I propose, with your permission, Sir, to take Questions Nos. 1 and 2 together.
I am aware that the position is as stated by the Deputy and I have investigated the matter. The desirable position in such cases is that the identity of the successful candidate should not be made public until the local authority have made the appointment and the candidate has formally accepted office. So far as is practicable, the procedure of the Local Appointments Commission is designed to conform with that course; and I believe that the present arrangements have, on the whole, worked satisfactorily. This procedure involves, however, notifying the unsuccessful candidates that their applications have not been successful, and requiring the successful candidate to furnish evidence of his age, academic or professional qualifications and so forth. Particularly in the case of professional appointments, where most of the applicants will be known to one another, it is virtually impossible, therefore, to prevent information about the outcome of the competition becoming known and the fact of such disclosure of the result in this way is no evidence of a breach of confidence on the part of anyone. Persons familiar with the procedure of the Local Appointments Commission are often able, in the manner I have described, to deduce the identity of the candidate being considered for a position before any official announcement is made on the subject. I do not think that any useful purpose would be served by taking any further action in these cases.