Skip to main content
Normal View

Dáil Éireann debate -
Wednesday, 19 Apr 1967

Vol. 227 No. 12

Ceisteanna—Questions. Oral Answers. - Medical Assistance in Accident Case.

66.

asked the Minister for Health if he has received an application from a person (name supplied) dated 18th July, 1966 for a sworn inquiry into the failure of a number of medical practitioners to grant him proper medical attention following a road accident; and what he proposes to do about the matter.

I have received the letter mentioned by the Deputy. Virtually all the medical attention given to the patient concerned was by private practitioners and I would, of course, have no power to inquire into the treatment received by him. It would appear that for a period the patient also attended outpatient clinics at a county hospital but I have no evidence whatsoever to suggest that there was negligence in the manner of the treatment given to him there.

Is the Minister aware that there is a complaint made by this man who is making a definite charge against an officer employed by the Department of Health and that the man concerned claims to have evidence to prove that his statements are correct? Under the circumstances would the Minister personally inquire to find out if, in fact, the statements made are true or false? If they are true the man has been treated scandalously and if they are false he should not be allowed to continue making those allegations.

Those allegations relate to the person himself. He appears to be a rather difficult person. The allegations also referred to some things which happened a very long time ago.

Ten years ago.

Twelve years ago to be exact. It is very difficult for me to agree to the establishment of an inquiry regarding something which went on such a very long time ago and in which there is no evidence to support the allegations mentioned by the Deputy.

Is the Minister aware that this man claims to hold certificates to prove that over a period of 12 years he was treated in a scandalous manner by one medical practitioner in particular and a number of others he also consulted? Since this is such a serious allegation would the Minister not consider that it is a matter which should be investigated? Would he bear in mind if the allegations are true that it is no wonder the man is a difficult man?

I do not think the allegations the Deputy refers to were in respect of a doctor over whom I have control.

Those allegations were made by this man who said that following a car accident he was treated by a doctor who seemed to be more interested in getting a friend of his who was a solicitor to deal with the case rather than having the man attended to. This man states that after ten years he still had the effect of injuries received in that accident because of the neglect of this doctor. If this is true, surely the Minister should have this matter investigated and if it is false surely the Department of Health should agree that it is in everybody's interest to have this matter clarified? This man says that he has got certificates to prove every statement he is making. Would the Minister not consider having the matter further considered?

I will, somewhat reluctantly.

Is the Minister not aware that this man gave service to his country in the past? He has been treated very shabbily by being ignored in this way. Why will the Minister not have some investigation into the circumstances of this matter so that it will at least satisfy both sides of the House?

I said I will have a look at this matter.

Top
Share