The Government stands indicted on its delivery of the health services. People's health is very important to them and over the generations we heard the old adage, "Your health is your wealth". The present health service is a disgrace. In 1999 alone we saw an unbelievable figure of 24,590 patients being readmitted to hospital within one week of discharge. What is happening? Under this Government, almost 500 patients are discharged each week only to be back in hospital within one week. This is a disgrace and the Minister must explain what is happening. Why are hospital staff forced to discharge patients before they are ready? What damage is done to their health because of this practice? The Minister for Health and Children must take urgent action to alleviate the suffering caused to these patients. He must intervene to remove the risk to the lives of these patients because they are not physically ready for discharge. Many who are so discharged are elderly people who worked hard in bad times, paid their taxes and created the foundation for our present wealth. It is not acceptable that the Government fails to give them a decent health service in their declining years.
The treatment of mental health has been neglected and under-funded. Mental illness has been the Cinderella of the health service. The attention and resources given to this area are a scandal. Why are provisions in this area not on a par with the general health and hospital services, albeit with its many faults? If there was justice in society the service provided for the mentally ill would be recognised as one of the greatest scandals of our time.
The sub-standard state of long stay institutions is unacceptable. Some institutions are in very bad repair and are symbolic of a different era. All psychiatric institutions which were constructed prior to 1900 should be closed down. Acute psychiatric units should be provided by modern purpose built hospitals for long stay patients. The Government should provide acute psychiatric units in general hospitals for patients in need of acute short stay treatment.
There will always be a small number of long-term disturbed patients and modern special secure facilities must be made available for them. What is happening now is a disgrace. In the new millennium these services should not have younger patients, functional psychotic patients, and patients with intellectual disabilities sharing the same ward. It is an affront to the dignity of each of these groups. As a matter of urgency the Government should introduce segregation for each of these groups.
There is now overwhelming evidence that psychiatric services concentrating on rapid response and community settings are superior to more conventional services. A community early intervention service should be introduced to provide a rapid response service for patients with severe mental illness. The service should see patients in their houses and other appropriate settings, including general practices, the community based day centres or, relatively rarely, in hospital. This should be styled on the hospice services.
In his rambling speech on this motion, the Minister assured the House that he had provided unprecedented levels of funding for health services. If the Minister has that sort of money he should be appearing before a tribunal of inquiry. As the Fine Gael motion states, the taxpayers, through this House, are contributing unprecedented levels of funding for health services. This Minister is not providing a penny. Furthermore, he is not making decisions because he will not take on any hard issues. Though it is a hard act to follow, he will leave the Department of Health and Children as badly led as the Cromien report showed he left the Department of Education and Science.
The public is not yet aware of the Minister's role in what one consultant last week called a mess, because the Minister spent £800,000 of the taxpayers' money on high visibility con job photo opportunities. How many orthodontic procedures could poor children, whose teeth are growing crookedly, have received with that £800,000?
The Minister, with his Cabinet colleagues, is quite happy to appear for soft media opportunities but when difficult questions have to be answered, be they about health or foot and mouth disease, it is very often the Minister of State who is left to face the music. This Minister fails to give leadership because he cannot make a decision.
In the course of his speech on this motion he told us he had created a forum to look into manpower issues, a national joint steering group on working hours of non-consultant hospital doctors, which he will consider, a review of bed capacity, a study of the impact of different measures on reducing waiting lists, a review of the role of general practice, a review of value for money audits within the health system and plans for the future which would provide the foundations for unspecified work.
He said he had entered into lengthy negotiations on reform, again unspecified, and has begun consultations on a new health strategy. Our party's spokesman on Health, Deputy Gay Mitchell, asked the Minister a parliamentary question on the health needs of prisoners. He refused to answer and transferred the question to the Minister for Justice, Equality and Law Reform who replied that, as one might have guessed, he is carrying out a review. All this after four years in office.
There are more varieties of commissions, inquiries, fora, review groups, consultation processes, steering groups, committees and commissions under this Minister for Health and Children than there are varieties of Heinz food products. There have been more than 57 varieties of such costly dogs' dinners which are excuses for inaction. The Minister and his Government have made a right meatball mess, though not of the Heinz variety, of overseeing what should be one of Europe's leading health services.
Instead, we now have a Third World health service complete with caste system. The poorer you are, the tougher it is, while the wealthy are seen immediately and live longer. The reality is that poor people suffer more and die younger. According to ESRI research on Irishmen aged 55 to 64, higher professionals have a death rate of 13 per 1000 while for semi-skilled men this figure rose to 22 per 1000, and for unskilled manual groups it is 32 per 1000. The mortality rate is almost three times higher among lower income groups than better paid professional groups.
Access to GPs and medicines in primary care, together with access to hospitals when needed, would help reduce the number of deaths among poorer persons. I would not be so direct about this were it not for the Minister's unnecessary and personalised guff handed out here and aimed at the leaders of Fine Gael and Labour, and the respective policy documents of both parties. Our policies are not perfect but they put forward sensible, innovative and imaginative proposals to tackle an unprecedented crisis in the health services and one which is acutely borne by those without large bank accounts.
This is real sleaze. This is why the Minister refuses to embrace Fine Gael policy which is the creation of a unified health system, with a covenant of rights and responsibilities for patients and providers, overseen by a health ombudsman. Unfortunately, indecision and prevarication are the hallmarks of this Government. The Minister has no new ideas, no capacity for decisions, no sense of reform and no feel for the suffering his lack of leadership has caused.