I propose to take Questions Nos. 25 and 49 together.
I am aware of the comments by the Secretary of State in Washington last month in which he stated that, before British Ministers will participate in exploratory talks with Sinn Féin, there would need to be a reliable assurance from Sinn Féin that constructive discussion — particularly in achieving substantial progress on decommissioning of arms — would be facilitated by ministerial participation. The Secretary of State also set out his views on conditions to be met for Sinn Féin participation in substantive talks.
The Government fully appreciates the deep concerns to which the arms issue gives rise, and the anxiety to ensure rapid progress regarding the stocks of weapons held by paramilitaries on both sides. Dealing with the paramilitary arsenals is clearly an essential element in the peace process and crucial to the achievement of a lasting peace.
The Government believes, accordingly, that the decommissioning of arms is one of a number of very important issues which must be addressed. I believe that there is a very widespread acceptance in principle of the need for progress in this vital area, and that the debate should now focus on how we can create the conditions which will enable this objective to be achieved. However, as the Taoiseach and I have both emphasised, the peace process is not a single issue agenda. Progress in this particular area may be made easier with the growth of confidence and in the context of movement across a range of issues. The objective of permanent peace is most likely to be achieved by a process which involves movement on a number of fronts.
Given the complexity of the issues involved in decommissioning it is clearly desirable that the necessary discussions on this item should get under way as quickly as possible. We welcome the fact that Sinn Féin seems now to have broadly met the criteria set out by the Secretary of State in Washington for ministerial participation in exploratory dialogue. It is our hope that technical or presentational difficulties in wording an agenda will not hold up for much longer the involvement of both sides in such dialogue. For our part we will continue to encourage all the parties to show the necessary flexibility to ensure that the peace process can continue to move forward.
As regards the Deputy's question about third party involvement, the practical arrangements for decommissioning arms will be a matter for discussion between the relevant parties. Obvious issues of verification will arise and it may be that, down the road, there will be a role for third parties. For our part we are quite open and flexible on that aspect and will be willing to look at it at the appropriate time. I see the immediate priority, however, as the achievement of meaningful progress in direct dialogue between the British Government and the parties concerned, and repeat my hope that there can be exploratory dialogue on this and other relevant issues with British Ministers as soon as possible.