I propose to take Questions Nos. 54 to 56, inclusive, 58, 60, 63 to 67, inclusive, 69, 71, 74, 82, 91, 99, 562, 566 and 576 together.
While official CSO figures for overseas visitor numbers and revenue earnings for the year to date are not yet available, I understand from Bord Fáilte that latest industry estimates put total losses in tourism earnings incurred through cancellations and, more particularly, lost bookings since the onset of the foot and mouth crisis at £225 million. As I said previously, this figure is made up of £175 million in foreign earnings and £50 million in domestic business.
Without taking into account the beneficial impact of the measures I have outlined to address the adverse impact of foot and mouth disease on the industry, potential losses of out-of-State tourism revenue in 2001 could, according to Bord Fáilte, be as high as £500 million, with additional losses in domestic earnings of the order of £140 million, depending on market conditions and performance for the remainder of the year.
As yet, there are no estimates available as to how potential losses will impact on a regional basis. Information on the effects of the foot and mouth outbreak, both in Ireland and abroad, indicates that city based tourism is less affected, whereas rural areas, in particular those catering for activity segments such as walking and hiking, are particularly at risk. Another determinant of the regional impact in Ireland would be the extent to which the region is dependent on discretionary or leisure tourism, compared with business travel or other non-discretionary trips.
As a result of the foot and mouth crisis, Bord Fáilte's target of 6.6 million overseas visitors for 2001 will be extremely difficult to achieve. I understand the chairman of Bord Fáilte has set as a current objective, which he sees as challenging, the achievement of a similar level of performance as last year.
The Government target for tourism growth, as set out within the framework of the national development plan, is for an average annual increase of 5% in foreign exchange earnings over the period of the plan, 2000-06. Given that actual performance in year 2000 was ahead of target, there are no plans at this stage to revise this target.
While I understand from Bord Fáilte that the level of potential losses which, if they materialise, could put up to 25,000 jobs at risk, the latest live register figures suggest that there has been no significant job losses to date in the tourism sector as a result of the foot and mouth situation. CERT's contacts with the industry also suggest that the level of permanent job losses to date is minimal, but that recruitment levels in the coming peak season could be affected.
My Department and I have been working closely with Bord Fáilte and the Irish Tourist Industry Confederation since the onset of the crisis to ameliorate the adverse impact on the tourism and hospitality industry. Taking on board many of the suggestions made by the industry, we have taken a range of measures to deal with the situation. As I have outlined the ten measures in question, I presume there is no need to go over them again.
My Department and Bord Fáilte are keeping the situation under close review with a view to making further appropriate adjustments, in consultation with the industry, to marketing and promotional activities planned for this year in line with the evolving situation. Our shared objective is to ensure no unnecessary medium to long-term damage is done to the tourism industry which is so important in economic terms.
As I have said before, the tourism industry has dealt successfully with crises in the past, including the fall-out from the Gulf War and the Northern Ireland troubles. It is a resilient and strong industry. With the help of the measures I have outlined and through its own efforts, we can overcome this current temporary set-back and meet the challenging average annual growth targets we have set under the national development plan.