asked the Minister for Finance whether he will in the light of the evidence submitted on behalf of the claimant reconsider his previous decision to reject the claim of Patrick Boyle, Newcestown, Co. Cork, for injuries sustained in a mine explosion, in view of the fact that such evidence tends to show that Boyle was not connected with Irregular activities.
CEISTEANNA—QUESTIONS. ORAL ANSWERS. - NEWCESTOWN (CORK) PERSONAL INJURIES CLAIM.
As I explained to the Deputy, in reply to a previous question, this case was previously considered by the Compensation (Personal Injuries) Committee who were unable, in view of their terms of reference and in the light of the evidence submitted to them, to make a recommendation for the payment of compensation. The Compensation (Personal Injuries) Committee, who were a tribunal for assessing compensation in cases such as this, have long since ceased to function and in the circumstances I regret that it is not possible to have the case re-opened.
Mr. MURPHY
Is the Minister aware that in his previous reply he stated that no award was made in this case because of certain tendencies, certain connections, of the claimant and in view of the fact that evidence was submitted from the Catholic priest and several other persons, does the Minister not consider that that would have some weight in the direction of re-opening the matter?
It is very difficult to see what could be done, even if there were further evidence. The machinery for assessing compensation was the Committee which has been dissolved, and I do not think it could be called together again.
Mr. MURPHY
Is it within the Minister's discretion to give some little payment? The man is wretchedly poor.
I am afraid not. No payments have been made except on the report of the Committee.