Skip to main content
Normal View

Dáil Éireann debate -
Wednesday, 16 Jun 1993

Vol. 432 No. 4

Adjournment Debate. - Athlone (Westmeath) Courthouse.

I thank you, Sir, for affording me the opportunity of raising this matter in this Adjournment debate.

Athlone is one of the largest centres of population in the midlands with a hinterland stretching for ten to 15 miles in all directions and it can boast of most of the usual facilities: a good industrial base, an Army barracks which employs 1,500 people, a large force of gardaí and the examination section of the Department of Education. Add to this a regional technical college, five second level schools and all the usual cultural and leisure facilities and one begins to understand the importance of Athlone in the midlands.

However, for the past ten months Athlone has had no courthouse. At that time the facilities at Athlone Courthouse were appalling. The acoustics in the courtroom made it impossible to hear what was happening unless one had the hearing of Superman. There were no facilities for consultations, so barristers, solicitors and clients huddled together in small groups in the courtroom or on the street, conducting their business in full view of anyone passing by. For family law matters there was nowhere that a client could go to discuss his or her case with legal advisers in any kind of privacy. The situation was very intimidating for any woman wishing to take a barring order against her husband. There was no public telephone in the Athlone Courthouse.

At the end of the Trinity Sittings of the Circuit Court in July, 1992, Circuit Judge Matthew Deery stated that he would not sit in Athlone Courthouse again until the facilities were improved to an acceptable level. This lead was rapidly followed by District Justice Jim O'Sullivan and Athlone District Court now sits at Moate Courthouse ten miles away and the most recent session of Athlone Circuit Court sat in Mullingar, 30 miles away.

Because of the closure of the courthouse a large cavalcade of solicitors, clients, gardaí, witnesses and court officials leaves Athlone every Tuesday morning and makes its way to Moate for the hearing of Athlone District Court cases. The inconvenience to all concerned is a major source of irritation when Athlone Courthouse lies almost derelict. For those who have no transport it means a taxi journey both ways, and for the professionals involved there is the time lost in travelling which could be productively used in another fashion.

An excellent proposal was presented by Westmeath County Council to the Department of Justice which would involve building a new purpose-built courthouse, incorporating free legal aid offices, a family law centre and the Department of Justice and its ancillary facilities. This proposal was rejected by the Department of Justice and a "take it or leave it" offer of £250,000 was made to renovate the existing facilities in Athlone. The balance, which is estimated to be in excess of £200,000, must be met by the local authority. The local authority has already heavily invested in courthouses in Mullingar and Moate and the Minister for Justice should live up to her responsibilities to provide these facilities in Athlone. Indeed, Mr. Haughey, when Taoiseach, promised in Athlone that funding for courthouses would be met by the Department of Justice and that they would no longer be a burden on the local authorities. I would ask the Minister to reconsider this decision in relation to Athlone Courthouse and make the necessary funding available so that it will not be such a burden on the local authority.

Athlone Courthouse, located in Barrack Street, Athlone, is in very poor condition and is unsuitable for modern use. It has restricted access for the public and causes parking and other problems in the surrounding area. It is one of a number of courthouses throughout the country which requires substantial renovation or replacement.

In July 1992, the Circuit Court judge directed that all further Circuit Court sittings for Athlone be held in Mullingar until the courthouse is improved to the required standard. The District Court judge also said he would not sit in the courthouse in Athlone and he has adjourned all Athlone business to the renovated Moate Courthouse, ten miles from Athlone, which is in excellent structural condition. Despite exhaustive inquiries, no suitable alternative court accommodation appears to be available in Athlone.

The county manager and other officials of Westmeath County Council and officers of my Department met on a number of occasions to discuss the matter. The council felt that it might be a better proposition to build a new courthouse rather than refurbish the existing one. The cost of a new courthouse was found to be prohibitive. A proposal for a possible commercial development which would include court accommodation was examined but was also rejected. As a result the council arranged for a professional survey of Athlone Courthouse to establish the necessary work required to rehabilitate it and the estimated cost. The survey, with its proposals and costings has been received, examined and discussed with the county manager and is under consideration in the Department.

The public and, indeed, my colleagues in the legal profession are undoubtedly inconvenienced by having to attend courts outside Athlone — a number of them in that area have made that point to me. Athlone plays a vital role in the court structure. I confidently expect that, in co-operation with Westmeath County Council it will be possible to implement satisfactory arrangements to restore courthouse facilities to Athlone without undue delay.

A number of courthouses throughout the country require renovation. Because of the limited availability of financial resources, priorities are being established in the Department between the different premises requiring attention. Progress has not been as rapid as I would like it to be but I am confident that the next few years will see substantial improvements in the standard of court accommodation throughout the country.

Top
Share