I propose to take Questions Nos. 16 and 137 together.
I, and my Department are in constant communication with representatives of school management bodies and teachers' unions on inservice training and on matters affecting second level education generally. They have made me aware of dissatisfaction with some aspects of the recent one day junior certificate inservice course, mainly of an organisational and presentational nature.
To date four one day courses have been held. While acknowledging that some difficulties affected the recent one day course, it is fair to say that these courses generally have been very successful. I am confident that further discussion with these bodies will lead to a better approach.
In regard to inservice training generally — the Deputy will be aware of this because I referred to it at a recent function he attended — the National Council for Curriculum and Assessment, in conjunction with my Department has commissioned a consultancy report on inservice training whose interim report I expect to have in a matter of weeks and their final report perhaps in two months time.
This report will deal with primary and post-primary education and will cover such areas as evaluation of current inservice education, identification of the nature and extent of future inservice education and the institutional arrangements and modes of delivery of inservice education.
The Programme for Economic and Social Progress acknowledges the importance of inservice training and provides for additional funds of £500,000 in 1992 and £1 million in 1993 for this purpose.
Funding for inservice for 1991 is £750,000 million, three times the amount allocated in 1987.