Skip to main content
Normal View

Dáil Éireann debate -
Tuesday, 25 May 1999

Vol. 505 No. 3

Other Questions. - Greenhouse Gas Emissions.

Trevor Sargent

Question:

31 Mr. Sargent asked the Minister for Agriculture and Food if his attention has been drawn to the most recent OECD review that highlighted the high levels of environmentally hazardous waste from agriculture, including the production of greenhouse gases such as methane; the measures his Department proposes to reduce the levels of livestock; the policy measures he proposes other than the REP scheme to significantly reduce the methane output from agriculture; and if he will make a statement on the matter. [13640/99]

I am aware of the recent review prepared by the economic and development review committee of the OECD, entitled "OECD Economic Surveys 1998-1999, Ireland". Among the environmental issues referred to in the OECD report are the disposal of hazardous waste and the restraint of greenhouse gas emissions.

Under Part II of the National Waste Management Act, 1996, the Environmental Protection Agency is required to prepare a national hazardous waste management plan, a draft of which will be published this summer for public consultation. This plan will identify sources of hazardous waste and make recommendations for prevention, collection, recovery and disposal of such wastes. National policy in relation to the management of such wastes, including those originating in the agriculture sector, will be determined when the national hazardous waste management plan is adopted formally by the Environmental Protection Agency.

The position regarding greenhouse gas emissions is that Ireland has committed itself to the restraint of such emissions as a result of the United Nations Framework Convention on Climate Change and based on an internal sharing at EU level. Ireland has to hold the increase in greenhouse gas emissions in 2008-12 to 13 per cent above our 1990 levels, while the overall EU level must be cut by 8 per cent. A national abatement strategy is being developed by the Minister for the Environment and Local Government in consultation with other Departments, including my Department. To ensure my Department can play a full part in the development of the abatement strategy, I have established an expert group on greenhouse gases, which includes representatives from the EPA, Teagasc, the IFA, the ICMSA, and UCD, to examine the impact of the agricultural sector on greenhouse gas emissions and to consider possible action which might be pursued in the agriculture sector with the aim of securing greenhouse gas emission over the next decade.

The recent Agenda 2000 agreement provides that member states may include minimum environmental conditions for the receipt of direct payments in respect of agricultural production. While the detailed rules governing this measure have not yet been agreed, it is likely that producers getting direct payments will have to follow good farming practice.

Some 43,000 farmers are currently participating in the rural environmental protection scheme. Participation in REPs is regarded as going beyond good farming practice. The scheme will play an important part in addressing environmental issues in the agricultural sector, with a significant increase in the number of participants expected in the coming years.

Does the Minister know of any proposals in the Department which would necessitate farmers having to apply for a licence to apply slurry to their lands? Will all farmers have to adhere to certain farming practices if they are to get cattle headage payments?

I am aware that many people have suggested ideas such as licensing. The Department is anxious to use the findings of the expert group to examine the impact of the agricultural sector on greenhouse gas emissions, including developments since 1990 and projections for the period up to 2010.

Slurry application is a matter for the Department of the Environment and Local Government. The Deputy will agree that anyone spreading slurry should be extremely careful. I was delighted to hear an advertisement by Teagasc and the IFA advising those using silage to ensure no effluent enters the river system. We have witnessed enough disasters. We have clean rivers and I hope this will continue as part of rural development.

Is the Minister suggesting we are reaching the stage where no slurry can be applied to the land?

God forbid. It must, however, be applied carefully and with consideration for neighbours. There was a complaint recently about a farmer who sprayed slurry while the wind was blowing towards three houses. All three were splashed with slurry. That was a stupid thing to do. It is a pity the wind did not change direction towards the person involved. Other people have to be considered and facilitated.

Top
Share