I propose to take Questions Nos. 37 and 51 together.
What was at issue in the debates on the Criminal Procedure Bill, 1993 was whether a definition setting out the effect of a pardon should be inserted in the Bill.
In that regard I am satisfied that there is no need to define by statute the legal effect of a pardon. Apart from constitutional or other considerations involved, a definition would be unnecessary since, under existing procedures, pardons can be worded in such a way as to achieve for practical purposes the same effect as a definition.