Skip to main content
Normal View

Dáil Éireann debate -
Thursday, 28 May 1925

Vol. 11 No. 22

COMMITTEE ON FINANCE. - VOTE 9—TEMPORARY COMMISSIONS.

I move:—

Go ndeontar suim ná raghaidh thar £21,196 chun slánuithe na suime is gá chun íoctha an Mhuirir a thiocfidh chun bheith iníoctha i rith na bliana dar críoch an 31adh lá de Mhárta, 1926, chun Tuarastail agus Costaisí eile Coimisiún Sealadach, Coistí agus Fiosrúchán Speisialta.

That a sum not exceeding £21,196 be granted to complete the sum necessary to defray the Charge which will come in course of payment during the year ending on the 31st day of March, 1926, for the Salaries and other Expenses of Temporary Commissions, Committees, and Special Inquiries.

This is a very miscellaneous type of Vote. In part 3 of the Vote there are fairly full particulars. There is, first of all, the Board of Assessors under the Military Service Pensions Act. They have an enormous number of claims to deal with. A great many of these will not be substantiated, but they will require investigation, and I believe that the work of that board will continue for a considerable time. The chairman of the board is a district justice, and there are two other members. I believe that a most careful investigation of claims is being carried out. Not only is documentary evidence required, but attendance in person is necessary, and cross-examination is resorted to. Every effort is being made to see that people entitled to the pension will get it, and that those disentitled will not get it.

Then we have the Boundary Commission, which is set out very fully. The solicitor employed in preparing the case and generally supervising every activity in connection with the Commission for the Government will be paid his professional costs for the work as taxed by the Attorney-General. The members of the staff travel to the various districts, assist people to put their evidence into order, see that all aspects of the case are fully represented, and that witnesses are procured to help the various considerations that should be brought forward. As this is an international Commission, it has been arranged by the British Government that one-half of the estimated cost of the Commission should be defrayed by us. This is the best estimate that we could get after an exchange of letters with the British Treasury. It may be too much or it may be too little. It is very much an open estimate.

The Central Savings Committee is a body which has really done very useful work, and which, I think, will result in a very substantial amount of money coming into the Exchequer annually through the sale of Savings Certificates. For a considerable period after the army trouble of March, 1924, the receipts from Savings Certificates fell off very much, and, in fact, went down for a long time to a net amount of not more than £3,000 or £4,000 per week. But in recent months they have gone up very substantially. In six weeks of the present year they have amounted to some £50,000 or £60,000 more than the corresponding six weeks of the past year.

The total amount invested in Savings Certificates up to 30th April last was £1,341,463. A very big amount came from Dublin—£348,654, or £731 per thousand of the population. In Cork, the amount was £219,050, or £559 per thousand of the population. That went down in a county like Offaly to £12,726, or £224 per head of the population. It is very satisfactory also to note that in recent months not only has the sale of Savings Certificates gone up very substantially, returning to something approaching the figure that it was before March of last year, but that the net amount got through the Post Office Savings Bank has also gone up. In the case of the Post Office Savings Bank, there are very substantial sums being withdrawn week by week. But every week the net amount of deposits has increased since the Post Office Savings Bank was opened. In the last few months there was a substantial net increase—a very substantial increase. After the army trouble the amount went down to a few hundred pounds in some weeks, but we were never on the wrong side. The propaganda of the Savings Committee will, we believe, in the course of the coming year, lead to very substantial purchase of Savings Certificates. That, although not the cheapest form of borrowing, is one of the most desirable forms of borrowing. We pay 5¼ per cent. free of income tax on Savings Certificates, but they are spread out, and I think not more than £500 worth may be purchased by any individual. That means that State liabilities are spread over a large number of people and that has an influence on stability, and it has also an influence on the possibilities of industry. It is desirable that considerable numbers of people should be encouraged to have the foresight to amass and to put by in some remunerative way certain amounts of capital.

The next sub-head deals with the Civil Service (Compensation) Committee. The work of that Committee was interrupted by the resignation of Mr. Justice Wylie, who had done a great amount of work for us, over a considerable period, and who found that he was not able to continue it. A successor would probably have been appointed by him but for the fact that certain appeals were brought in the courts. The view that we had held that the grant of pensions was in the discretion of the Minister for Finance, was challenged. The whole committee scheme rested on the basis that the giving of pensions was within the discretion of the Minister for Finance, but as these were Treaty pensions—pensions which might be the subject of diplomatic negotiations and representations—we all along felt that the only satisfactory way of dealing with them was to have a committee, with a judicial chairman, to advise the Minister for Finance and on whose recommendations the Minister for Finance would act. Our view of the rights of civil servants has been upheld by the Supreme Court. It has decided that pensions are a matter of discretion with the Minister for Finance, subject to any legislation we have. We still feel that the only satisfactory way of dealing with them is to have this committee, on which the Finance Department is represented and on which the staffs are represented, with a judicial chairman. I have already taken certain steps and I hope that very shortly we will be able to announce the appointment of a judge as a member of the Committee. Deputies should know that pressure of work in the courts, to which any judge must, in the first instance, attend, is very heavy and that, in fact, no judge can do this work except during his vacation and at the sacrifice of his own leisure.

If I might interrupt the Minister, would it be possible to obtain the services of a pensioned judge—somebody with judicial experience who is enjoying a pension at the present time?

That is a matter we can consider. We thought it was more desirable, if possible, to have a sitting judge. The other would be an alternative.

The next sub-head deals with the Commission of Inquiry into the Preservation of the Gaeltacht. That Commission is one that was set up by the Executive Council comparatively recently, and it is carrying out work which we regard as very necessary. It is definitely the policy of the Government, as it was the aim of the Constitution, that every possible step should be taken for the preservation and spread of the national language of the country. It is very difficult to frame the type of consistent policy which is necessary—the well-planned, consistent policy that will gradually achieve the object that has been in view, in a more or less well-defined way, by the majority of the people of this country ever since the Sinn Fein doctrine was generally accepted in the country.

Sub-head (f) deals with the Commission on the Relief of Destitute Sick and Poor, including the Insane Poor. It has, I think, just begun its operations. The notable item under that heading is £1,000 for travelling and subsistence allowances. That large figure is put down because it is the intention of the Commission to sit in provincial centres. If that is done, it will involve considerable expense under this sub-head.

Sub-head (g) deals with the Committee on National Health Insurance and Medical Services. The Committee has presented a very interesting and useful interim report, on which it may be possible to take action before very long. It is a report which I look upon as of very considerable value, especially in view of the general lack of knowledge of the realities of the question of national health insurance in the country.

Sub-head (h) deals with the Dáil Eireann Courts (Winding-Up) Commission, which has concluded its labours.

Sub-head (i) deals with the Greater Dublin Commission of Inquiry. This Commission has, so far, endeavoured to hold its sittings while the Dáil and Seanad were in session, so that expenses would be kept to the lowest possible level. It is not possible, owing to the very wide scope of the inquiry which the Greater Dublin Commission has undertaken, to state when it is likely to conclude its proceedings.

Sub-head (j) deals with the Intoxicating Liquor Commission, which has been sitting for some time. I think it will not continue for very long. This estimate was arrived at rather hastily, because the Commission was being appointed when the estimates were being prepared. However, it is estimated that the amount provided will suffice.

Sub-head (k) deals with the NorthEastern Boundary Bureau, which did work preparatory to the sitting of the Boundary Commission. It prepared matter which, I think, has been of very great value, and the results of which will be seen to have been of importance when the Commission comes to give its findings. It is necessary to continue the work of this Bureau until a decision has been reached on the boundary matter.

Under sub-head (1) the Old Age Pensions Committee is dealt with. It has not, as yet, been able to present a report. It is dealing with matters several of which are discussed here this afternoon—matters in which difficulties arise that are very hard to overcome when we wish to act fairly both to the State, as representing the general taxpayer, and to the applicants for old age pensions.

I would like to put one or two questions on matters which the Minister has not covered, although his statement was very complete and ample. The first question is with regard to the Boundary Commission. Item (b) under that sub-head deals with fees to counsel. One of the counsel engaged has recently been promoted to the Bench, and I presume that somebody has been appointed in his place. If anybody has been appointed in his place, I think it might be to the general benefit that a statement should be made as to who has been so appointed. Allied with that is the question of the NorthEastern Boundary Bureau. The Minister did state, and these printed Estimates do, in several cases, state when it is expected that these Commissions will terminate. It is, of course, impossible to say when the Boundary Commission will terminate. That is not within our control. I suppose one may take it that the Boundary Bureau will continue as long as the Boundary Commission will continue. I would like to have some knowledge as to whether it is considered that the Boundary Bureau should last as long as the Boundary Commission will last.

If I might make a suggestion—I do not make it for this year because a good deal of time has already been spent upon the Estimates—it would, I think, be desirable and when dealing with these Votes in future, in cases where Chairmen of Commissions are members of this House, that they should let the House know exactly how their particular task is progressing. If that were done, it might be very useful. In one case, I think, we can get that information now. That is in regard to the Gaeltacht Commission. I am stirred to admiration by this report under sub-head (e). I think it is a most profound statement. Every other Commission, I notice, has got staffs. Some of them have got judicial commissioners, and all of them have got secretaries. This admirable Commission, for its entire staff, has got a cleaner at £25 a year. I do not know exactly what the significance of a cleaner is in connection with this Commission or why it should be able to dispense with a secretary, which every other Commission requires. I do not know either why it should want a cleaner when no other Committee or Commission wants a cleaner. Why have we this substitution of a cleaner for a secretary? I think we should have some information on that subject.

I would like to take advantage of this discussion on the Boundary Commission to ask the President what arrangements the Executive Council have made for the carrying on of the duties of the Minister for Education while he is absent on this Boundary Commission, and whether he is satisfied that these arrangements are satisfactory or are being carried out properly in regard to this very important Ministry.

I have been in communication with the Minister for Education, and I have also been in fairly close contact with the Minister. He is satisfied that he is able to attend to the duties of his office——

As well as in the past? Just as well as ever?

Even though he has to be away a considerable time. I had hoped to be able to make a statement to the Committee on Privileges and Procedure as to the date on which the Estimates would be taken. It is the Minister's intention, I think, from the last communication I had from him, to be present some day next week with a view to taking the Estimates.

The Minister for Education has informed the President that he is satisfied the work will be carried out in a proper way. What I asked the President was, is he, and is the Executive Council, satisfied that the work of the Ministry is being carried out in the way in which it ought to be carried out, and in the way in which it is due to the country it should be carried out?

That question would more properly arise on the Education Estimates.

I do not want to anticipate the Education Estimates. I want to say another word on the subject of the Civil Service (Compensation) Committee. I would urge the Minister for Finance to take into consideration the possibility of appointing someone with judicial experience, who is not now employed as a judge, to this Committee. Its work is very much in arrear and the inevitable result is mistrust and suspicion. I am constantly receiving letters, which I constantly turn down, stating that this Committee has been abolished by the Minister for Finance and that he is now dealing with every claim for compensation himself, and turning them all down in order to save the revenue. I do not believe that is true, and I tell my correspondents that it is not true. At the same time, there is a feeling of that kind abroad and it would be desirable to put an end to it by appointing another Chairman in the place of Mr. Justice Wylie.

We have pensioned at least half a dozen judges of the High Court; we have pensioned nearly ten County Court Judges. I do not believe that those gentlemen who have judicial experience are so devoid of public spirit that if they were asked to do it, they would not take part in the deliberations of this Committee. Probably you could find one or two who would be willing to do it without payment. That is the practice elsewhere; it is the practice in Great Britain for pensioned servants of the State to come back and help the State in an emergency. I refuse to think so lowly or so meanly of the Irish Bench and Bar as to imagine they would not do the same. I refuse to think they would be so mean as to refuse help on an occasion like this. That would enable us to avoid the necessity, which is a very unpleasant necessity and which, I believe, is an avoidable necessity, of putting extra labour on a serving judge. That is unfair. A judge ought not to be taken away from his ordinary duties. When you are pensioning on the scale that has been adopted lately, you ought to be able to find one who will take part in a Committee of this kind.

With reference to Deputy Cooper's statement, I might mention that there has been another cause for delay. I am not quite sure whether we should regard it as being yet removed. So long as the whole matter was sub judice, it was impossible to get any person of judicial rank to take this office. People who were concerned, when they were defeated in the Supreme Court, vowed very strongly that they were going to the Privy Council, and so forth. I do not know whether the Privy Council would hear them. I do not know what the result would be if they did, or whether there would still be a likelihood of the case being further tried. It probably would be undesirable to proceed until we would know whether they are going ahead or not. I do not know whether appeals are being taken; that matter has yet to be taken into account.

Why cannot the Minister ascertain whether the appeals are being taken? Is there not a procedure—some limit of time? How long will it last?

If we wait for it, it will involve a delay of three months from now.

I wanted to refer to that point. Does the Minister intend to say that he will not set up this Committee to carry on the work because of the possibility that prospective applicants for a pension under the terms of the Treaty might not be satisfied with the procedure and might possibly go to the Privy Council, and, therefore, the work of this Committee cannot be carried on? It amounts to that, with the exception that there may be a certain probability or a greater likelihood in view of certain legal action that may be taken. Even though there was a decision one way or the other, there is always the possibility of persons taking action in the court. If the fear of an action in the court will prevent the Committee functioning, then the Committee will never function. I would urge that the Committee ought to be set up. Leave the question of the judicial decision entirely apart from the decision as to the setting up of the Committee.

I am dealing with it. As a matter of fact, I was dealing with it no longer ago than this morning; but I am not in a position to make a statement.

I want some information in connection with sub-head (a). I do not know if the Minister has received any complaints as to the tardiness with which this body is doing its work. I have received a score of letters. I quite appreciate that there is a good deal of difficulty in deciding as to who is, or who is not, entitled to a pension. Possibly if all the people who applied for pensions were to get them, or were entitled to get them, the thing would have been settled a good deal earlier. I want to find out how many certificates have been issued, when the Board of Assessors intend to start on their circuit, or intend to travel to the different towns. There is some dissatisfaction, I know, and it would, perhaps, allay some of that dissatisfaction if the Minister would let us know what arrangements are being made for dealing with this matter with expediency and dispatch.

There have been very great numbers of complaints, naturally, and there will be complaints, because everybody thinks that his case should be dealt with first. When you have thousands of cases you are bound to have a great number of complaints. The Committee has done a considerable amount of work. I have not the figures at the moment, but I am sure that something in the nature of 252 actual pensions have passed through my Department, and have been sanctioned. Probably double that number have been dealt with by the Committee, and are on the way. After the Committee has issued its certificates, a certain procedure has to be gone through before the award of a pension can be made out and sent along to the Finance Department. A great number, probably 500 cases, have been dealt with fully by the Committee. The Board is about to go out and visit various centres in the country. It will go to other centres in the course of, or inside, a month.

Vote put and agreed to.
Top
Share