There are specific legislative provisions applying to family law proceedings (Family Home Protection Act, 1976, Family Law (Maintenance of Spouses and Children) Act, 1976, Judicial Separation and Family Law Reform Act, 1989, Family Law Act, 1995, Domestic Violence Act, 1996 and Family Law (Divorce) Act, 1996) which require the court to hold proceedings otherwise than in public. There is also, of course, a general provision in the law which gives the court discretion in other family law proceedings to hold them otherwise than in public and the general practice is to invoke this discretion. My Department continues to keep the law in this area under review.
In its 1996 report on family courts, the Law Reform Commission affirmed the importance of the right to privacy in family law cases on the basis that they frequently involve detailed discussion of personal relationships. However, the Commission recommended that access by a bona fide researcher to such proceedings should be allowed by a judge subject to refusal only on the basis of compelling and stated reasons and that the attendance of students of family law should be allowed at the discretion of the judge. The commission's report was preceded by a consultation paper of 1994. As the Deputy will appreciate, the Law Reform Commission's recommendations fall far short of any major relaxation of the in camera rule, as it is called, for family law proceedings.