Skip to main content
Normal View

Dáil Éireann debate -
Tuesday, 29 Feb 2000

Vol. 515 No. 3

Priority Questions. - Litter Pollution.

Eamon Gilmore

Question:

26 Mr. Gilmore asked the Minister for the Environment and Local Government the action, if any, he will take to deal with the chronic litter problem which is blighting every area; the proposals, if any, he has to prevent continued littering; the measures, if any, he will take to ensure the effective implementation of the Litter Pollution Act, 1997; the number of litter wardens employed by local authorities; the number of litter fines imposed in 1999; the number of prosecutions taken in 1999; and if he will make a statement on the matter. [6091/00]

Since taking office, the Minister, Deputy Dempsey, and I have made litter eradication a priority. Reflecting this, a range of anti-litter initiatives have been taken, including doubling the on-the-spot fine to £50; allocating almost £1 million to local authorities for anti-litter initiatives in the last three years, and a similar grant scheme will operate in 2000; co-financing the An Taisce led national spring clean; approving the development of a national monitoring system to assess local authority anti-litter action, which will be fully implemented over the coming months; establishing a national anti-litter forum to promote greater involvement on the part of the business sector in anti-litter action. The forum is developing a programme of measures to extend responses to litter pollution. In addition, there is continuing strong personal support from me and the Minister at many fora, conferences and launches of local litter campaigns.

Primary responsibility for tackling litter pollution rests with local authorities. I am satisfied authorities are using the extended powers now available to them to take a more pro-active approach. Figures for the first half of 1999, the latest available, show that almost 300 litter wardens were employed, nearly 8,300 on-the-spot fines were issued, more than 850 prosecutions were taken and more than 350 convictions secured. These figures represent a significant improvement over earlier periods. Full details are in the Oireachtas Library.

I am concerned, however, that the general improvement in local authority performance should be continued and extended to cover all authorities. I will continue to convey my views in this matter directly to elected members and managers. The House can be assured we will continue to work actively with local authorities and the various sectors to realise our vision of a litter free Ireland.

If litter eradication is a priority for the Minister of State, does he accept that, notwithstanding all the initiatives he mentioned in his reply, the policy has been a failure and that we are a disgrace in Europe due to the amount of litter scattered all over the countryside? Will he organise a national effort for a week to mobilise local authorities, State agencies and voluntary bodies to clean up the countryside?

What steps is he taking to ensure local authorities carry out their functions? They are not sweeping the streets or providing enough litter bins. Where bins are provided they are not being emptied and local authorities are not enforcing the litter laws with any effect. Will the Minister of State take more urgent steps to deal with the problem of litter and show some leadership on this issue so that we as a people can be proud of our country and visitors will not continue to make the comments they have been making to tourism agencies?

I remind the Deputy that An Taisce organised the national spring clean last year. This involved 1,700 organisations and more than 120,000 people. It was a great success and will be repeated this year. We are not sitting back on this issue and we are anxious to involve as many people as possible to highlight to need for participation at all levels of the community.

Local authority members, particularly those who are also Members of this House, should be more proactive on the issue. I would like to know whether local authority members have discussed local litter management plans or put pressure on managers and officials to ensure the Act is implemented. This House passed the Act and it is up to local authorities to enforce it. Enforcement coincides with education. This is a two-way process and we all have a role to play. The Minister and I have spared no effort in every part of the country to highlight, participate in and ensure local involvement in dealing with this problem.

I pay tribute to the many organisations that are helping to improve the environment, particularly those in education, NGOs and others. There is much to be done and it is unsatisfactory that some local authorities are more proactive than others on this issue. Will Deputy Gilmore pursue his local authority to ensure the Act is implemented?

Deputy Wallace is the Minister of State with responsibility for environmental protection. In so far as the protection of the environment from litter is concerned, his efforts have been a remarkable failure. It is the Minister of State's function to provide the leadership to ensure local authorities carry out their functions and, where they are not doing so, to take remedial action.

To remove litter from our streets we do not need more pens, papers or plans from local authorities but more brushes, shovels, effort and elbow grease. Will the Minister of State provide local authorities with the resources, energy and leadership to achieve this objective rather than engaging in the paper exercises we have seen concerning the problem of litter?

One of the problems local authorities face with the enforcement of litter laws is that a prosecution can take place only if the offender is caught by a litter warden or a garda. Will the Minister of State extend the category of authorised officers empowered to enforce litter laws to include residents associations, schools and various other bodies so that we achieve a greater mobilisation of responsible people to create the kind of culture necessary to stop people engaging in the anti-social practice of littering our countryside?

The time limit for this question has expired. I will allow the Minister of State a brief reply as we must move on to Question No. 27.

I assure Deputy Gilmore that we will consider any aspect to improve the situation. However, we are not about providing shovels and brushes.

They are what the Minister of State should be about.

Prevention is what is needed and I appeal to the Deputy to ensure his local management plan—

The Minister of State should do his job.

It is not being done and the Deputy is failing in his responsibility at local level.

Top
Share