I move:
That the following be adopted in substitution for Standing Order 130 of the Standing Orders of Dáil Éireann relative to Public Business:
130. (1) As soon as may be following the reassembly of the Dáil subsequent to a General Election there shall be appointed a Select Committee, to be known as the Committee of Public Accounts, to examine and report to the Dáil upon:
(a) the accounts showing the appropriation of the sums granted by the Dáil to meet the public expenditure and such other accounts as they see fit (not being accounts of persons included in the Second Schedule of the Comptroller and Auditor General (Amendment) Act, 1993) which are audited by the Comptroller and Auditor General and presented to the Dáil, together with any reports by the Comptroller and Auditor General thereon:
Provided that in relation to accounts other than Appropriation Accounts, only accounts for a financial year beginning not earlier than 1 January, 1994, shall be examined by the Committee.
(b) the Comptroller and Auditor General's reports on his examinations of economy, efficiency, effectiveness evaluation systems, procedures and practices; and
(c) other reports carried out by the Comptroller and Auditor General under the Act.
The Committee shall also suggest alterations and improvements in the form of the Estimates submitted to the Dáil.
(2) The Committee may proceed with its examination of an account or a report of the Comptroller and Auditor General at any time after that account or report is presented to Dáil Éireann and
(a) the Committee shall have the power to send for persons, papers and records;
(b) every report which the Committee proposes to make shall, on adoption by the Committee, be laid before the Dáil forthwith whereupon the Committee shall be empowered to print and publish such report together with such related documents as it thinks fit; and
(c) the Committee shall present an annual progress report to Dáil Éireann on its activities and plans.
(3) The Committee shall refrain from inquiring into in public session, or publishing, confidential information regarding the activities and plans of a Government department or office, or of a body which is subject to audit, examination or inspection by the Comptroller and Auditor General, if so requested either by a member of the Government, or the body concerned. The Committee shall also refrain from inquiring into the merits of a policy or policies of the Government, a Minister of the Government or equivalent Office holder, or the merits of the objectives of such policies.
(4) The Committee may, without prejudice to the independence of the Comptroller and Auditor General in determining the work to be carried out by his Office or the manner in which it is carried out, in private communication, make such suggestions to the Comptroller and Auditor General regarding that work as they see fit.
(5) The Committee shall consist of twelve members, none of whom shall be a member of the Government or a Minister of State, and four of whom shall constitute a quorum. The Committee shall otherwise be constituted according to the provisions of Standing Orders 70 and 73, and so as to be impartially representative of the Dáil.'."
I wish to refer to the amendment to the motion tabled by Deputies John Bruton and Ivan Yates, which seeks to have a value for money audit carried out by the Comptroller and Auditor General. Value for money audits may be carried out by the Comptroller and Auditor General in accordance with the provisions of section 9 of the Comptroller and Auditor General (Amendment) Act, 1993.
The first part of this section provides that the Comptroller and Auditor General may carry out such examinations as he considers appropriate for the purposes of ascertaining — (a) whether and to what extent the resources of a Department (i) have been used, and (ii) if acquired or disposed of by the Department... have been so acquired or disposed of economically and efficiently, and (b) whether any such disposal has been effected upon the most favourable terms reasonably obtainable.
The other subsections read as follows:
(2) Without prejudice to the generality of subsection (1), the systems, procedures and practices employed by the Department or person concerned or the manager of the fund concerned for the purpose of enabling the Department or person or the manager of the fund to evaluate the effectiveness of its or his operations may be examined by the Comptroller and Auditor General.
(3) Without prejudice to the generality of subsections (1) and (2), the Comptroller and Auditor General may, in carrying out examinations under this section, make such comparisons, including comparisons of systerms, procedures and practices, as he considers appropriate.
(4) Where the Comptroller and Auditor General proposes to make any examination under this section, he may, at his discretion, seek the views of the committee of Dáil Éireann established under the Standing Orders of Dáil Éireann to examine and report to Dáil Éireann on the appropriation accounts.
Clearly, the type of value for money audit envisaged in the amendment does not come within the terms of the relevant section of the 1993 Act. That section covers examinations of economy and efficiency in the use of resources and in the acquisition and disposal of resources; it also covers the possible examination of systems, procedures and practices employed in a Department for evaluating the effectiveness of its operations. It clearly does not cover an examination of Government plans or policies. In fact, the Act specifically excludes the Comptroller and Auditor General from questioning or expressing an opinion on the merits of policies or of policy objectives. The effect of this amendment would be to draw the Comptroller and Auditor General into the area of policy and political controversy which would be totally unacceptable. Therefore the amendment must be opposed.
With regard to Deputy Jim Mitchell's proposals to amend paragraph (3) of the terms of reference, the effect of the first part of this amendment would be to prevent a non-commercial State body, or one of the other bodies subject to audit, inspection or examination by the Comptroller and Auditor General, from protecting its interest by restricting the publication of confidential information concerning its activities and plans. This does not exclude the Committee of Public Accounts from dealing with such matters in private session. When one considers that the bodies in question are being made directly answerable, under statute, for their performance it seems unreasonable not to give them the same protection as a Minister or Government Department. Therefore I cannot accept this proposal.
The second part of the amendment relates to an attempt to involve the Committee of Public Accounts in policy matters. This would represent a breach of the long standing tradition that Minister answer to this House in policy terms, not to the Committee of Public Accounts.
These new terms of reference are made necessary as a result of the additional functions given to the Comptroller and Auditor General. The Act of the Oireachtas which extended his functions specifically excludes him from the policy area, as I have already said. Thus there are no grounds for making this change as a consequence of the statutory changes. Accordingly I shall be opposing the amendment.
The motion itself is for the purpose of amending Standing Order 130 which deals with the terms of reference of the Committee of Public Accounts. These terms of reference have to be brought up to date because of the expansion of the role of the Comptroller and Auditor General following the enactment last year of the Comptroller and Auditor General (Amendment) Act. In the White Paper on the Role of the Comptroller and Auditor General, which preceded that legislation, the Government undertook to propose revised terms of reference.
Before dealing with the substance of the motion before the House it is appropriate to record the appreciation of the Government and this House for the outstanding work carried out by the Committee of Public Accounts. Indeed as a former member, and having had experience of the working of that committee, it has to be said that it is one of the committees of this House which has done an excellent job. The committee is a crucial link in the chain of public accountability for the use of taxpayers' money. Successive committees have been very diligent and conscientious in carrying out the functions assigned to them. The new terms of reference will greatly enhance their role. I am sure they will not be found wanting in meeting the new demands made on them.
The Comptroller and Auditor General, in accordance with Article 33 of the Constitution, reports to this House at stated periods as determined by law. Standing Orders assign responsibility for considering his reports to the Public Accounts Committee which, in turn, reports to the Dáil. Heretofore, the Comptroller and Auditor General's reports were mainly concerned with matters arising from his statutory audit of the appropriation accounts, the revenue accounts and central fund services.
The functions of the Public Accounts Committee as laid down at present are "to examine and report to the Dáil upon the accounts showing the appropriation of the sums granted by the Dáil to meet the public expenditure, and to suggest alterations and improvements in the form of the Estimates submitted to the Dáil". The appropriation accounts are, in effect, the annual accounts of Government Departments. The committee examines these accounts in detail and, in the course of its examination of each of them, calls the responsible accounting officer to attend for the purpose of giving any explanations which members require in relation to the account and any matters raised in the Comptroller and Auditor General's report. Thus, the role of the Public Accounts Committee is to act as watchdog in relation to the public expenditure approved by the Dáil, as accounted for by the accounting officer for each Vote and as audited by the Comptroller and Auditor General.
While it is intended that the traditional role of the Public Accounts Committee will continue, its terms of reference need to be expanded to cope with the new statutory functions of the Comptroller and Auditor General. The existing Standing Order restricts the Public Accounts Committee to examining the departmental appropriation accounts. This is no longer adequate because the wider terms of reference of the Comptroller and Auditor General now cover the financial transactions of health boards, vocational education committees, non-commercial State bodies and certain other bodies, mainly in the education and cultural areas, which are largely dependent on public funding. The accounts of all these bodies will now fall to be examined by the Public Accounts Committee. Furthermore, the Comptroller and Auditor General now has the discretionary power of inspecting and reporting on the accounts, books and records of commercial harbour authorities, the regional tourism organisations and any other body, other than a commercial State body or a local authority, which received 50 per cent or more of its gross receipts directly from the Exchequer.
In addition to extending the Comptroller and Auditor General's audit to bodies other than the Government Departments and offices, the audit process itself has also been broadened. Traditionally, the emphasis of the process has been on regularity and compliance — the principal concern was whether accurate and detailed records of expenditure were kept and whether moneys spent were used for the purposes for which they were voted and did not exceed the limits set by the Oireachtas. While these objectives will remain and will always be important, the audit process in the public sector internationally has been developing into new areas, notably into the area of "value for money" auditing and this has been written into the new legislation.
In addition to assigning extra powers and functions to the Comptroller and Auditor General, the new legislation provides for the first time a comprehensive statutory basis for the duties of accounting officers. The act obliges an accounting officer, whenever he is so required, to give evidence to the Public Accounts Committee on the regularity and propriety of the transactions recorded in his accounts, on the economy and efficiency of his Department in the use of its resources and on the systems, procedures and practices employed by the Department for the purposes of evaluating the effectiveness of its operations. All these duties reflect the range of functions assigned by the Act to the Comptroller and Auditor General.
Up to last year, the Comptroller and Auditor General's reports on the public accounts were presented annually to the Dáil, in accordance with statutory requirements. The new legislation provides for the presentation of reports as they are ready rather than submitting them annually in bulk. The proposed terms of reference provide at paragraph 2 for such reports being referred automatically and without delay to the committee, whose own reports, in turn, can be published without the need for further motion of the Dáil. Given the increased volume of reporting which will take place under the new system, it is essential to speed up the process of getting reports to the Public Accounts Committee and from the committee to the Dáil and the public.
Paragraph 2 (a) repeats the terms of the existing terms of reference in regard to the committee's power to send for persons, papers and records. This raises the question of the power of the committee to compel the attendance of witnesses and the production of documents and the degree of privilege to be accorded to evidence so furnished to the committee. This is a general issue which can and does affect other committees of the Houses of the Oireachtas. The Programme for a Partnership Government contains a commitment to introduce legislation to cover these matters and I am glad to inform the House that such legislation is being drafted at present and will be introduced at the earliest possible date.
Paragraph 4 deals with the relationship between the committee and the Comptroller and Auditor General. This was debated during the passage of the legislation through the Dáil and it was agreed that, because of the constitutional autonomy of the Comptroller and Auditor General, he cannot be given directions in regard to his work programme. The Public Accounts Committee, however, is being given the right to communicate privately to the Comptroller and Auditor General from time to time its views relating to the work to be carried out by his office. I know there is a good relationship between them.
I do not think that there is anything controversial about the remaining amendments to the terms of reference but I shall, nevertheless, be interested to hear the views of Members on what is proposed.
I commend the motion to the House.