I propose to take Questions Nos. 28, 31, 56 and 70 together.
I am aware that there is a significant imbalance between male and female earnings. Progress has been slow, if steady, and while we may draw some comfort from that, I am not satisfied that the gap is closing. Neither am I satisfied that replacing or amending the law is the only answer. The fact is that the differences in industrial earnings result from a wide range of factors. These include wage rates but, also, hours worked, overtime payments, shift or unsocial hours premia, payment by results, bonuses for output levels and payments for length of service. There is also the point that the statistics which we normally use cover only a percentage of women who are at work and relate to women in manufacturing industry where there is a tendency for women to be segregated into certain low pay areas and confined to a restricted range of jobs.
The solution to the differential in pay between men and women does not lie in equal pay legislation alone but in improved access for women to a wider range of jobs. Nevertheless, there are a number of changes which I propose to make to the provisions of the 1974 Anti-Discrimination (Pay) Act, in the context of the general review of the employment equality legislation. These changes will simplify and make more effective the procedures for the pursuit of equal pay for work of equal value.