Skip to main content
Normal View

Dáil Éireann debate -
Wednesday, 5 Dec 1923

Vol. 5 No. 18

PRIVATE NOTICE QUESTION. - HAULBOWLINE DOCKYARD—DISCHARGE OF EMPLOYEES.

asked the President whether he is aware that 50 employees were discharged from the Haulbowline Dockyard on the 1st instant: whether he will state the reason for these discharges; whether a number—8 or more—of patrol boats were recently sent to this yard for overhaul and refit, and still remain tied up there; whether it is the intention of the Government to have such necessary work on these boats carried out in this yard, if so, when such work is likely to start; whether an effort will be made by the Government to continue employment in this yard, at least over the next three months, and help in relieving the present condition of distress amongst a large number of families residing in this district, and unable for a considerable period past to find employment.

I am aware that about 50 men have been discharged, as stated, their services having ceased to be required. Of the patrol boats at Haulbowline, it was decided to reconstruct three. The work on these has been suspended, as I understand, by direction of the Minister for Defence. The Government are anxious to provide employment so far as possible at the Dockyard, but cannot undertake to do so by incurring expenditure which in itself serves no useful purpose.

Are we to understand the suspension of the work is merely for a short period?

I am very much afraid it is a permanent suspension, owing to the necessary economies that have to be made in the Ministry of Defence Vote, and also owing to the fact that fortunately the necessity for which these boats were originally purchased has not materialised.

Mr. HENNESSY

Are we to understand that it was more economical to repair these boats elsewhere than at Haulbowline?

No; it is not intended to have anything done to them. The work is not being done elsewhere.

Top
Share