Skip to main content
Normal View

Dáil Éireann debate -
Tuesday, 1 Feb 2000

Vol. 513 No. 3

Priority Questions. - Academy for Performing Arts.

Enda Kenny

Question:

73 Mr. Kenny asked the Minister for Arts, Heritage, Gaeltacht and the Islands the reason for her change of plans in announcing the academy for the performing arts to be located in DCU and not Earlsfort Terrace in view of her comments in Dáil Éireann in this regard; the reason Dublin Institute of Technology and Trinity College, Dublin, have been excluded from the announcement in view of their international credibility in this field; and if she will make a statement on the matter. [2539/00]

Brian O'Shea

Question:

74 Mr. O'Shea asked the Minister for Arts, Heritage, Gaeltacht and the Islands the role, if any, her Department will play in regard to the proposed academy for the performing arts; and if she will make a statement on the matter. [2490/00]

I propose to take Questions Nos. 73 and 74 together.

In answering previous parliamentary questions on this subject, the Minister made it very clear that while her preference for an academy had been the Earlsfort Terrace location, the scope, the content, the standard of pedagogy and the ethos of the academy were the crucial issues and should not be constrained by focusing first on a particular site or location.

Issues in the debate on where the academy might be located have been informed in recent times by the production of two reports which were prepared at the behest of the Minister for Education and Science and the Minister for Arts, Heritage, Gaeltacht and the Islands. These are the report of an interdepartmental working group, chaired by Mr. Noel Lindsay, and the report from Dr. Peter Renshaw of the London Guildhall School of Music and Drama. Both of these reports are in the Library of the House. The suitability of the Earlsfort Terrace site for the academy was considered in the course of all these deliberations. Resulting from Dr. Renshaw's report, however, the recommended option was to adopt a "nodal" approach for the academy on economic, educational and cultural grounds. The nodes recommended in the Renshaw report are those to be located in Dublin on a site in the DCU campus, at the Irish World Music Centre in the University of Limerick and at the Firkin Crane in Cork. This recommendation has been accepted.

In this House on 3 June 1999, the Minister stated that the traditional model of a single location academy or conservatoire is being questioned, especially in a European context. The Minister went on to say that it is essential that we establish the correct model here. She is now satisfied, in the light of the extensive deliberations which have taken place, that the model of an academy concentrated in one location in one building would not be appropriate in the light of the most up-to-date and informed thinking on the role and functions of such an institution.

The report produced by Dr. Renshaw drew on many sources and sectors in preparing the recommendations, including interviews with representatives of the Dublin Institute of Technology. The Minister recently received a submission from Dublin Institute of Technology relating to the proposed academy of the performing arts. The Deputy is aware that the Minister for Education and Science recently announced the establishment of a planning and steering group to plan for the development of the academy. The Minister is referring the submission received from the Dublin Institute of Technology to this group which, as part of its work, will consult widely with interested parties. It will be open to all relevant bodies, including Trinity College, to make submissions to the group when it commences work. My Department will be represented on the group and will contribute to its deliberations on issues relating to the performing arts in particular.

This is a major concept which I support in principle. Does the Minister of State consider that the Minister is guilty of misleading the House on a number of occasions over the past 18 months, when she gave a clear indication that this academy would be sited in Earlsfort Terrace? Is it not a fact that the Lindsay report recom mended clearly that the Earlsfort Terrace site was suitable? Will the Minister inform the House of the type and range of consultation carried out by Dr. Peter Renshaw and if it was adequate and appropriate to justify an expenditure of £35 million with significant revenue funding? Will the Minister outline the potential impact of the proposed academy for the performing arts on existing third level colleges of arts education, their courses, staffing, students, facilities and budgets? Why were the Dublin Institute of Technology, which has international credibility in this field, and Trinity College, Dublin, excluded from the observations made by Dr. Renshaw and accepted by the Minister?

Two questions are being taken together so the reply will be allotted twice the normal time.

The Minister has no difficulty in stating that her preferred location for the academy was Earlsfort Terrace. That is well known. The Minister, however, was always of the view that the scope, content and standard in detail of the academy were the crucial issues and should not be constrained by focusing on a particular site or location. If it transpired that there were financial, legal or other insuperable reasons why Earlsfort Terrace was not viable, other options would have to be examined.

In a reply on 9 March 1999, the Minister indicated that she was not opposed to Dublin City University or another location for the academy provided that the proper accommodation and resources could be satisfactorily provided. Following the detailed consideration given to the matter in the Renshaw report, this is now the preferred option of the Minister.

What nominating powers will the Minister for Arts, Heritage, Gaeltacht and the Islands have to the planning and steering group for the development of the academy? Will the Minister give the House an assurance that there will be a geographic spread of people from all parts of the State on the group and that it will not focus on the capital?

The Deputy can be sure of that.

Is the PIANO report, commissioned when Deputy Michael Higgins was Minister, now redundant? Will it be implemented?

I am sure the Deputy will be delighted that, rather than centralising this academy in one location, it is intended to decentralise it to three locations, two of which happen to be in Munster, the Deputy's own province. A fundamental decision has already been taken not to centralise this academy in Dublin.

With regard to nominations to the group mentioned by the Deputy, I am not in a position to give any undertaking on behalf of the Minister but I will convey his thoughts on the matter to the Minister and I am sure she will consider them. As a general principle, both the Minister and I have made it very clear that institutions such as the academy of performing arts are for all the people and not merely some of them. I am sure the Minister will agree with the general principle of what the Deputy has said.

Is the Minister of State happy that Dublin City University, a fine institution but one without a track record in the arts, has been chosen to be the headquarters of this academy? Is he happy that the Gaiety School of Acting is to be acting department of the academy? The Gaiety School of Acting is a national joke whose director happens to be the voice tutor of the Taoiseach.

I am happy. The report recommended DCU and I agree with that recommendation.

And the Gaiety School of Acting?

Will setting up the independent governing body and the nomination of its members be the sole function of the Minister for Education and Science and will the Minister for Arts, Heritage, Gaeltacht and the Islands have any function in that regard?

I will seek clarification for the Deputy on that matter.

Top
Share