I propose to take Questions Nos. 1 and 3 together.
The matters raised by the Deputies were dealt with during the three day Dáil debate on the report of the beef tribunal.
The official who amended the CBF briefing note explained his reasons for amending the document to the tribunal and these are outlined at page 544 of the tribunal report. He also explained to the tribunal that he did not intend to mislead anybody and that he was certain that he would have discussed the amendment with the author of the original document.
As I indicated in the course of the debate on the report of the beef tribunal on the 3 September it has never been the policy of my Department to alter documents for the purpose of misleading and I condemn any such practices.
Neither I nor my predecessor were aware of the amendment to the document until it was brought to the attention of the tribunal by counsel for the State in June 1992. The official who made the amendment to the document indicated to the tribunal that he and a junior official in the division which prepared the composite Department's brief for the joint commission were the only officers immediately aware of the amendment. The consequences of the amendment of the document as seen by the chairman of tribunal are outlined on pages 214 and 545 of the report of the tribunal.
It is nevertheless, clear that the document concerned was prepared as briefing material for a Minister engaged in discussions relating to trade and was not in any way intended as background for decisions to be taken in regard to export credit insurance.