Skip to main content
Normal View

Dáil Éireann debate -
Wednesday, 18 Apr 1956

Vol. 156 No. 5

Ceisteanna—Questions. Oral Answers. - Imports of Waste Paper.

andJ. Lynch asked the Minister for Industry and Commerce if he will state, in respect of each of the 12 months ended February, 1956, the quantity of waste paper imported, indicating separately the quantity in respect of each of the various prices.

I am advised by the Central Statistics Office that it would not be possible without a detailed examination of the records of the imports of individual lots of paper waste and old paper to classify such imports by price. I propose, however, with the permission of the Ceann Comhairle, to circulate in the Official Report a statement showing for the period March, 1955, to February, 1956, by country of origin the quantity, value and average price per cwt., c.i.f., of the imports of paper waste and old paper.

Following is the statement:—

IMPORTS OF PAPER WASTE AND OLD PAPER IN EACH MONTH, MARCH, 1955—FEBRUARY, 1956.

PERIOD

COUNTRY OF ORIGIN

GREAT BRITAIN

THE SIX COUNTIES

BELGIUM

NETHERLANDS

SWEDEN

TOTAL

Quantity

Value

Average (c.i.f.) price per cwt.

Quantity

Value

Average (c.i.f.) price per cwt.

Quantity

Value

Average (c.i.f.) price per cwt.

Quantity

Value

Average (c.i.f.) price per cwt.

Quantity

Value

Average (c.i.f.) price per cwt.

Quantity

Value

Average (c.i.f.) price per cwt.

Cwt.

£

s.

d.

Cwt.

£

s.

d.

Cwt.

£

s.

d.

Cwt.

£

s.

d.

Cwt.

£

s.

d.

Cwt.

£

s.

d.

March, 1955

26,172

16,492

12

8

8,934

5,262

11

9

35,106

21,754

12

5

April, 1955

25,240

15,826

12

7

8,706

5,337

12

3

221

456

41

3

7,874

6,250

15

10

42,041

27,869

13

3

May, 1955

32,045

19,270

12

0

11,330

7,009

12

4

1,240

2,395

38

8

44,615

28,674

12

10

June, 1955

32,470

21,087

13

0

12,375

8,327

13

5

16,701

12,734

15

3

61,546

42,148

13

8

July, 1955

24,338

17,935

14

9

10,766

7,209

13

5

28,831

22,832

15

10

63,93

47,976

15

0

August, 1955

18,105

13,367

14

9

14,675

9,750

13

3

80

163

40

8

14,211

13,173

18

6

47,069

36,453

15

6

September, 1955

20,658

14,729

14

3

16,900

11,366

13

3

6,114

4,547

14

10

7,270

6,518

17

11

50,942

37,160

14

7

October, 1955

27,231

19,595

14

5

12,713

8,291

13

1

9,922

7,845

15

10

49,866

35,731

14

4

November, 1955

12,712

9,207

14

6

11,624

7,219

12

5

5,170

4,589

17

9

29,506

21,015

14

3

December, 1955

9,666

6,632

13

9

12,724

7,275

11

5

4,683

4,244

18

2

27,073

18,151

13

5

January, 1956

11,955

9,540

16

0

9,844

5,196

10

7

21,799

14,73

13

6

February, 1956

8,810

6,620

15

0

6,461

3,303

10

3

15,271

9,923

13

0

12 months ended February, 1956

249,402

170,300

13

8

137,050

85,544

12

6

301

619

41

1

82,189

68,115

16

7

19,827

17,012

17

2

488,769

341,590

14

0

Is the Minister aware that, in a letter to Deputy Barrett, the manager of a paper factory in Waterford stated that they had cut out imports completely in December? A week ago the Minister told us that imports were cut down to about 500 tons a week at present.

If the Deputy looks at the question again he will see that there is not a single reference in it to what he now says. If he wants information on that point, perhaps he would put a question in which the matter which is now disclosed will be included.

I agree. I am referring to the Minister's statement last week.

The Deputies' question requested particulars of the various prices at which paper is imported. I have gone to the trouble of having this long table prepared for the edification of the Deputy. If he forgot to include something in his question and only thought about it afterwards, he cannot blame me.

Top
Share