Skip to main content
Normal View

Dáil Éireann debate -
Thursday, 26 May 1994

Vol. 443 No. 3

Adjournment Debate. - Higher Education Grants.

I am grateful to the Chair for giving me the opportunity to raise this important issue. The position is that students do not receive third level grants until November or December each year. This causes great hardship both for them and their families. Will the Minister for Health, who I presume has been briefed on behalf of the Minister for Education, indicate the steps that are being taken to ensure that grants are paid on time, that is, at the beginning of the academic year?

Under the covenant system — and this is an important point — a parent can covenant up to 5 per cent of their income for education purposes. This favours the very rich. Someone on an income of £300,000 or £400,000 a year — there are a few in the Law Library — can easily covenant 5 per cent of his income; 5 per cent of £300,000 is £15,000 whereas 5 per cent of £16,000, which would place a person above the threshold for third level grants, is £800. The rich get richer under the covenant system.

Earlier this week I tabled questions to the Ministers for Education and Finance. The Minister for Finance indicated in reply that the total cost involved under the covenant system in a full year is £37.4 million while the Minister for Education indicated that the total amount paid in fees by students is £45 million. If we were to scrap the covenant system, for an extra £7.6 million per annum we could have free education. This would greatly help those families who are just above the threshold, in particular those families with a second child at third level and in receipt of no assistance.

Middle income families are being clobbered from every side. They are paying for everything and getting nothing. Under the grant system those under the threshold are given grants and under the covenant system the well off are given a major and costly concession. Middle income families who pay property tax, mortgages and income tax and do not qualify for a medical card, do not receive any grants or benefit to any significant degree under the covenant system.

The time has come to phase out covenants. As covenants have a maximum lifespan of seven years, if a decision in principle was taken now they would be phased out over that period. The point I am trying to make is that no new covenants should be granted and third level fees should be phased out. This would provide relief for many middle income and working class families. It is distressing that bright students from middle income and working class families who have the required number of points cannot go to university because their families cannot meet the fees or maintenance costs. Even if the fees were abolished they would still have to meet the maintenance costs and many bright students from working class families would have the chance to go to third level. What is extraordinary is that it would only cost the Exchequer £7.6 million per year. The Government should consider this without further delay.

This question relates to the late payment of higher education grants in November or December each year instead of September and the unfairness of the covenant system, and I am happy to respond on behalf of the Minister for Education. This matter has been of grave concern to her. It was for this reason that she announced on 22 February that she was arranging with officials of her Department to have the grant schemes issued to the local authorities by 1 May. The Deputy may not be aware that this deadline has been met and with a closing date for the receipt of applications of 30 June, the local authorities will have two months to process grant applications before CAO offers of places are received. I expect this will speed up the payment of grants.

I am not clear as to the Deputy's reference to the relationship between the covenant system and the grant system. Covenants are a function of the tax code, and relate to issues broader than third level education and are a matter for the Minister for Finance.

In relation to the grant threshold for higher education grants, however, the Deputy will be aware of the Minister's ongoing concern to increase the income eligibility limits within the resources available to her. As she announced on 22 February the income eligibility limits this year have been increased in line with the increase in the average industrial wage. The actual percentage increase is 5.4 per cent, this is on top of the 3.4 per cent increase in the limits last year.

One always has the greatest of sympathy for those whose incomes are just above the income limits, but this would happen irrespective of how high the limits were set. It is however an issue that will be kept under examination in the context of the annual ongoing review of the student support arrangements.

The Dáil adjourned at 4.15 p.m. until 2.30 p.m. on Tuesday, 31 May 1994.

Top
Share