Skip to main content
Normal View

Dáil Éireann debate -
Thursday, 9 Oct 1997

Vol. 481 No. 3

Ceisteanna—Questions. Priority Questions. - Hepatitis C Statutory Tribunal.

Alan Shatter

Question:

3 Mr. Shatter asked the Minister for Health and Children when the necessary commencement order will be made to bring into operation the statutory tribunal for the payment of compensation to the victims of hepatitis C; the reason for the delay in making the required order; and whether regulations prescribing the procedure applicable for bringing claims before the tribunal in accordance with provisions of the Hepatitis C Compensation Tribunal Act, 1997 have been prepared. [15971/97]

The preparatory work on the regulations and the settlement arrangements under section 8 of the Hepatitis C Compensation Tribunal Act, 1997, which is being carried out by my Department, the Attorney General's Office and the compensation tribunal is almost complete. These regulations will cover, inter alia, the establishment of the statutory tribunal, the establishment of the reparation fund and matters relating to costs and expenses. Although it is not necessary to have settlement arrangements under section 8 in place in order to establish the statutory compensatory tribunal, it is my intention that on the establishment day, all benefits accruing to claimants will be immediately available.

The procedures for bringing claims before the statutory tribunal will not, in general, require regulations as they primarily involve administrative arrangements which will be made by the tribunal itself. In this regard, new application forms have been prepared and printed which will incorporate the range of options available to claimants under the Act.

I understand that many claimants will wish to claim from the reparation fund which will give them automatic entitlement to an amount of 20 per cent of their tribunal award. The reparation fund will be established on the same day as the statutory tribunal and I understand that procedures for claims and payments from the fund will be straightforward and that the tribunal will notify all claimants, including those who have already had their claims determined by the non-statutory tribunal, of their entitlements as soon as possible, inviting them to claim from the reparation fund or to choose one of the other options available under the Act. Payments from the reparation fund will be made automatically on foot of such claims where appropriate.

The Deputy will be aware that on 16 September last I amended clause one of the non-statutory compensation scheme. The effect of the amendment was to allow access to the non-statutory compensation tribunal to persons who, in particular circumstances, appeared to have contracted hepatitis C from the administration of blood or blood products outside the State. At this point I am aware of only one such case. However, in the interests of fairness I consider that sufficient time should be made available to allow any other person who might be covered by the amended clause to make a claim.

I will be in touch with the four groups representing those person eligible to make claims to the tribunal within the next week or so to discuss the draft regulations, the settlement arrangements under section 8 and procedural matters relating to the making of claims. Following these discussions it is my intention to sign the commencement order bringing the Hepatitis C Compensation Tribunal Act, 1997, into operation. At that stage, all the necessary arrangements will be in place to allow claimants their full range of entitlements under the Act.

Will the Minister give an undertaking to the House that the necessary commencement order and procedures will be in place this month and that the Act will also be brought into force this month?

I am meeting the four groups who claim entitlement under the Act within the next week. On Thursday I am meeting Positive Action with whom I want to discuss the finalised drafts on these regulations. Subject to their agreement and my not having any major problem with it, I do not see a problem in arranging for the commencement order to be signed within a week or two thereafter.

Will the Minister understand and accept that all of those who can make claims are anxious that the statutory tribunal be established as rapidly as possible and that while delays are occurring the health of people is deteriorating? Does he accept that it is important that the tribunal commences work this month on the statutory basis as provided for under the 1997 Act and that there is concern that, almost five months after the Act was put on the Statute Book, the necessary regulations and commencement order have not yet been made?

I take the Deputy's point, but two issues were involved. The first was the amendment of clause 1 and the delay involved in finding out if there were any others in those circumstances, apart from the case of which I was aware. If so, they should have the opportunity to claim. The second issue was to ensure that the settlement procedures were in place. It was technically unnecessary in terms of the Act to put it on a statutory basis, for it to be the same as the section 8 procedures. However, to avoid any confusion, I considered it best to deal with everything together to ensure the full range of entitlements were available from day one. Subject to discussions with the interested parties, although I do not anticipate any major problem, it should be possible to proceed with the commencement order.

Is the Minister aware some of those who have suffered from hepatitis C claim the Department has reneged on promises to provide state of the art treatment and that it is downgrading its commitment to their cause? There is a specific concern that several consultants around the country who are experts on hepatitis C are not available to the victims at present and that the necessary teams are not always available to them. What steps is the Minister taking to ensure that the type of medical care which the previous Government and the Minister when he was in Opposition stated should and would be made available to all sufferers of hepatitis C, will continue to be made available to them?

I am aware of the complaints articulated by the Deputy. I will meet Positive Action next Thursday and we will discuss all the issues on the agenda. I am anxious to ensure those who have suffered as a result of this appalling matter find that their after care services are what one would expect, given the magnitude of the wrong done to them. I hope to deal with those issues at the meeting next week.

Does the Minister agree that the request for at least one treatment centre in each health board area is reasonable? It would reduce the difficulties of travel for many of those infected with hepatitis C. Will the Minister consider the request that the services available to sufferers are organised on that basis?

As the Deputy is aware, my view on these matters is that we should seek to accommodate and satisfy the reasonable demands made by this and other groups since this issue first arose. I will seek a constructive discussion on all these issues next week.

Top
Share