Skip to main content
Normal View

Dáil Éireann debate -
Thursday, 18 Apr 1996

Vol. 464 No. 2

Adjournment Debate. - Ennis (Clare) Flooding.

The Minister is aware of the high level of flooding which occurred in County Clare in the winter of 1995. North Clare and Ennis were most affected and there is considerable concern among residents and UDC members in Ennis that this situation could be exacerbated by any building development on the flood plains of the River Fergus, particularly from Mill Road to Bank Place.

The town development plan recognised the importance of the flood plains in this area. However, public concern was expressed at the Mill Road traders meeting on 1 April last regarding planning permission in the post office field and proposed development on Watery Road in Ennis. At this meeting it was pointed out that this stretch of river is prone to flooding and is unique as it lies between two river control mechanisms. The weir is situated on the up river side while the bridge is located at Bank Place. The point was also made that this area acts as a flood relief zone at times of high rainfall. This situation can be exacerbated by spring tides causing the water to back up.

In the existing circumstances, it was thought prudent for Ennis UDC to commission an impact study on the area to avoid causing a problem, such as the crisis in Clonmel this year. Will the Minister give a financial commitment to enable such an impact study to take place? According to many of my constituents, if development takes place in the flood plain area, it will further reduce capacity in the river. I am told that, if the river is enclosed on the east bank, it will have the effect of rising the river level by approximately two feet between Mill Road and Bank Place.

Many residents have approached me because they are concerned about the proposed works of Ennis UDC and the civic trust. Their concerns include landfilling areas previously prone to flooding and the construction of a flooding protection wall at Cloughleigh; landfilling existing water courses at Mill House and the river itself; a reduction in the width of the river by up to 15 feet due to landfilling to create a new river walk; demolition of the existing earth and flood protection embankment along the eastern perimeter of the tennis club; a slipway and poorly designed surface water pipe to facilitate water flow at flood periods into property behind the riverside walk which is being constructed; the provision of pedestrian and vehicular access to the rear of properties previously inaccessible, and the destruction of boundary fencing. My constituents inform me that a detailed flood impact study is needed and that a slip-way and a wall level greater than four metres above datum is required as a minimum until the study is completed. That level will only deal with known previous flood levels and does not take into account the detrimental impact of the works outlined.

My constituents say it is obvious that the works undertaken are not flood neutral and call on the UDC and others to demonstrate what proposals they have to ensure that such works, including any future proposals, will not adversely affect river overbank flows on to their property. The Minister should commit funding for a technical plan to be drawn up for this area.

I thank the Deputy for her expert analysis of the problem and I will study her contribution.

I cannot give an instant reply in respect of the cost of funding a flood impact study but I will consider it and discuss it with the Deputy within two weeks.

The Commissioners of Public Works are empowered to undertake drainage schemes for the relief of localised flooding problems under the Arterial Drainage (Amendment) Act, 1995. The current drainage programme, which was established after the passing of the 1995 Act, comprises investigation of flooding problems and preparation of localised flood relief schemes for nine areas around the country which are known to suffer periodic flooding and for which the commissioners already had sufficient information to enable scheme designs to be initiated quickly.

These nine schemes are: Sixmile-bridge, County Clare — where construction work is to commerce shortly — Gort Town, County Galway; Carlow Town; Kilkenny City; Duleek, County Meath; Cappamore, County Limerick; Newport, County Tipperary; Dunmanway, County Cork; and Williamstown, County Galway.

A further scheme for the Lackan area of Ardrahan, County Galway, which was recommended by the specialist consultants who investigated the overall flooding problems in South Galway, has also been prepared and will proceed shortly.

It is clear that the Commissioners of Public Works do not have the resources to deal with all of the flooding problems in the country as and when demanded by individuals, groups, local authorities or indeed elected representatives and to expect them to have is both impracticable and unrealistic. It is considered therefore that the available resources, financial etc., would be used to the best advantage by concentrating on those applications most in need, in effect, to prioritise schemes in some order so that a flood relief programme of works can be carried out on an ongoing/phased basis.

The Commissioners of Public Works intend to establish a national priority programme of areas to be considered for the execution of localised flood relief schemes.

There are in excess of 100 areas which are known to be at serious risk of or subject to periodic flooding. The effect of the flooding varies widely and includes damage to houses and other property, closure of national primary and other roads, isolation of houses, businesses, farms, etc., waterlogging of agricultural and other land, disruption of water, sewerage and other services, damage to the natural environment, including habitats, instilling fear in communities and individuals, particularly the elderly. It will be necessary, in preparing the national priority programme, to have regard to these and other impacts in order that a system of prioritising evolves in a rational way.

We have decided to appoint consultants to advise us on the criteria to be applied in considering areas for inclusion on the priority list and on the relative weightings to be given to different factors. We have, in fact, agreed on the consultants who will be appointed in the next week or so. I expect to receive their report in about three months. The criteria determined on the basis of the consultants' report will be applied to the flood affected areas to establish priority lists. Ennis has been noted as an area which has suffered severe flooding recently and will therefore be among the first areas which will be considered by the consultants for inclusion on a priority list. I cannot go beyond that because I would be pre-empting their work. I will report to the Deputy in about two weeks on the question of funding the flood impact study to which she referred.

Top
Share