Skip to main content
Normal View

Dáil Éireann debate -
Wednesday, 14 Jun 1995

Vol. 454 No. 4

Adjournment Debate. - Drumsna (Leitrim) Project.

Thank you, Sir, for allowing me raise this matter on the Adjournment but it is regrettable I have to raise it in this manner. The action of the Minister in lodging a formal objection with An Bord Pleanála is unprecedented in the history of the State. The Minister has objected to a decision taken by a Government of which he was a member and which is supported by this Government. The Minister for Agriculture, Food and Forestry made great play of the Masonite project by visiting Carrick-on-Shannon on his first day in office to announce its establishment, despite the fact that he was the beneficiary of actions taken by previous Ministers and the previous Government of which the Minister, Deputy Higgins, was a member.

Why did the Minister object to this project? Who advised him to do so and why did his Department not clarify the matters he claims are important when the Office of Public Works, the prescribed body, was formally notified by Leitrim County Council when the planning application was lodged? Why did he wait until ten minutes before the closing time for lodging objections to lodge his appeal? Did he know what he was doing or did someone advise him badly in regard to the logic of lodging such an appeal.

This appeal has caused serious damage to Forbairt, IDA Ireland and other promotional organisations of the State. Two weeks ago Members went to the Washington Conference to encourage American industry to locate here. We used Masonite as an example of a major project that would be based in the Border regions, the focus of that conference. I am sure the Minister is well aware of the shock we experienced on Monday last when we discovered the Minister had lodged a formal appeal to An Bord Pleanála in regard to the project. He stated his main concern was the visual impact the project would have on adjacent amenities. Did he read the conditions Leitrim County Council put in the planning application? Did he read the formal conditions concerning landscaping and the preservation of adjacent amenities? I do not believe he did. If he had he would not have lodged an objection.

The project would create 330 direct and approximately 150 indirect jobs in the area, the equivalent of at least 5,000 in Dublin. We are talking about an area in great need of investment. If this plant does not proceed there will be adverse effects for the sawmilling industry in the west. The plant would be strategically located. It would be adjacent to the Dublin-Sligo railway line and the N4, it has a sufficient water supply to allow effective operation of its cooling system and it would be located at the hub of the main material suppliers for the plant.

This opportunity must be grasped by the Government and all those in a position to expedite the matter. I appeal to the Minister to discuss his concerns with the company. He should request his officials to examine the way the planning application was processed by Leitrim County Council and to explain why they did not bring the matter to his notice until such a late stage. Did the Minister inform the Minister for Agriculture, Food and Forestry or the Taoiseach of his intention to lodge a formal appeal? From the information available to me, I do not believe he did. When the Taoiseach was informed of the matter by one of my constituency colleagues on Monday morning last he expressed horror and shock that a Minister in Government should decide to object to a project that had full Government backing.

I am aware the Minister sent officials of his Department to Drumsna to examine the area yesterday. The Masonite Corporation went to enormous lengths to ensure the project was environmentally friendly and planned to the highest standards and Leitrim County Council did likewise regarding its preparations. If the project was planned for Galway west, would the Minister formally object to it?

He would not.

I welcome the opportunity to deal with this issue. I support, and have consistently supported, the proposal to provide a fibre-board manufacturing plant in Leitrim. The raw material, conifers, is available in abundance in the region and I welcome the company in question to Ireland in this venture which will enable the added value from tree planting to be generated here, using local materials and creating much needed jobs in the region.

I discussed the suitability of locating a plant in the west on the occasion of a previous decision in a Government of which I was a member which decided to locate a plant in Waterford. The decision in regard to this plant was taken on 15 December at a Government meeting, a Government of which I was not a member, and on the basis of a memorandum circulated on that day.

There are other jobs in the region which must be protected and my concern is to maximise the number of jobs in Leitrim by protecting those already in the area by creating new ones. A sum of £22.6 million was allocated from Structural Funds for waterways development to, among other reasons, tap the great potential for jobs in water tourism. The people of Leitrim would be ill served by those who suggest they must lose that potential to benefit from others. It should be our intention to ensure they benefit from both. An investment of £30 million has already been made in the restoration of the Ballinamore-Ballyconnell Canal, what is now called the Shannon-Erne Waterway. There were 11,000 boat passages in 1994 through Albert Lock, adjacent to the site of the proposed plant.

The information available to Leitrim County Council did not show perspectives from the Albert Lock, from the Drumsna berth, from the railway bridge at Lough Tap, or at any place in between. This is one of the deficiencies involved in discussing questions about the visual amenity.

I do not see the problem as representing competition between existing and potential jobs in relation to the waterways. For example, it is not a case of waterways versus jobs arising from this plant.

These are not yuppie jobs but real ones.

Jobs need to be set against each other. My concern, as Minister for Arts, Culture and the Gaeltacht, with responsibility for waterways, is in relation to the possible adverse impact of the plant on the visual amenity of the waterways.

In the past there have been objections by the Office of Public Works in relation to monuments, amenities, flora and fauna. In this case the Office of Public Works would concentrate on the navigational requirements and the requisite water levels. I am the Minister to whom responsibilities in this area have been transferred and my concern is entirely with the visual amenity on the Shannon. The architectural advice available to me indicates that the proposed building is of huge proportions which would have a significant visual impact on an area of distinctive drumlin landscape adjacent to the Shannon.

Far from taking an impetuous decision ten minutes before closing time, that was the best advice available to me from a senior architect of the Office of Public Works. It was supplied to the waterways division and transmitted to me.

If the development were to proceed as planned in its present location, it could impact negatively on the amenity of the waterway and on the development of the tourism potential of the Shannon navigation. For that reason I have requested my officials to garner further information, examples of which I have given, so that I can consider the matter fully, including an assessment of possible short term and long term amelioration measures.

There are 11 objectors to the proposed plant. My objection is solely in relation to its possible visual impact. My concerns can be addressed in the continuing consultations with the developers, by relocation, adjustment, excavation or by screening. My responsibility and concern is for the integrity of the waterway. While appreciating the concerns of other objectors, if mine are addressed, my name can be removed from the list of objectors.

It is better that we have the best plant that will not interfere with existing tourist amenities. There are 900 tourism-related jobs in this area. The people of Leitrim would be ill served by anyone contending that these do not matter. Leitrim has the capability of supporting this new plant and of retaining and developing its tourism potential.

A meeting between my representatives and those of the company, the Masonite Corporation, took place in Dublin this afternoon. I am satisfied that progress has been made. Further meetings are scheduled to take place tomorrow and perhaps the following day. I am hopeful we can reach a solution.

Top
Share