Skip to main content
Normal View

Dáil Éireann debate -
Tuesday, 10 Nov 1998

Vol. 496 No. 3

Adjournment Debate. - Dublin College of Music.

Although this matter was tabled by Deputy Pat Carey and I, Deputy Carey decided to leave it to me to speak on the matter because it is of such importance and it would not be possible for two speakers to do justice to it with only two minutes each.

Dublin Corporation established the College of Music in 1890. Responsibility for it was transferred to the City of Dublin Vocational Education Committee in 1930. In 1978 it became one of the six constituent colleges of the Dublin Institute of Technology and it remained so after the Dublin Institute of Technology Act was passed in 1993.

The policy of this college was always to charge moderate fees to make music education available to the widest spectrum of the population, particularly the less well off. Expansion in the 1970s, 1980s and early 1990s to cope with a growing demand for music education saw a thriving college with 2,000 students, 90 teachers, six orchestras, three bands, four choirs and opera, chamber, drama and percussion groups. Weekly, monthly and annual concerts of extraordinary standard gave voice to all this talent. These concerts no longer take place. An active parents' association, with representation on college council, gave protection to the students and provided a solid support system for students suffering hardship, as well as providing bursaries and loans of instruments which were financially inaccessible to many students.

This has all changed since 1993, most of all in 1998. The parents' association was the first to be disbanded. Dramatic annual increases in fees culminated in a massive 42 per cent increase in 1998. This increase is excessive, disproportionate, aggressive, ill informed and poorly researched as to its fallout. It is immoral and counter productive in educational terms. It is also 30 per cent more than fees in the Cork College of Music.

A consequent reduction in student numbers caused vacancies which were allocated to new students. However, an arbitrary decision to introduce a quota on new entrants meant that although new students were informed they were allocated places, when they turned up for classes in September and October they were told there were no classes for them.

Another consequence is loss of staff. Never in the 100 year history of the college has there been staff redundancies, lay offs or even reduction of working hours until now. Now, not only have teachers been laid off, but for the second year in a row part-time teachers have not been paid or paid only a percentage of their salaries.

There are 300 fewer less places in the College of Music in 1998 as a result of these decisions. Professional studies in applied arts can only thrive if supported by a stable infrastructure. One needs a broad base of part-time students to supply the third level. The Dublin Institute of Technology is running down its comprehensive music education service at the expense of its own feeder system.

The Government has an obligation to preserve this infrastructure in the schools of music because the general school system cannot supply it. There is a demand for music education and a willingness to pay a reasonable fee for it. The current situation within the College of Music has destabilised the operation of the college and is sapping the morale of staff and students.

The intentions of Dr. Brendan Goldsmith to phase out lower levels of music education within this institution is no longer covert. It is manifest in the massive 42 per cent increase in fees and the culling of enrolments when the fee strategy proved insufficient to achieve its aims. There is a crisis in the College of Music which needs to be solved before this prized institution is totally destroyed. If action is not taken, this strategy could be implemented throughout the country by other agencies not sufficiently informed of the problems of music education. What action does the Minister propose to take to address this appalling situation?

I thank Deputies Briscoe and Pat Carey for raising this important matter and I acknowledge their ongoing commitment to the provision of music education in Dublin; in particular, I thank Deputy Briscoe for his contribution to this debate. I welcome the opportunity to clarify the position in relation to music education in the Dublin Institute of Technology this evening.

Under the Dublin Institute of Technology Act, 1992, the principal function of the institute is to provide vocational and technical education and training for the economic, technological, scientific, commercial, industrial, social and cultural development of the State. It is clear from the legislation that the control and management of the day to day activities of the institute are matters for the management of the institute.

My Department asked the Dublin Institute of Technology for information on the issue raised by the Deputies. The response which has been received is as follows:

The Dublin Institute of Technology is committed to the provision of education in the arts and has created a Faculty of Applied Arts in its new faculty structure.

The Conservatory of Music and Drama is centred in this faculty and continues to offer music education at all levels. The conservatory has offered places this year to more students than were enrolled last year.

The recent PCW pay agreement provides for a special working group, with representatives from all parties, to be set up to make recommendations on the most suitable arrangement for the future delivery of music education and we await its deliberations.

As indicated, under the recently agreed PCW pay agreement, a special working group with representation from all the relevant parties is to be set up to make recommendations on the most suitable arrangements for the future delivery of programmes in Cork, Dublin and Waterford Institutes of Technology, which includes the provision of music education over a range of age and proficiency levels.

That said, we are very concerned about the information the Deputy has provided to the House tonight. We would be very concerned if it were the case that in anticipation of the working group the institute were to take any action which might cause significant numbers of students to be unable to attend courses. We are asking Department officials to contact the institute again with the information supplied by the Deputy. I can assure both Deputies they will be kept fully informed of all developments, and that we will do all we can to ensure that as many students as possible continue to benefit from this excellent facility in the city of Dublin.

The Dáil adjourned at 11 p.m. until 10.30 a.m. on Wednesday, 11 November 1998.

Top
Share