Skip to main content
Normal View

Dáil Éireann debate -
Thursday, 29 Mar 2001

Vol. 533 No. 5

Adjournment Debate. - Road Safety.

I raise the matter of basic road safety as a Deputy for Dublin North who, with many others, has grieved with families affected by road tragedies, particularly those which occurred on the M50 and M1, the Santry bypass. The tragedy of a collision between a jeep which veered off a road and hit a train at Selby in England reminded us again of the need for a thorough assessment of safety standards on newly built primary routes, particularly dual carriageways and motorways.

Having investigated the standards being followed by the National Roads Authority, I have discovered that rather than implementing the EU-sponsored EN 1317 standard adopted by the National Safety Authority the NRA has continued to follow the old British standard specifications which have operated in the United Kingdom for many years. This raises a number of basic issues, safety being the main one. EN 1317 is a five part standard, of which Parts 1 and 2 cover all the design and testing requirements and criteria. Part 3 has been published. The NRA has informed me that Parts 4 and 5 are awaited and that it will not move on implementing EN 1317 until they are published. Meanwhile our EU partners are moving ahead with EN 1317, the most up-to-date and best tested standard to meet the needs of modern society.

I have not met anyone who can tell me about the certification of testing of the old British standard. I have yet to receive a copy of certification of testing. EN 1317 requires a much more sophisticated barrier system appropriate to collision with either a small vehicle, a one tonne family car or a 40 tonne heavy goods vehicle. We should implement this standard. Given that we will debate the Nice Treaty next week, it is ironic that our EU partners on the Continent are operating an EU standard while we continue to operate a British standard which is both outdated and less satisfactory.

Accusations have been made that a cartel will operate for tendering of the old British standard. I have only come across two companies which are able to cope with tenders for this standard. Those companies which operate the EN 1317 standard are ruled out of tendering for road contracts. This is a separate matter beyond the issue of safety.

Given that we receive Cohesion and Structural Funding for the building of highways, it is difficult to understand the reason we do not comply with the standard our EU partners in the main apply to their road building operations. I am worried that we are giving an excuse to those who argue with the Minister for Finance about our use of EU moneys and accuse us of not complying with the general EU standard.

Many have raised with me the scarcity of crash barriers, particularly along central reservations on the M1 and dual carriageways. Without a central reservation crash barrier there is the added danger that a car or other vehicle which loses control can cross the central reservation and crash with oncoming traffic. This has happened. The Minister should take note of these tragedies and ensure the standards are improved and these issues addressed.

I thank the Deputy for raising this matter. Under section 17 of the Roads Act, 1993, the National Roads Authority has overall responsibility for the planning and supervision of works for the construction and maintenance of national roads. The Minister for the Environment and Local Government appoints the members of the authority and is responsible for the payment of block grants to the authority and for certain broad policy matters. Non-national roads are the responsibility of road authorities.

Under section 19(1)(g) of the Roads Act, 1993, the NRA may specify standards in relation to construction or maintenance works on national roads, with the approval of the Minister. This task is being addressed by the NRA on two fronts. The NRA document, Specifications for Road Works, outlines the specification which should apply to various materials, including crash barriers used in national road construction. The other main aspect of road standard specification relates to the design of roads and bridges. This includes consideration of location, geometrics and the provision of signage and delineation. A study of the design options for major road projects carried out for the NRA in the 1996-98 period recommended that the standards of the UK highways Agency Design Manual for Roads and Bridges be adopted for national roads and that the existing national road guidelines – RT 180 and RT 181 – should be replaced with a simple condensed design guideline. Consultants were subsequently appointed to prepare the NRA Design Manual for Roads and Bridges and the NRA Road Geometry Handbook, which, inter alia, address the use and positioning of crash barriers. These documents have now been submitted by the NRA for my approval, as required under the Roads Act, 1993, and are being considered in the Department.

The adoption of EU harmonised product standard for crash barriers is an involved procedure and a number of essential elements of the formal process have still to be completed. Formal adoption and implementation of the standard is a six part process. Parts 1, 2 and 3 have been published to date, while parts 4, 5 and 6 are at various stages of preparation. As all parts of EN 1317 are not yet available, I understand that the NRA is in the process of drafting a revised standard that will incorporate all the published elements of EN 1317. These relate particularly to design performance classes and impact test acceptance criteria. Pending completion of this exercise, the NRA considers it necessary to specify standards in terms of the Design Manual for Roads and Bridges and also to accept equivalent product standards from another member state.

In relation to a related point raised by the Deputy, if he has evidence of a cartel operating in this particular area and brings the details to my attention I would be pleased to pursue it on his behalf. l hope this clarifies the position and I thank the Deputy for raising the matter.

Top
Share