I do not accept the Commission's proposal to introduce veterinary health fees for fishery products. I am glad that in the last two weeks the proposal has been taken off the veterinary agenda following strong opposition by Ireland supported by the UK. It is unlikely to surface again, if at all, for some considerable time.
In any event, I have fundamental concerns about extending the principle of charging for veterinary inspections at point of first sale to the fishing sector. Such charges have been introduced in the meat sector and this was the Commission's rationale for seeking to extend them to the fishing sector. The Agriculture Commissioner has, however, failed to recognise that the two sectors are not at all comparable in terms of structure and scale. The fishing industry is small and fragmented and there are over 1,000 landing places around the Irish coast. The administrative cost alone of collecting fees would be entirely disproportionate and the additional cost to the fishing industry would be considerable. Existing competitive disadvantages in the marketplace, through high transport costs, poor prices and competition from outside the EU, would only be exacerbated by introducing such a levy at a time when we are actively working to overcome these disadvantages.
I stress that the principle of the veterinary inspections as such in the fishing sector is not at issue. We are committed to the highest standards of health and hygiene for Irish fishery products and fully implement the relevant EU Directives, but the proposal did not take account of the unique needs and structures of the fishing industry and on that basis could not be justified.
As I said, however, the Commission has pulled back from the issue and I would certainly discourage reintroduction of the proposal in its present form.