. The corporate strategy was signed off in 2020. Mr. O'Donnell began as chief executive in 2020.

Mr. Francis O'Donnell

That is correct.

Mr. O'Donnell has highlighted a number of challenges and we should really be discussing them and the accounts for 2021 but obviously there are other more pressing issues. There were six resignations from the board recently, including the chairperson. Then there were a number of disclosures. Is there an issue between the board and the executive of IFI?

Mr. Francis O'Donnell

It is publicly known that a number of board members resigned.

Mr. Francis O'Donnell

I did not have sight of the resignation letters. They went directly to the Minister, Deputy Ryan. With any board and any executive, there is a waxing and waning. It should never get too comfortable. It is important that, as an executive, we are challenged but equally as an executive, we should not be afraid to ask questions or raise issues on matters of concern. It is a very healthy environment to be in. I can only speak about my own relationship with board members in IFI. I felt I had a very professional and good working relationship with board members. They may not necessarily have the same opinion but I cannot speak to that. That is my view.

Mr. O'Donnell is saying he had a good working relationship with the previous chairperson and the new chairperson who was appointed and then resigned a year later.

Mr. Francis O'Donnell

I did have, yes.

It paints a different picture for us. All of this played out in the public domain, as Mr. O'Donnell can appreciate. He is right that everything went to the Minister and the Oireachtas heard that the Minister was taking action on IFI. What Mr. O'Donnell is saying this morning does not necessarily chime with what we are seeing and he can appreciate why. There is clearly a problem somewhere and it will come out in the wash.

My next question is for Ms Bradley as head of HR. It is about the morale of the staff. How many staff does IFI have at present?

Ms Róisín Bradley

Just under 320. It depends on the time of year. At present, we have our seasonal staff so that increases the number by 50.

Overall in the organisation what is morale like?

Ms Róisín Bradley

I would not say it is particularly good at present. I would say staff are feeling very deflated. They work so hard-----

What are the main reasons for that?

Ms Róisín Bradley

It is because of all of what has played out in public. I want to say very quickly that I have been working in the organisation for five years. It is my first time to work in the public sector. Our staff are one of the most amazing groups of people I have ever worked with. Their vocation to what they do is unbelievable and palpable. They go above and beyond every day. What they find so difficult is that all of this has been playing out in the media and they are asking what about them. It has tarnished the jobs they do. That has been very difficult.

What actions have HR and the wider organisation taken to try to arrest this problem and motivate staff with regard to the good work that they do?

Ms Róisín Bradley

We put together a well-being team. We got a commitment from the board and the executive to go for the KeepWell Mark so that we would have a benchmark.

When did that start?

Ms Róisín Bradley

We started that in late 2021 and we got the award in 2022. We are rolling out an employee survey through an external body in September.

My next question is for the Comptroller and Auditor General. When did the audit of 2021 accounts begin?

Mr. Seamus McCarthy

It was around this time of the year in 2022. I can get the exact dates for Deputy Devlin.

With regard to what Mr. O'Donnell said in terms of when the issue with the change of base for his workplace was flagged, when did that become apparent during the audit?

Mr. Seamus McCarthy

I would have to check. I know the file came to me in December 2022.

Obviously, many issues had been surfaced and each took some time, so it was in December – around 12 December, I think – that I cleared the issues. However, I think they would have been raised prior to that with staff members in IFI.

I thank Mr. McCarthy.

When was Mr. O'Donnell's decision to move back to Dublin made?

Mr. Francis O'Donnell

I got into negotiations straightaway with the two section 18 appointees, our two board members, once it was pointed out by the Comptroller and Auditor General.

Does Mr. O'Donnell have a rough idea as to when it came to him?

Mr. Francis O'Donnell

I certainly took a mental decision six or eight weeks ago to do that. I wrote to the two board members officially, probably a fortnight ago, to say that my base had changed.

So, it was very recent.

Mr. Francis O'Donnell

Yes. It is important for me to state here today that what was done was done for very genuine reasons. I had no issue when it was pointed out by the Comptroller and Auditor General. I believe that if there had been a full board decision at the time, there would have been no issue with it. I regret that I did not do that but-----

There are no notes. Is that not right?

Mr. Francis O'Donnell

There is a letter from the head of human resources, Róisín Bradley, to the HR department. In it, she informs me that she can confirm that my normal place of work, as specified in my five-year fixed-term contract as chief executive officer, is changing from Citywest Business Campus to the Ballyshannon office, effective immediately.

What date is on that letter?

Mr. Francis O'Donnell

The date is 3 November 2021. It states the arrangement has been made in line with sections 2.2 and 2.3 of my contract and refers me to page 2 of my fixed-term contract, dated 2 November 2020. It adds that all other terms and conditions of my employment remain unchanged and that if I have any queries about the content of the letter, I should not hesitate to contact Ms Bradley directly.

Therefore, it was not something that just happened. There was a discussion between the chairman, me and the head of human resources. That was the letter that I got-----

Was that the original chairman of the board?

Mr. Francis O'Donnell

Yes, it was the original chairman. I appreciate that there is no other written record on this issue.

On the timeline, I think the phrase was "very little written evidence". The Comptroller and Auditor General's opening statement stated, "We found no contemporaneous written record of the proposal for the work location change or of its financial implications, or of a decision in that regard by the Board, which is responsible for setting the terms and conditions of the Chief Executive." If the audit started and the Comptroller and Auditor General was notified in December 2022, the letter Mr O'Donnell read out is dated 3 November 2021.

Mr. Francis O'Donnell

That is correct.

One letter is fine, and Ms Campion said the cost was €5,400 overall. In the round, irrespective of the amount of money and the way in which things were done, coupled with the issues concerning fleet management or the lack thereof and other issues we are discussing today, it points to either a laissez-faire approach within the organisations to items or indeed something more sinister than that. Mr. O'Donnell can appreciate why we, as members of the Committee of Public Accounts, would be very interested in various issues that have arisen, not only at board level but also in respect of the management of various items within the organisation. From where I am sitting, I believe that the overall management of the organisation, which ultimately stops with Mr. O'Donnell as chief executive, points to a litany of issues. As I said at the outset, we would prefer to discuss the external challenges the organisation faces rather than the internal ones, but we are discussing quite a few internal issues today. Would Mr. O'Donnell agree?

Mr. Francis O'Donnell

I would not agree with some of the Deputy's comments. I do not believe we take a laissez-faire attitude to anything in IFI. I have brought a significant number of governance issues to the attention of the board since I became CEO in 2020. There was nothing sinister about my base change. I have to say that the word "sinister" makes it sound as if things were predetermined and that I went about this in some kind of sneaky way. I did not do that. I have said, and state again for the record, that it was agreed with the chairman at the time and the head of human resources. The Comptroller and Auditor General is correct that there should have been a full board decision, but if it had been a sinister thing I would have just done it myself and not asked for permission to do it. My expenses were paid afterwards and signed off by the then chairman. It is important for the public watching this today to note we do not have a laissez-faire attitude. We have problems and we have apologised. We are absolutely up front about the problems and need to get through this bottleneck. We have two excellent board members working along with us at the moment and they have great experience. They are going to do a governance review that is going to help us. Public service organisations make mistakes and humans make mistakes, and we are here to answer for them. We have no issue but I have to object to the word "sinister".

I welcome our guests. Mr. O'Donnell said he had a good working relationship with the board members. Would that be accurate?

Mr. Francis O'Donnell

Yes.

It is being portrayed publicly that there was open civil war between the executive and the board. Would Mr. O'Donnell agree there was civil war?

Mr. Francis O'Donnell

I do not believe there was civil war at all. The media presented it in a particular way. We are all here and we all know that people have various strategies.

The media portrayed it in a certain way. Five board members resigned. They did not resign because there was a great relationship between the executive and the board.

Mr. Francis O'Donnell

I cannot speak to that because I am not actually sure why those board members resigned. They would have tendered their resignations directly to the Minister, Deputy Eamon Ryan, and I would not have had sight of them. Therefore, I cannot speak to that point.

Can I ask Mr. Maher about it then? I am not going to ask him to get into the detail of the resignation letters. Would I be right in saying the resignation letters were received by the Minister and the Department?

Mr. Denis Maher

Yes. Some related to disagreements and some to the pressure of work. Our Secretary General wrote to this committee a little while ago in relation to correspondence received from the committee in terms of clarification. The correspondence stated quite clearly in relation to the resignations that there was a breakdown in relationships. That means inter-board relationships. It is important to emphasise that. The executive follows the direction of the board but if the board members are not ad idem, that is a problem. This is in a letter to the committee chair.

Can I ask about the Minister's move to remove the three remaining board members? On what basis was that done, and why? We are being told there was no basis and that it was on a no-fault basis. Why were they removed?

Mr. Denis Maher

Again, it is contained in the letter to this committee. There are functions reserved for the board. These are very important in terms of strategy, finance and signing off on procurement of a certain level. We exercise corporate governance over IFI not in the day-to-day operational sense but in the sense of dealing with the bigger issues. If there were a board decision that required further action – for instance, the sanction of the Department of Public Expenditure, National Development Plan Delivery and Reform to carry out the action – I would be charged with securing that. Also, our governance relates to the code of practice for the governance of State bodies and compliance with the Act of 2010. Those are important points. There are a number of functions listed in the Secretary General's letter that just could not be progressed-----

Mr. Denis Maher

-----and if they were not progressed, it would be very detrimental to IFI.

Have many protected disclosures been made to the Minister?

Mr. Denis Maher

I am sorry but I am not privy to that because there is a specialised unit in the Department. It would not be appropriate for me as the head of the inland fisheries division to have any impact in that regard. Again, it is detailed in written correspondence to the committee that the disclosures remain at various points of completion.

Within the terms of the 2014 Act and our own policies, and with those disclosures having been made to IFI within its own ambit, if matters can be forwarded to the committee, we are happy to do so.

I have a question about dormant accounts funding. An allocation of €30,000 was refunded to the Dormant Accounts Fund due to governance issues with the grant process. Does IFI review all grant applications as a result of the disclosure or only a sample? What processes have been put in place on foot of the governance issues that were highlighted and in terms of the €30,000 that had to be refunded?

Ms Suzanne Campion

The review the Deputy is talking about, which recommended the refund or, rather, that IFI might think about refunding a proportion of the €30,000, looked at grants to IFI to the amount of €924,000. The organisation was privileged to have dormant accounts funding to work with. We deeply regret that there are any queries around it at all. However, as it stands, the review looked at all the money that was given to us. It included the various programmes and measures that were in place in those two years, 2019 and 2020. In effect, the €924,000 is about 75% to 78% of the total amount of grants that were given to us. The bit that was not looked at was the following year.

The funding was broken down to various programmes such as Go Fishing Week, the angling for all grants and novice angler activation. The review looked at all amounts of money over €5,000 that were disbursed to third parties. It found these particular payments. IFI had a rationale for actually including them in it, if one considers what the programmes are about. Leave No Trace is about bringing people into the environment and educating them to ensure they leave no trace behind them. The visitor safety in the countryside programme looked at keeping all those people we were intending to bring out safe in the countryside. We were dealing with the Dormant Accounts Fund target groups, namely, the disadvantaged, the educationally disadvantaged and people with a disability.

I have a question about Aasleagh Lodge. The property was leased to a staff member on an informal basis. It has come to light that it was being operated as a guest house. Are these two statements correct?

Mr. Francis O'Donnell

I will go back a little bit and try to answer all the Deputy's questions.

I ask for a "Yes" or a "No" on those points first.

Mr. Francis O'Donnell

I do not think it was informal. There was a contractual arrangement in place with the employee but the mistake started in 2017. I want to get to the nub of the issue here. At that point, there was an internal call in IFI. There was a tendering process to see if anybody within the organisation was interested in leasing the property. That should never have happened. That was a mistake. I think it was a cascading effect thereafter because the property was for sale. It was going to be very difficult to get anybody to tender to lease the property because of a condition that the property would have to vacated with ten weeks' notice if IFI managed to sell it. This was a governance mistake and we regret that it happened.

In 2021, when I reviewed the files and went back through some documentation, I realised that the tendering process had not been done nationally. I immediately brought the issue to the board's attention.

How many properties similar to that would IFI have?

Mr. Francis O'Donnell

I want to give clarity on this issue. Aasleagh Lodge has three properties. There are two self-catering cottages. There is a working base on the property and then there is Aasleagh Lodge itself. The house was given to the State by the Brabourne family in 1984 after the murder of Lord Mountbatten.

I want to move on to the fraud investigation by An Garda Síochána that Mr. O'Donnell alluded to. I am very conscious that it is a live investigation. Without identifying any individuals, is Mr. O'Donnell in a position to provide some context around the various issues relating to the alleged fraud?

Mr. Francis O'Donnell

I am conscious of the fact that anything I say here could identify somebody. We have known about it since 2022. I was of the opinion that it had occurred from reviewing internal paperwork and looking at time sheets and rosters associated with certain staff. Having looked at it very carefully, I was quite sure that something very significant had happened.

Mr. O'Donnell only reported the incidents to An Garda Síochána after a second review was carried in September 2022. Is that correct?

Mr. Francis O'Donnell

I first reported the matter to An Garda Síochána in July. I went back and made a 25-page statement in September. I have to be very careful about what I say here.

Thank you, Mr. O'Donnell. I want you to be cautious. I also remind Deputies to be careful in their choice of language. A word like "sinister" has certain connotations.

I will start with Ms Bradley in relation to the 16 uninsured vehicles. To have a vehicle on the road without insurance is a criminal offence. Were there any prosecutions in that regard?

Ms Róisín Bradley

No.

Ms Róisín Bradley

No prosecution occurred for having an uninsured vehicle on the public highway.

Ms Róisín Bradley

No.

That is strange. Was Ms Bradley asked to present documents?

Ms Róisín Bradley

No.

Were gardaí called?

Ms Róisín Bradley

We became aware that the vehicles were uninsured when the accident occurred. We contacted our insurance company. An Garda Síochána has not-----

How long ago did the incident take place?

Ms Róisín Bradley

It happened in August 2021.

Is Ms Bradley aware that somebody in the organisation will be held responsible from a criminal perspective?

Ms Róisín Bradley

Yes, we are aware of that.

So what has IFI done apart from employing a fleet manager? Has there been training in that regard?

Ms Róisín Bradley

Yes. A full review was done in terms of the administration resources. Apart from that, we also made sure to put in a fail-safe mechanism to ensure that this cannot happen again. The insurance policy that we-----

I want to be clear on this. No one in IFI made a statement to An Garda Síochána regarding the issue of uninsured vehicles. Is that correct?

Ms Róisín Bradley

No. We were not asked to.

I want to go back to the maintenance issue for a moment. I would not ever equate a logistics manager with a fleet manager. However, in IFI one person seems to have been doing the two jobs. I note in some of our reports that the idea of the vehicle telematics was that IFI would incorporate fuel and other services from them. Is that correct?

Ms Róisín Bradley

Yes. Basically, the idea was that we had a dual relationship with LeasePlan.

It was a package deal.

Ms Róisín Bradley

Yes. We had maintenance and insurance with it.

There is a reference to "vehicle fuel". Were fuel cards provided by LeasePlan?

Ms Róisín Bradley

No. Our fuel cards are through Circle K.

How many fuel cards does the organisation have?

Ms Róisín Bradley

I am not sure.

Would each vehicle have a fuel card?

Ms Róisín Bradley

Yes. We would also have fuel cards for boats and certain equipment that would require diesel to operate.

Would the chief executive, for instance, have a fuel card?

Ms Róisín Bradley

I have a fuel card, as does the chief executive.

For how long has the chief executive had a fuel card?

Ms Róisín Bradley

I do not know.

Mr. Francis O'Donnell

Can I answer the question? I have had a fuel card since about 2019 or early 2020, when I first started with IFI as a regional director. For clarity, I use my car for work purposes only. It is not for private use. We have a policy internally which prohibits that.

Does Mr. O’Donnell use his car or his card?

Mr. Francis O'Donnell

I use my car. Obviously, the card is for work purposes only - for operational reasons relating to IFI.

Slow down for one second. Mr. O'Donnell is getting ahead of me.

Mr. Francis O'Donnell

Sorry.

Is the car Mr. O’Donnell his own or is it an IFI vehicle?

Mr. Francis O'Donnell

It is an IFI vehicle.

For which Mr. O'Donnell has a fuel card.

Mr. Francis O'Donnell

Yes, for which I have a fuel card.

When Mr. O'Donnell was claiming subsistence, did he ever use that fuel card? Can we have a record of the transactions relating to it? He stated that he has had the card since 2020.

Mr. Francis O'Donnell

Yes, I have had it since I started in IFI.

Mr. O'Donnell did not use it when he was claiming subsistence. We will be able to get a record of that.

Mr. Francis O'Donnell

That is not how it works. I would just claim the normal-----

Hold on. Why would Mr. O'Donnell claim subsistence from IFI?

Mr. Francis O'Donnell

I do not claim travel. One just claims an overnight. They are two different components of the travel and subsistence system.

Let us clear that up. For travel, Mr. O'Donnell was claiming an overnight and had no mileage.

Mr. Francis O'Donnell

Correct.

Mr. O'Donnell had no mileage claim.

Mr. Francis O'Donnell

I have never claimed mileage. I go in and I use my card for IFI business, and that is it. It goes directly centrally back to our finance section.

Mr. O'Donnell would fill the IFI car using the fuel card.

Mr. Francis O'Donnell

Of course.

And Mr. O'Donnell does not use that outside the business.

Mr. Francis O'Donnell

Of course I do not.

Perfect. IFI obviously has oversight of the fact that Mr. O'Donnell has a vehicle that he uses for work only.

Ms Róisín Bradley

Yes.

Does IFI have telematics information?

Ms Róisín Bradley

Yes, we do.

That is fine. The information we received indicates that there was no record. I know that details of a HR letter were referred to earlier. However, that letter came after the fact of our investigation or that of the Comptroller and Auditor General. Was that letter posted or emailed to Mr. O'Donnell? How did he receive it? How did he find that it had not been submitted initially?

Mr. Francis O'Donnell

I do not know whether I got it in the post or by email. I could not honestly answer that question. It was sent by my colleague, Ms Bradley. She might be able to-----

Okay. Ms Bradley.

Ms Róisín Bradley

I wish to explain how this came about because it-----

I just need to know where the letter that the Comptroller and Auditor General did not receive came from.

Ms Róisín Bradley

As far as I remember - I would have to double-check - I printed out a hard copy of it in order that I could put it in Mr. O'Donnell's file and left it on his desk. I also scanned a copy of it to him. I was cc'ed on it by the chairman. However, that was not after the fact; it was at the time.

It was after the fact of our report.

Ms Róisín Bradley

Okay. Right.

Sorry, I will clarify that with the Comptroller and Auditor General.

Mr. Seamus McCarthy

The letter that we are talking about was from 3 November 2021. That was a notification to the chief executive that his base had changed. That happened at the time the change was made. A year later, we were carrying out the audit and looking for where the business case underpinning it was. The only document that was available to us for audit purposes was the notification to the chief executive that his base had been changed.

Which would not suffice from the point of view-----

Mr. Seamus McCarthy

It was not sufficient, in my view, when the change of base should have been a decision of the board. I was looking for evidence of the board's decision with regard to the change of base in 2021.

Now that has been explained, in the absence of the board making that decision, why did Mr. O'Donnell go ahead and repay the subsistence?

Mr. Francis O'Donnell

As a public servant, if the Comptroller and Auditor General points something out to you and he is of a strong view that the process around my change of base was not correct and it should have gone to a decision of the full board, I am duty-bound to lead properly and not be one bit afraid to do this and say "Okay". If I had known that I had to do that at time, I would have gone to the full board and got a decision to do it.

A man of Mr. O'Donnell's experience is telling me, to be clear, that he needed the Comptroller and Auditor General to advise that it was not proper practice in line with public service guidelines that he would just change the address.

Mr. Francis O'Donnell

Can I respond to that? The chairperson of the board-----

There must be a code of conduct.

Mr. Francis O'Donnell

-----and the head of HR agreed to this change.

Mr. O'Donnell said the chair of the board agreed to it. Where have we seen that?

Mr. Francis O'Donnell

That is correct, and the Comptroller and Auditor General has pointed that out.

Who was the chair of the board at the time?

Mr. Francis O'Donnell

Fintan Gorman was the chair of the board at the time.

Mr. O'Donnell is saying categorically, under oath, that Mr. Gorman agreed to his change of work base. Did he just say-----

Mr. Francis O'Donnell

Not alone did he agree it, he also signed off on my expenses, which would have been from the Ballyshannon base thereafter.

But there was nothing in writing.

Mr. Francis O'Donnell

There may have been nothing in writing but he agreed to it. There is no possible way that I could have operated from the Ballyshannon base without at least getting agreement, and I had the letter from-----

On that basis, why did Mr. O'Donnell feel the need to pay back the subsistence if he was categoric that he did not do it unilaterally and had the agreement of the former chair?

Mr. Francis O'Donnell

The Comptroller and Auditor General pointed it out. I sat down when the section 18 board members were appointed. They considered the issue and were aligned with the Comptroller and Auditor General on it.

I am sure they were.

Mr. Francis O'Donnell

They were aligned with the Comptroller and Auditor General on it and I took the corrective action. Would the Deputy not have wanted me to do that?

Of course I would. I just wonder why it took so long and why it needed to be pointed out to someone in Mr. O'Donnell's position. Why did that need to be pointed out? These are basic rules relating to public office.

Mr. Francis O'Donnell

I will go back 2021. It is about context here as well. I was asking everybody in IFI at that point not to go to headquarters and not to go to a regional office but to work from home if they possibly could. That is important. When your office is only open one day a week-----

Those were different times, I agree-----

Mr. Francis O'Donnell

I think-----

That was one error. There was an accumulation of errors that make IFI look like a basket case. For a start, there were uninsured vehicles, which I, as someone who operated as a haulier for years, find incredible, to be honest. It is a jailable offence. The other thing is the leasing of the cottage. Was Mr. O'Donnell aware of that?

Mr. Francis O'Donnell

I just informed the other Deputy in depth.

I know. Would Mr. O'Donnell take responsibility that there was a comedy of errors within IFI?

Mr. Francis O'Donnell

Over a time period, organisations make governance mistakes. The difficulty with IFI was when these governance issues were brought to the attention of the Minister and the public, they all came out at one time.

Does Mr. O'Donnell take any responsibility for that?

Mr. Francis O'Donnell

Why should I take responsibility? My responsibility at this point in time is to be here in front of this committee today and-----

I just asked Mr. O'Donnell whether he as CEO would take any responsibility for all of those errors and he said "Why would I?"

Mr. Francis O'Donnell

I was not here for many of them, so I could not take responsibility for them. However, I am taking responsibility now to tighten up on governance and get us through this bottleneck in the organisation. That is my job.

Mr. O'Donnell would be happy that there is nobody claiming travel subsistence within the organisation but would have use of a fuel card categorically.

Mr. Francis O'Donnell

That absolutely should not be.

Mr. O'Donnell would have already stated to employees that should not happen, given his own brush with subsistence and repaying money. There would probably have been a sit-down with everybody to say that IFI needs to have the height of good governance and conduct.

Mr. Francis O'Donnell

We have a telematics system.

(Interruptions).

Mr. Francis O'Donnell

It is very important.

I do not want anyone confused about what a telematics system does.

Mr. Francis O'Donnell

Can I say-----

Just a second. I am chairing the meeting. The Deputy should allow Mr. O'Donnell to give an answer. He should keep it brief. Ms Bradley has indicated three times that she wishes to come in. She may do so briefly as well. Mr. O'Donnell should clarify that point.

Mr. Francis O'Donnell

When a fuel card is used in IFI, we can - there and then, or sometime thereafter - see whether the vehicle that the fuel card is assigned to was at the relevant petrol station. I do reviews. I have done significant reviews on that in relation to an investigation that I am assisting.

Mr. O'Donnell would cross-check-----

Mr. Francis O'Donnell

Of course.

-----if there was any form of subsistence claim with fuel purchase. He cross-checks that all the time.

Mr. Francis O'Donnell

I do cross-checks and I have done cross-checks, but I do not want to go into that in depth now in relation to what I spoke about earlier.

I know Ms Bradley was anxious to come in.

Ms Róisín Bradley

We have taken a lot of learning from what happened. Not only did we put in a robust new administration support system and the policy and all the rest of it, but we also conducted a number of mandatory sessions with staff to remind them of the fleet policy, the subsistence and, more importantly, how the fuel cards should be used and monitored, and so on.

Ms Bradley would be happy to state categorically that there could be no cross between a claim for subsistence and use of the fuel cards.

Ms Róisín Bradley

No.

We will suspend for ten minutes.

Mr. Francis O'Donnell

I want to say one thing for the record, although it may not be that important. Unless I heard it wrong, the Comptroller and Auditor General may have stated that the Inland Fisheries Ireland headquarters is in Donegal, when it is actually in Dublin. That is just for the transcript of the meeting. I apologise if I misheard him.

Mr. Seamus McCarthy

I am sorry for that.

To clarify, Inland Fisheries Ireland has a regional office in Ballyshannon.

Mr. Francis O'Donnell

We have offices all around the country.

That is just a point of clarification for myself. That is the one it was using during the Covid period.

Mr. Francis O'Donnell

Exactly.

Thank you for that clarification.

Sitting suspended at 11.11 a.m. and resumed at 11.20 a.m.

I welcome the witnesses. They know why they are here. It is because of incompetence, poor governance and disregard towards taxpayers' money. That is evident within the accounts laid before the House but also the statement on internal control, which took at least an hour, if not two hours, to read through. They have apologised and we accept that. We now need further clarity and understanding of the revelations in these accounts and the actions and decisions taken. I will also go so far as to compliment the board of IFI on disclosing its concerns with the standard of internal control. That is the board's job, to hold those at executive and management level to account. Considering what happened to the board in terms of highlighting the issues, I am sure the public will say a lot of its members resigned or it was disbanded on a no-fault basis. That is really concerning. As in the case of RTÉ, the Committee of Public Accounts has to get the facts and achieve transparency.

Will Mr. O'Donnell confirm if there is a separate Garda fraud investigation under way around a senior IFI appointment?

Mr. Francis O'Donnell

Is there a senior Garda investigation around-----

Is there a separate Garda fraud investigation under way around-----

Mr. Francis O'Donnell

I am not aware of it, if there is.

There is only one Garda investigation under way at present. Will he confirm that today?

Mr. Francis O'Donnell

There is only one Garda investigation. That is correct.

Who requested the change of workplace?

Mr. Francis O'Donnell

It was actually a discussion. I am answering the question-----

I will ask the question again. Who requested it? Was it Mr. O'Donnell who requested the change of workplace?

Mr. Francis O'Donnell

I cannot actually answer that question-----

Chair, it is a simple question.

Mr. Francis O'Donnell

Hold on. It was a discussion. I will ask Ms Bradley to come in because I know she is aware of how this happened.

Did Ms Bradley go to Mr. O'Donnell and say he should change his workplace or did he go to her?

Mr. Francis O'Donnell

I will let Ms Bradley answer that question.

Ms Róisín Bradley

I suggested it.

On what basis?

Ms Róisín Bradley

At the time, previously-----

What was Ms Bradley's role?

Ms Róisín Bradley

I was head of HR.

She requested that the CEO-----

Ms Róisín Bradley

Let me just explain-----

-----who was at executive management level, change his workplace.

Ms Róisín Bradley

I suggested it. I first suggested it to the chair to see if it was something that would be appropriate. I then suggested it to the CEO. At the time, the remote working strategy for Ireland had come out, and I was ringing round-----

I am conscious of the clock.

Ms Róisín Bradley

Okay.

Mr. O'Donnell had a contract in place.

Ms Róisín Bradley

Yes.

What was his work base in the contract?

Ms Róisín Bradley

The location was Citywest, but there is nothing in the contract preventing him from changing it.

Okay. That is all I asked. It was a signed contract.

Ms Róisín Bradley

That is correct.

It was legally binding.

Ms Róisín Bradley

Yes.

Okay. Ms Bradley understands that.

Ms Róisín Bradley

Yes.

Mr. O'Donnell has established that the chair and the head of HR verbally agreed in November 2021.

Ms Róisín Bradley

Correct.

Is Ms Bradley aware if the chair has executive decision-making powers?

Ms Róisín Bradley

I genuinely believed it that if the chairman said we could do it, I did not realise any further requirement was necessary.

Ms Bradley is director of HR.

Ms Róisín Bradley

Yes.

Should she not have established that?

Ms Róisín Bradley

That is the reason I checked with the chair, and if the chair said it was okay, I figured it was. I am just telling the Deputy honestly that I believed that to be the case, and it was okay.

I presume Ms Bradley drew up a new contract.

Ms Róisín Bradley

I drew up a letter, which acts as an addendum to the contract, and I copied it by the chair.

Can the committee be furnished with a copy of that contract? Do we have-----

Ms Róisín Bradley

This is the letter they are talking about in November.

Can it be presented to this committee?

Ms Róisín Bradley

Yes.

Who signed that contract?

Ms Róisín Bradley

I signed it.

Ms Róisín Bradley

Just myself.

Ms Bradley took the unilateral decision to change his work base.

Ms Róisín Bradley

Yes, with the consent of the chair.

With the consent, but the chair had no executive powers in decision-making. It had to go before the board.

Ms Róisín Bradley

As I said, I was not aware of that fact. The chair did not advise me of that fact either.

Who did not advise you?

Ms Róisín Bradley

The chair.

In terms of good corporate governance, and proper legal contract arrangements, Mr. O'Donnell's original contract stated his headquarters were in Citywest. Ms Bradley took the decision.

Ms Róisín Bradley

I should say that I would take decisions like this during the normal course of work, where I would change other people's-----

Not for a chief executive.

Ms Róisín Bradley

Okay, I understand that, and now I know, but I can say to you that I believed I could do it on the basis that I had the consent of the chair. He is copied on that letter.

Mr. O'Donnell also sits on the board. Is that correct?

Mr. Francis O'Donnell

Yes, I did sit on the board.

Did he bring this to the board's attention?

Mr. Francis O'Donnell

I did not bring it to the board's attention.

Mr. Francis O'Donnell

Because, as I have stated, I think, about three times already today-----

Does he not think that was a really important thing to bring to the board members' attention?

Mr. Francis O'Donnell

Can I answer the question? I did not bring it to the attention of the board. The chair and the head of HR were aware of it, and-----

My question is, why not?

Mr. Francis O'Donnell

-----if I had thought at the time that I should have brought it to the attention of the entire board, I would have done that.

Does Mr. O'Donnell not think that is an important decision in the context of his contract? Did he try to conceal it from the board?

Mr. Francis O'Donnell

I think, Deputy, the fact that the chair was aware of it-----

This was a cosy-----

Mr. Francis O'Donnell

Sorry, Deputy, you are using-----

Sorry, Mr. O'Donnell, you are in the Committee of Public Accounts.

Mr. Francis O'Donnell

I am.

I am asking the questions. This was a cosy arrangement between the HR director and the CEO-----

Mr. Francis O'Donnell

Can I-----

-----because nobody else was aware of it. Is that correct?

Allow the witness to answer the question.

Mr. Francis O'Donnell

It is not correct. It was not a cosy arrangement.

But Mr. O'Donnell never brought it to the board.

Mr. Francis O'Donnell

The chairperson of any board discusses and talks with their fellow colleagues regularly. The fact that the chairman was aware of it-----

When the chairman resigned-----

Mr. Francis O'Donnell

As far as I am concerned, at that point, it was okay.

When was the decision made? Was it after the chairman resigned or before the chairman resigned that Ms Bradley signed that letter?

Ms Róisín Bradley

It was well before.

Ms Róisín Bradley

Maybe a year beforehand.

A year before.

Mr. Francis O'Donnell

For the record, it was probably November 2021, and the chair resigned in late April 2022.

And Mr. O'Donnell never thought to bring that to the board's attention.

Mr. Francis O'Donnell

I did not see any issue with it at the time. I keep stating that.

Does Mr. O'Donnell think Paul Reid as head of the HSE would have changed his work base to Leitrim even though HSE headquarters are in Dublin?

Mr. Francis O'Donnell

I am not going to comment about what any other executive does.

This highlights-----

Mr. Francis O'Donnell

I am here to account for myself, not for any other executive, Deputy.

We are here to talk about governance and protecting the taxpayer.

Mr. Francis O'Donnell

Yes.

The taxpayer was put on the tune for an additional €5,000 because Mr. O'Donnell and his HR director entered an arrangement which seems absolutely ridiculous in nature. They were then caught on the basis of the statement on internal control and the Comptroller and Auditor General, and they are here to answer questions about it.

Mr. Francis O'Donnell

There is nobody caught here. Everything that we do-----

On what ground did Mr. O’Donnell reverse the decision?

Mr. Francis O'Donnell

I have already spoken to that.

On what grounds?

Mr. Francis O'Donnell

The Comptroller and Auditor General pointed out they were clearly of the view that this should have gone to a full board decision. This is probably my fifth time saying that. The section 18 appointees who have just joined the IFI-----

Which only happened this year.

Mr. Francis O'Donnell

Can I finish this?

Which only happened this year, Mr. O'Donnell..

Mr. Francis O'Donnell

Chair, will I be allowed to answer a question? I am being badgered here. I think it is unfair.

If the Deputy is asking a question or making a charge I do want to give the witness chance to reply.

Mr. Francis O'Donnell

It either has to be a question or a statement. I cannot answer a statement. It is either a question, but if it is a statement I cannot answer that, Chair.

Please respond, Mr. O'Donnell.

Mr. Francis O'Donnell

Could Deputy Dillon repeat the question please?

Mr. O’Donnell entered a contract on a unilateral basis with his human resources, HR, director. He never got board consent. Does he think that is acceptable?

Mr. Francis O'Donnell

I think in the context of how it happened, why it happened, and when it happened, it was done in absolute good faith. I did it in good faith then so-----

Mr. O’Donnell was the only beneficiary of this.

Mr. Francis O'Donnell

Well actually, how is that the case?

Because the headquarters of IFI are in Citywest.

Mr. Francis O'Donnell

Okay.

That is where Mr. O’Donnell should be based.

Mr. Francis O'Donnell

Then I would ask the Deputy the question. If the office is only open one day per week-----

Mr. O’Donnell only changed. We were well out of Covid-19 when he actually made that change.

Mr. Francis O'Donnell

We were not well out of Covid-19 and our office was only open one day per week at the time.

When did Mr. O’Donnell change his work base? On what date?

Mr. Francis O'Donnell

I think it was in November 2021.

When did Mr. O’Donnell change his work base back to Citywest?

Mr. Francis O'Donnell

I can supply the record to the meeting. I do not know exactly what-----

I will ask the HR director.

Roughly, what times did Mr. O'Donnell use Ballyshannon? I know he cannot remember off the top of his head but just roughly-----

Mr. Francis O'Donnell

Well I have claimed no expenses for being in Dublin.

That is not the question I asked. When did Mr. O'Donnell change back his work base?

Mr. Francis O'Donnell

Probably a fortnight ago.

A fortnight ago.

Mr. Francis O'Donnell

I officially wrote to the two section 18 members. This is a discussion. This was part of a process.

Is that acceptable, Ms Bradley?

Ms Róisín Bradley

I have to say that there were a number of things-----

Did Ms Bradley not ask Mr. O’Donnell, since it was her suggestion in the first place, when we came out of Covid-19 that he should revert back to Citywest?

Ms Róisín Bradley

Let me just say that it was not purely for Covid-19 reasons that I, and I came up with this suggestion-----

Ms Bradley previously said it was related to Covid-19, or Mr. O'Donnell did.

Ms Róisín Bradley

Sorry, Mr. O'Donnell did. I said that was not my only consideration. I was looking that a number of things. First of all, the remote working strategy was talking about redeploying people back into rural settings. That is the first thing. The second thing is, there has always been a bit of a "them and us" in terms of Dublin versus the regions. I have redeployed; for instance, my learning development manager job is advertised in Ballina and Limerick where in the past it would have been in Dublin.

Has Mr. O'Donnell claimed expenses in 2023?

Mr. Francis O'Donnell

Sorry?

Has Mr. O'Donnell claimed expenses in 2023?

Mr. Francis O'Donnell

Of course I have claimed expenses in 2023. I travel all over the country for IFI.

Has Mr. O’Donnell claimed expenses to go to his headquarters in Citywest? Has he claimed expenses for overnights?

Mr. Francis O'Donnell

I have claimed expenses.

Has he claimed expenses for overnights?

Mr. Francis O'Donnell

I have claimed for overnights, which-----

Does Mr. O'Donnell think that is reasonable, or justified?

Mr. Francis O'Donnell

I have paid back the expenses from the start date of the section 18 members. I cannot speak for them because they are not here today but my conversation, hold on, my conversation with them was, what happened under a previous board happened under a previous board. The previous chairperson signed off on my expenses, but from 14 February, which was their starting date. Anything that I had claimed after that period I have paid it back. That is what I was asked to do, Deputy. That is what the board asked me to do. They are my employers and I have done that. There is full transparency here.

That is not credible, Mr. O'Donnell; I will be honest it is not credible.

Mr. Francis O'Donnell

Do you know you what, Chair, the records are absolutely clear?

It is not credible. It is not credible-----

Mr. Francis O'Donnell

To say that it is not-----

-----that Ms Bradley did not seek this change of headquarters base until two weeks ago.

Mr. Francis O'Donnell

Chair, I can I say something? I think we are being very credible today. We are being very open and we are being very honest to the committee and I just find that, this is about the fifth time we have visited this, which is fine. It is the Deputy’s right to question. This was done in very good faith.

There is not a board member here today, Mr. O’Donnell. Where is his chief financial officer? When did he take over that role?

We have gone over time. Since 31 March?

Ms Suzanne Campion

March.

Okay, I thank Ms Campion.

I thank the witnesses for being here today. I just want to put the questions asked by committee members to date in context. I think the witnesses have been very open in the way they have answered the questions. The difficulty is that some of the responses have elicited more questions. It is only right that members of the committee have an opportunity to follow up on those questions. We should all just take a moment. Our job is to try to get to the bottom of that. I would say one thing though. There are lots of side posts here, that there is not a fully functioning relationship between the senior management team and the board in IFI, or there has not been, and that there are problems. While €,5000 is not the be all and end all of the future of IFI it does help to identify and illustrate the working relationships that were happening at the time. I think that is why Deputy Dillon is correct to try to focus on some of these issues and I will do so again.

I find how this arrangement began really unusual. The reason I do is because hundreds of thousands of people right across Ireland changed their workplaces, carried out their work in different ways, and in different manners. I cannot think of any other scenario that I have heard of, even informally - and I am on boards and so on - where a person's employment was changed. As a HR director, a change of employment means something. It carries an additional cost to the company. It is not about where someone works, it is about their legal place of work for Revenue and for purposes of travel and subsistence. I will go back to Mr. O’Donnell and just ask the question - is he saying that he did not request this, that this idea did not come from him; that he did not speak to Ms Bradley; he did not speak to the chairman and this was something that was put to him for the first time?

Mr. Francis O'Donnell

I think as the head of HR has alluded to, she suggested it to me first.

To be fair I am asking Mr. O’Donnell the question directly.

Mr. Francis O'Donnell

I am saying-----

Mr. O'Donnell should not use Ms Bradley's words to answer his question.

Mr. Francis O'Donnell

No, that was my recollection. It was it was then a discussion, a normal discussion, and then it progressed and evolved into my change of place.

Mr. O’Donnell said earlier to Deputy Devlin that he contested the word "sinister" - I accept his right to do that so bear with me - and that if this was sinister he would not have asked for it. Did Mr. O’Donnell ask for it, or not?

Mr. Francis O'Donnell

I did not ask for it but I would not have gone ahead with something, as a senior public servant, if I thought that it was genuinely doing something wrong or sinister, to used that word, or anything like that.

Mr. Francis O'Donnell

I mean, it is my job to be open-----

I am removing Mr. O’Donnell from the initial timeline of how it was initiated. What came across Ms Bradley’s desk, what made her consider possibly changing the contract of the CEO and his place of work?

Ms Róisín Bradley

Right, so there were a number of things. The first thing is that the previous CEO lived in Dublin and spent a lot of time in Dublin. All of our of support services posts, anything in HR, finance, and communications, were all based in Dublin even up as far as an assistant principal, AP, grade post. There had been a bit of a view in the in the regions that all the nice jobs were in Dublin. When I first came in one of the first things I did was I actually started to split my team and started recruiting for my team, who had all been based in Dublin, in the regions.

Was that a formal strategy or was that just a-----

Ms Róisín Bradley

That was a formal strategy. It was actually part of my HR strategy.

Ms Bradley had a formal strategy to implement more diversified locations.

Ms Róisín Bradley

Yes, exactly.

Okay. When Ms Bradley made the change or proposed the change, she obviously realised that would have an impact on cost for travel and subsistence.

Ms Róisín Bradley

Yes. I suppose what I would say is that Mr. O’Donnell was spending most of his time In Galway anyway, so to be honest I did not see that there was really much of a difference.

The difference was, and as a HR director she would know this, that travel and subsistence is paid from one’s place of employment.

Ms Róisín Bradley

Absolutely, and to be honest-----

Mr. O’Donnell could have worked in Timbuktu or Reykjavík or anywhere. The point is that changing the place of employment of the contract is a very specific thing.

Ms Róisín Bradley

Yes.

What made Ms Bradley consider that?

Ms Róisín Bradley

I suppose I probably did not give it the weight that it was due, if I am being honest. I have to say in hindsight, and I was only thinking about this recently, what I should have done was to say to Mr. O’Donnell to change his base but we will keep it that in terms of subsistence it is his base or Dublin, like the way you would have your base or home, when claiming subsistence. It should have been his base, home, or-----

That leads to a follow-on question of whether anybody else's base was changed?

Ms Róisín Bradley

I have changed people's bases.

Of course. Was anybody else's base changed as part of this policy at a senior level? For example, was Ms Bradley's place of work changed?

Ms Róisín Bradley

No, it was not.

Was Ms Campion's-----

Ms Róisín Bradley

No, no one else on the executive team. However, as I said, we have done that in the past.

It could be done for logical organisational reasons. It comes to the core of an additional cost being levied on the organisation. Mr. O'Donnell was travelling. He was being reimbursed for the travel he did and did not gain any money from that. You can make a few bob on subsistence but by and large-----

Mr. Francis O'Donnell

Not in Dublin.

-----you would want to be working very hard. My point is Mr. O'Donnell did the work and was reimbursed from a tax perspective, but the issue is that the company paid more money when it already had a contractual arrangement with Mr. O'Donnell to not incur that cost.

Ms Róisín Bradley

I understand that. As I said, in hindsight, I would make a different decision. I should say though that it was genuinely made with best intent. It was open. Everyone in my team knew about it. It was not a water-cooler discussion.

The point Ms Bradley is making is that it was an honest error.

The next issue is the deciding of the change of contracts with the CEO. It is an unusual position because the CEO has no line boss at an administrative level within the company. Is it normal to directly go to the chair on different issues?

Ms Róisín Bradley

How do you mean?

Normally, the reporting relationship is between the CEO and the board.

Ms Róisín Bradley

Well, yes. I suppose my position is an unusual situation to be in because when the last CEO was exiting, I was the conduit between him and the board managing his exit, which was an odd scenario because he was ultimately the person I reported to. It is a weird scenario. I understand that.

There was a level of informality in board governance in that if it had been communicated by Mr. O'Donnell to the chair, it would probably normally have gone through a board meeting or been entered into a board pack and so on, but there was that informal connection between Ms Bradley and the chair. Again, that points to an informality of governance that might have happened for very legitimate, logical reasons. That informality of governance does not rest with Ms Bradley but with Mr. O'Donnell. Staff members should not report directly to the board on any operational issues. As a board member, the only time I ever speak to a staff member is if I have to sign a director's form. I would never speak to the head of wages, for example, for any of the boards I am on. It again shows a level of informality.

I will switch to the departmental officials because I think they got a little off the hook. We have spoken about IFI for a long time. There is a senior counsel review, a McCann FitzGerald review, and a Garda investigation. Effectively, there is no fully functioning board. Will the officials give us an update on where we are as regards a full board appointment, the McCann FitzGerald report, and why, when the senior counsel's report stated that there was no reason for the board members to resign, they were asked to resign?

Mr. Denis Maher

The senior counsel or Bradley report was completed in July 2022. The Minister's office received it a short time later. I do not think it is quite accurate to say that there was no reason for the board to resign. The report is quite clear. Taking paragraph 103 of that report and reading it in isolation, does not present the accurate or entire picture here. I have the exact sentence here, if the Deputy will bear with me please.

Of course. Mr. Maher is saying the senior counsel report gave the basis for the removal of the board.

Mr. Denis Maher

No, I did not say that. Not at all. Paragraph 103 states:

There is not a basis, from the alleged disclosures and the information and documentation which has been reviewed, for the Minister to be satisfied that the functions of IFI are not being performed in an effective manner such as to effect the removal of the ... [board].

Below that, there is a series of very important recommendations made by Mr. Bradley in relation to the conduct of the board's business, which clearly indicate that the delivery was suboptimal. It was not sufficiently suboptimal as to affect a removal at that stage. It must be remembered this arrived into the Minister in July 2022. The Minister took the decision to remove the board on 14 February 2023. In the meantime, the Minister asked senior officials, including myself, in the area to meet with the board. The board accepted all the recommendations, including the one the Deputy cited, in the report and agreed to move forward, working with the executive to implement all the recommendations in the report and report back to the Minister. Unfortunately-----

Documents were being sought, but where is the McCann FitzGerald report at this point?

Mr. Denis Maher

That is in relation to protected disclosure.

Mr. Denis Maher

As I said earlier, it would not be appropriate for me, as head of the division looking after the governance of IFI, to be privy to that. I do not even know what is in the report.

It was commissioned by the Department.

Mr. Denis Maher

Yes, and as I said, there has already been correspondence to the committee in that regard. There are a number of disclosures in-----

If Mr. Maher is not a position to respond on behalf of the Department today, could he seek a written reply to that question from the Department?

Mr. Denis Maher

What I can say is that the process that is being carried out under the Department's policy for protected disclosures under the aegis of the special unit dealing with that, which is not accessible to others in the Department, and under the Protected Disclosures Act 2014 must run its course. I have already updated the committee in the sense that the various protected disclosure investigations are at various stages. Once these are completed, I have offered to come back or to have the Department come back, but they must-----

It was a simple question. Can we get a written update as to where things are in the process?

Mr. Denis Maher

As soon as due process has taken place, of course. It is important that takes place.

We are way over time.

The committee is asking where we are in the investigation. It is a legitimate question. We could be at the very beginning or at the end-----

Mr. Denis Maher

I am not privy to that information. We are at various stages-----

I am not asking Mr. Maher for that. I am asking him to get an update from the Department on it.

Mr. Denis Maher

Absolutely-----

Is that commitment being given by the official?

Mr. Denis Maher

I will answer one further question and give one further clarification. As you know, the Minister removed the board on a no-fault basis on 14 February. One of the reasons for that is that the recommendations of the Bradley report were not implemented by the board. That is a simple issue that arose. Also, it is being characterised here that IFI is in some way board-less or directionless. That is not the case. Section 18 of the Act is very specific that the appointees are carrying out the full functions of a board. There is no board per se. In other words, under the Act, there are ten members of the board, one of whom is ex officio, but there are nine persons appointed by the Minister.

On that, can I clarify that the two former county managers have powers and functions equivalent to what a board would normally have?

Mr. Denis Maher

Absolutely.

All power-----

Mr. Denis Maher

Their function under section 18 is to manage the statutory obligation and affairs of IFI.

They have full authority under section 18.

Mr. Denis Maher

Full authority.

Okay. Thanks for that.

In the past seven days, we have had the Irish Horseracing Regulatory Board, RTÉ and the IFI before the committee. We have had a dysfunction overload in a week, the extent of which is highly unusual for the committee to see. IFI mentioned the vocational nature of many of its staff in its opening statement. I accept that and I accept their morale must be on the floor but it is not because of what is in the newspapers. All of this is self-inflicted damage. There would not be adverse newspaper articles if there were not a basis for such newspaper or media articles. IFI staff, rather than just the committee or the public, require a very serious consideration of how IFI will make an apology to them, especially those people who are working on fish kills and conservation issues.

That is self-evident.

I want to start by asking Inland Fisheries Ireland about the dormant accounts funding of €1.18 million. The Dormant Accounts Fund is confined - not everyone that would qualify for it - to disadvantage and disability. IFI obviously applied for funding. Three reports were subsequently produced at a cost of €50,000, which is extraordinary. They identified governance issues. As I have a limited amount of time and we are trying to cover a lot in a short period, I ask for short replies. There was an internal audit. Was that part of the three reviews? The internal audit found there was no justification for spending €8,500 on the ploughing championship and €17,500 on Leave No Trace. Can Ms Campion confirm that was a finding?

Ms Suzanne Campion

That is not correct. It said that IFI should consider repaying a proportion of those amounts.

When IFI applied for this money the expectation would have been that, with the exception of a small amount of spending on administration, it would all have been used to directly benefit people with a disability or facing disadvantage. However, a lot of money was spent on salaries, overnight subsistence and events such as the ploughing championships.

Ms Suzanne Campion

None of the dormant accounts money went to the ploughing championships, Leave No Trace or the Visitor Safety in the Countryside Group because IFI bore that cost.

In relation to what we do for dormant accounts, it is projects and programmes that would assist the socially and economically disadvantaged, the educationally disadvantaged and persons with a disability. That is in the legislation. IFI is happy that everything we did was on plans and programmes that would assist those particular categories. I can only say that we were so privileged to do it. We have been inundated with requests since we stopped doing it and we are very regretful that it has stopped.

Did IFI return money?

Ms Suzanne Campion

Basically, we drew down money in arrears and it was a net off what we were drawing down.

What was the amount?

Ms Suzanne Campion

It was €29,740 - something like that. Sorry, I do not have the exact amount.

It was in that order.

Ms Suzanne Campion

Yes.

I want to ask a particular question before I asking about some of the legal fees. There was an internal review in July 2022 and another in September 2022 and the CEO reported potential fraud to An Garda Síochána in 2022. It appears that report was only made after the second review. There were two reviews. Why was it not reported after the first review, if that was the case?

Ms Suzanne Campion

The Deputy is not talking about dormant accounts now.

No, I am talking about the fraud investigation. There were two internal reviews, in July 2022 and September 2022.

Mr. Francis O'Donnell

Sorry, on the internal reviews, can the Deputy be more specific?

I am specifically talking about the fraud investigations by An Garda Síochána.

Mr. Francis O'Donnell

Yes.

How many fraud investigations are there?

Mr. Francis O'Donnell

There is one investigation.

Okay. We are talking about the same thing.

Mr. Francis O'Donnell

Sorry, but I first reported the issues to the Garda, along with a number of issues - not just fraud - in July. I went back to the Garda in Ballyshannon in September and made a far more detailed statement.

Once Mr. O'Donnell became aware of the issue, he reported it to the Garda.

Mr. Francis O'Donnell

Once I was satisfied that there were very significant issues here, yes I did. I am being very careful here now. The committee can have me back again. There is a very clear reason around the timelines of my making my reports and if I was to speak to them, I could jeopardise the case.

I do not need further expansion now that we have that information.

An extraordinary amount of money has been spent on legal fees. I fully accept IFI will prosecute people, including people who damage the environment. That is the nature of its job. In recent years, legal fees seem to have increased by approximately three times what IFI would normally spend on them. Why is that? Apart from the legal fees arising from prosecutions, on what other areas are legal fees being spent? There are two particular firms, ByrneWallace and Coakley Moriarty, both of which, I believe, are based in both Dublin and New York. What would they be used for?

Ms Suzanne Campion

If I can go back to the Deputy's previous question in relation to the repayment, we drew down €300,000 in June 2021 but we only spent €256,000. Therefore, we had to give back €43,817. Our figures were based on the fact that the drawdown originally-----

Can I have a reply to my other question?

Ms Suzanne Campion

No problem. In any event, it was a net-off against a drawdown.

In terms of the legal fees, ByrneWallace got €157,000 in 2021, €235,000 in 2022 and €201,000 so far in 2023.

I am not asking Ms Campion how much they got. I know the figure was €1 million when all the fees are amalgamated because I asked a parliamentary question on it. Outside of prosecutions, what is the nature of the escalated spend on legal fees?

Ms Suzanne Campion

In 2021, we had €235,000 for prosecutions and €90,659 for the judicial review into ALAB, the aquaculture licensing authority or board - I am not sure what the "A" stands for. We had €39,000 in relation to dormant accounts funding.

IFI spent €39,000 on legal fees around the Dormant Accounts Fund.

Ms Suzanne Campion

Yes, €29,000 was spent on a report and a further €10,000 on legal advice. Then there was €25,000 for other-----

Is that €29,000 spent on the report included in the figure of €50,000?

Ms Suzanne Campion

Yes.

Ms Suzanne Campion

A further €25,000 was spent on various other bits and pieces - I will not call them that - such as HR advice, conveyancing and so on.

Was the HR advice in relation to the issues around the board?

Ms Suzanne Campion

No, not at that time.

It was internal staff.

Ms Suzanne Campion

Yes, this was 2021.

As a matter of interest, the Minister will seek additional funds as part of the budget process. I ask Mr. O'Donnell to put himself in the Minister's position following all of the issues that have come to light, such as not insuring vehicles and the dysfunction around the board. Mr. O'Donnell says the organisation is understaffed and requires technical people. Does he honestly believe it is viable for the Minister to seek additional funding in the context of all that we are seeing in this regard?

Mr. Francis O'Donnell

It certainly would be viable. I say that in the context of-----

Is it politically viable?

Mr. Francis O'Donnell

We are here today to account for it. I think we have done that very honestly and effectively. It does not change the mandate we have. We have a very significant environmental resource out there that we need to protect, manage and look after for current citizens and future citizens. We are very well placed to do that. We are going to have a governance-----

I must beg to differ.

Mr. Francis O'Donnell

That is okay but, as the chief of the organisation, I have to stand up for IFI today and say that we absolutely accept the fact that we have governance issues.

Those issues are on the table now, we are discussing them and a review will be undertaken by the board. There will be a new board in September. We are extremely cognisant of what has happened. However, it should not mean that I as leader and the members of the executive team would not make our case. What we do is a vocation. I am fully committed to expanding IFI.

The vocational side is done by the people out there in wellies and so on.

We are over time.

Mr. Francis O'Donnell

It is not that long since I had the wellies on.

Mr. Maher wants to come in. I ask that he be brief.

Mr. Denis Maher

There have been significant High Court challenges in recent years in regard to fishing rights owned by the State, in respect of which legal costs were mounted . The expectation in the Department and from the Minister is that IFI would vindicate those rights on behalf of citizens. I do not think there is any demurring from the fact it is extremely important in situations where people are trying to usurp the rights vested in various parts of the State. That is part of the legal issue. As the Deputy knows, dealing with cases at the High Court can be quite expensive. Thankfully, we have secured and won the cases so far. We will continue to vindicate those rights. That is done through IFI. It is important.

Presumably, the State Claims Agency leads on that.

Mr. Denis Maher

No.

Is it done directly?

Mr. Denis Maher

IFI does it directly, with the support of the Chief State Solicitor's Office and the Attorney General.

On the Deputy's other point, the Minister has asked for a workforce plan for IFI, particularly around protection, conservation and development, which are extremely important. We are in the middle of a biodiversity crisis. IFI has been understaffed for some time. We secured a small number of staff for this year. There is a workforce plan and critical to that is the plan by the Department of Housing, Local Government and Heritage for the removal of barriers to fish passage, which is required by EU legislation. The Department has asked IFI to deliver that, given its expertise over many years. That is part of it.

Is Mr. Maher referring to the removal of river barriers?

Mr. Denis Maher

Yes.

To clarify, is the plan is to get a new board in place in September?

Mr. Denis Maher

I will update the Cathaoirleach quickly on that. The two very experienced section 18 appointees are acting in loco of the board at the moment. They are well known. They will complete their governance review and that will be a template for the new board.

Along with the review, is there oversight from those two individuals?

Mr. Denis Maher

Yes, and that is hugely important.

Can Mr. Maher confirm there is oversight?

Mr. Denis Maher

Yes, absolutely. It is second to none. The other element is that the template for the new board coming in. In respect of both competitions, the Oireachtas committee associated with the Department nominates a number of persons for appointment. The Minister does all the appointments and then there are two other Ministers who have an opportunity to nominate. The three Ministers, that is, our line Minister and the other two Ministers, have agreed to a common Public Appointments Service, PAS, process. That process has been advertised and we expect to have a new board in place once those competitions are finished. PAS advises us it will be approximately 12 weeks from advertisement to having a panel in place.

I thank Mr. Maher. I want to go back to the issues around Aasleagh Lodge. I hope I have pronounced that correctly. I understand it is a Victorian country house.

Mr. Francis O'Donnell

That is correct.

How many rooms are in it?

Mr. Francis O'Donnell

There are eight en suite rooms, two reception rooms, a kitchen and other facilities.

Is there a dining area?

Mr. Francis O'Donnell

Yes.

Is there a hall for socialising? Many country houses had one of those.

Mr. Francis O'Donnell

There is not a hall. There is a small landing but not a hall.

I understand there are also two cottages close to the house.

Mr. Francis O'Donnell

That is correct. They are located approximately 200 m from the house.

How many acres make up the site?

Mr. Francis O'Donnell

The site has 20 acres.

When were issues first flagged regarding Aasleagh Lodge?

Mr. Francis O'Donnell

They go back some time.

Mr. O'Donnell came into his role in 2020.

Mr. Francis O'Donnell

Yes, in November 2020.

Did he hear about this straight away or fairly soon after he was appointed?

Mr. Francis O'Donnell

I did not hear about it fairly soon after my appointment.

Was it 2021 before he heard about it?

Mr. Francis O'Donnell

It was 2021 before I was aware of the leasing arrangements.

Was Mr. O'Donnell aware of the existence of Aasleagh Lodge?

Mr. Francis O'Donnell

Of course I was.

Were any of the other witnesses aware of what has happening at the lodge or the cottages?

Ms Suzanne Campion

I was involved in the previous tender last year seeking tenants to look after Aasleagh Lodge.

Was Mc Campion aware of any of the significant issues with the lodge?

Ms Suzanne Campion

Since I took over the role, I was aware of the issues that were happening at Aasleagh Lodge, which had been going on since IFI took it over and before that. The board was constantly concerned about the lodge because it was operating at a loss.

Did any of the IFI witnesses ever visit the lodge?

Ms Suzanne Campion

I did.

Did Ms Campion stay in the lodge?

Ms Suzanne Campion

No.

Did any of the other witnesses stay in the lodge?

Ms Suzanne Campion

I apologise. I did stay in the lodge.

How long did Ms Campion stay there?

Ms Suzanne Campion

I stayed there for a night back in the time of the Central Fisheries Board and the regional fisheries boards. I was there for a team meeting.

Was that meeting on site?

Ms Suzanne Campion

Yes.

Was it taking place the next day or something like that?

Ms Suzanne Campion

Yes.

Dr. Cathal Gallagher

I stayed at the lodge on one occasion that I can remember. A national salmonid index catchment research station is located there. I paid my fee and stayed at the lodge on one occasion a number of years ago. I cannot remember exactly when.

There was an arrangement whereby the lodge was leased to an outside operator. There had been a loss of €84,000 over the previous four years when it was leased to the external operator. That operator pulled out in 2017, as I understand. An employee and spouse were then successful in becoming the leasees. Was that in 2017 or 2018?

Mr. Francis O'Donnell

It was in 2017.

Mr. O'Donnell might not want to name the person but can he say what position that individual held in the organisation?

Mr. Francis O'Donnell

The person had an administrative role within the organisation.

Was it a senior administrative role?

Mr. Francis O'Donnell

I can answer that question but it might identify the person. I would say the position was somewhere in the middle.

It was middle management?

Mr. Francis O'Donnell

No, the person was not in middle management. The role was on the administrative side, probably somewhere in the middle. Ms Bradley might be better able to address that question.

Ms Róisín Bradley

The person was in an entry grade.

I thank the witnesses. Why was the lodge leased to somebody internal to the organisation?

Mr. Francis O'Donnell

I will provide context around that. I have stated at an earlier discussion on this matter that it was a mistake and it should not have happened. I repeat that now for the record. There is correspondence around this. From what I can gather, the thought process at the time was that the property was for sale and it was going to be very difficult to get anybody to lease it. One of the issues was that if somebody leased the property from IFI and the organisation was fortunate enough subsequently to sell the property, the leasee would get ten weeks' notice to vacate it. The difficulty with that is there was a significant risk for the leasee if customers or clients were booked to stay in the property.

Were the two cottages being leased as well by the internal person?

Mr. Francis O'Donnell

At that point, it was only the cottages that were being leased.

The cottages were leased. Was the mansion not being used?

Mr. Francis O'Donnell

It was not being used. It was just the cottages. I want to make that clear. It was an internal decision to lease to the individual. The board was apprised in March 2017 that somebody internal might lease the property. There is a note to that effect in the file. I found that note.

Who was responsible for putting that arrangement in place and who signed off on it?

Mr. Francis O'Donnell

I imagine it was signed off at the time, in 2017, by the former CEO.

Were any of the witnesses working in the organisation in 2017?

Ms Suzanne Campion

I was.

Is what Mr. O'Donnell indicated Ms Campion's understanding of what happened?

Ms Suzanne Campion

I would have thought it was signed off by the regional director at the time. However, it could have been either the regional director or the CEO.

Is the regional director no longer in post?

Ms Suzanne Campion

That is correct.

Was a business case or feasibility case put forward at any point for the use of the lodge?

Mr. Francis O'Donnell

That was done recently. The property could not be sold and we had the difficulties around leasing it. Just to explain, as one enters the property-----

Will Mr. O'Donnell repeat what he said there about something that could not be done in regard to the property?

Mr. Francis O'Donnell

We could not get the property sold. It was on the market about three years.

Three years. From 2017?

Mr. Francis O'Donnell

Yes. I suppose when you think about it, I do not know what-----

There was an asking price on it, was there not, by the Galway company?

Mr. Francis O'Donnell

There was an asking price, and I do not believe that we reached that. The two cottages, in my view alone, are probably worth €500,000. The house is probably another €400,000 or €500,000, and then 20 acres of land overlooking Killary Harbour, a very significant piece of real estate. It is in a special area of conservation, SAC; I accept that.

It is a nice part of the country.

Mr. Francis O'Donnell

It is a beautiful part of the country, but one of the problems is we have an operational base there, smack bang in the middle of the property, 50 m from the house.

It is not within the house though.

Mr. Francis O'Donnell

It is not within the house, but it is right beside it.

Okay. Was there an offer of €800,000 on it?

Mr. Francis O'Donnell

I would have to defer to Ms Campion. I was not here, so I could not say.

Ms Suzanne Campion

I do not know. I would have to check that out.

Was Ms Campion aware of any offers on it?

Ms Suzanne Campion

I was not involved at that particular time, but I do have all the files relating to it, so I can check back and provide that to the committee in writing.

Mr. Francis O'Donnell

I would say, and we are talking about governance today, I would be confident - we can go back and make a written submission to the Chair and the committee - if there was an offer made, the board would have been made aware of that offer.

There was no sale, and it is sitting idle now for many years - the cottages and the mansion.

Mr. Francis O'Donnell

The cottages are not being utilised at the moment because-----

And the house?

Mr. Francis O'Donnell

The house is not being utilised at the moment. We have offered it out to the Department of Children, Equality, Disability, Integration and Youth.

I saw that. This country house and the two cottages are in fairly good condition, I understand.

Mr. Francis O'Donnell

They are. We were faced with this conundrum, Chair, as to what to do with the property. As I said, we have the two cottages on the outside. We have a working base. We have the house itself, and at the far side of the property we have the salmon index station, which is one of the most important research centres. We have to try to find a solution as to where we are with this. We could not get it sold, so we commissioned a feasibility study around the future purpose of this property. We did not just pause it and not-----

Where is that now? This is three years. It has gone on a number of years now. It is six years since it was decided to sell it, and it was three years on the market. It has sat there for three years, and now we are in a situation where another three years have elapsed, and I do not see a firm proposal today on the use of it.

Mr. Francis O'Donnell

There is actually a proposal on the table, and at our last board meeting, our section 18 board members asked Ms Campion and me to bring forward what is basically a shortened version of the feasibility study to present to them so that they could actually decide where this was going.

Send it to the two people appointed by the Department?

Mr. Francis O'Donnell

Yes, so it is actually in process at the moment.

There is a firm proposal now.

Mr. Francis O'Donnell

There is.

It has been six years. Meanwhile, how much has been spent to date on plans, architects, auctioneers and environmental consultants regarding Aasleagh Lodge?

Mr. Francis O'Donnell

In relation to the feasibility study?

No. How much has been spent in total on it, and the feasibility study?

Ms Suzanne Campion

Professional fees since I took over have amounted to €45,641.

For what period, Ms Campion?

Ms Suzanne Campion

From 1 July 2010 to the end of 2022.

Okay. That is the sum total of it. Have some woodlands been cleared there?

Ms Suzanne Campion

No.

There are no woodlands there? No native trees been removed?

Ms Suzanne Campion

No. There was a natural-----

Mr. Francis O'Donnell

Can I speak to that, Chair?

Mr. Francis O'Donnell

A query came in to IFI about that. One tree fell on site. It was not removed from the site. It was cut up and left to biodegrade naturally. We are very conscious there is an ancient Scots pine woodland there, and if we were to cut any trees down, we could not do that without planning. We would not do it anyway, if it can be avoided.

I believe these species of trees are very important. On Aasleagh Lodge, has any member of staff holidayed there during that period?

Mr. Francis O'Donnell

In the cottages or in the lodge?

Mr. Francis O'Donnell

I stayed in the lodge myself while a director in the western river basin district, WRBD, and I-----

This is in the Victorian house?

Mr. Francis O'Donnell

Not in the house, no. In the cottages.

Tell me about that.

Mr. Francis O'Donnell

I stayed with my family. I was holidaying in the west of Ireland and, like anybody else, I paid the full amount.

How long did Mr. O'Donnell stay there for?

Mr. Francis O'Donnell

I stayed there for two weeks.

What year was that in?

Mr. Francis O'Donnell

I stayed, I think, in 2020, and possibly 2021 again.

Okay. I thank Mr. O'Donnell for the clarification. I am going to let members back in.

I want to stay on the issue of Aasleagh Lodge for a moment or two. What was it valued at when it was put up for sale? What was the valuation?

Ms Suzanne Campion

We would have to go back to the figures. Sorry, I do not have that.

It was always going to be one of the key issues discussed today. I would have expected those numbers. Was the valuation internal or was it an independent valuation?

Ms Suzanne Campion

I understand it was an external valuation.

We all probably would have expected information both on the valuations and on any offers that were made.

Ms Suzanne Campion

My apologies.

That would be pertinent information. Without personalising it, one of the phrases Mr. O'Donnell used earlier was that, in any board, there is a waxing and waning, and then he described it as a healthy environment to be in. I know he was talking about the board, but it is quite at odds with what Ms Bradley said that there is a significant impact on staff morale. It just stood out for me. It was something that I had to come back on. This is not a natural waxing and waning of the board.

Mr. Francis O'Donnell

Can I respond to that? Having sat on a number of boards before, I would expect that the public would want boards to scrutinise and challenge executives all the time. I meant it in that context. I think it is a very healthy environment.

Okay. I had to come back to it because it stood out for me. I wanted to ask about note 6, remuneration and other pay costs. There are details here of one ex gratia payment totalling €3,600, five redundancy payments that come to €21,600, and five settlements totalling more than €40,000 in 2021. Before I ask about the nature of those payments, I wanted to ask a more general question. Are there any pending cases between IFI staff taken to the Workplace Relations Commission, WRC, and how many?

Ms Róisín Bradley

Three.

I know Ms Bradley will not want to identify the employees, but are there any further details she can give us on those without identifying the actual employees?

Ms Róisín Bradley

Our organisation is just too small.

I will not push Ms Bradley on that. Similarly, on the settlement and redundancy payments, I realise the organisation is small but these are unusual payments.

Ms Róisín Bradley

I should say to the Deputy that we have a cohort of staff members who are externally funded for research projects. If they do more than 104 weeks, they are entitled a statutory redundancy payment, and we have to pay it.

Okay. I have this ex gratia payment, five redundancy payments and five settlements.

Ms Róisín Bradley

I will explain those. Four of the settlements are for the same thing. Basically, we did a whole big review a couple of years ago where we were looking at our fleet. There were some old arrangements in place where people had vehicles that were not needed for operational reasons. Maybe at some stage in the past they were, but we did not believe there was a reason for them to have an assigned vehicle. If they needed a vehicle for work, they could use a pool car. However, when I went back and looked at how long they had the vehicle for, in some cases they had it for more than 20 years, so I had to buy those out.

What I always try to do in addressing issues like that is to have a once-off scenario that-----

Which can be accounted for.

Ms Róisín Bradley

Yes. I should say that was mediated through the WRC.

Okay. That is helpful. I have one last question about the RIBs. A lot of money, €3.5 million, was paid for these 13 RIBs. There are 16 coxswains. There is a staff training budget that comes within spitting distance of half a million, but only three people who are qualified to drive these RIBs at night-time.

Ms Róisín Bradley

No, that is not accurate.

That is the information I have.

Ms Róisín Bradley

No, that is not accurate. I should say to the Deputy that 70% of our training budget is on regulatory training, so that is water safety, boats, first aid or, if you are in development, cutting trees and all that kind of stuff.

If you are a coxswain, if you are in a boat or if you do personal survival techniques, they all involve a period of time. For example, first aid every two years - blah, blah, blah.

We have these 13 RIBs. They are very valuable pieces of kit and we want to have them out and in use as much as possible. How many people are equipped to operate them at night?

Mr. Barry Fox

We have 60 advanced coxswains within the organisation and an additional 35 staff who are qualified to man the vessels. All the 60 advanced coxswains are trained to do night navigation and radar and to use the vessels at night. I would accept that they do not all do so. Most of our work is at last light and first light. This is something we have identified. We are now bringing forward a familiarisation course over the winter periods in the same location, Killary Harbour, where we will bring additional staff through night-time operations, but they are all qualified to do it-----

There is no training impediment-----

Mr. Barry Fox

No.

-----to making best use of this equipment.

Ms Róisín Bradley

No.

Mr. Barry Fox

Absolutely not.

I call Deputy Dillon.

I want to go back to the Donegal insurance issue. On what date did IFI establish that it had no insurance on the subsequent-----

Ms Róisín Bradley

On 10 August, the day the accident occurred.

By what means was this information determined?

Ms Róisín Bradley

Obviously, when the accident occurred, the employee contacted our health and safety manager; our health and safety manager informed the logistics manager; and the logistics manager then contacted the insurance company to advise it that an accident had occurred. It was at that stage that the insurance company said it had not been notified that the vehicle was on the fleet insurance.

The accident happened on 10 August 2021.

Ms Róisín Bradley

Yes.

IFI was contacted. When did it report it to the board?

Ms Róisín Bradley

I could not tell the Deputy the exact date, but it was literally immediately.

Mr. Francis O'Donnell

I reported it to the board in real time, as I found out about it. I initially advised the board - the minutes will probably match what I am saying - that I thought it possibly was-----

On what date did the board meet in relation-----

Mr. Francis O'Donnell

I would have to check and come back to the Deputy on that. It was not in my board report and was not on the agenda. I found out in real time.

Does IFI have the minutes?

Mr. Francis O'Donnell

There are minutes of that meeting.

Ms Róisín Bradley

Yes, we have the minutes.

Mr. Francis O'Donnell

Of course.

We are aware that in November 2021 a report on this was brought to the board. Is that correct?

Mr. Francis O'Donnell

No. The report was probably about the mitigation, the processes we would have put in place to make sure this did not happen again, but I-----

In terms of establishing the facts, when were they brought to the board's attention?

Mr. Francis O'Donnell

I would have to check the record. I told the board once I knew. There will be a record of that, and that can be provided. There is no issue there. I remember getting a text message at the time and I was advised that seven vehicles were involved. Then, by the end of the meeting, the board was updated to the effect that it was many more than that. As soon as I knew, I knew it was very serious and I knew that the board needed to know immediately.

Deputy Catherine Murphy asked if Mr. O'Donnell reported the insurance incident to An Garda Síochána.

Ms Róisín Bradley

I will have to check with the logistics manager. I genuinely do not know.

Will IFI come back to the committee with that information?

Ms Róisín Bradley

Yes.

What type of insurance discs that the insurance company did not issue are displayed on the windows of these 16 vehicles? I am sure any employee would look to see if there is an insurance disc on his or her windscreen.

Ms Róisín Bradley

I will have to check. I do not know.

Ms Suzanne Campion

I can help there. They are normal insurance discs when they come from the leased companies.

Did the employee of IFI produce details of his insurance to the Garda within ten days of the incident occurring?

Ms Róisín Bradley

I do not believe he was asked to do so.

He was not asked.

Ms Róisín Bradley

He was not. I can double-check that but I do not believe that was-----

Did IFI discuss this with the employee?

Ms Róisín Bradley

We have had regular discussions with the new employee because we wanted to offer support. As the Deputy can imagine, he was extremely distraught.

Was there a crash investigation carried out by IFI?

Ms Róisín Bradley

Yes.

What was the result of that investigation?

Ms Róisín Bradley

The investigation found that the individual was driving within the speed limit at the time of the accident. The individual was driving behind the car he crashed into. The car in front of him had quickly indicated to take a turn. Our employee rear-ended that individual and then pushed his vehicle into another car. There were three cars involved. I should say that the individual involved was driving within the speed limit when the accident happened. His driving history, which we have through telematics, is excellent.

Has An Garda Síochána prosecuted anyone within IFI-----

Ms Róisín Bradley

No.

-----for having no insurance on his or her vehicle?

Ms Róisín Bradley

No.

Who will be ultimately responsible for any claims arising from the crash?

Ms Róisín Bradley

IFI will be. We had got into-----

IFI is going to take the hit for this.

Ms Róisín Bradley

Yes, we are going to have to do so, unfortunately.

Do the witnesses have any figure for the expected cost relating to it?

Ms Róisín Bradley

I do not really want to discuss that because, obviously, there is a case pending, so if I were to put that into the open-----

Is anyone in IFI taking accountability for not insuring these vehicles?

Ms Róisín Bradley

Is the Deputy asking if I-----

Has anyone in IFI been held accountable?

Ms Róisín Bradley

I am not going to root out an individual on the basis that this was a case of staff being overworked and a number of systems failures. Rather than a culture of blame, I would rather a culture of people being free to put up their hands if an error happens - we all make mistakes - and then making sure that we learn from such mistakes and put in robust systems to make sure they do not happen again. That is the culture I would like to-----

I have one final question.

Very briefly.

Did Mr. O'Donnell pay full rates in the Aasleagh cottages when he stayed there for-----

Mr. Francis O'Donnell

Yes.

To whom did he pay them?

Mr. Francis O'Donnell

I paid them to the person leasing the - it either went through my bank account, I paid it - I do not know but I paid the full rates and I think-----

How much did Mr. O'Donnell pay?

Mr. Francis O'Donnell

I cannot tell the Deputy off the top of my head. I paid whatever I was asked to pay, whatever the rate was. There is a record of this in our finance department because I think this has come in as a protected disclosure about me already. I have no problem saying it. I am under privilege here. It was fully looked at. There was no issue there.

Thank you, Mr. O'Donnell. I call Deputy Catherine Murphy.

Mr. O'Donnell made reference to 17 months of intimidation. Was that intimidation external or internal? Can he expand on the nature of it?

Mr. Francis O'Donnell

I want to be careful because I have spoken to the Garda and have put clearly in my statement what I believe was happening to me. There was an internal investigation being managed within the organisation, not by me but by our HR department. I started getting sent letters at home and letters to my work, privately. I believe there was other significant harassment. With me in my role as CEO-----

The communication was exclusively about Mr. O'Donnell, was it?

Mr. Francis O'Donnell

Actually, I do not believe so. I believe other executives were involved as well. Some very serious letters were written to my Minister about me, making claims about me that were absolutely outrageous, very damaging and very hurtful. I suppose that when you are managing a Garda investigation of the nature I am managing, it is very important to have me held in very poor light by somebody. That is as much as I would like to say about it.

The Minister was on the record as saying there were ten protected disclosures, but they do not appear to have been logged in IFI. There is no record of them in IFI.

Ms Suzanne Campion

They did not happen in 2021, and these are the 2021 accounts, but we have our section 22 protected disclosure report ready to publish-----

How many protected-----

Ms Suzanne Campion

There were ten.

There were ten in 2022.

Ms Suzanne Campion

Yes.

That is enormous in relation to-----

Ms Suzanne Campion

It is absolutely enormous. The last time we had one was in 2019, when there was one, so there was a plethora of them.

Mr. Francis O'Donnell

While protected disclosures are very important for accounts policy, they are often used and weaponised against individuals.

How many were validated?

Ms Suzanne Campion

I have the report here. It would be easier to read from it. I will find it. I have a lot of papers here. I have the Aasleagh Lodge valuation now. It was done by Keane Mahony Smith, dated 25 September 2017: €800 for the lodge and €225 each for the cottages, coming to €450, and then it estimated €1.2 million for the entire-----

That was for the entire parcel and what was the highest offer made on it?

Ms Suzanne Campion

I am still waiting to get that. I think it was €790,000 but I do not want to lead anyone astray.

That was for the parcel?

Ms Suzanne Campion

Yes.

In regard to the lodge, in 2015 a contractor was appointed for four years but withdrew after a year. Was there a penalty clause built into that because it was a four-year contract? Who ultimately broke the contract?

Ms Suzanne Campion

The tenant had to be removed from the premises. We had to get legal people to get them out. They were not paying their rent so they were removed from the property and the locks were changed.

In regard to the disclosures, we had seven anonymous disclosures which alleged a number of different issues such as use of resources, recruitment, welfare, health and safety. Where feasible, the allegations were investigated and where possible appropriate corrective action was taken. One protective disclosure was completed. There was a follow-up to that one, which was similar in nature, from the same person I understand. I had nothing to do with protected disclosures, so this is very top-level-----

It was completed. What was the nature of it?

Ms Suzanne Campion

The report, which will be published on our website, says about the further disclosure that there were breaches to health and safety protocols.

There are two others.

Ms Suzanne Campion

There were seven. There was one and a follow-up to that one, which was on foot of the outcome of the investigation on the first one. It was decided not to progress the second one because it was basically rehashing the same thing, as I understand it. However, I do not know any of the details. At the end of this period, there is one disclosure outstanding. Relevant steps for managing this disclosure have commenced.

Were these all from present employees?

Ms Suzanne Campion

The anonymous disclosures say they are employees, so I do not know. Being anonymous makes it very difficult. I do not know the detail of the named disclosure. I only know the top-level that we report.

Do we not know how many out of ten have been upheld or validated? Is there anything to support that figure?

Ms Suzanne Campion

There was an outcome on the health and safety one. I have details on that if the Cathaoirleach will bear with me.

I do not want to take up the meeting. Were five upheld? Were six or seven upheld? What is the figure?

Ms Suzanne Campion

I will have to come back on that. I just have the report that we will publish.

Were most of them upheld?

Ms Suzanne Campion

I do not know.

Does anyone know?

Ms Róisín Bradley

It would be half and half. I know a good few of them.

Will Ms Bradley say that again?

Ms Róisín Bradley

It would be half and half. We can get the details for the committee, as to how many were upheld or not upheld and what actions were taken, if any.

Ms Bradley can come back on that. In regard to Maugherow Sea Angling Club, that was granted IFI funding in what year?

Ms Suzanne Campion

That was in 2020.

Did it have a bank account at that stage?

Ms Suzanne Campion

It does now but it did not, at the time.

In 2020 it had no bank account. It has now.

Ms Suzanne Campion

Yes.

Did it have one at that point?

Ms Suzanne Campion

No. I said it did not. Can I give-----

I have a few questions. I want to structure this a little bit. When the money was allocated, if it did not go into an account, where did it go?

Ms Suzanne Campion

It was a reimbursement scheme.

I am trying to figure this reimbursement out. We know the way this works. If a body is reimbursed for costs or fees paid or works or whatever else, the money is being sent to an entity. The entity is Maugherow Sea Angling Club. Without naming the person, will Ms Campion say who it went to? Did it go into somebody's bank account?

Ms Suzanne Campion

No. What happened was when Maugherow applied for the funds along with all the other applicants, mainly for rent, the applications were evaluated. A number of them-----

They were-----

Ms Suzanne Campion

The Cathaoirleach needs to understand this. Sorry if I am labouring it. On the announcement of the awards, they were given the amount of offer. They began all their work like everybody else. IFI administration sent out the bank details with the instruction to please fill out the form, as this would be necessary for payment of money. Maugherow came back and said sorry, it did not have a bank account. At that stage, in hindsight we should have said "No, we are not giving it to you". Actually we were fortunate, in that the Angling Council of Ireland, which is the only Irish Sports Council-funded national governing body, NGB, for angling, agreed to do the procurement for Maugherow and then buy-----

Did it act as the recipient?

Ms Suzanne Campion

Yes, it acted as the recipient. It bought the stuff, which was €4,000 worth of fishing rods and scales, all of which were of small value. It then supplied IFI with full details of the purchases with three quotes for everything-----

Did it supply invoices and receipts?

Ms Suzanne Campion

There were invoices and receipts and proof of payment. We paid the Angling Council of Ireland and it gave the goods to Maugherow. Maugherow is now fully established with a bank account.

In regard to the findings of the internal audit on that, were there any other major issues in that internal audit?

Ms Suzanne Campion

The way I treat audits is that they are there to help us and to make us stronger. It found, and this is what we have been saying since the beginning, that the angling club was a new angling club at the time of the application.

New clubs can be established.

Ms Suzanne Campion

It had been operating, holding events and so on. However, it wanted to establish formally.

I am not trying to pick on the club, because people there in a voluntary capacity were doing their best in many circumstances with good intentions. We have all been there and done that. They are unpaid and giving their time to the community on something they are passionate about. Would Ms Campion agree that allocating money to a particular entity, not wishing to cast any aspersions, without it having a bank account or evidence of a bank account and the other pieces in place, is not good practice?

Ms Suzanne Campion

I agree with the Cathaoirleach. In hindsight, I would not have done it. However, I understood that with the Angling Council of Ireland, which is the most highly governanced angling NGB in the country, that we were okay. As well as that, the club had affiliated, before being awarded funds, with its national governing body so to me, an affiliated body is a club.

Have any other such instances cropped up?

Ms Suzanne Campion

Absolutely not.

Can I ask, given what the CEO said regarding the information around the stay in the lodge, will IFI provide that to us?

Mr. Francis O'Donnell

Absolutely, yes.

I might ask Mr. Maher of the Department whether it is the Department's intention that Aasleagh Lodge and its cottages will continue to be on the market?

Mr. Denis Maher

Aasleagh Lodge is in the ownership of IFI. It is not under the Department's ownership. Our function at the time was, and remains, in regard to any sanctions that may be required from the Department of Public Expenditure, National Development Plan Delivery and Reform, to acquire the lodge. When the board decided to put the lodge up for sale, I secured the agreement of the Department of Public Expenditure, National Development Plan Delivery and Reform for the sale. The board then changed its mind.

Has the board officially changed its mind?

Mr. Denis Maher

That is my understanding. That is what was communicated to me. I do not have the board minutes.

Can Mr. O'Donnell confirm that?

Mr. Francis O'Donnell

There was a board decision on this. There is a second board decision asking me and the executive to undertake a feasibility study to consider the future purposing of the property.

Has Mr. O'Donnell brought that feasibility study?

Mr. Francis O'Donnell

I have not got it with me today.

Will that be brought before the board?

Mr. Francis O'Donnell

I brought it before the old board, yes.

What was the outcome of that? Was it accepted or refused?

Mr. Francis O'Donnell

No, it did not refuse it. The outcome was it asked me, Ms Campion and the retired head of finance to work up some other figures. However, things developed at the board of IFI and it was not prioritised.

There were other issues and so it was parked. The new section 18 individuals are looking at this again.

It is a developing situation. Will Mr. O'Donnell come back to us as soon as possible on that. It is my understanding there may be a proposal for IFI to use it because it has an operation centre on site and the use of it.

Mr. Francis O'Donnell

Yes, we do.

It obviously is a very important facility.

Mr. Francis O'Donnell

It is a very important facility and there is a strong political aspect to it as well. I am aware that this is about money. There is a strong connection locally with the property among people living there. I accept that the management of it could have been much better. It does not mean that I would have a knee-jerk reaction and do the wrong thing here. It is very substantial. The Cathaoirleach asked a question earlier about the offer. Ms Campion has said that we were looking for €1.2 million. An offer of €800,000 was put on it on 15 October 2019.

I have a question on this, if I may, as Aasleagh Lodge is in my constituency.

I will allow the Deputy back in for one question.

IFI are in fisheries, not tourism. I would take that as a principle. Secondary to that, is IFI now seeking an additional €250,000? Has it got approval for capital expenditure to develop further offices at Aasleagh Lodge at the minute?

Mr. Francis O'Donnell

The working base there has been refurbished. I will ask my colleague, Mr. Barry Fox, to answer that. We have undertaken work in the past six months on the work-----

Has Mr. O'Donnell had board approval on that work?

Mr. Francis O'Donnell

There is board approval on that.

Who sanctioned it?

Ms Suzanne Campion

The board approved the capital plan in May 2022, in which the grounds of the property and staff buildings were included. The works include upgrading existing wiring to certification standard, insulation, dry lining of the second floor, insulation of the disabled toilet facilities and so on.

This is happening at a time when the decision to sell Aasleagh Lodge and its cottages is still not clear.

How much was approved?

Ms Suzanne Campion

We had just finalised that the procurement for the project was coming in at €219,000 before VAT.

I will end this round with Mr. O'Donnell, briefly, and then we will get in-----

Mr. Francis O'Donnell

The decision around Aasleagh Lodge is quite clear at the moment. It is not for sale. It is incumbent on myself, along with our current section 18 board members and the new board, to purpose the property. We have a feasibility study there. If the decision was taken not to go with that concept - and I do not wish to speak for a board - I am sure that in due course a board will consider that. However, it may consider asking us to go to a full business plan on this. I do not know that. I have been active in making sure that either way, it is about purposing the property for the public for the future.

Surely it would need a full business plan.

Mr. Francis O'Donnell

It would of course. As the Chair is well aware, a feasibility study-----

And use the mansion.

Mr. Barry Fox

To add additional information, the works undertaken at the Aasleagh Lodge property are specifically on our operational base. They are separate to the lodge and the two cottages. This is an operational base for the operations staff and for restoring vessels and so on. It is a separate piece of work that was undertaken, apart from the two cottages.

I ask IFI to supply us with the cost of the auctioneer fees that have been outlaid on this. Obviously, the property had been put up for sale. Will the witnesses give us some sort of profile on what has been spent on it and what kind of income has come in on it, perhaps over the past five years?

It may be more appropriate to have it for six years, going back to 2017.

That is right. Since 2017.

Because it changed then with the various-----

Mr. Francis O'Donnell

We could do that in the written response.

Mr. Maher has indicated.

Mr. Denis Maher

To clarify, I have a full history of all of this here beside me. The most important thing at the time the sale was mooted and then approved by the then Department of Public Expenditure and Reform was the retention of the fishery for all of the population and for research purposes. It is the national salmonid, that is, salmon and trout index for the whole country. It has a research station on it. It assists our reporting internationally with data. The most important thing was that we retained the fishery and not some fishing lodge. It was said earlier that the house was given to the State by the Brabourne family but it was actually sold. That is an important distinction.

When the feasibility study comes forward, I know that we are due to get a presentation on it because the Department of Public Expenditure, National Development Plan Delivery and Reform circular also requires me or somebody in the Department to get sanction for a change of use. Nothing will happen without that.

We will finish where we began, which is with the fish. This is what it is all about, or should be about anyway. I am not an expert in it and know very little about it. I live in the most inland county. It is the only county that does not touch a county that touches the sea. The witnesses are correct, in that I remember a lot of freshwater trout in the rivers. It is a long time since I had a fishing rod in my hand while riding around on a bicycle. I have just seen the headline figures in a recent report that show it has really been diminished. Whatever is the role of the Department and the IFI, I am not too sure how loudly they can bang the drum in the context of advocacy and protection, given that management is the IFI remit. It really needs to be done. It is not just the fish life it will kill. Habitats are being killed. This is catching up with us all in the human race as well. None of us will be exempt from this. Serious issues are being outlined here today and we have thrashed out a lot of them. Serious governance issues have arisen. A number of different areas have been covered and have been given a good thrashing out. We need to start to get into a better place. I cannot over-emphasise the importance of the role that IFI is doing. I wish the witnesses well in that, to get things onto a good footing with a new board, full transparency and full accountability and we will move on from there.

Mr. Francis O'Donnell

I thank the Cathaoirleach. We appreciate those words.

I thank the witnesses and the support staff from the Department and from Inland Fisheries Ireland for the work involved in preparing for today's meeting.. I thank the Comptroller and Auditor General and the staff for their attendance and for the help they have provided. Is it agreed the clerk will receive any follow-up information and will carry out any agreed actions raised at the meeting? Agreed. Is it agreed to note and publish the opening statements and the briefing notes from today's meeting? Agreed.

The witnesses withdrew.
Sitting suspended at 12.48 p.m. and resumed at 1.35 p.m.
Top
Share